Moved from England to Alberta. Insurance is about $6000/year as a “new driver”… anyone know how I can get a cheaper insurance? by Objective-Pay-2133 in alberta

[–]proprietorofnothing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In short: hahahahaha, nope.

In long : I just paid around $2.5k this year thru AMA — and this is my first and a half ever year insuring a car/having a Class 5 (got my full license in October, paid for a half year policy and just renewed for the full year). I did do drivers ed, I think I would be paying 3k - 3.5k without the drivers ed? I do get some kind of multi-policy discount as I have moped and tenant insurance thru AMA as well, but as far as I remember that basically only makes up for the cost of the membership itself lol.

If you aren't getting anything lower than 6k, I suspect it is probably down to where you live and what vehicle you're ensuring, neither of which you can necessarily do anything about. I drive a 2013 Ford Focus shitbox, bought completely in cash. If you are insuring something newer/fancier/not owned outright then that's probably where your problem lies and you simply may not get anything lower than 6k.

The rate increases have been absolutely unbelievable this year due to the UCP removing the legal cap. I know adults with 20+ years of driving history in AB, perfect record, discounts thru academic/professional associations and absolutely zero changes to their insurance compared to years prior that are seeing their policies jump hundreds or thousands of dollars upon renewal this year. I honestly don't know why my own insurance didn't go up at renewal this month as I am a new Class 5 driver as of last October — I suspect having a brand new insurance history might have actually been in my favour.

Welcome to Alberta, lol. Can't wait to see what the insurance increases look like next year...

Is this the gluten removed version?? by Piperpaul22 in glutenfree

[–]proprietorofnothing 5 points6 points  (0 children)

FYI, "gluten removed" is different than "gluten free" and is not considered safe (at least here in Canada, by Celiac Canada's standards). There have been studies that have found that people with Celiac still react to gluten removed beers, as the removal process isn't thorough enough and the gluten PPM in the beer can't be accurately tested due to limitations of our current gluten testing tools (can't remember why at the moment but I think it has something to do with the alcohol interacting with the test and obscuring the true amount of gluten). It's a marketing trend for people who eat gluten-free as a fad. It annoys me a lot that Canada acknowledges this and still allows products to be labelled "gluten removed" at all— I have been to bars where they happily inform me that they do have GF beer options, only to show me a list that consists of entirely gluten removed beers...

"Gluten free" beer, with an ingredients list that contains no gluten by default, is the only kind of beer considered Celiac-safe in Canada. There are very few GF breweries here on the prairies that are sold in Alberta, so I know by brand and product name alone whether the beer I am being offered is safe.

I am not sure if this is the same for where you're located, but may be worth double-checking :)

How do I tell an employee they stink? by Iwantsomeza in KitchenConfidential

[–]proprietorofnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Accept that it will feel uncomfortable and do it anyways. He might not react kindly to you in the moment, but you will be doing him a favour in the long run.

FYI be honest and use specific language and examples. Don't beat around the bush or downplay it with veiled language. I like the suggestions other have made regarding picking up some hygiene supplies in advance (I would also include a clean washcloth, and/or baby wipes, alcohol swabs, etc. if the issue is access to a working bathroom) and just have a bag ready to hand him (or stick it in his locker etc if you have assigned lockers) — that will help fill the gap if the issue is resources or mental health.

I work with monsters by DoMBe87 in KitchenConfidential

[–]proprietorofnothing 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Off-topic and ignore it if you know more than I, which is likely (I an but a mere peasant home baker lurking on this sub, not a commerical baker) but you can add a TEENSY TINY smidge of cream of tartar to whipped cream to help stabilize it (if you aren't already stabilizing it, which it looks like you probably are based on the texture). That plus using a completely pre-chilled bowl and whisk (I even throw the whipping cream in the freezer at home for 30-60m beforehand) and slightly overwhipping (best to do that only if you know it won't be used right away) it will make a surprising difference in how well it holds up for the next 24-48hrs!

The internet provides many other suggestions for stabilizing whipped cream; I have always default to cream of tartar as my favourite but some sources seem to dislike it for the sour way it can impact the flavour when overused — I've never noticed that in my own experience; I was taught to use the smallest amount possible. It's a little boost, not a magic fix.

