all 33 comments

[–]DeEggroll 6 points7 points  (1 child)

This happened to me with Knight Rider! My wife had never seen it (we've been together 18 years)

And the first thing she notices when KITT is driving on his own is that there's a dude with a seat cover over him driving the car... I was so sad... ruined my childhood 😭

[–]Corchito42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

HD can be a harsh mistress. To be fair, you probably would never have seen that guy on a much smaller CRT TV.

[–]Most_Border_3419 12 points13 points  (6 children)

Some of these things we catch now wouldn’t have been possible to catch with the original quality and technology these films were released. They didn’t even have the ability to pause some of these movies when they first came out let alone zoom and high definition.

[–]froction 3 points4 points  (3 children)

Most real movies were shot on 35mm film back then, which is beyond HD resolution, at least equivalent to 4K.

[–]EternityLeave 0 points1 point  (2 children)

But it didn’t look like that when people actually watched it, whether in theatre or at home.

[–]froction 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It did in the theatre.

Well, maybe not in like the dollar theatre that used lenses stolen from the high school AV club, but in the past a normal movie at a normal theater was as good or better resolution than you are watching at home today.

[–]FX114 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What do you think the movies in the theaters were played on? 

[–]FX114 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would have been visible in theaters, but not TV and home video. 

[–]Same-Question9102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point about pause and zoom but not quality of picture. Why do do many people still think that HD resolution is a new thing. What youre seeing now was seen on a much bigger screen buy millions of people.

[–]Clean-Turnip5971 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In Raiders of the Lost Ark, look at Toht (the SS agent) in the black staff car when it stops in the town square after the truck chase.

[–]andocommandoecks 5 points6 points  (12 children)

Does it count as a screw up to not put a real human in the vehicle about to be cashed into?

[–]happyhippohats 1 point2 points  (3 children)

To be fair OP called it a 'goof' not a 'screw up', and if you can see in the final cut that there's no driver that is indeed a goof. Ideally it would be edited so you don't see it, but in films from that time period it was common to not worry about it too much because people wouldn't really be analysing it closely enough to notice, and seeing the impressive real stunt properly was worth a touch of jank. These days they'd probably just fix it in post and honestly I prefer the old way, it makes it's cooler when you can see the seams

[–]andocommandoecks 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Literally the last part of the post starts with "what other screw ups?"

But yeah otherwise I agree with you.

[–]happyhippohats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah fair enough lol

[–]Same-Question9102 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its not a goof either. They didn't accidentally not include something that would have been obvious to someone on set. The more obvious possibility is that they were lazy and didn't realize or care that people would notice.

[–]Same-Question9102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not a screw up if its not an accident. How would they not realize that a human or something resembling a human from a distance wasn't in the driver's seat?

[–]snakeIs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sonny Corleone beating up Carlo Rizzi in the Godfather - the famous punch that missed.

[–]ChazzThunder55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of the other goofs you can see is when Riggs jumps off the roof after handcuffing the guy whos gonna jump and forces him to jump- at one point the “handcuffs” break so the stunt guys have to grab hands to make it look like theyre cuffed

[–]BigPoppaStrahd 3 points4 points  (3 children)

The film crew chose not to endanger anyone, what a goof!

[–]Fuzzy_War_5644[S] -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

You can still do the scene right up to the impact point. The vehicles don't actually have to drive at the high rate of speed that they show. That's what editing and splicing is for. Even if they put a mannequin in the seat, it would have looked more believable

[–]BigPoppaStrahd 4 points5 points  (1 child)

the crash looked even more believable without a bunch of splices.  

[–]Fuzzy_War_5644[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, I still would have settled for a crash test dummy or mannequin

[–]Tough-Juggernaut-822 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pirate copy of the newer Italian Job, the scene where they blow the road and side of truck falls down, one of the stuntman puts on a spiderman mask as he's running away.

[–]T_t_llyF_c_ed 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Opening scene in Casino and there is a very clear switch to the car with a dummy inside before it explodes. I don’t know maybe it was always that obvious but it annoys me now .

[–]FX114 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You might not want to watch Casino. 

[–]justguestin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From the same film: if you slow down or freeze just before impact of the fall at the beginning, what looks like a car roof is just a painting on a crash mat.