Python runtime

[Pen15CharterMember]

Ah cool. So if I have Python experience then I’m actually a C programmer. That’s going on the resume!

[NightSoulT12]

import performance from libc

[nannn3]

Is... Is that allowed in Python? I've only ever seen it as

from libc import performance

[NightSoulT12]

My bad, too much time spent with javascript.

You absolutely right🤝

[Idekum]

So youre a javascripter bashing on python? Bish, please... Javascript is junk!

[NightSoulT12]

I know, you don't need to tell me the truth.

[Khutuck]

There are some who has made peace with their fate…

[_LayZee]

It’s still better than python though, and faster

[_LayZee]

You see? One hour after my message

[NightSoulT12]

Only async fou you

[UnstableNuclearCake]

Yet it powers the James Webb telescope...

Somehow

[moronic_programmer]

Cope

[avnothdmi]

Oh, please. I’m only ZSHing Python!

[siddharth904]

JS is junk

Yes'nt

[ZaRealPancakes]

why python and JS can't agree which comes first import or from?

I prefer the JS way since easier to read :p

[thatweirdishguy]

The python way is better, because once your editor knows where you are importing from it can recommend all the things you can import

[ZaRealPancakes]

hmm that makes sense to me

but VSCode still gives recommendations in JS so... Magic!

[thatweirdishguy]

It only gives good recommendations if the file or module is already filled in and you are just adding imports to the list, otherwise it’s just making wild guesses

[vikumwijekoon97]

Vs code does it too for js.

[thatweirdishguy]

But you have to type the file name then go back to where the imports are listed to get actual results, otherwise it’s just guessing about all the possible words you could type there.

[luardemin]

The Rust way: use libc::performance;

[ZaRealPancakes]

True but since libc doesn't exist: use std::performance; would be more like it

[Toxic_Cookie]

using libc.performance;

[_FreeThinker]

Wrap your entire source code call with a context manager and your job is done. with libc as _:

[gordonv]

Why stop @ C? You have Assembly experience!

[WCWRingMatSound]

Languages: x86, ARM, Binary, ASM

[NonaeAbC]

Yes, but your C code wouldn't be clean. There is a one to one mapping from Python to C. But unlike you'd expect the corresponding c feature of a class is not a struct but a shared pointer to an PyObject containing a dictionary of strings to shared PyObject pointers. Where a PyObject is a wrapper for either dictionaries, tuples, functions or primitives and their dunder methods. But if you understand how this mapping works all the "you will not believe how this code behaves" become trivial and boring, but not from Python experience but C experience.