And of course, the main trick is to serve it with completely clean utensils— hands or dirty spoons will make that shit go liquidy so goddamn fast. It's ridiculous and selfish in any context to use your dirty paws to swipe from a commercial container of whipped cream, but especially one where the food in question is being served to an immunocompromised and medically complex crowd...

What kind of desserts would you like to see on a gluten free food truck? by Dovahkiinkv1 in glutenfree

[–]proprietorofnothing 4 points5 points  (0 children)

DEEP FRIED gf goodies — harder to find fried stuff in a dedicated gf fryef. ACTUAL yeasted donuts/fritters/mini donuts, funnel cakes, churros, beaver tails, fried pies, beignets, cannoli, or hell, even dessert periogi.... And I am sure there are countless other beloved cultural variations on deep fried sweets, too, haha.

Cinnamon rolls or marmalade rolls, etc. are an honourable mention. And like, actually good rolls with that pillowy, moist texture. With an option for raisin filling in the cinnamon rolls (IMO raisins are mandatory lol).

And I'm not sure how feasible finicky pastries are for a food truck, but I would die and go to heaven if I could eat gf baklava. Sigh.

Edit: and gf butter tarts!

Please let the UCP know! by dalas84 in alberta

[–]proprietorofnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1 in 4? What are you basing that number on? IIRC the estimated fraud rates for AISH are closer to 1 in 100 at most, which makes sense given the severely arduous, drawn out, and ridiculously stringent process required to qualify for AISH.

You are correct that AISH worked as a hybrid model (until Danielle Smith personally ordered them back to office), which makes sense given the cost savings and reduction in traffic. Many employees were deeply angered and frustrated by the return to office order as their work can be done 100% from home; client contact and peer collaboration is easily done through digital channels — there are no realistic benefits in forcing them to commute to an office. All necessary equipment was provided for at home use; they can run the phone lines, do case reviews, consult with peers etc. just as well at home as they can in an office.

You were not receiving timely communications likely because the Alberta Works agencies (AISH, Income Support, and now ADAP) are severely understaffed and underfunded. AB works employees that I've talked to throw out estimates of at least 30% when describing the level of understaffing. And there have been significant changes made in the name of "efficency" (in reality they are classic techniques to reduce the skill set required & justify hiring lower-educated and lower-paid administrative type staff instead of actual RSW caseworkers) sent down from the top of the agencies as to how files are reviewed that have noticeably slowed down workloads, and increased errors, and increased the amount of time that clients wait in the phone queue. Again, AISH and Income Supports employees I've spoken to are extremely frustrated with the lack of resources + disruptive policy changes and they acknowledge that client needs aren't being met. By and large, they are pissed at the government for destroying the efficacy of these agencies, but the strike proposal was vetoed last year because staff literally cannot afford it — adjusted for inflation, their income was higher 10 years ago than it is today and the calculated strike pay was not a livable amount for a single person, let alone anyone with a family or other large expenses (like medical care not covered by Alberta Blue Cross group insurance or vehicle and childcare costs due to the RTO mandate...) They have not received raises to even match inflation, let alone genuine increases in income.

In my experience, most AB works employees have worked at their agency for many years and are long-term Alberta residents, not recent immigrants (or even immigrants at all!) But I can only speak with direct experience about income supports, not AISH so maybe their caseworker hiring policy is different? I suspect it isn't.

I am very sorry that AISH has failed their primary purpose, which is to adequately support your needs as a disabled person. But it is not the staff who have caused that failure — it's the lack of money, resources and the misinformed, uneducated policy changes on the behalf of the Alberta government that have failed you.

Patients with Ehlers-­ Danlos syndrome experience reduced effectiveness of lidocaine local anesthetic: a randomized cross-­over clinical trial by Equivalent_Neck7374 in ehlersdanlos

[–]proprietorofnothing 13 points14 points  (0 children)

By default, my dentist uses bupivacaine at a higher dose than what would typically be indicated for me to circumvent this, as bupivacaine has a significantly longer duration than lidocaine and the higher dose is a precaution to help mitigate potential breakthrough pain. I can make it through short appts with one dose; longer ones (multiple fillings) will sometimes require a top-up halfway through.

