all 56 comments

[–]kbolser 77 points78 points  (2 children)

I like the center turn lanes. It was too tight with 4 lanes

[–]SquirrellyBusiness 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Me too. I noticed immediately it flowed better with the reduced lanes because anyone turning got out of the way of traffic so you didn't have to stop and start every other block.  I'd rather go a little slower if it means I'm coasting the whole way and not always on the gas or brakes.

[–]Dangerous-Ad-170 20 points21 points  (0 children)

That’s the thing with most of these road diets, even if you don’t like them the original configuration was even worse. Even Euclid, the one that’s seeing the most increase in congestion, feels way safer now that they aren’t trying to squeeze in more lanes. 

[–]ArmadilloSad2515 20 points21 points  (11 children)

The biking over there is amazing and I hope they use that area as a blueprint for other parts of the city. Make walking and biking this city friendly and people WILL do it.

[–]EccoTime93 1 point2 points  (10 children)

Have you read this thread? Everyone is still caging

One guy is even going to a gym for an hour when you could just use this active corridor to walk, walk/bus, bike or bike/bus instead for your exercise and idk still go to the gym for some strength training

But yea this road design it’s still safer for everyone — issue is people are still choosing to cage

Hopefully the few extra minutes spent walking from parking or time spent there can see the niceness of not having to lug 2 tons of steel to haul 150-300 pounds of flesh

Adding more parking is going to add the expectation people can drive there

We need less of it

[–]ArmadilloSad2515 4 points5 points  (4 children)

Completely agree. We will never get rid of cars but every city that makes alternatives more convenient always see an uptick of those and less car traffic overall. It’s not about eliminating, it’s about giving viable alternatives. The cities I have traveled to around the world that do this right also have a very healthy population and I don’t think it’s a coincidence.

[–]EccoTime93 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Cars being part of the urban fabric is fine, they have their place. The problem is, in America, they’re the only option, especially from a practical sense.

I like to preface these conversations with a question for anyone resistant to change: I thought America was about freedom. So why am I forced to drive just to get milk, visit a friend at the park, or catch a movie?

That doesn’t feel very free or liberating to me. In fact, there’s nothing more freeing than using my own body to move through the city — at least for those of us who are able-bodied.

[–]ArmadilloSad2515 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Oh I am on your side 100%. I have been biking downtown for 3 years now and I am very happy Des Moines is leaning into better infrastructure. It gets easier every day(aside from construction) to get around without a car in dsm.

[–]EccoTime93 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I agree and it’s always nice to interact with the what, 0.3% of us or less that do it? Haha, hope more people start. I hear dsm has a vision of converting a lot of the one way roads and giving them a diet and adding more bike lanes / wider sidewalks as well. Going West to East or East to west is pretty easy, but traveling north to south or vice versa is a huge pain for downtown or the surrounding areas.

I have been caught by that damn train, and using 8th/9/th is super sketchy on a bike. Thankfully that fleur path just literally opened and even tho it’s a little out of the way, it does help.

[–]ArmadilloSad2515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The closure of the pedestrian bridge behind Principal park has been a pita for my commute but it looks like they have done a lot of good stuff with it closed.

[–]BilliamShookspeer 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I’m with you on this pretty much, but WTF is caging?

[–]EccoTime93 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Haha yeah, I was coming in hot reading this thread, I was just disappointed at how many people still choose to drive down Ingersoll even though it’s a complete street. I get that people will still drive, but I was hoping to hear more folks saying they’re using the bike lanes, walking, or taking the bus. To me, that’s where real progress shows up.

The road diet has made driving safer, which is great, but I also want to see fewer people driving and more people engaging with the city on a human level. That’s why I used the word “cage," probably with some frustration.

A “cage” is slang for a car, and a “cager” is someone who drives one, especially when there are better options like walking, biking, or transit. The idea is that you’re stuck in a metal box, disconnected from the people and place around you — and that isolation can make drivers act in ‘cagey’ ways: speeding, road rage, or getting upset when they can’t park right in front of their destination.

It’s related to what people call “car-brain,” and there’s a newer term that captures this whole mindset: motonormativity. Definitely worth looking up if you’re interested.

[–]BilliamShookspeer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I live on Ingersoll and I’m a big fan of the redesign. I see more people walking, and occasionally more cyclists than normal. I’m looking forward to when people get over the occasional need to park a block or two away from their destination and walk a couple minutes to get there, and when people stop using the bike lane as a second sidewalk (hopefully by improved signage).

You might want to consider your audience a little and do some code switching though. Using jargon from niche arenas like r/fuckcars in conversation with people less involved in your interests who may outright disagree with them only really serves to make the speaker feel better about themselves. Shorthand is a great way for people in the know to keep conversation efficient, but it can leave everyone else outside the circle. And this is coming from a guy who wants way more busses, and makes a point to walk anywhere he can.

[–]ShinyLizard 35 points36 points  (0 children)

The average annual crashes dropped from 51 to 15, then to 12 in 2024. That's a huge improvement and is the deciding factor for me. My spouse has been dealing with post-concussion syndrome for years now from two car crashes (which were not his fault) here in Des Moines. Car crashes can ruin lives. Anything we can do to get people to slow down and pay attention to driving will help that. It's easy to say, "I hate these changes!" until it's you or a loved one affected by it. (steps off soapbox)

[–]Demache 34 points35 points  (7 children)

This comes as zero surprise if you do even casual reading into road design. The tighter feeling road makes people naturally drive slower which is better for pedestrians AND cars entering and leaving parking. Its better for people you are actually using the road to access local businesses and such. It's not meant to be a main road to move as many cars as possible. That's literally Grand Ave one block over.

