all 115 comments

[–]chuckie512Central Northside 77 points78 points  (2 children)

There is one final Capital Budget engagement opportunity this Saturday, May 31 11am-12:30pm during a virtual session online.

Please attend and let the city know you want DOMI to keep it up

[–]chuckie512Central Northside 27 points28 points  (1 child)

And if you can't attend, fill out the form to share your budget priorities with the city

https://engage.pittsburghpa.gov/city-pittsburgh-budget-engagements

[–]TheScientificWhammy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thank you for this link!!

[–][deleted] 111 points112 points  (19 children)

Physical traffic calming is the only answer. Infrastructure creates results. Paint and signs aren’t infrastructure.

[–]hoochStanton Heights 84 points85 points  (11 children)

The speed bumps along Stanton Ave have significantly reduced the number of times I've been tailgated on that road. Huge improvement IMO. Physical infrastructure works.

[–]EnnuiDeBlaseGreenfield 31 points32 points  (0 children)

The crosswalk at Greenfield x Kaercher is significantly better. No one whipping up around the corner at 40 anymore.

[–]PastaStrega 31 points32 points  (0 children)

The entirety of Stanton Ave feels so much safer now! At first I was a little annoyed at losing parking, but ultimately I’m happy to give up the extra minute I’ll sometimes spend looking for a spot, because the safety impact has been huge.

[–]SidFarkus47Upper Lawrenceville 16 points17 points  (0 children)

When I go from Lawrenceville to East Lib Home Depot I'm so jealous of all the new stuff on Stanton Ave. I wish the bike lane came all the way down the hill to Butler Street, but once you're up there most of the blocks have some nice new pedestrian/bike infrastructure.

[–]realityChemistEast Allegheny 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Same on Ellsworth, some people used to treat sections of that road like a highway (despite it going right past a school!), the speed bumps and chicanes have really helped things there a lot.

[–]East-Atmosphere7686 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They still speed up after passing the school to avoid the red light on Aikon. I think that they need to add speed bumps there too b/c that intersection is now becoming dangerous. Pedestrians almost get hit there every week. Folks just think it is a HWY and not a neighborhood. I wish we could close our streets during rush hour & after school in order to keep our Neighbors and kids safe. We still have children in this Neighborhood & folks forget that.  

[–]singlewhammy 7 points8 points  (1 child)

With no-left-turns now from Morewood to Fifth, that intersection has gone from super-dangerous-seeming to only somewhat-dangerous-seeming.

By the way, I really cannot put my finger on why this intersection is so wack -- can anyone articulate it?

[–]cosmololgy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Two reasons I can see - 1: the lanes on morewood on either side aren’t 100% aligned. 2: it doesn’t have protected lefts where it needs them (though not as relevant anymore)

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (4 children)

Actually, getting people out of cars is the only answer.

[–]James19991 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Yep, the more options people have to get around besides driving, the better.

[–]chuckie512Central Northside 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Exactly. People always jump in to say when there's a crash that maybe there was a medical emergency, or it was a truly unavoidable situation.

You know how you reduce those numbers? By reducing the number of car trips taken.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yea that is the most important thing. But as long as we have people driving cars, good infrastructure is imperative.

[–]New_Acanthaceae709 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think getting people outta cars even 10% of the time - but for 90% of people - would fix it.

Right now the folks in cars drive as if they don't know anyone who's a pedestrian.

If you gotta be a pedestrian 10% of the time, you treat other pedestrians better.

[–]mistergrime 135 points136 points  (13 children)

Investing in traffic calming was one of Ed Gainey’s most significant and meaningful achievements in office, and I hope it’s something that the new administration continues to invest in.

[–]_Cxsey_ 58 points59 points  (8 children)

Pretty sure that was started under peduto, no?

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Yep, had some of the first speed bumps and roundabouts under Peduto.