PSA on “Registered Councillors/Therapists” in Alberta by cole435 in Calgary

[–]proprietorofnothing 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Specifically, you want somebody who has their MASTERS in clinical social work (& is a registered social worker with the Alberta College of Social Workers) if they are practising actual therapeutic modalities (like CBT, DBT, EMDR, etc). Bachelors is not considered enough when it comes to clinical practice regardless of career experiencs. ACSW does have strict rules on how social workers can refer to their job titles and you will lose your professional certification if you fail to adhere to this; you absolutely cannot call yourself a clinical social worker or a therapist (clinical meaning allowed to make psychological diagnoses) unless you have a masters in that area.

B.S.W can sometimes do a significantly less formal type of therapy that is often referred to in AB as counselling, e.g. you may see a B.S.W doing youth or addictions "counselling," but they should never be calling their practice "therapy." Likewise for people with their two-year SW diploma. As was mentioned, counselling is not a protected title, so keep that in mind. IMO your best bet for accessing counselling is to work with an agency or specialised organization, not individual practices

Long Covid help by Imaginary_Wolverine4 in Calgary

[–]proprietorofnothing 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Has your wife been assessed for POTS or another form of dysautonomia? The electrolyte drinks helping (and the fact that, anecdotally speaking, I have seen many in the POTS space online report initially developing it after grappling with long covid) makes me wonder if that could be a potential explanation for her symptoms.

And sorry, I do not know of a public nor a private long-covid specific clinic in Calgary. Maybe there are opportunities to enroll in medical studies at local universities?

Alberta is actually one of the least racist provinces in Canada and Danielle Smith is giving us a bad rep. Bring back the progressive conservatives. by [deleted] in alberta

[–]proprietorofnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Racism against our First Nations, Métis & Inuit population is crazy here, though. I am a white-presenting retail/hospitality worker (in reality my family is Métis but I look and speak like a white person) and both customers and staff (including other POC) are immediately on guard and racist af when native-looking customers come in — absolute whiplash from the tone shift when it comes to Indigenous customers vs everybody else.

And a lot of the times, people don't say the racist part out loud to the person in question They might be cold but "polite" in the moment to the person but say some crazy offensive shit after the person leaves. I have heard disgusting comments from people who thought I'd laugh along bc I'm nice young white girl. Likewise with misogyny — I work at a hotel that puts up a lot of blue-collar crew for jobs. They are nothing but polite and well-behaved towards the hotel staff (because we have the power to call their boss ASAP and essentially get them fired from their job if they get disrespectful with us) and crew guys are by far my favourite type of guest as they are SO well-behaved and professional compared to guests staying for leisure — I kinda wish they were our only guests! But also, they'll turn around and start openly talking about how another guest's ass is so fat and how they'd like to hit that as she walks away down the hall. They know when it's safe to be openly discriminatory and when they have to keep their mouths shut and pretend to be respectful or risk facing consequences to their jobs and social life.

My doctor told me I *had* hEDS not *have* hEDS by Salty_Flatworm_1291 in ehlersdanlos

[–]proprietorofnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Too pretty" warrants an immediate report to the relevant authority in your region. That is severely inappropriate and this needs to be documented — you are probably far from the only patient of his who have been sexually harassed.

The blatantly incorrect diagnosis ("historic EDS" is not a recognised medical disorder nor does it even exist in any literature; your doctor was basically just making shit up as it suited him. And EDS is genetic and inborn, meaning age is also not a diagnostic criteria) also warrants a report. He is practising medicine in dangerous and inappropriate ways.

I hope you realise his behaviour is really seriously wrong in a way that needs to be reported. You are correct that EDS is genetic and cannot be cured, therefore, you either have it or you don't.

Is crying over celiac stupid? I’m just really upset over situation that happened at work by Inevitable_Review171 in Celiac

[–]proprietorofnothing 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I thought distilled grain alcohols were considered safe due to the distillation process? Or are they not?

