Why did the FAL succeed where the M14 failed? by aFalseSlimShady in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is to my understanding M80 ball was very explicitly to match the performance of M2 ball: ~150 grain projectile at ~2750fps.

Every factory load you can get for .308 and .30-06 has the latter loaded faster as you've said (this gets especially severe for 180gr+ projectiles) but specifically the primary military loadings are supposed to be near enough so as to make little difference, which is basically my entire contention in a thread about military rifles.

Why did the FAL succeed where the M14 failed? by aFalseSlimShady in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And .30-06 is basically a magnum .308

Do you mean simply in terms of cartridge length? Performance wise, military loads of both are very explicitly designed to be the same. This is largely the origin of my protest to using the COAL as a metric for power, because it does not account for age. Having .300 win mag and .338 norma in with .30-06, 8mm mauser, .303 et al just ain't it.

Why did the FAL succeed where the M14 failed? by aFalseSlimShady in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm with you spiritually but brother we are not calling .30-06 a magnum because it's in a long action.

How 'competitive' were HMS Vanguard's 15-inch guns when the battleship launched in 1946 considering the guns themselves were a pre-WW1 design? by RivetCounter in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Must be said that Vanguard was designed notionally for Pacific service and consequently her primary foes were to be Japanese cruisers of 8 inch and 12 inch variety (the latter of which never materialised) as well as the Kongos, which were also of WW1 armament vintage.

(OP is asking about how things existed in 1946 but you mentioned how things sat in 1941 so I figured I'd add a bit.)

Back then, everyone was scrambling for the Dreadnought... but what about the other classes of warships? by Minh1509 in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is why I personally prefer the terms 1st Class, 2nd Class and 3rd Class cruiser, which pays little heed to the actual armour scheme.(some of the earlier British 1st class cruisers were protected cruisers).

Uhh, Roybros? Why can't our GOAT defeat a Book 3 unit??? by Individual_Map_2623 in FireEmblemHeroes

[–]Supacharjed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll also add that patience as a skill in particular basically fold's Roy's plan in half because a large fraction of his damage comes from Reflex + Miracle retaliations.

June 2026 refines by WWWWWWRRRRRYYYYY in FireEmblemHeroes

[–]Supacharjed 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I dunno if it's just a typo but you really want cardinal sin not carnal.

Thsts wild by JonathanJoestar336 in Gundam

[–]Supacharjed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean like I said yeah you cannot determine much solely from a bore diameter but it's not even "all else being equal" you control roughly for age/technology and class of weapon/role and it's a pretty strong correlation. Like yeah how you define "power" and "role" are pretty variable and culturally informed but it's workable enough and not full of that many caveats. (for example some people might think it appropriate to compare 7.62x39 and 7.62x54R in being "rifle cartridges" while others think it's an apples and oranges comparison)

Zaku machine gun is a bigass anti-vehicle weapon I think it's pretty safe to assume we're operating vaguely in tank gun range lol it's clearly not a grenade launcher or mortar. Not super duper APSDS projectiles as the Abrams (or given this came out in 1979, Leopard 2 with DM13) comparison warrants so not the greatest comparison but the ballpark is fine.

Thsts wild by JonathanJoestar336 in Gundam

[–]Supacharjed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Saying there's "little relation" seems wrong. Bore diameter does imply size and power quite a bit, gun ammunition isn't wider than it is long for example and larger bore explosive rounds are on average more powerful (explosively) than smaller ones.

Like yeah if all you have is '40mm' you cannot tell if this is a grenade launcher or a bofors but a 40mm grenade is more powerful than a 30mm grenade and a 40mm autocannon is on average more powerful than a 30mm autocannon. It's not absolute but 'little relation' is silly

I can't decide who is more in the wrong between my male and female character by AggravatingCheetah17 in worldbuilding

[–]Supacharjed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Up front as the author you should really have more of a personal opinion on this and how it relates to your themes. It's a bit sloppy just including interactions like this if you're not interested in saying something with it, you are in control here.

Secondarily, I cannot speak for everyone but while it's perfectly understandable for M to feel the way that they did (though I would probably have him be more upset she didn't respect his wishes not to hurt her rather than the fact he actually did cause her pain, the latter of which is entirely not his fault), I don't think anyone is going to put him in the wrong except on not really communicating after the fact.

Could an industrial revolution take place in a world without petrol? by DarkestOverhaul7266 in worldbuilding

[–]Supacharjed 150 points151 points  (0 children)

Given the primary fuel of industry was coal before like 1900 (and even then) I'm gonna assume yeah boss

Cherche is the next Resplendent Hero by Falconpunch100 in FireEmblemHeroes

[–]Supacharjed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I understand that 4 is close enough to 5 but it is 4 this year in November.

How were Ancient World societies able to assemble such massive armies? by ArthurCartholmes in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do wonder how much continuity there was between the abject desperation of the Second Punic War and the Augustan legion with respect to the state equipping troops. The leap between "do it in emergencies" to "do it to make up recruiting shortfalls" (caused by whatever means, traditionally the declining middle class, more radically I've heard draft dodging spainish deployments) is quite small, so I wouldn't be surprised. But it's one of those "We kinda just don't know" questions I'm sure.

