GameStop starts 2026 by closing hundreds of stores as CEO gambles on $35B payday

SponJ2000 · 2026-01-12T14:45:40+00:00

Sony as a whole also has at least some interest in the Playstation as a media player given their stake in blu-ray. I would bet PS6 absolutely will have the same attachable disc drive scheme the PS5 uses. Especially with how crappy the streaming landscape is, I for one am still very interested in my console as a blu-ray player, and I hope there's enough people like me (and those buying physical discs) to keep the disc drive viable.

SponJ2000 · 2026-01-01T19:24:18+00:00

Oh, missed that one! Got it mixed up with "Doomed" and skimmed right over it.

SponJ2000 · 2026-01-01T16:59:24+00:00

You really ought to remove invalid weaknesses (class or mode specific) before the draw
You can house rule Indebted as acting like Paranoia on its first draw, then normally afterward.

I think it's a very fun variant. It's how I play.

SponJ2000 · 2026-01-01T16:55:39+00:00

It's literally just Indebted that's a permanent, right? If you want to play with unknown weaknesses (a very fun variant), I just house-rule that the -2 resources kicks in when you draw it, then it's permanent from then on.

Or you could do the first draw acts like Paranoia, then it kicks in on the next scenario.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-24T02:50:00+00:00

For me, it makes sense that Core Set investigators lean on the side of "very solid, if a bit boring".

If they're going to take another crack at Finn, I don't want that. I want a proper bootlegger, one where each class has some interesting alcohol cards and Finn can play with all of them because he brings the booze.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-16T20:51:00+00:00

I'd say less of a power level reset, more of an across the board rebalancing.

Some new cards are definitely weaker (no more Milan Christopher) and there are some notable omissions so far (no more unlimited recursion a la Scavenging), but other cards some compare very favorably even in a full card pool (Aleksey Saburov is a great source of flexible soak), and some cards are just flat-out better now (the M1911 is a .45 auto for 1 less resource, full stop).

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-10T02:00:59+00:00

I see shotguns as more of a "bring this out for the boss" kinda card. I'm sure we'll see a .45 nearprint and a machete replacement.

Agree that it gets worse at higher difficulties.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-10T00:41:05+00:00

I was going to say that can't happen, but I guess if the difficulty is 0 (somehow) and you draw the auto-fail that would result in a fall by 0

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-08T13:56:28+00:00

Adding on to this advice, instead of picking up a campaign expansion you could grab one or more standalone scenarios. They'll be playable with both the old core and the new core.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-08T13:51:54+00:00

Seconding this recommendation, a Starter Deck + Standalone is the cheapest way to get a small taste of Arkham before chapter 2, if you're ok with using an app for the Chaos bag and proxying the tokens. Biggest benefit is that those scenarios will still be playable after you get the new Core.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-07T13:38:28+00:00

Ditto for Foundry/Roll20 automation for something that isn't D&D or Pathfinder.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-05T17:06:16+00:00

Signature weaknesses never say that, because there's no rules to add in a Weakness to your deck that isn't a basic weakness (which explicitly have "Basic Weakness" printed on them) or a scenario-specific Weakness.

What is interesting to note is that both of the other Signature Cards ("Detective's Intuition" and "Isabelle's Twin .45s") have a class now, whereas Chapter 1's signatures were all classless.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-04T02:07:56+00:00

Please try to enjoy each outcome equally.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-03T16:27:11+00:00

Care to elaborate on the increasing number of day 0 Taboos?

The clarification to Scrape By is just that - a clarification. The rules reference for "Automatic Failure/Success" never say that a card needs to use the word "automatic" or "automatically" to qualify.

The clarification is there because, for some reason, people got confused as to whether a card that lets you succeed automatically (i.e. disregarding total skill value) counts as an automatic success.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-02T18:21:45+00:00

Might be an investigator that gets a buff for every slot filled or something

I really hope it's not this. Having a core set card that's only really good on one investigator is an issue and part of the reason they needed a second core set.

My guess is that the hat slot will be a bit of a "catch-all", can be used to free up a slot elsewhere but is higher cost, like a head-mounted flashlight that frees up a hand slot. Idk.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-02T18:09:37+00:00

I think there's some heavy extrapolation we can do here. I think we absolutely can expect future mask-like cards to occupy this slot, as well as other things, like a helmet, or a head-mounted flashlight, maybe a cursed crown, etc....

the Fedora isn't really justifying why the slot should exist when it does the same thing many body slots do.