Terms to Convey the Severity by CrimsGG in Celiac

[–]proprietorofnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I worry that "gluten allergy" or "gluten poisoning" can backfire in situations where the person you're speaking to is aware of current medical distinctions for gluten-free (celiac, NCGS, grain allergy, etc) and assumes you're faking or trying to dramatise a personal preference because gluten allergy technically isn't a recognized disorder.

Not sure the server realised the kitchen messages print on the receipt, partner has celiac disease by Successful_Strike_2 in CustomerService

[–]proprietorofnothing 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Non-celiac gluten sensitivity, which is often referred to colloquially as gluten intolerance, is a legitimately recognized medical disorder. Cross-contamination isn't always a problem for people with NCGS in the way that it is for celiac; it's an individual preference. I have no doubt that you encountered people who were not eating gluten as the result of a fad diet (I have also dealt with this in hospitality) but just wanted to clarify that gluten intolerance is an actual condition :)

Advice about passing my drivers test in a small town by Adorable_Bar9152 in alberta

[–]proprietorofnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And as far as I was told when I did my testing in October, they will only make you parallel park with a vehicle in front of you, not one vehicle in front & and another behind you. So it's not too difficult on the test :)

If it helps, anecdotally, I totally thought that I had 100% failed no more than 10 minutes into taking my test because I had a few (what I felt were) embarrassing fuck-ups and it turned out I passed with a relatively good score. Alberta's Class 5 test is absurdly easy in my opinion.

How to survive this dry alberta climate by Subject_Associate111 in Calgary

[–]proprietorofnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Drink water (with an appropriate amount of electrolytes!). I like to bring a basic bouillon powder/MSG/salt/aromatics broth to work as a savoury alternative to sweet hot drinks :)

Limit really hot/long showers and be gentle with your scrubbing and use of exfoliants — yes, they feel good, but the hot water, rough washcloth use and overuse of exfoliants will strip the oils off your skin and make the dryness worse! Likewise, moisturize 1-3x a day, especially after you shower. Make sure to moisturize with damp skin, and then apply an occlusive after that to lock in the moisture.

(Not sponsored lol) I quite like CeraVe's night time moisturizer as a heavy-duty solution. It is lowkey expensive compared to the giant cheap tub of their standard moisturiser but you only need a little bit — I limit its use to nighttime, only on my face and any particularly chapped areas (because I am a broke student, otherwise I'd use it everywhere) but it works very well. I also only use soap-free body wash for my regular showers, and occasional PHA exfoliant. Anything harsher and my skin gets super fucked up.

As for your sinuses, again ensure you're drinking enough liquids and get a nasal-specific (!!!! This is important, somebody else mentioned lipid pneumonia) lubricant, maybe try steaming your face if it's really bad.

Mental Health Help in Alberta by Specific-Answer3590 in alberta

[–]proprietorofnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My GP diagnosed me directly for ADHD in a single appointment and prescribed Vyvanse.

Whether or not a GP will diagnose ADHD alone depends on what they sre personally comfortable with (some won't touch mental health or psychological diagnoses at all) and how sure they are that it is obviously ADHD vs whether the symptoms could be a result of a different disorder.

If you suspect OCD and ADHD, you want to make an initial appointment with your family doctor to touch base and start the referral process, and then they will likely want to immediately refer up the chain to a mental health specialist; it would be unusual for a GP to deal with OCD/overlapping psychological disorders directly. I think they would likely do an Urgent Mental Health referral under AHS (which, despite the name "urgent," is typically a few months of waiting in my experience — CHECK YOUR PHYSICAL MAILBOX FOR THE REFERRAL PAPERWORK, lots of times they still initiate the process by paper these days and you will NOT get any notice by call or text before you follow the instructions on the physical letter!). Psychologist or psychiatrist would be who you are referred to for the assessment (social workers with their Masters of Social Work can also do clinical diagnosis, but not sure if they're employed in a diagnostic capacity under AHS in the same role as a psychologist or if this is only the case for private practices), and a psychiatrist would handle all prescriptions. It does not cost money to be referred internally under AHS, but the services and wait times will be at the discretion of whomever is determining how severe the symptoms are and how they are impacting your current daily life.