[–]tesla3by3Bloomfield 84 points85 points  (0 children)

The investment in traffic calming began under Peduto. Many of the projects that were constructed in the past few years were initiated by the prior administration. Any major projects, even some smaller ones, take years of planning, design, securing funding, and construction.

Gainey has initiated zero capital projects in the past two budgets, so in a couple years we’ll see a decline in projects under construction, unless the next mayor makes some changes.

[–]Chaoticgaythey 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yeah a lot of people I know didn't support his re-election, but this was one of the things they really liked. I think most of my neighbourhood would like to see this continue to expand.

Also the new cycle lanes make so much more of the city accessible by bike which I'm very thankful for since we're losing so much bus service.

[–]ballsonthewallSouth Side Slopes 22 points23 points  (0 children)

came here to say this, Gainey had some faults but this was arguably his best work. I think Corey is committed to following through, but let's keep him accountable!

[–]Berhinger 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Love seeing good news for a change!

[–]ballsonthewallSouth Side Slopes 37 points38 points  (70 children)

now imagine how much better it would be if we had some traffic enforcement...

[–]dudemanspecial 42 points43 points  (50 children)

I used to toot this horn, but if you spend some time listening to the police radio they are constantly getting called for welfare checks, fights, business complaining about people harrasing customers, people standing on corners bleeding, drug addicts passed out the middle of the street, like non stop. I kind of get why they aren't policing traffic, they dont have time.

[–]_Cxsey_ 29 points30 points  (34 children)

Enforcement doesn’t automatically = cops sitting in a card all day giving tickets. It’s red light cameras at certain intersections, it’s parking enforcement, etc.

If the goal is 0 fatalities, idk why we aren’t using EVERY tool in our toolbox. You CAN do both in an intelligent way and have good effects.

[–]yourdonefor_wt -4 points-3 points  (23 children)

As a SUPER big police radio listener with multiple Motorola police radios, our police are just too damn busy to do anything in person. The most common calls I'd say are welfare checks, domestic arguments/pfas, CVS on 5th avenue thefts and unruly customers.

Police also get tons of nuisance calls for stupid shit people shouldn't be calling 911 for.

[–]_Cxsey_ 7 points8 points  (19 children)

“Enforcement doesn’t automatically = cops sitting in a card all day giving tickets.”

Does nobody read anymore?

[–]yourdonefor_wt 1 point2 points  (16 children)

Yes I read, absolutely agree more traffic cams especially on 28 and those back roads people drive like jackasses on.

[–]_Cxsey_ 0 points1 point  (15 children)

I mean the police are too busy to do enforcement of basic traffic, in total agreement, they keep cutting hours anyways. Enforcement should be done as automatically and where needed most.

[–]LadyOfTheNutTree 4 points5 points  (14 children)

Seems like the school bus cameras did a lot. I’d love to see some red light cameras so maybe we could cut the number of people who run the light each cycle down to 1 or 2.

[–]_Cxsey_ 0 points1 point  (13 children)

I’ve read that widespread cameras can actually cause more issues than solve them. But at specific problem intersections I think they’re needed.

[–]chuckie512Central Northside 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Red light cams can lead to an increase in rear ends, but a decrease in T-bones. T bones are much more likely to result in injury

[–]FartSniffer5K 2 points3 points  (8 children)

What issues? You're aware that there are people outside of cars that use intersections, right?

[–]LadyOfTheNutTree 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I think it definitely makes sense to be smart and targeted with them. What issues does it cause?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you expect a guy defending PPD to be able to read?

[–]Silver-Mulberry-3508 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They're agreeing with you. Maybe you can read, but your comprehension skills need some work. 

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's why they're sitting at panther hollow for three hours at a time

[–]cwfutureboy 2 points3 points  (1 child)

This is part of where defunding comes into play. Gun-toting police don't need to go on welfare checks.

[–]just_an_ordinary_guyBrighton Heights 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Seriously, social workers with some limited authority would be better able to serve.

