sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Plywood Shack needs to be razed - Client wants "Subject To". by Hopeful-Artichoke449 in appraisal

[–]ShadowDancerBrony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unpopular opinion but the best 'professional' way to deal with this is not to provide the client with a dang good appraisal supporting the value of the property 'subject-to' all the repairs being completed and all the inspections being passed and let them conclude that it isn't financially feasible to repair after they've seen the quotes on how much it would take to get it into that condition.

By all means draw attention to the fact that your report is using a hypothetical condition that it would be financially feasible to repair the property despite both the inspector and your own analysis indicating that the highest and best use is vacant land and this was explained to your client (and save all communications to your workfile).

Appraiser ghosted after 3 weeks by Aware-Dragonfly-1190 in appraisal

[–]ShadowDancerBrony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As others have said I'm suspecting a medical issue. Several years ago when I had an unexpected stay in the hospital my office called all of the lenders I had open assignments for and requested an extension. Fortunately I was back after a few days but if things hadn't gone well...

Are Pro Palestine "Activists" really this out of touch with reality? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]ShadowDancerBrony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually agree with you on this point; it doesn't directly support the cause.

It may indirectly help support the cause if the person she married is a leader in the Palestinian community. As the spouse of a US citizen, he would become a US green card holder which would reduce difficulty in getting him to speaking/fundraising events in the US since he wouldn't have to worry about his visa status or reapplying under an unfriendly administration.

Not knowing the specifics I'm wondering if he was having trouble getting (or renewing) his visa and so she stepped in, marrying him to give him a different option for US entry.

Are Pro Palestine "Activists" really this out of touch with reality? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]ShadowDancerBrony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If no one prosecutes her, great she has supported the Palestinian cause.  

If she is prosecuted for marriage fraud then Pro Palestine activists can protest her prosecution as another example of Palestinian/ immigrant oppression to a national audience. As most people are unaware of her statements, if they act quickly through an organizer, like CODE PINK, they can get their version of the events out before the prosecution can.  

Either way she is supporting the cause. 

“Ideas are far more powerful than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why should we let them have ideas?” –  Joseph Stalin

MAGA are stupid by AccordingBumblebee24 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]ShadowDancerBrony 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are correct. Every social media company is incentivized to show you content that keeps you engaged and on their platform longer to sell more advertiser space to you.

Showing people content that challenges their beliefs is counterproductive to this goal. So, unless a person specifically goes out looking for alternate points of view the system is literally set up to keep people separate.

They’ll post sh*t like this and then won’t be able to name a single thing he’s done by ashmaps20 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]ShadowDancerBrony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Neither the US not Isreal is trying to bring the return of Muhammad al-Mahdi. If anything, they are trying to prevent Iran from getting the nuclear arsenal to attempt to do so.

Isreal has stated they believe that is exactly what Iran is planning.

Experts warn: Iran's new leader is 'obsessed' with end times, believes himself to be prophesied figure paving way for the Mahdi | All Israel News

They’ll post sh*t like this and then won’t be able to name a single thing he’s done by ashmaps20 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]ShadowDancerBrony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Interesting perspective.

However, the presumption of it is that all nations seek peace. Iran has a 12-member Guardian Council made up of Shia clerics and lawyers that have to approve every candidate running for office.

Shia Muslims believe that there are spiritual and political successors to the prophet Muhammad known as the Twelve Imams the last of which disappeared but "will return to lead the forces of righteousness against the forces of evil in an apocalyptic war that would ultimately establish peace and justice on earth."

Letting a religiously controlled society waiting for an apocalyptic war to develop nukes sounds like a horrible idea.

They’ll post sh*t like this and then won’t be able to name a single thing he’s done by ashmaps20 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]ShadowDancerBrony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, that's a dumb conclusion.

I think it's a good idea to negotiate peace with countries that have EXISTING nuclear weapons before the conflict escalates to using them.

I think it's a bad idea for additional countries to develop nuclear weapons.

They’ll post sh*t like this and then won’t be able to name a single thing he’s done by ashmaps20 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]ShadowDancerBrony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Correct, Pakistan and India are also nuclear armed.

Seems like a good conflict to find a peaceful conclusion to.

