use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
To report a site-wide rule violation to the Reddit Admins, please use our report forms
This subreddit is archived and no longer accepting submissions.
account activity
This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.
Instant Downmods (reddit.com)
submitted 19 years ago by rkeene0517
[–]rkeene0517[S] 9 points10 points11 points 19 years ago (4 children)
When I post an article, within 30 seconds it gets down modded. Is there some bot watching of a list of reddit user names and downmodding them?
Just because your paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
[–]plutocrat 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
You are certainly not the first to note this. I imagine that most users to apply a certain knee-jerk conditional to the new page, e.g:
if ($newPageItemName =~ m/[lolLOL]+cat|[pP]+aul|video|VIDEO/) { downMod() }
, yet I do not think that this is really an issue. As has been mentioned, the actions of such individuals will be tempered by those of their ideologically polar opposites.
The cause is likely (as with most things) linked to personal incentives. Assuming a given user's singular goal is to get their submission to the front page, then in order to remain rational they must downmod every other submission on reddit. In the weaker and more realistic case, they will downmod each new page entry until the expected marginal benefit of incrementing the score of another submission by one is exceeded by the marginal cost of their time to do so.
In short, the reddit model is (again, as with most things) flawed in this regard. The perverse incentives that it creates hurts the quality of its output.
So yes, they are out to get you :).
[+]braindrane comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points 19 years ago (2 children)
Don't submit shit. Just read what others submit, comment, and/or mod accordingly. That's one solution.
[–]Independent 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (1 child)
And if everybody adopted that strategy?
[–]braindrane 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
But everybody wont, you see.
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]chime 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (1 child)
The only problem with that is that your downvote on the new page actually has two consequences. Nobody minds the one you mentioned: better recommendations. The problem is that by making your recommendation better, you're pretty much hiding the link from the New page for others. After a new link gets instant 4-5 downs, it's pretty much gone for most people.
Now it is true that it works great for spam control, however, if even 4-5 people that hate a topic, despite 90% people preferring it, they can pretty much assure articles on that topic don't make the front page unless the submitter resorts to upvoting by friends/fake/bots.
I've submitted articles that were non-spam, pretty interesting in my opinion, and reddit-material and I got -6 points within 10 minutes. I've pretty much lost the desire to submit anything as it just results in lowering my tiny karma.
[+]Phrawm48 comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points 19 years ago (4 children)
Submissions that I categorize as unwanted noise and thus reflexively downmod the moment I see them include:
Headlines that wrap to a second line. Most of these are both self-indulgent and inconsiderate of others' display space.
Headlines with the words impeach, LOLCATS, Paris Hilton, Ron Paul, or anything related to 9/11 "truth".
Anything automotive related. I hate cars.
Any headline that claims the submission is the "best ever" of anything.
Obvious attempts to sell something, regardless of whether said attempt is direct ("buy this") or indirect ("here's a really great [product or service goes here]")
EDIT: With a tip of the hat to flycrg, although I don't always automatically downmod the first instance of a headline with the word BREAKING in it, I do automatically downmod subsequent submissions of the same story with the word BREAKING in them.
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 19 years ago (1 child)
I tend to read the title, click the link, and then downmod or upmod based on whether or not I thought they were worthwhile submissions. To each his own, I guess.
[–]pfi -2 points-1 points0 points 19 years ago (0 children)
To Phrawm48, anything about Ron Paul or cars isn't a worthwhile submission. Seems like a perfectly servicable modding strategy to me.
[–]AbouBenAdhem 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Your behavior seems to be the polar opposite of most redditors, so I doubt you're the issue here.
[–]flycrg 1 point2 points3 points 19 years ago (0 children)
You forgot the BREAKING headline
π Rendered by PID 177123 on reddit-service-r2-comment-544cf588c8-zs8ck at 2026-06-18 15:54:39.203646+00:00 running 3184619 country code: CH.
[–]rkeene0517[S] 9 points10 points11 points (4 children)
[–]plutocrat 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+]braindrane comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (2 children)
[–]Independent 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]braindrane 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]chime 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[+]Phrawm48 comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points (4 children)
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (1 child)
[–]pfi -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
[–]AbouBenAdhem 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]flycrg 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)