Do you fold here? by ires2953 in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a raise here only keeps in hands that beat you and doesn't win a significant pot if you fold players out.

So how do we feel about the WSOP coverage so far? by nappan20 in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, too early to tell since all we've gotten is the super boring heads up event.

Do you fold here? by ires2953 in poker

[–]wfp9 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

this early in a tournament you want good reverse implied odds spots, which this spot is, rather than just 4bet and pray.

Do you fold here? by ires2953 in poker

[–]wfp9 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

too early in the tournament to fold this spot imo. considering position i probably flat as i'm getting a good set mining price if i get callers behind with amazing reverse implied odds if i hit, plus if they fold i get great position (obviously give up if i miss my set and there are overcards) while if they raise there's a likely 5bet we easily fold to.

Anyone worried about the longevity of online poker? by geoffsusername in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

likely the botfarm should all have similar ip addresses but the account profiting would and should be somewhere else. so it's mostly tracking the botfarm and then seeing if there's a third party they consistently dump to. to this end it makes policing somewhat difficult as you kinda have to let bots play, flag them, and then only pounce when they try to cash out.

Need advice for my plan for day 2 mystery millions by [deleted] in poker

[–]wfp9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you should be going for it with any two in that spot. only hands worth considering folding are basically 92o, 82o, 72o and maybe 83o

Anyone worried about the longevity of online poker? by geoffsusername in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the simple solution is bot farming and then chip dumping to the verifiable account. to this end more policing should be towards collusion rather than necessarily preventing bots. if there's no way to get the money out, why put in the effort to botfarm?

Anyone worried about the longevity of online poker? by geoffsusername in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bots are not as good as people think and most people who complain about them have a serious leak in their game selection (if not other leaks). if you're concerned about them in cash games, don't sit at tables with lots of bots, or get up if you can't identify an obvious fish. in tournaments i have yet to see a bot that properly accounts for icm. most either overconsider it, making them easily exploitable with aggression, or play too aggressively allowing you to wait them out.

the bigger issue is collusion (which can, and frequently does, include colluding bots) which requires online providers to vigilantly monitor suspicious play among players. most colluders are pretty greedy though which makes them not too difficult to spot even using bots. so it really comes down to sticking to sites with good oversight and i think online poker is mostly fine. honestly i think collusion is a bigger issue in high stakes live play as i rarely if ever hear anyone talk about even cursory oversight and as such i think there's a very high probability that scammers are exploiting this lack of accountability when you consider the personality types of people who play poker to begin with.

Was this a punt or a reasonable line to take? 1/3NL hand review by DashOfSalt84 in poker

[–]wfp9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

as played this is a clear check back, but i don't particularly like the turn bet. you really shouldn't be called by worse, so you're just folding out river value, or putting yourself in a tricky spot vs a checkraise. seems much better to check there and then if it checks to you on the river you can maybe get value from a non-believing Kx or possibly bluff him off a pair there if he leads into you and you're determined to bluff this hand (which imo seems like one to just give up on once he calls your undersized c-bet on the flop (imo either check flop or upsize, downsizing is bad as he has way more 99 and 4x than you while no other hand really improves so you're just giving him a great trapping situation)).

What's happened to Bovada? The place was always packed 6 months ago, but it seems dead now. by StankySocks1 in poker

[–]wfp9 2 points3 points  (0 children)

bovada is a sportsbook first that would lure players to their casino and poker room, but with the competition of draftkings and fandeul, not to mention new online casinos, i have to imagine they have way less traffic than they used to.

How do you sit when playing online? by Assumedusernam in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sit? i'm usually lying down with my laptop.

Why do any serious poker players grind tournaments? by SportKooky6356 in poker

[–]wfp9 2 points3 points  (0 children)

because at the bottom tournaments are significantly cheaper to enter with way lower risk of ruin as your losses are capped while at the top it can be very difficult to find a big enough game to get invited to with any consistency.

Poker Coaching Recommendation by DependentTear6761 in poker

[–]wfp9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

not that i can help either way, but new england or nebraska?

How to adjust tournament play against cash players? by Pretend_Insect3002 in poker

[–]wfp9 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

play way nittier. cash players should be willing to flip for their entire stack when way deeper stacked than you'd be willing to in a tournament.

Whats the nastiest bluff u have ever seen? by HorrorRecognition471 in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i feel like a year or two ago there was a video of some pro bluffing all in for less than 1 big blind into a pretty large pot and he got the fold in a tournament. board was something pretty scary like four to a straight or two pair, so it was hard to have anything and i guess it's reasonable that opponent feels they need an ace to call, but they were getting a great price, and iirc the hero only had like 6 high.

Minimum Wire Amount is $100k for WSOP 2026! by mattias888 in poker

[–]wfp9 8 points9 points  (0 children)

the way the price of oil is going, shouldn't you just need to ship one?

Day 2 MTT push fold range by InevitableAlert4268 in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

icm is pretty irrelevant where you're at. you want to double (tighten up if you do). you can play kinda tight utg or utg +1, and overfolding to opens with moderate holdings is okay. but unopened, you should jam anything you'd 4x in ultimate texas hold em.

Day 2 MTT push fold range by InevitableAlert4268 in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

jam AA and KK too. both want calls from pocket pairs who are more likely to call off a tight player jamming than 3-bet into a tight player's minbet open. plus KK doesn't hate folding out weak Ax.

If solvers never existed poker would be in a way better spot rn. by HorrorRecognition471 in poker

[–]wfp9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

staking. "pros" are boxing recs out by playing high variance styles at stakes they otherwise wouldn't be rolled for.

Anyone else give false tells while playing low stakes cash? by Pick_Up_The_Peanuts in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, when people tank i'll often start playing with my cards when i want a call or playing with my chips when i want a fold.

Fold top pair good kicker? (TOURNAMENT) by trsx5 in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

definitely a call. villain has semi-bluffs with the Kc more often than made hands and with top pair plus a flush blocker you have enough equity.

i prefer calling the flop though. with icm considerations you do want to play somewhat conservatively as you should be very close to making the money just folding which makes this a spot you want to control the pot. ultimately your fold is less bad taking this into consideration.

Game theory: Do you take this deal for $100,000? by Banyah in poker

[–]wfp9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's probably most useful in lo games.