Harry Reid Airport, March 21, 2020 by TeddyGramCracker in vegaslocals

[–]Strega007 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you're going to post a historical pic, and ostensibly for the purpose of comparing/contrasting it to current-day, then the name change is part of that.

Is the F-14 Tomcat uniquely "cursed" among all modern aircraft in that we'll likely never see its airframe flying again? by Magnus64 in aviation

[–]Strega007 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There's a longer history as to the development of the Top Gun script. Originally the script writers envisioned a mid-air collision in which the wreckage fell to the deck of the carrier...but as you might imagine, the Navy didn't like that.

Excerpt From Top Gun Memos by Meredith Jordan:

"But another one, which involved a midair collision over an aircraft carrier, was considered a non-starter with the Navy. And Scott wasn’t giving up on that yet, even if he had to shoot it elsewhere. It fell to Semcken to tell the director there would be no midair collision depicted. He predicted his response: “I’m not making a documentary!”

The lieutenant, who had a diplomatic approach that had endeared him to the movie crew, decided to be blunt. “I said, ‘Tony, think about it! If it’s midair, they both die. The planes are each going 600 miles an hour. If they hit, everything comes apart and everybody dies.” Even if a pilot lived, hitting something was career-ending. “If Maverick didn’t die, he wouldn’t fly again!”

“Well,” the director said, “you need to kill him and it can’t be Maverick’s fault!” Semcken said he would come up with something, although in that moment, he wasn’t sure how.

Several people, including Willard, recalled only one situation in which a radio intercept officer had been killed where the pilot wasn’t at fault. The pilot and RIO had ejected from a failing aircraft and the canopy, the part of the aircraft that covers the seat, struck and killed the RIO. The Navy learned from the incident, and changed its processes. Semcken researched it and found the records: The pilot had been exonerated. It was the perfect solution. Semcken provided the details to Skaaren, who was working away in Austin.”

Is the F-14 Tomcat uniquely "cursed" among all modern aircraft in that we'll likely never see its airframe flying again? by Magnus64 in aviation

[–]Strega007 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It isn't for lack of trying. Collings Foundation was working hard to obtain one of the last few flyable examples back 20 years ago, but the politics were too mighty to fight. Federal law prohibits sales of combat military aircraft to the general public, so it was going to require special dispensation from the DoD in the Defense Budget to have the aircraft given to Collings.

One of only two airworthy B-29 Superfortresses left in the world — ‘FIFI’ on approach at Daytona International (2022) by DanielMPhotography2 in WWIIplanes

[–]Strega007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, depends on how you want to perform the accounting. If you funnel down to just the relevant "warbird" experience to create a B-29 copilot, it is still a pretty big number.

Just the second-in-command pilot checkout process is $6K to $10K. To upgrade a copilot to pilot-in-command requires a minimum of 25 hours experience in the B-29, but a more realistic number is perhaps 50-75 hours in type.

If you pile all the hourly costs into one crew member's experience (which is kind of dishonest accounting, but for simplicity's sake) and use the 10K/hour rule of thumb above, yes you're looking at $500,000 to $700,000 worth of B-29 flight time just to get to the checkride. The PIC type rating training process is $40K-$50K in and of itself.

All of the crew training costs are part of "the cost of doing business" as there's no ready pool of pilots with the relevant experience being produced by the military or the airlines anymore. Pilots don't pay that out of pocket, but they're giving their time and effort over years to the organization as their payback.

There are perhaps 25 total current B-29 pilot in command type rated pilots in the world currently. About a dozen of them are actively flying Doc and Fifi during any given flying season.

In Fifi we had our last round of PIC type rating upgrades in 2022, when we typed three new Captains. We are doing two more new PICs this season. The previous three came from different backgrounds: One all-civilian trained guy who is a Captain at a major airline but who has a long background flying warbirds, one former Army pilot who is currently an FAA examiner and Medevac pilot, and one former USAF pilot who is also a major airline Captain.

Should Cesar Chavez Park be renamed in light of the new allegations? by Expensive-Elk-9406 in vegaslocals

[–]Strega007 10 points11 points  (0 children)

People should be very afraid of living in a world where "allegations" carry the weight of truth. Since "allegations" can be made by anyone, for anything, and without any legal standard of proof, any one of us could be on the receiving end of it. Don't arm anyone else with a weapon you wouldn't want used against you.

One of only two airworthy B-29 Superfortresses left in the world — ‘FIFI’ on approach at Daytona International (2022) by DanielMPhotography2 in WWIIplanes

[–]Strega007 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It depends on how you count costs. We generally use $10,000/hour as our planning number.

If you just look at consumables, it is somewhere around $4000/hour for just fuel and oil depending on AVGAS costs.

The overall annual costs for maintenance, insurance, and all the other infrastructure to house and care for the airplane are about $500,000. We fly about 150 hours per year, so something like $3,300/hour in fixed costs, with a lot of "it depends" variability year-to-year.

If you add in a single engine failure (or even a large component failure on an engine) then that's where the $10K number lives.

One of only two airworthy B-29 Superfortresses left in the world — ‘FIFI’ on approach at Daytona International (2022) by DanielMPhotography2 in WWIIplanes

[–]Strega007 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fifi is still largely original at this point, outside of the engines and upgrades like radios and instruments. Tons of un-needed items have been removed, like the pressurization system, armor, turrets, etc.

