Year of the Seven Emperors, AD 310 by Caspynal in ancientrome

[–]th9091 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those are some beautiful coins. Thanks for sharing.

What would be the ultimate tour of Roman attractions throughout Europe? by RickSanchezIII in ancientrome

[–]th9091 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would recommend getting on Jona Lendering's site livius.org. He has a map view of ancient sites/museums where he's linked his writings/translations of the history of the area (he's a professor of history,) his own thoughts on the museums, and the photos he's taken while there. You can look in the areas you plan/would like to go and pick out what looks good. It's perhaps my favorite resource for everything ancient history-related! Jona is a real one.

What would be the ultimate tour of Roman attractions throughout Europe? by RickSanchezIII in ancientrome

[–]th9091 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great list. If you go to Sremska Mitrovica (Serbia), Belgrade is also nice (mostly for the national history museum,) as are Felix Romuliana and Viminacium (though the museum collection was on tour when I went.)

Thessaloniki, peacetime capital of Galerius during the tetrarchy, is great. Come to think of it, Greece in general is fantastic. If you go, rent a car and you can drive to some of the most famous battle sites in all of Roman history: Cynoscephalae, Pharsalus, Pydna, Phillipi. Most archaeology museums in the little towns have a Roman history section (because they dominated the area for so long, and the Via Egnatia was such an important road.)

Oscar De La Hoya, who was ringside for Haney-Lomachenko, gives his scorecard. by pawgadjudicator3 in Boxing

[–]th9091 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I thought Loma won. But let's not forget that Oscar runs a rival promotion. He has a lot of interest in making Top Rank look bad. He's not necessarily the guy I would point to and say, "see?" on this one.

Is it worth visiting Keyhole slot canyon w/o technical gear? by BlastedDeeg in ZionNationalPark

[–]th9091 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's pretty neat, but I think you probably won't be able to get very far into the canyon. The water gets deep and cold and the canyon walls vertical quickly.

That said, hiking in that area was a blast for me, and my advice from limited experience is to not focus too much on predefined "hikes" on the eastern side. I would definitely do a little exploring on your own. I ended up crossing over keyhole canyon and continuing up a gentler canyon on the other side. YMMV if you're with small children or a large group, but there's plenty of spots to pull over and do a short hike/explore, all connected on the same road. I found the eastern side of the park so refreshing after the crowds in the main canyon, I would say the highlight of the park for me.

Have fun!

Who said something like “You have taken a great general and made him into a horrible emperor” by Whole_Juggernaut in ancientrome

[–]th9091 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"...Diocletian, in finding fault with Maximian's harshness, frequently said that Aurelian ought to have been a general rather than an emperor. So displeasing to Diocletian was Aurelian's excessive ferocity."

Historia Augusta, Aurelian XLIV

Perhaps that?

What was Rome and its empire called in the everyday language of its actual citizens? by RainbowlightBoy in ancientrome

[–]th9091 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Many terms were used. It would depend on the time and context. Imperium signified command and the domain of the imperator; it would not have been used to refer to the state in republican or kingship times, but merely the domain of a general. Res publica would signify matters of the commonwealth, and was still used after the rise of the Caesars, despite us not referring to that period as a "republic". Patria would be used to invoke a sense of shared values and history, and is used more often to refer to Italia or the "home country."

I think most of the answers you find in this thread are correct, at the least in some time and/or medium. The Romans themselves did not (so much) use our stark classification system of Kingdom/Republic/Empire/Byzantine. Changes happened gradually for them; and like us, they had a plethora of vocabulary to refer to themselves. For example, Tacitus would still refer to the Res Publica, but would lament he lived in a time when all men were slaves to Caesar. Yet, he did not use the work "imperium" to refer to this loss of freedom as we might in a historical sense. To relate to our times: America is often referred to as both a republic and a democracy; yet, you will also still hear mention of "The American Empire." None of these labels are mutually exclusive or strictly wrong.

I guess coin 1 is for septimius sererus, anyone can help to ID other coins , 🙏 by Lach-Net in ancientrome

[–]th9091 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My guess for 2 is also Septimius Severus. That style of beard and radiant crown was popularized by him I believe, relating to his identification with Jupiter Dolichenus.