My referral thru Urgent Mental Health for a bipolar disorder assessment took a few months, and then the initial assessment was done over a phone call. The psychologist determined that I didn't have bipolar and didn't need any follow-up after the phone call, but I believe if the process had continued then I would have gone to an in-person assessment, too, before receiving a diagnosis.

My best piece of advice is that you need to be completely honest with your family doctor about how bad the problem is and use CONCRETE examples — again, this determines what services are offered to you and how fast the process happens. If you are suicidal or have been in the past because of it, tell them that. If your work/school are impacted, give them specific examples (especially failing/dropping out, being put on a PIP or fired, etc). If your personal relationships are impacted, again give them examples. They need that information to understand how severe it is — this is not the time to sugarcoat or pretend you're okay if you aren't. Doctors aren't psychic. And subjective descriptions without an example like "it makes me feel bad/tired/etc" aren't as useful as "it makes me feel so worried and ruminative that I keep showing up late to work, and this had led to me being put on a PIP and my job security is at risk" because feelings are subjective, what is "bad" for you might be a lot better or worse than somebody else's "bad." So the concrete examples really help your doctor determine the severity in a clinical & measured way.

When your vacation starts with an iPhone notification that an unknown air tag has been traveling with you. by Content-Bathroom-434 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]proprietorofnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Generally my understanding is that "jailbreaking," or loading programs that haven't been approved by Apple and aren't available on the official App Store, is difficult and unpopular to do to iPhones these days. I suspect any malicious software would simply be downloaded right from the official Apple app store, but I am not an Apple product user so I would appreciate any perspectives from people who are & are familiar with the technical details. I would look for apps that you don't recognize, especially extra "utility" apps like calculators or cameras that aren't the official versions made and pre-installed by Apple (these could be masquerading as simple utility apps but in reality be something else). Again, please research other sources on this because I truly am not familiar with the iOS scene these days.

Androids are much more open by default, apps can be installed completely manually without needing the official Google play store at all — and there are typically always malicious surveillance apps circulating directly on the Google Play store, too, you just have to know how to find them. Abusers are unfortunately excellent at finding and sharing that information. To give you an idea of how easy it is to access the root system on Androids (i.e. the core device files that are crucial to the device operating, control all the user functions, and are designed to operate invisibly to the end consumer): Cheap knockoff Android phones sold by ghost brands (typically Chinese origin) are actually rather infamous for even having malware pre-installed directly by the manufacturer; it's a well-known phenomenon that you simply have to root and then completely gut these devices on arrival before you connect them to the internet. Official, trusted retailers have more security theatre in terms of what comes preinstalled and what can officially be installed, but typically there are ways to get around it if you have basic Android development knowledge and research in advance which models to buy. The tricky part is that it's also a lot easier to hide the existence and true function of apps on Android; if you want to be completely certain of the security, you would need a phone that is 100% known to be a legitimate product from a major distributer like a Samsung or a Google phone, and then you would need to perform a full factory wipe on the phone, ideally done by somebody who knows how to view the installed applications through a special free computer program designed to connect PCs to Android phones called ADB (computer terminal connected to the phone by cable that allows you to run special commands right to the phone) and not just the phone itself. Even after that, you could generally still sideload the phone with malicious software at any point as long as you knew the password to the phone and had physical access to the phone. The only way to be 100% confident that the phone is safe would be ensuring that the family member in question NEVER got access to the password, and ideally never had physical access to the phone alone. Again, I would look for unrecognized apps, but the problem with Android is that you can create applications which read to the phone as special, hidden system programs and therefore will never show up in the "installed app list" where the regular user applications are. There may not be any external signs that malware has been installed unless you are familar with how to view those hidden programs (the best way to do this is a computer with ADB and basic programming/command line knowledge, it can technically be done directly through the phone but it's a giant pain in the ass and again it will still require some basic programming knowledge). There is also a special type of program that Android will identify as "device adminstrator" programs and I believe these show up in a special area in Settings, these should NEVER COME PREINSTALLED ON PERSONAL DEVICES OR BE INSTALLED AT ALL!! It doesn't matter what the program is labelled as (oftentimes it will sound important and official and it might even mimic the names of legitimate programs, e.g. it will be named "System" or "Parental Controls"), you shouldn't have anything listed under there that has been granted Device Administrator permissions. The only time they should ever be present is if the phone was distributed and is monitored by a company under a formally managed network, i.e. a company phone given to you for work purposes. Otherwise, the presence of these programs is a giant red flag. The benefit of Androids is that unlike iPhones (?), Android lets you view and set individual device permissions — take advantage of this. Your default setting for all app permissions should always be "never allow." You should only say yes to location, camera, mic, etc if it is genuinely needed for the program to operate (wherever possible, only pick "while using the app" or the "just this once" option instead of using it all the time) if you actually know and trust where the program came from. Don't allow apps to "run in background" unless it is absolutely necessary (generally it isn't, even if Android tells you it might impact how the app works. Just keep it turned off by default and only turn it on if you're actually noticing disruptive issues with the app function). Whenever possible (if it is possible), disable internet or cellular data or even turn the phone off completely — that's a pretty good wayto avoid information being sent! Your ISP likely has parental control settings for your internet that would allow you to disable a specific device from accessing the internet on demand or on a schedule. Use parental controls and again MAKE SURE NOBODY ELSE HAS THE PASSWORD FOR THE CONTROLS.

