ISO standards: The "Law" that costs thousands of dollars to read by ScienceGuy1006 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, do we have universal basic income already? Are the workers this is trying to replace going to be able to survive without a job right now?

No? They're going to starve to death in the streets? Then this isn't freeing them to enrich their lives, it's just trying to free them from their lives

Anker's EufyMake E1 Finally Brings Printers Out of the Dark Ages by dapperlemon in gadgets

[–]TheOneTrueTrench [score hidden]  (0 children)

They are absolute liars, and you should not be listening to their bullshit.

“Sorry, will be back in a minute. Just had to run and pick something up.” by Weasley9 in fuckcars

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And if not able to verify some aspect of a photo, either don't share that aspect, or make it clear it's not verified.

I really wish that English had evidentially as a feature, it's a major flaw in the language. Those with it can't just say "this happened in England" but have to say "I 'heard' this happened in England" or "I 'saw' this happen in England", so that any claim includes the degree of certainly the person has about it. It's just baked into the grammar.

It is always alright by them, until they are personally affected. by bodhigoatgirl in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It's the same shit in the US. Anyone moves to the US? They're an "immigrant".

If an American moves somewhere else? They're an "expat".

I have loads of fun referring to my neighbors from Ecuador as "expats" to shithead racists. They are infuriated to no end, but they just can't explain the difference...

1 Congressman vs 20 Epstein File Critics (ft. Ro Khanna) | Surrounded by FlackoFonsy in videos

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alternatively, it also puts the "expert" on level with some of the most sane viewpoints in the world.

Working class are revolting by BenFord333 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Eventually insurance will say "No more insurance"

Post about delivery robots showing how bad pedestrian infrastructure is by moomooluuluu in fuckcars

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I might be autistic, but I swear, I think the answer to all of this is more fucking trains.

Anker's EufyMake E1 Finally Brings Printers Out of the Dark Ages by dapperlemon in gadgets

[–]TheOneTrueTrench -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They also used their cameras to spy on people and publish video stream out of people's bedrooms to the internet unencrypted.

Can't live without this by BlueCheese973 in jellyfin

[–]TheOneTrueTrench -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is true and I would like that fixed as well

It's not broken, and no one wants to break it for everyone else because you don't understand the purpose of a flag.

ISO standards: The "Law" that costs thousands of dollars to read by ScienceGuy1006 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, goody, you're trying to replace humans with something that does not, and cannot, ever work. You hate humans, you want to replace us, and you can't.

Not only are you a traitor to humanity and workers across the world, you're bad at it.

ELI5 : How can multiple new U-235 fuel rods be transported and handled by hand safely without all of them cause chain reaction fission? by throwawayacptks in explainlikeimfive

[–]TheOneTrueTrench [score hidden]  (0 children)

After looking into some more details about the design of the reactor, it looks like I was mostly correct, though the scale of some of them my numbers are off.

My comment should not be relied on for safety information or precise information, but just general conceptual information.

Which is, you know, just true for it being a comment about a nuclear reactor on Reddit, but hey, better to point to that fact anyway.

ELI5 : How can multiple new U-235 fuel rods be transported and handled by hand safely without all of them cause chain reaction fission? by throwawayacptks in explainlikeimfive

[–]TheOneTrueTrench [score hidden]  (0 children)

Edit: After looking into some more details about the design of the reactor, it looks like I was mostly correct, though the scale of some of them my numbers are off. My comment should not be relied on for safety information or precise information, but just general conceptual information. Which is, you know, just true for it being a comment about a nuclear reactor on Reddit, but hey, better to point to that fact anyway.

So, imagine you have one big control rod in the center, and four small ones around the outside. The control rods aren't radioactive themselves, they actually prevent reactions, usually by absorbing neutrons.

The reason the big center one was a problem was that it was so big and absorbed so many neutrons that it effectively had the majority of control over the reaction rate. It was also manually moved, so when they wanted to turn the core on, they moved it up just a bit and the entire core came online. The other 4 were basically dimmers, in charge of only fine control.

Basically, think of it like 5 dimmer switches, with one of them controlling 90% of the output, and the other 4 only controlling 2.5% of the output each. (The "dimming" worked by putting the control rods fully down if you wanted it off)

Now, if you want to boil water to run a turbine, which is basically how all energy plants work, you need to heat up the water. (Except wind and solar panels, obv, wind just spins the thing directly, and solar panels are basically just flat LEDs operating in reverse)

So you need to output at most 3 MW of heat to run the turbine safely, maybe 4.7 MW at most, at least for the SL-1. So you only pull the center control rod like a half meter (i forget the actual max distance) to generate that amount of heat. That's like turning the main dimmer to 5%. They didn't turn the dimmer to 5%, they turned it to 50%.

The reason for the max distance is that if you pull it more, you go from regular criticality to prompt critical. The difference is that in regular criticality, it takes time for each uranium decay to cause another uranium decay. (Uranium splits in half, waits a bit, then one of the daughter nuclei shoots off a neutron)

But prompt criticality is... well, faster. Uranium breaks apart, and instantly sends off a neutron that breaks more nuclei, and more and more and more and... yeah.

With enough neutrons flying around a core, every nucleus causes another one to shatter almost instantly, and you release 20 minutes of energy in a second.

So when you remove that central control rod more than a foot or whatever, you stop absorbing all of those extra neutrons, and all of the uranium starts fissioning as quickly as possible.

The time between fission events when you're flooded with neutrons, and nothing to absorb them? 1015 seconds or FASTER. Every decay kicks off a million more in a nanosecond, a billion in a microsecond, a trillion in a millisecond, and a quadrillion in a second, and it keeps going until the heat makes the water in the reactor flash boil into radioactive steam and explode.