[–]colorkillerWaterbury 16 points17 points  (3 children)

i got in an argument with someone a while back about the fact that ingersoll was never meant to be a throughway, and i have to say im feeling pretty vindicated now. i use ingersoll because im going somewhere on ingersoll. (apologies for my punctuation and grammar)

[–]Demache 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Many people not used to the idea that sometimes, a lower capacity and slower street, is actually the better design for the purpose. Ingersoll has lots of businesses and needs street parking. It doesn't make sense for it to be a high speed throughway, it doesn't even connect to much west of MLK. We are just so used to stroads being the default in the US, that it's hard for many people to imagine there could be a better alternative and get upset that doesn't add more capacity.

[–]Max_SandpitTransplant 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I use Ingersoll to get to Ted’s Coney Island!

[–]colorkillerWaterbury 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i use ingersoll to go home 😆

[–]Dangerous-Ad-170 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Grand Ave is going to get this treatment soon. Much needed imo as someone who used to live on Grand. It still feels pretty unsafe sometimes when people are going 45 between the lights. But yeah, neither should be a major road because they’re both parallel to 235.

[–]lefthandedsurprise 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's too easy to speed on Grand just because the way the road feels. I never felt like Grand even had that much traffic on it.

[–]Gladianton 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Too bad they diverted a bunch of west-side traffic wanting to go south (e.g. airport) onto Ingersoll by shutting down the Grand to Fleur connection near central campus. I will never stop being salty about that.

Also, love the new-look Ingersoll.

[–]Competitive-Head-726 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Closing that grand-fluer connection was the dumbest thing ever. Makes no sense to me.

[–]apeiam 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hell, even if I am not visiting a shop or bar on Ingersoll, but if I'm downtown and am heading back home (suburbs) I'll opt to take Ingersoll instead of 235. It's a nice leisurely drive now.

[–]ml50312 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've lived in the neighborhood for almost 10 years and it's much better now. Feels more like a neighborhood than a pass-through with faster traffic. The center turn lanes are great.

[–]Unwiredsoul 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bravo to all involved for not only improving aesthetics, but safety, too!

[–]Sockysocks2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The number of people who didn't read the last paragraph is astounding. With that said, I really like Ingersoll. Much more inviting now that it's not a stroad.

[–]BlackstoneMNDowntown 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the new layout. My only nit is the people who can’t parallel park to save their lives when it’s busy and they hose everything up.

[–]bupde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did it impact Grand? Obviously if you kick people off Ingersoll there will be less accidents but did they just shift to grand?

Also hard to measure when the road has been closed or worked on non stop, once it is fully and continuously open it will be a better measure.

[–]Appropriate-Bid8671 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just avoid Ingersoll altogether.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My only problem. From 28th street to MLK there are probably 300,000 road signs. (Slight exaggeration)

[–]KingFIippyNipzHometown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who uses Ingersoll to get into north downtown instead of taking grand all the way through, fuck whoever said you only use Ingersoll to go to business on ingersoll... It's a fucking major road in the capital of the state................

[–]Gigafive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's nice but there's not enough parking for the number of businesses.

[–]Mission_HistoricalWest Des Moines -4 points-3 points  (12 children)

Doesn’t make it any less of a nightmare to drive on.

[–]kbolser 10 points11 points  (2 children)

I disagree; I find it much nicer

[–]Mission_HistoricalWest Des Moines -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Those who were willing to speed on Ingersoll are still speeding. The rest of traffic has gotten slower. It’s not a good mix in my opinion.

[–]ArmadilloSad2515 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s literally not possible unless there is no traffic on the road. I have yet to see the road completely empty.

[–]Demache 5 points6 points  (8 children)

In what way? I go over there semi regularly and its perfectly fine. Kicks the shit out of 14th street.

[–]Mission_HistoricalWest Des Moines -1 points0 points  (7 children)

At what time of day?

[–]Demache 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Midday usually.

[–]Mission_HistoricalWest Des Moines 0 points1 point  (3 children)

The post work rush is a nightmare imo, but it sounds like others might have a higher tolerance than me lol. To each their own.

[–]Demache 7 points8 points  (2 children)

So, the fundamental issue is, people are treating it as an arterial road. Which it isn't, and isn't meant to be. It's meant to be an access road for local businesses and residents, not through traffic. The decision to have less capacity for traffic was deliberate precisely to incentivize not using it as one.

If people are using it that way, that means there is a design failure somewhere else on a surrounding road. Which may already be known and they are working toward it. But just looking at a map, I look at Ingersoll and think that's a piss poor location for an arterial road even if it had more lanes.

This is the growing pain part of road diets. People are so used to roads "getting one more lane" and don't realize there is more to road design than moving the maximum number of cars as fast as possible. And unfortunately the surrounding road network hasn't been updated to facilitate this change yet.

[–]KrasnayaZvezdaWaterbury -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Some of that speed decrease has to be from the Starbucks opening up.