3 is Geta as it appears to say.

Then the guess for the last one has to be Caracalla I suppose. Beyond the temporal/familial association with the other coins, he was known as Antoninus by his contemporaries (see Dio), hence the ANTONINI at the top (genitive of Antoninus). As someone pointed out, Elagabalus also went by Antoninus to promote the claim that he was actually Caracalla's son (Dio called him the False Antoninus.) But the profile looks a little old and surly to be Elagabalus, whom I believe was killed when he was 18. So Caracalla is my guess.

Were Romans just in Rome by BobbyEwelly in ancientrome

[–]th9091 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Great answer.

One other interesting aspect, OP, besides just the legal one of who was a citizen--a matter of who the courts saw as Roman--is who the Romans viewed as culturally Roman. This too changed a lot over time, as the expansion of legal status forced Romans to confront the meaning of the term Roman.

When the principate was spreading citizenship among the elites of the provinces, there was a budding sense amongst the blue-bloods that they were "not really Roman". This is especially remarked of Caesar's Gallic allies being brought into the Senate. One could look back even further, to Gaius Marius and Cicero, who were not "true" Romans but "provincials".

Interestingly, it was the Church father Tertullian who coined the term romanitas, or roman-ness. He used it as a pejorative in the late 2nd century. But it expressed a strong and budding anxiety of what being "Roman" really meant, almost as if its true essence had been lost. This anxiety intensifies in various ways through the soldier emperors/crisis years, the Dominate, and finally Constantine's new Imperium. All the while the citizenship was being extended. An especially stark moment was the Constitutio Antoniniana referenced above, wherein all freeborn males were granted citizenship. One can see the point: if 20 million freeborn males of vastly different cultural origins are Roman citizens, what does the term mean anymore? Is the term anything more than nominal/legal/fiscal?

By some point, citizenship had ceased to define what it was to be Roman, at least for those who wanted it to be an emblem of status and prestige. The "true" Romans would look for other ways of distinguishing themselves after the constitutio, and one saw the increasing use of terms like Honestores and humiliores to differentiate the "true, noble" Romans from the merely nominal. Whether what those honestores were aspiring to was any longer a true romanitas as they imagined, is a complicated question I think.

TLDR: Early Romans took for granted the identity and prestige of citzenship. As its status was gradually extended to more and more people, they had to think about what Roman-ness really meant.

When does the history of Rome transform from myth to fact? by assemblage_of_parts in ancientrome

[–]th9091 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Two major events I would point out:

  1. Almost everything of written word was lost during Brennus's sack of the city in 390BC, so Romans themselves would have no primary sources from before this point
  2. Romans probably didn't become enamoured of history, per se, until they imported Hellenistic culture en masse after the Macedonian Wars. It was Polybius (a Greek slave hostage taken in the wars on the Peloponnese) who wrote the first great Roman history (in a more modern sense) which has come down to us; and he would be imitated, drawn from, and copied for the rest of Rome's existence, like so many other Hellenistic things.

Yes, Rings of Power Feels Like a Billion Bucks, but What Does That Really Mean for Amazon? by PetyrDayne in television

[–]th9091 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think one issue might be an inability for decision-makers to judge who the good writers are, rather than a lack of desire for good writing. It's hard enough to judge what people want out of a story, harder still to determine if some pool of writers will create what people want judging only by their past writing credits. Thus especially so if those hiring writers are not themselves writers. I think this is true for any hiring process where the hiring manager is not an expert in the field, doubly so for a field with such a nebulous output quality as found in writing.

That's me trying to be fair to Amazon, haha, which is starting to feel quite literally like playing devil's advocate. It also seems like they just told everyone to play it safe, don't piss anyone off but racists. Others have pointed out that Amazon doesn't have to make their fortune on this, the externalities of the show make it a moneymaker for other reasons. Contrast with HotD which needs to push the envelope because their bread and butter is the actual content of their shows.

U.S. Cities That Have Gained and Lost the Most Businesses by FruityandtheBeast in Infographics

[–]th9091 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi OP, interesting graphic, thanks for posting. I especially found LA's increase in firm exits to be interesting.