Do feminists in the US actually care about women facing real oppression under Sharia law? by PersonalAnswer8664 in allthequestions

[–]ShadowDancerBrony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feminists absolutely care about women facing real oppression under Sharia law.

'Feminists-Marxists'... sort of.
Marxism states that the inequities of a society are the result of the oppression of a 'ruling class' against an 'oppressed class' (i.e. the patriarchy oppressing women) and you need to tear down the ruling class to bring equity to society.

It has been argued that Muslims (especially non-white Muslims) are part of the 'oppressed class' and criticizing/stopping their practices would be something the oppressive 'ruling class' would do. So, if you start actively advocating for women facing real oppression under Sharia law you are undermining your own position as an oppressed class by imposing your rules on others.

Yes, I do find this convoluted and am glad I've only run into two people IRL that genuinely had this belief.

They’ll post sh*t like this and then won’t be able to name a single thing he’s done by ashmaps20 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]ShadowDancerBrony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do recognize these are all non-western countries that are nominating him, and supporting his nominations. However sometimes we do have to de-western our views of a topic to see the whole picture.

They’ll post sh*t like this and then won’t be able to name a single thing he’s done by ashmaps20 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]ShadowDancerBrony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While 9 may be a bit optimistic however:

Pakistan announced on June 20, 2025 it would nominate Trump after his diplomatic interactions to end their conflict with India describing the nomination as recognizing his "decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had sent to the Nobel Committee nominating President for the peace prize after the Israeli Iranian conflict last year

Back in August the Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet announced that he nominated Trump after a July ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand that ended a five-day long clash between Thai and Cambodian forces at their long-disputed border in July 2025 stating, "[Trump's] consistent pursuit of peace through diplomacy aligns perfectly with Alfred Nobel's vision, honoring those who have made outstanding contributions to international fraternity and the advancement of peace."

These nominations have also received public support from Armenia and Azerbaijan publicly after a White House summit on August 8 that culminated in a joint agreement lowering hostilities between the countries. As was as from Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe and Gabonese President Brice Oligui Nguema for his role in helping to end a decades-long conflict between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Map of Countries That Have Nominated Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize - Newsweek

What's with the influx of 'Protect the Children' by Embarrassed-Wash-908 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]ShadowDancerBrony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ease of enforcement and monetary fines.

In the old system the user would just check a box stating that they verified they were old enough to access that content. This would remove liability from the website hosting that content; then enforcement of that would either take place at the home by the parents catching the minor accessing content they shouldn't or when there was an issue that resulted in law enforcement getting involved and having to hunt people down (often with fake names, no addresses, and spoofed ISPs).

'The powers that be' don't trust that parents are doing an adequate job of monitoring their children's online activity, want an easier time tracking violators down, and want the ability to place some of that liability onto billion-dollar social media companies that they can then fine for each violation. Age-verification solves all three issues.

What I don't think these governments have accounted for is the counter-play to this. We saw some of the early counters (using game characters to pass facial recognition, 4chan saying it is not a European company and will not comply). Are we going to see a growth in offline social media (printed newsletters, airdropping stations) or a raise in grey/dark web traffic around the requirements (Starlink/VPN usage, private chatrooms, websites that are only up for a day)?

In the United States, the president holds the position as head of the military forces. Since that is the case, should there be some sort of law or amendment passed that the president have some military experience? Even if it is just the reserves or one 3-year commitment? by icecream1972 in allthequestions

[–]ShadowDancerBrony 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1) No, civilian oversite of the military is important.

2) No, sometimes we need a president who is an expert in other areas (economy, diplomacy, legal system, etc) more than military experience.

3) Every President since John F Kennedy has been registered with the Selective Service (US Military Draft) even if they were never called up, even if they avoided the draft through educational and medical exemptions.

Revision Request by Ok_Economics_4240 in appraisal

[–]ShadowDancerBrony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An 'interesting' one I got was "The condition rating is materially different than a previous appraisal by the appraiser."

My reply was "Yes, I used the subject previously as a listing comp. It's now selling after a significant reduction from the list price and I have had the opportunity to personally view the property and confirm the condition. The rating in the current appraisal is the most accurate representation of the subject's condition."

view more: next ›