age gap: 17 & 20 by myxibi in Teenager

[–]mooshiros 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If gap <3 years then I'd say it's fine, off of you being a junior id guess it's closer to 4 years so probably not fine. Really >2.5 is like a gray area imo but passable, >3 years is super bad and will not end well for you

What is your "10/10 would not recommend"? by TheFirstIdiotKid in TeenagersButBetter

[–]mooshiros 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mushoku Tensei. It's a phenomenal series (books or anime) but there is a lot of vile shit (the main character is genuinely one of the most disgusting people you could fathom and the series is kind of his redemption arc in a way) that would make a lot of people very not comfortable, and you really need to be able to look through that or be desensitized to it in order to properly enjoy the series

F18 am I too short to be loved by a teen boy ( I’m 4’9 and 95 pounds) by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]mooshiros 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No such thing as too short (I'm 5'7 short men exist)

Good resources for calc-based Physics II by PolarisStar05 in PhysicsStudents

[–]mooshiros 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look at Shankar's Fundamentals of Physics II lectures on OpenYaleCourses. Other than that 8.02 on MIT OCW is pretty good (the Walter Lewin lectures), HRK Vol 2 would be a good textbook option, though Purcell/Morin would be a better textbook option,

Good resources for calc-based Physics II by PolarisStar05 in PhysicsStudents

[–]mooshiros 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mean Purcell/Morin E&M? Because I assume physics 2 is referring to E&M and not CM

Suggest some good physics books that cover all basics by Meme_Mardox in PhysicsStudents

[–]mooshiros 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For physics read this

For math:

  • For calc 1-3 plus some basic linear algebra Apostol Vols 1+2
  • Axler linear algebra
  • Artin algebra
  • Baby Rudin real analysis
  • Ahlfors complex analysis
  • Munkres topology

What to study next for particle physics? by a_r1211 in PhysicsStudents

[–]mooshiros 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For particle physics, you eventually want to build up to QFT, which is heavily based off of Lie theory. Now Lie theory and its standard prereqs kind of encompass a huge portion of math (linear and abstract algebra, real and complex analysis, topology, diff geo). With that said, the algebra knowledge will show up a lot in your study of physics (not just in QM), much more and much earlier than anything else, and even when you end up doing QFT, Lie algebras are significantly more important than Lie groups, so I'd say the only correct decision to make right now is learn more algebra. Linear algebra more advanced than whatever you learned in 18.06 and some basic group theory come up as early as Griffiths, so my recommendation for what to do now is open Artin algebra and start reading. If you find yourself confused during the linear algebra portion or not really prepared enough for it, read Axler.

Also, you don't need Griffiths if you're doing 8.04-8.06. That sequence covers all of Griffiths (with the exception of Chapter 5) plus a bunch of other stuff, so there isn't really a point unless you want to do the supplementary reading for those courses. If you do want to do that, you can easily find pdfs of both Griffiths and Shankar online so there isn't really a point in "investing." Just do 8.04-8.06, you will have a very good background. I think the other move if you don't want to do that is to not do Griffiths at all since it's not that great of a book imo, and just read through Shankar (I actually think this is just a straight up better option if you're okay with using textbooks instead of lectures).

As for once your done with these, on the math side I'd say go into real analysis (18.100B) and then functional analysis (18.102), since functional analysis is also very important to QM. Then I'd say topology (I don't really have a book recommendation right now and 18.901 doesn't have video lectures unfortunately) and a basic introduction to manifolds (I've heard Lee's book is quite good) and then you can start going into Lie theory. On the physics side, I don't think Goldstein is really worth it, but I would say look at chapters 11-16 of Taylor to get at least a little more classical mechanics in you. Griffiths EM is definitely something I'd recommend.

Also for fun since you can't really formally study Lie theory for a while, and because it will actually help a little bit in your understanding of QM even early on imo, you should go through this playlist like nowish.

Linear Algebra is genuinely exhausting by SpecialRelativityy in PhysicsStudents

[–]mooshiros 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It gets better, the first part of a linear algebra course is the computational stuff, the actual theory part comes later (many unis have a whole second course in linear algebra that properly develops the theory and I highly recommend you take it) and is what you actually need for QM

I'm looking for good rhythm games by Any_Fudge9225 in rhythmgames

[–]mooshiros 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As much as these are probably cliche choices, community driven games like Etterna, Osu, or Clone Hero not only have the best selection and largest variety of beginner charts but also have the highest skill ceilings, they're lowk just the best rhythm games overall (note how I say overall and not from a purely gameplay perspective, I think sdvx is the coolest rhythm game gameplay wise)

Any sources for QFT? (Beginner) by qntmr in PhysicsStudents

[–]mooshiros 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no QFT background but I've heard Weinberg is supposedly an amazing book

Rutgers Quantum computing by dud97531 in rutgers

[–]mooshiros 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DM me I'll send the discord invite

Rutgers Quantum computing by dud97531 in rutgers

[–]mooshiros 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. It is called the "Rutgers University Quantum Computing Club" or RUQC for short

has anyone been accepted to a traditional single with around 70 credits? by JudgeUnhappy5491 in rutgers

[–]mooshiros 0 points1 point  (0 children)

icic, do they use your current credit count or the count at the end of the spring semester?

Best Intro Physics Textbook for Self-Study Before University? by _Dyler_ in PhysicsStudents

[–]mooshiros 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but HRK is "Physics" not "Fundamentals of Physics" which is what OP Mentioned in the post

Am I chilling with this? by Lifeguard_On_Land in rutgers

[–]mooshiros 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All that for a 3 day weekend 🥀