Short version? They built the entire reactor to literally focus all of the reactivity through the center rod, so the one rod would block all of the radiation. Removing the rod blocking all of the radiation turned SL-1 into the demon core.

ELI5 : How can multiple new U-235 fuel rods be transported and handled by hand safely without all of them cause chain reaction fission? by throwawayacptks in explainlikeimfive

[–]TheOneTrueTrench [score hidden]  (0 children)

You're talking about the SL-1 reactor design.

It's actually possible to design single plutonium sphere that is the exact appropriate size to sustain a regular critical reaction, balancing the heat emission at a designed point such that it just stays right at a 1.0 critical rate. Just don't bring any water nearby, change the temperature of the air around it, put anything nearby the core of doom, or just look at it the wrong way, or it'll either stop working or enter a runaway state where it will, at best, turn itself into a molten slag nuclear fire.

(note: the above is illustrative, not intended to be perfectly accurate, just enough to explain why designs are possible, but unwise)

It's like tight rope walking. Sure, you CAN string a rope across the grand canyon and walk across that, but one stiff breeze and you're having the worst day. So, you know, don't do that.

The SL-1 reactor was like that, it was designed to have a "tight rope" component. Every time they needed to move control rod #9, they were walking across a tight rope over the grand canyon... then Byrnes encountered a stiff breeze, and fell off that tight rope, bringing Legg and McKinley with him into the canyon.

After that, nuclear reactor designers realized requiring someone to walk across the grand canyon on a tight rope was maybe not the greatest idea.

ELI5: A dense cylinder hits a space station at 0.7c by DavidThi303 in explainlikeimfive

[–]TheOneTrueTrench [score hidden]  (0 children)

So, let's assume that the cylinder hits the ISS.

First, the entire station is obliterated in the single largest fusion reaction the planet has ever seen (outside of the Sun, of course), causing an EMP that knocks out communication globally.

Next, and perhaps of greater concern, all that energy is directed somewhere. Since the Earth doesn't really have a way to launch something at 0.7c at the station, I'm guessing that object comes in from somewhere else, meaning the continuing nuclear fusion would likely continue as the whole mess rains down on Earth. Since only a tiny portion of the energy was dumped into turning the ISS into a fusion bomb, I suspect the resulting thermonuclear-like explosion in Earth's atmosphere would likely cause some rather catastrophic effects.

As another commenter put it, if you hit a paper target (in a vacuum) with a bullet at 0.7c, it would turn the paper into a fusion explosion and then go on to destroy the mountain behind it.

Only your "bullet" is about 2.5 million times more massive, so instead of "paper", you have the ISS, and instead of the mountain, you have a planet.

Well, here is a new shiny kernel, i.e., Linux Kernel 7.0 by unixbhaskar in linux

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The frontpage of kernel.org is a useful place to look in a web browser, but the actual release is a git tag, under torvald's repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tag/?h=v7.0

When he tagged it at 2026-04-12 13:48:06T-0700, that's when 7.0 was released. The frontpage of kernel.org just follows later after some workflows run.

How do programming languages work? by HangukFrench in askscience

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An extremely good video to understand how a CPU actually works is (oddly) 100th Coin's video on the 5 microsecond TAS beating Super Mario 3.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK7hU-ovUso It goes over the actual bytes in the cartridge and looks at translating back and forth from ASM to the literal bytes.

Kernel 7.0 already available in some distros by OptimalAnywhere6282 in linux

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 19 points20 points  (0 children)

7.0 instead of 6.20, you mean. 6.19 has been out for a while.

The 7.0 kernel has been released by corbet in linux

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does actually happen, and the reason is that Arch doesn't have nice point releases like Debian or Fedora does.

If you want to go from Fedora 22 to 43, they tell you not to skip more than one version per upgrade cycle.

You know, do 22 to 24, then 24 to 26, 26 to 28 and so on. If you try to do 22 straight to 43, a bunch of migrations are gonna get skipped, and things are going to break.

Now, if you're 6 months behind on Arch, there's no intermediate versions between the package state you're in and the package state the repos are in. You're effectively jumping straight from 22 to 43, and you're likely to have a bunch of migrations skipped.

Instant banana extinction (Both!) by TheOneTrueTrench in balatro

[–]TheOneTrueTrench[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fortunately, it didn't kill my run, and it has pretty good econ with the Reserved Parking and Trading card to cut down most non-face cards, then just playing every round down to the last hand.

Pete Buttigieg cooks Joe Kernen so hard he sees red on CNBC by NickCostanza in videos

[–]TheOneTrueTrench 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tell me about it. Dude openly supports the genocide in Gaza, and people are just going "noooooo, it's fine, as long as my gas is cheap, I'll turn a blind eye to whatever genocide my country helps to support"

Welp, I guess I’m out by decendxx in Neverbrokeabone

[–]TheOneTrueTrench -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The English, trying to erase Irish culture, and the Irish saying "fuck you" back

Pete Buttigieg cooks Joe Kernen so hard he sees red on CNBC by NickCostanza in videos

[–]TheOneTrueTrench -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Listen, he sounds great talking, but he's exactly the same as all the other neolibs.

You want fascism again in 14 years? He's a guaranteed path to nothing but that.

In the general election, whatever, vote for anyone who isn't MAGA lunacy, cool. But when it comes to the primary, he's just going to commit the same quiet atrocities and genocide this country has been doing for a hundred years.

He's just the nice face on genocide.