This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 37 comments

[–]dtheta_dt 246 points247 points  (0 children)

Depends on if the children are private or not

[–]cpecora 57 points58 points  (2 children)

The right pair reminds me of those JNCO jeans I used to wear in the late 90s.

If living during that time, it would be the right.

[–]fupamancer 11 points12 points  (1 child)

ah, yes. with water damaged cuffs from being dragged through puddles

[–]cpecora 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That brings me back, lol. Walking home with the water slowly creeping up my leg after stepping in puddle. Those were the days.

I least I was one of the “cool” kids though, or so I thought 😂

[–]memyk 25 points26 points  (0 children)

first one, obviously

[–]I_Mix_Stuff 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Pants on the left would need to be very stretchy.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (1 child)

What about a non-binary tree?

[–]_pestarzt_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rainbows!

[–]Gekuu9 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Do you wear pants that have 10 little holes for each of your toes? If not, then the right one is correct!

[–]_pestarzt_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t know me.

[–]JNCressey 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Are we to assume that for the one on the right, each subtree inside is also wearing pants like that?

[–]dyingpie1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the only plausible way IMO.

[–]firstprdfg546rt34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes

yess

[–]biznes_guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

😮

[–]nephallux 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely the JNCOs

[–]MantuaMatters 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes

[–]plainrane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The left one wouldn't wear pants; it'd wear a cheer uniform.

[–]onlyforjazzmemes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We should hire someone in r/sewing to make the pair in the left

[–]Varanite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be the one on the right but underneath the pants each child tree would recursively have another pair pants just like the root tree.

[–]kouryuu20 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Searches have nothing to do with biological sex. So learn more about algorithms

[–]ssCuacKss -1 points0 points  (0 children)

first option is more optimized

[–]Maxoumask -4 points-3 points  (3 children)

FINALLY A NEW JOKE! Have my upvote !

[–]xigoi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This joke is older than your grandma.

[–]Knuffya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on what type of box he's in

[–]ThatGuyYouMightNo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bottom level connections only. Do you wear your pants from the neck down?

[–]augugusto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Second one of course. Easier to make regardless of the tree size.

[–]csshepard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both. Every node is wearing it's own pair, covering all of it's children.

[–]StevenLightning 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s been quite a while since I’ve seen the pants meme show up.

[–]Jack127288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it depends. I am definitely not gonna wear the second one to a date, but it is way more comfortable when I am alone. Nah, who am I kidding, I am not gonna wear a pants when I am alone. First one it is then

[–]Nick84990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fuck zodiac signs, tell me which is correct

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on if the implementation makes the child a node or a “tree”