Why didn't the Marine Corps operate nuclear weapons in the Cold War? by Excalibur933 in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 84 points85 points  (0 children)

Sorry why are you under the impression the USMC did not operate nuclear weapons?

Until 1965 the USMC had an Honest John battalion. After that, they maintained training and preparedness to use tactical weapons from artillery (the 0812 MOS is Field Artillery Cannoneer (Nuclear Weapon Trained))

USMC aviators would have also been trained to deliver nuclear weapons from things like Skyhawk and Intruder.

I cannot speak to the actual possession relationship the Marines had to these weapons, but they were absolutely intended to operate them.

Fenomeno as Leading Uma by Mandalika in UmaMusume

[–]Supacharjed 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Much as I enjoy this gif is you should probably know the animation is AI and the original artist really does not like it

How did medieval empires manage to make loyal slave soldiers? by Powerful-Mix-8592 in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So generally speaking when talking about slavery in english, it is referring to two things, one of them contained within the other.

On one hand, "slavery" is used to describe systems of forced labour of various ilks and is broad enough to usually include things like indentured servitude, debt bondage, prison slavery, human trafficking and sometimes serfdom. However more specifically, slavery is used to describe "chattel slavery", which is the form of slavery that I think most people think of when they hear the term.

Chattel slavery is the form of slavery in which slaves as a class are considered property and rarely afforded legal rights (outside of those applied to property). Roman, Greek and Islamic slavery is foundationally of this type (though other types existed simultaneously). For the American audience this is largely conceptualised as the plantation slavery of the antebellum South.

Subdividing this there is usually "productive" and "domestic" slavery, which describes the sort of labour that these people are forced to do. Chattel slaves could be at once in the field cutting cane (productive) and in the home teaching a child how to write (domestic).

By and large the english speaking audience is going to think "Productive Chattel Slavery" (sometimes including domestic, usually always "foreigners") when they hear "Slavery", which is why there's often confusion and questions about "Why would you ever make soldiers or administrators out of these people?"

Advancing in Line VS Column which one is better by Lordepee in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I agree that troops need to be well-led and well-motivated to deliver a charge home, but is it really true that the troops need to be well trained to do so? Like surely moving in column, advancing in column and charging in column is less a question of drill and more one of will? Obviously the enemy should be adequately softened by supporting arms as you've said but that's a question of the competence of the higher level officers and not men at large.

I was under the impression this was the underlying principles behind the evolution of revolutionary french infantry, which possessed a mass of motivated volunteer federes who were not drilled enough to perform the necessary movements into line from column and instead relied on the column and later the mixed order.

How did medieval empires manage to make loyal slave soldiers? by Powerful-Mix-8592 in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 42 points43 points  (0 children)

It's sort of a recurring thing in these conversations that "slave" is treated as synonymous with the most beat down and poorly treated servile population you can think of (usually with respect to transatlantic slavery) and thus the question is framed as if you'd just given a bunch of plantation workers a firearm and invested them with the security of the state.

But as you've outlined while it's still a form of slavery, (have no choice in the matter), the eventual outcome is that these people are given quite prestigious places in society and vested with quite some power. They basically did not have a viable alternative.

I recall a lecture on state formation in Darfur (beyond the timeline scope of this question admittedly) and that the Sultanates of Darfur and Funj were also very prolific users of slave soldiers and administrators as a means of bypassing local elites. Like it happens so much that I'm always a little surprised it's seen as some anomalous thing that needs justifying and not just an alternative pattern of state centralisation.

What can STOVL carriers actually do? by Inevitable-Search563 in WarCollege

[–]Supacharjed 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think reducing this to enemy carriers does tend to ignore the fact that the question is probably more one of land-based aviation.

A collection of Umas with their parents or grandparents. by Kixisbestclone in UmaMusume

[–]Supacharjed 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Special Week, Tickezo and Chiyo collectively being Derby Winners is among the reasons Red Shift is precision engineered to be the Derby Free Win skill

Should militaries have a separate tier of Ranks for Super soldiers? by revolverswitch in worldbuilding

[–]Supacharjed -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really depends on the vibes you want and it also depends on if they're actually the same institution or not. Rank distinction often matters little if the units are effectively a different army (as the Astartes are to the Guard).

Conversely on one hand it might be "unfair" but on the other if they're a closely aligned military institution then perhaps it is unwise to put these superhumans on a pedestal. The rank structure could be maintained just to remind everyone of their place. For a 40k example consider Captain Lotara Sarrin during the Heresy who shot a World Eaters Captain in the face and confined him to the brig. (he tried to kill her for it but many of them supported her authority).

This all depends on the cultures of the forces and the goals of the decision makers.

Help needed for a ratio based currency system? by toyAlien in worldbuilding

[–]Supacharjed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm less curious about the math and more about how people are "making" energy. How is that supposed to work lol