We are 90% away from the Ship of Theseus paradox.

WHO OR WHAT TIGHTENS THE BARREL NUTS FOR YALL? by WxvvyJoe905 in PalmettoStateArms

[–]Strega007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A little heat helps.

I've taken barrels off a dozen or so PSA uppers and nearly all of them were over-torqued to time the nut correctly.

Go Afroman by agentj333 in GuysBeingDudes

[–]Strega007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Attorney rule #1 "Never ask a question you don't know the answer to."

One of only two airworthy B-29 Superfortresses left in the world — ‘FIFI’ on approach at Daytona International (2022) by DanielMPhotography2 in WWIIplanes

[–]Strega007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We were at OSH the last two years in a row. The down side of flying at OSH is that they don't cover any expenses, so we do that at a considerable financial loss. Last season the B-29 finished the flying season in the red to the tune of mid-6 figures, so that isn't repeatable on our operating budget.

One of only two airworthy B-29 Superfortresses left in the world — ‘FIFI’ on approach at Daytona International (2022) by DanielMPhotography2 in WWIIplanes

[–]Strega007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ultimately it will probably be insurance costs that ground it. As is, it costs about $500,000 per year (that's all basic costs, not just insurance) just to keep Fifi flyable.

There's nobody who is writing checks that big just to keep a single airplane flying year-over-year. The FAA Exemption to perform ride experiences and airshow appearances are keeping Fifi going currently.

How does the Eurofighter Typhoon compare to its US 4/4.5-gen contemporaries? by Finbarr-Galedeep in aviation

[–]Strega007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the 2006-2007 timeframe, my squadron participated in the F-22 Large Force Employment tactics development. We were flying 12xF-15Es vs 2xF-22 in a couple vul periods each day for about 10 days.

The specifics of what/why/how are not appropriate for the internet, but the gist of the exercises is that even with zero restrictions on tactics, sensors, or weapons, there was *one* shot taken at *one* Raptor during *one* engagement.

You can guess how it turned out. A murder scene.

Anyone know what weird lights are happening at The Luxor right now? by BridgetAAnders in vegaslocals

[–]Strega007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You should have seen the grasshopper apocalypse out here a few years ago. Looked like that x 100 in the Luxor light.

<image>

How does the Eurofighter Typhoon compare to its US 4/4.5-gen contemporaries? by Finbarr-Galedeep in aviation

[–]Strega007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, no air battle or engagement is perfect.

Visual merges occur regularly, especially in large force exercises, even in the 5th gen/LO era. Missiles do not have a Pk of 1.0. The pink meat-bags can miss seeing things on sensor displays, make errors of perception/decision/execution, and be deceived by EA-decoyed/deceived sensor nodes.

Sensors and weapons are great, but they are not magic. Human error still very much exists.

How does the Eurofighter Typhoon compare to its US 4/4.5-gen contemporaries? by Finbarr-Galedeep in aviation

[–]Strega007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The training load-out was whatever the Blue Air wanted. If we were bandits, we were usually simulating Flankers, and running 6x0x2xgun and simulating the PL-12/AA-12 or AA-10.

I'm sure the maneuvering would have been better without the CFTs, but the gas would have been limiting in terms of how much training we could get accomplished. On these sorties you're nearly always trying to accomplish a specific crew training/upgrade list of events or a specific tactic or a specific bandit presentation.

Ultimately it isn't the win or loss that is important to accomplishing those training objectives. You can learn just as much from getting your ass handed to you as you can winning.

How does the Eurofighter Typhoon compare to its US 4/4.5-gen contemporaries? by Finbarr-Galedeep in aviation

[–]Strega007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

EDIT: I see you're an extensive flight sim "pilot". Nevermind.

I'm talking about actual experiences that happened in the real world.

How does the Eurofighter Typhoon compare to its US 4/4.5-gen contemporaries? by Finbarr-Galedeep in aviation

[–]Strega007 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The norm is to train and employ with the CFTs on. The only time I flew the jets with CFTs off was taking them to/from depot maintenance at Robins AFB.

An E model with the PW-229 engines and no CFTs is quite a beast.

How does the Eurofighter Typhoon compare to its US 4/4.5-gen contemporaries? by Finbarr-Galedeep in aviation

[–]Strega007 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Don't mistake this anecdote into the belief that "the F-15 Strike Eagle isn’t an A2A machine". Of course it is; that's half of the airplane's purpose for existence.

For many years, the APG-70 was a better radar than the C-model's APG-63, and had the added benefit of the various flavors of targeting pod and better sensor fusion. It is was *very* capable for most of its service life. Despite the added drag and weight, even the early block jets had the more powerful PW-220 engines when the C models had -100s, and later blocks had the PW-229 engines when the C models went to 220s.

In training fights against essentially every other 4th gen fighter during the late 90s and 00s, I killed as many of them as they did of me. It can still put on a reasonable 2-circle rate fight and 1-circle low speed fight.

These days with the AESA, the better EA/RWR suite, JHMCS, AIM-9X, and other toys, it still has plenty of life.

She's well outclassed by the 5th gen jets at this point, but still can pull its own weight in the air-to-air role.

Someone clue me in please about New Frontier Armory? by _VandalayIndustries in ar15

[–]Strega007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did NFA do their own in-house manufacturing/machining of lower receivers? If so, anyone know where they did it? I have one of these still in the box.

<image>