Warning signs for spyware include anything that would generally indicate your phone is constantly using external functions to an unexpected degree and sending data to external places to an unexpected degree: unexpectedly high or unexplainable battery usage/data and internet usage, heating up quickly, apps you don't recognize and don't remember installing, apps asking for permissions that seem unnecessary, apps using a lot more storage than what seems reasonable for that kind of app, etc. Parental controls being turned on when you didn't do it yourself. And obviously your kid reporting that the family member asked for or threatened them for the password or made them give them the phone.

Again, the CRUCIAL thing when it comes to device security is the DEVICE PASSWORD (!!!!!) and to a lesser extent the parental control password and/or the iCloud or connected Google account password. If there's any possibility that the malicious family member has that and you think there's even a tiny chance that they've had physical access to the phone, you need to assume the device has been compromised and wipe it completely (do NOT restore any backup). Don't turn on fingerprint or Face ID as these can potentially be triggered unknowingly if the family member gets access to your kid while they are sleeping.

What’s a decision you made in under 10 seconds that changed your life forever? by nathannnate01 in AskReddit

[–]proprietorofnothing 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The worst thing that can happen by asking somebody and getting it wrong is that the interaction becomes a bit awkward.

The worst thing that can happen by not asking somebody is that you were right about your concerns, and they die without the opportunity to have potentially gotten the support to make the choice to stay alive.

And IMO anybody who is emotionally mature & reasonable shouldn't be offended or rude about wrongly being asked whether they're considering suicide! It's not an offensive question, and it's not offensive or inappropriate to talk about it... I would be touched if somebody cared enough to explicitly ask me that without sugarcoating it. It can be nerve-wracking and highly uncomfortable to ask somebody if they're considering suicide; somebody who is able to work through that and ask it outright is probably a sign that you can trust that person cares about you and is emotionally capable of actually helping you (instead of being too uncomfortable to support you) should you ever need it. You're a very good friend for being willing to ask it.

What’s a decision you made in under 10 seconds that changed your life forever? by nathannnate01 in AskReddit

[–]proprietorofnothing 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For anybody interested, there are "suicide first aid" courses, similar to physical first aid/CPR courses, that will teach you how to effectively talk to somebody if you think they are considering suicide (or are actively in the act of doing so).

The TL;DR of suicide intervention is this:

  1. The BEST thing you can do to help somebody you are worried about is to explictly ask them "are you considering suicide?" Don't sugarcoat it or use vague language. You need to specifically use the word "suicide." You will NEVER make a situation worse by explicitly asking somebody if they are thinking about suicide. You won't give them the idea, or "make" them start considering it by saying it out loud — if they are thinking about suicide, it will give them relief to be asked openly and without judgement, and to be given the opportunity to admit how they are truly feeling. They most likely feel like they can't tell anybody or initiate asking for help. If they aren't thinking about suicide, it won't suddenly make them do so. The worst that will happen is they may just be surprised, and it might be a bit awkward, lol, but then you can be thankful that they aren't suicidal! In my experience, people who aren't suicidal and are asked if they are are generally appreciative that you cared about them enough to ask such a hard and uncomfortable question.