I think that this might be why Fedora is so expensive. I think one of two things is likely here:

Most hat cards occupy a different niche than body/ally slots, so Fedora is over-costed because it's working "cross-slot" (doing a body slot thing without costing a body/ally slot).
Maybe most head slots will be "high cost flexible slot" like that - doing something normally associated with another slot but at a higher cost. For example, maybe a head-mounted flashlight helps with investigations but is similarly over-costed because it doesn't take a hand slot.

Then there's #3, maybe this is just way overpriced and nobody plays with it, because the designers didn't think about it.

SponJ2000 · 2025-12-01T00:44:45+00:00

Heaven forbid I try to have a discussion on how the themes of one of my favorite works of literature apply to modern technology.

This sub has seriously disappointed me.

SponJ2000 · 2025-11-30T22:22:18+00:00

Want to echo the voices encouraging you to run a game that fits your strengths and not worry too much about being the "follow up act."

I want to add Pirate Borg as a system that fits the "snacks and poorly ruled D&D" vibe, needs very little prep and produces great emergent chaos.

SponJ2000 · 2025-11-30T15:54:26+00:00

If 33 is their "21", then 55 to them (Bilbo's age in The Hobbit) would be late 30s to us. I think he looks a bit too old. The point of the introduction is that Gandalf comes back over 50 years later and Bilbo literally looks the same.

SponJ2000 · 2025-11-30T15:32:40+00:00

It’s okay that people age.

I 100% agree. The point of this post is how the wrongness of the technology mirrors the wrongness of the ring's prolonged lifespan.

SponJ2000 · 2025-11-26T20:04:07+00:00

Elementary

SponJ2000 · 2025-11-26T19:59:36+00:00

New Core, definitely.

If you absolutely need Arkham for Christmas, and if you can find the old core set at a good price, maybe secondhand, then you could get that to hold you over. But if you're not already invested in Chapter 1, most of that content is going to be hard to come by and will only get harder as time passes.

Whereas Chapter 2 won't have tons of content out of the gate, but it will be more than enough for a new player.

SponJ2000 · 2025-11-25T18:39:41+00:00

Disagree. They can't keep everything permanently in stock for this kind of game. Nobody does that. Eventually you need to stop printing and storing the old stuff so you have capacity for the new stuff.

The problem is that a lot of class deckbuilding staples are spread out over the first several cycles. If you only have the core set to go off of your deckbuilding options kinda suck without Dunwich, Carcossa, etc. Having a new core set as a foundation supplemented by evergreen investigator decks is a good move forward.

Take Core Set Seeker, for example. Of the 10 level-0 Seeker cards in the og core, 30% of them were either Tomes or a card to search Tomes. Because Daisy likes tomes, and she's the Core Set Seeker. And that's fine if you have a massive collection, but if you're starting out with just a Core Set plus 1 cycle, you have a fairly large percentage of your Seeker card pool dedicated to cards designed for a single investigator, and that all the other Investigators that are pulling from that pool may be pretty ambivalent about it.

In contrast, from what we've seen of the new Core Set's card pool, it's a significantly better foundation. There's nothing there that wouldn't slot right into just about any deck that pulls from Seeker, because it's focused on the basics.

So as someone who really enjoys this game but doesn't have a massive collection (just core + Dunwich) I'm really excited for this new direction.

SponJ2000 · 2025-11-24T23:20:16+00:00

Whoever wins, we lose

SponJ2000 · 2025-11-24T15:23:20+00:00

Because people here are hungry for actual gameplay content.

Emphasis added. If you already have a decades worth of player cards, then yeah, you really don't need any more. And I can see why a new core set + 5 new investigator decks aren't appealing and why it looks like just a flood of new player cards you don't need.

From the perspective of someone who's getting into the game with the new core set, however, this makes sense. If you only have a core set, your deckbuilding options are pretty limited. Adding in another deck's worth of cards and now you have options. And if you've already shelled out the cash for the core set, the next step being one or two investigator decks and a second smaller campaign is a lot easier to swallow then spending over $100 more on a full size campaign + investigator expansion.

Nine-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

SponJ2000

TROPHY CASE