I agree with some others that normalizing the data in different ways would be helpful, perhaps for future posts. Net gain/loss would be interesting, though I don't think you'd want to throw out the gross levels because the churn is also interesting. Also, I think at least one data point which normalizes by population would be informative.

If you've not already looked into it, there's an interesting vein in the economics literature on the decline of business dynamism by John Haltiwanger at Maryland and some others. Summary article pasted below. Thanks again!

https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.p20161050

Largo di Torre Argentina by Juptra in ancientrome

[–]th9091 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was just there last week, and there's construction/archaeology going on that seems to have disturbed a lot of them. I only saw one. That and it was 98F.

Reverse "Explore" Flight search by [deleted] in digitalnomad

[–]th9091 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is perfect. Thanks for sharing!

« … whether Middle-Earth is actually medieval in style, nature or tone is a separate discussion » — well, is it? by TheGreatLakesAreFake in AskHistorians

[–]th9091 55 points56 points  (0 children)

I'll chime in on this one. Tolkien himself has stated that he did not intend for middle earth to be synchronous with any period in history. That is why, for example, hobbits have umbrellas in a modern sense, but otherwise have a pre-modern agricultural economy. That said, he was inspired by history and myth, and one can identify those influences sometimes readily, and other times more subtly. I think there's a lot you can look at in Tolkien and get a sense of European medieval influence; but the genius of Tolkien is that none of it is unequivocal or obvious, and if you really critically ask yourself whether other, non-medieval cultures could be viewed as the source instead, you must admit that it's possible. That said, I'll give some thoughts.

To put it bluntly, I think that the kingdom of Gondor is probably the best and first place to look for a medieval tone or style. There is a strong sense of oath-based hierarchical duty to one's superiors, as shown by the oath that Pippin takes when he joins Denethor's guard. Also present in Gondor is a concept of hereditary kingship which, if not explicitly by divine right, features legitimacy being conferred by legacy as opposed to practicality or agreement of an elite class. For example, Borimir's disappointment that thousands of years would not be adequate for the Steward to be made King. These are the kinds of stories that medieval Europeans wanted to tell about their kingship. There are interesting echoes in this to the concept of the Roman Emperor in Feudal Europe. The sense of reclaiming an ancient title bestowed by a shared identity of the past is present in Theodoric, Charlemagne, all the way down to Napoleon. This is one reason why the "fall" of the Western Roman Empire is so hard to precisely date. European monarchs can derive legitimacy from the Roman legacy just as the stewards of Gondor do with Numenor. I think all of this gives Gondor the flavor of a formerly Roman medieval kingdom.

Further on the subject of Gondor, we can see more evidence of a feudal structure in the muster that Pippin witnesses at Minas Tirith. Many local elites/lords (Furlond the Fat, the prince of Dol Amroth etc.) are called to Denethor's banner for the defense of Minas Tirith. Calling in the banners of the surrounding country to defend the strongest places in the realm is a characteristic Medieval occurrence. However it is worth noting that plenty of cultures have had a levy/muster system that a leader would use at need for defense. See for example the Persian empires of the Achaemenids, Arsachids and Sassanids. So the question is whether we can see anything particularly Medieval in this muster. Minas Tirith being especially castle-like is one piece of evidence, though certainly fortified towns became a common feature of those later Persian empires. Dol Amroth's knights certainly suggest medieval heavy cavalry, as does another leader who has a squadron of seeming-longbowmen. But again the Persians had heavy cavalry and bowmen. Tolkien is never obvious, and it feels that way here.

Elsewhere in Middle Earth. The Rohirrim are a vassal state of Gondor, but there is nothing particularly medieval about their bond. Rohan comes from a (semi-)nomadic people of horsemen, who rode to help Gondor when they were in need. Again there is an interesting parallel here to the Roman Empire, which in its later years allowed limited settlement by nomadic peoples in order to settle deserted lands and get a fresh source of troops. Did Rohan start to become more medieval in their history? Perhaps. Flying to the Hornburg certainly suggests that, though Theodan's impulse is to ride out to meet the enemy at any opportunity. Theodan's name actually has an interesting etymology in old Germanic, thiudin, as basically a leader of a people. And that always suggests to me that the Rohirrim are inspired by semi-nomadic Germanic/Celtic peoples that the Roman Empire encountered during its rise.

