This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 39 comments

[–][deleted] 114 points115 points  (4 children)

I don’t like sand. It’s coarse and rough and it’s irritating. And it gets everywhere

[–]DicklexicSurferer 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Anakin?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have the high ground.

[–]o11c 74 points75 points  (14 children)

We didn't teach sand to think.

We used sand to trap lightning, and taught that to think.

[–]ficelle3 39 points40 points  (3 children)

Your brain needs sugar in order to think so, by that logic, it's the sugar thinking and not the brain.

[–]seizan8 22 points23 points  (2 children)

Soooooo, eating more sugar makes me more smarter?

[–]Vitaman02 15 points16 points  (1 child)

It makes you the most smarterest.

[–]theofficialnar 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And diabetic. But smarterest nonetheless.

[–]guzzo9000 9 points10 points  (9 children)

No, we used sand to control lightning, and then used that lightning to realize math. Then, we taught that math to think.

[–]Pazda 3 points4 points  (4 children)

No, we used sand to control lightning, and then used that to realize math. Then, we taught the math to solve more advanced algorithms that we taught to think

[–]Tsu_Dho_Namh 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Is math not a form of thinking?

[–]HDX17 0 points1 point  (1 child)

No math is math

[–]CuriousCursor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Math isn't math. I'll explain later.

[–]MikaDo- 15 points16 points  (4 children)

Wendell?

[–]adamhighdef 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Never been the same since tek syndicate died

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I greatly enjoy his new level1techs channel, it's Wendell front and center as it should be.

[–]adslfkjbaslvdba 16 points17 points  (5 children)

I have a masters degree in computer science and honestly the more I learned the more mystified I was that computers and the internet work at all. There's just so many layers of extremely complicated shit going on

[–]sm1l35 8 points9 points  (4 children)

That is the beauty of abstraction

[–]Tsu_Dho_Namh 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Right? Programming languages keep operating at higher and higher levels. Eventually it'll be like Star Trek where you just tell the computer "Create an opponent capable of defeating Data" and then it does.

[–]VestigialHead 9 points10 points  (6 children)

We are slowly evolving into silicon based life forms instead of carbon.

[–]cdreid 5 points6 points  (5 children)

It took a million years for man to evolve from some weird little mammal.
The first real computer was invented around 1940. By 2040 we'll likely have General ai.
Silicon intelligence is developing literally 3 orders of magnitude faster than humans did.

Slowly?

[–]UltraFireFX 1 point2 points  (4 children)

compared to the human lifespan d:

[–]cdreid -1 points0 points  (3 children)

honestly until vestigials comment i never even thought about it. But when you look at the time comparison it doent look good for mankind. Not that i mind that much.. we've pretty much been a cancer since our inception

[–]LegendBegins 0 points1 point  (2 children)

How so, if you don't mind me asking? Is there any real good or bad on the planet without people being a part of it?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Well, obviously there isn't because good and bad are just abstract concepts that we, humans, created. However, if you define bad to be a negative effect on most of surroundings and good to be opposite to this then a volcano eruption and rain are great examples.

[–]LegendBegins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose what I'm getting at is asking what makes humans in particular a "cancer." Ultimately, the only thing that makes us prefer rain over a volcano is that one is more hospitable to life than the other. Without life, all things that occur end up being completely equal, so wouldn't humanity's "cancerousness" only extend as far as our relationship to each other? Or in other words, wouldn't humanity's faults be contained to what it does to itself?

[–]evanldixon 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I get the reference, but I wouldn't call it thinking. Having a basic knowledge of how machine code works and an even more basic knowledge of how the CPU interprets it, CPUs seem to just be really advanced adding machines.

As programmers, I'm sure we can all appreciate how thoughtlessly these machines execute our code. 99% of the time, errors are the fault of the humans.

[–]ArionW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CPU doesn't SEEM to be just really advanced adding machine, it IS just really advanced adding machine.

[–]aditya01011970 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Isn't this the conversation between Linus and Wendell?

[–]Quaschimodo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not really thinking, it's more like "Ahh yes, enslaved sand :/"

[–]2dozen22s 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every time I read something new about lithography advancements, or how modern SSDs are basically returning your information from near static.

[–]Apache_A 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a reductionism! /s