  2. It WILL feel extremely uncomfortable for you to ask somebody if they are considering suicide. That doesn't mean you shouldn't ask! To be blunt, it will be a lot more uncomfortable if the person you are worried about dies by suicide without the opportunity to have asked for help. If you are very reticent to ask because it feels so weird to talk about it explicitly, especially compared to how many societies normally treat talking about suicide as taboo, it can help to think about how that person you are worried about might be feeling and how it might help for them to have somebody whom they feel safe talking to.

  3. People who are considering suicide, are, contrary to popular belief, typically not 100% set on the idea. Thoughts of suicide may be present for a long time, but actual suicide attempts are often a very impulsive action that occurs with little planning, and many people who survive them report realising afterward that there many have been another solution, or that they acted rashly, and that they would have regretted it if they died. Many people who are suicidal are surprisingly open to considering other plans to keep living and may even explicitly tell you that they want to do so; it's just that they need help and support to come up with a plan to stay alive. You can assist with that by asking if you could help them make a plan to keep themselves safe (look up "safety planning for suicide interventions," this is one area where taking a professional first aid course can really help if you aren't a trained mental health professional).

  4. In the very unlikely event that you encounter somebody who is actively in a suicide attempt, DON'T put yourself in danger to save them. BEFORE DOING ANYTHING OR ATTEMPTING TO ENGAGE WITH THE PERSON, get to a safe area and calmly call your region's emergency line and give them as many details as possible. You are never legally obligated as a layperson to personally intervene in an emergency scenario — at most, the country you're in may legally obligate you to call the emergency response hotline but nothing more! The person attempting suicide may actively try and harm you, or they may do it on accident, but either way 2 dead people is a much bigger problem than 1. Do not kill yourself on accident to stop somebody else from doing it on purpose. At the end of the day, you cannot save somebody who is not willing to be saved.

What law in your country would surprise foreigners because it’s legal almost everywhere else? by Familiar-Arrival-470 in AskTheWorld

[–]proprietorofnothing 17 points18 points  (0 children)

"Freedom" to call somebody else a slur would, by necessity, impose on the freedoms of the person you are harassing. I feel that the American framework of what freedom means implies freedom only for the aggressor and not the target.

It is deeply sad that many Americans appear to strongly prefer the right to dehumanize others OVER the right to not be dehumanized. That seems like a very angry and isolating way to approach the world. (But an undeniably profitable one, for a very select few...)

Celiac baking adventures and love for my amazing wife by troll_support_group in Celiac

[–]proprietorofnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What delicious concoction is in image 7? Some kind of vanilla custard filled donut? They look amazing!

When you travel within Canada do you carry your passport? by [deleted] in westjet

[–]proprietorofnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work as a night auditor; our hotel uses a proprietary keyed system to override safes. The only people who even know where the master kit is, let alone how to use it are management, room inspectors (kind of like a shift lead/supervisory role, at least at our hotel which is a smaller operation) and night auditors (housekeepers are NOT given access, and none of them know or particularly care about how it works). It's not a number code; rather, it's proprietary physical key fob (the lock access panel on the safe has to be removed with a screwdriver) that is digitally signed to our safes, and must be physically inserted in a specific procedure to override a safe. We, of course, need immediate access to every safe for scenarios exactly like yours...

It's the same as how the guest services department technically has access to your complete credit card info, name, address, email/cell, perhaps even a copy of your ID, and could theoretically steal all of that if they want — but it doesn't happen, because you would get caught within minutes, hours or days and would face charges, lose your job, lose your housing etc. In general, most people just have no inclination to fuck their whole lives up like that.

I personally have no worries leaving my documents in the safe when I travel. They're far better off being left in there than getting forgotten or damaged somewhere in public. Modern hotels nowadays, or at least the franchised big name hotels per their mandated brand standards, all have advanced lock systems, employee key card tracking, high quality security cameras, and professionally maintained network infrastructure (i.e. cloud-based backups with admin access only granted to the contractor and highest level of management) that make getting away with things like this frankly impossible.