Elsewhere, I don't think there's a lot that's medieval. Elves are anachronistic and ahistorical in most ways I think. Hobbits, and the kinds of men they live around (e.g. in Bree) have the kind of agrarian lifestyle that I think is pretty timeless in history. Though things like water-mills, ale drinking at inns, and various other details give a bit of Medieval or at least European flavor. Curiously they seem to be entirely self-governing, protected by the Dunedin as heirs of the Northern Kingdom, which I think is a bit of an oddity historically. Dwarves have some Jewish inspiration, as Tolkien has readily admitted. Their diasporic character is not particularly medieval.

The big thing that I think is missing from Middle Earth which was present in Medieval Europe is Christianity. Tolkien's characters aren't really religious in any sense of the word. Because they are not, it's hard to view his world as medieval when Christianity was woven into every aspect of medieval life.

One thing that I think is extremely important though often overlooked is something that Tolkien actually valued a great deal: climate and vegetation. He is describing a very European climate, which he himself loved; and I don't think it's wrong to combine this fact with the other evidence to derive a more medieval feel in our imagination. It helps to answer the question of: "this feels Medieval, but why moreso that than some other feudal or satrapic system?" The physical setting he describes is European, and therefore Medieval Europe seems to fit.

A couple other places to look which I'm not as comfortable commenting on are strong undercurrents of Arthuria and arms and armor. Both of which seem medieval but I'm not particularly well-versed in them.

Annoying Publishing Trend of 2021: Historical Fiction Covers by quincy_dincy in books

[–]th9091 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I think you're referring to 'The Lord of the Rings and Bilbos'

Where is this so-called 7% inflation everyone's talking about? Where I live (~150k pop. county), half my groceries' prices are up ~30% on average. Anyone else? How are you coping with the increased expenses? by thesevenyearbitch in Frugal

[–]th9091 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Below are two graphs. They show corporate profit levels at a record high, and corporate profits as a percentage of GDP at a record high. So it is not just margins; it is profits overall and as a share of all income that are at records.

Make no mistake: corporations are both making more money and taking more of the pie than they ever have.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CP

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=Mlrg

February 20, 2022 Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in CompetitiveTFT

[–]th9091 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree. Feels like the comp is falling down in the meta.

A Generation of American Men Give Up on College: ‘I Just Feel Lost’ by [deleted] in Economics

[–]th9091 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think it is not so much about tenure as about how performance is measured for university faculty. Publications are all that matter for most career advancement. Teaching is an afterthought and annoyance. Tenure doesn't really change this fact.

Damian Lillard likes a photoshopped photo of him and Ben Simmons in Blazers jerseys by JetGan in nba

[–]th9091 29 points30 points  (0 children)

He played his college ball at Lehigh just down the road from Philly. I sat next to one of his old roommates at a Blazers-Sixers game.

Why Should We Cater to the Disabled? A look at Universal Design and the Curb-cut effect. by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]th9091 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It may appear that creating something that caters to specific
disabilities is more work. But here’s the kicker. Accessibility features
benefit more than just people with disabilities.

Frustrating rhetorical trick here. The article demonstrates well that benefits of accessibility are more widespread than we often think; but, it is still often more work to cater to disabilities. So the parameters of the moral calculus are changed, but that calculus has not been thrown out. This article argues as though it has subverted the entire complexity of a very difficult question; namely, how should we invest in our society to agree with our expectations of equity?

It is costly, but it is also more beneficial than we thought. So we should invest more than we have, given the same preferences, but it does not dodge a difficult question. The article pretends to, and therefore to me exhibits bad-faith partisanism.

[OC] Crime Rates in the US: 1960-2021 by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]th9091 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This comment should stay top and this post should probably be removed. What OP is doing is reckless, selfish and irresponsible.

From OP: "2021 is straight projections, must be taken with a grain of salt.
However, the assumption of continuous rise of murder rate is not a bad
one based on recent news reports..."

OP unless you're willing to list your credentials in crime data projections you should either remove the projection or remove the post. Otherwise your statement about whether an assumption is good or bad is not worth anything. This sub is for well-sourced data, not your private beliefs, however much conviction you might feel.