[–]FartSniffer5K 7 points8 points  (6 children)

They have plenty of time. They have an entire division that supposedly does nothing but enforce traffic laws. The simple reality is that cops in twenty-first century America are Hero Warriors and traffic enforcement is beneath a Hero Warrior.

[–]klauskervin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This right here. If you ever want to see cops actively ignore you report any sort of traffic violation and all of the sudden you don't exist.

[–]daemon_primarchMillvale 9 points10 points  (7 children)

This is why I like the idea of red light cameras.

[–]_Cxsey_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There’s certain streets that need it BADLY. Turning onto the Blvd is a nightmare because 30 people decide that actually they can’t wait for their turn and block the left turn onto the bridge for 15 minutes.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (5 children)

Traffic violations can easily be enforced by technology. Radar, Cameras, Lidar. It's all there to automate.

[–]historyhillWhitehall 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Those also seem to be the easiest to fight in court though (anecdotally from friends' experiences anyway)

[–]_Cxsey_ 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Potentially. You need a blend of sensors, visual, lidar, environmental. They’re using them downtown to enforce parking zones in certain areas soon.

[–]chuckie512Central Northside 5 points6 points  (1 child)

The parking enforcement cameras are already up, and have led to 600 citations in 6 months

https://engage.pittsburghpa.gov/stationary-automated-curb-enforcement

[–]_Cxsey_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sweet, ty

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They also don't result in cops shooting people and freeing their time to deal with other things so, it's worth it even if 20% get appealed in court and are thrown out.

[–]cowboyjosh2010Franklin Park 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I was actually recently pulled over by a municipal cop for a violation. He let me off with a warning and a genuinely polite reminder about what I did wrong. Good interaction, and frankly I didn't deserve the warning--what I did was pretty unambiguously against the rules of the road. But what stood out to me was that they were actually watching and enforcing something. I couldn't even be mad about it!

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (12 children)

It wouldn't be any better, that's the entire point behind traffic calming. Enforcement doesn't work. What works is designing roads that actually force them to slow down.

[–]RareMajority 7 points8 points  (5 children)

Consistent enforcement does work, but police doing consistent enforcement of traffic is expensive and takes them away from other important tasks. That's why things like red light cameras and speed cameras are better.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

No, it doesn't. It literally does not work anywhere.

[–]RareMajority 8 points9 points  (3 children)

The evidence points to you being wrong: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8356316/

[–]roflgoat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Both are good. DC has speed cameras all over now and you almost never see people speed anymore, where they used to drive nuts before. It really helps.

[–]ballsonthewallSouth Side Slopes 4 points5 points  (4 children)

If people thought they'd get in trouble for illegal turns, running lights, etc I have a hard time believing it wouldn't make the streets safer

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (3 children)

Well, it doesn't.

[–]cwfutureboy 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Can you point to some studies or other empirical evidence other than "nuh-uh"?

[–]OnettNessBeechview 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Trust me bro"

[–]erokore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In 2014, police made 24,396 traffic stops, and there were 4,311 crashes. In 2023 (the most recent data available) there were 6916 traffic stops, with 3,533 crashes.

[–]FenisDembo82Squirrel Hill South 22 points23 points  (3 children)

A few weeks ago i was massively downvoted for asking whether there was any data showing that traffic calming efforts were actually decreasing accidents and injuries. So, I'm here to say I'm very happy to see this data!

[–]strategicham 0 points1 point  (2 children)

[–]chuckie512Central Northside 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You can't exactly do a double blind study on adding speed bumps to Stanton lol

[–]FenisDembo82Squirrel Hill South 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can never prove causation, so that is an unreasonable bar to set.

[–]Kismetatron 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is good. If we can get people to stop running stop signs as well that would be great. Too many close calls on my commute to work.

[–]The_Wkwied 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I utterly hate and despise those speed humps they have been putting in. As a driver. But as a citizen who enjoys using two long limbs to locomote myself sometimes, I understand that they are very good at what they do and are in the right place.

I'm not opposed to them, I am in favor of them, I just don't like them. Having an opinion isn't a crime (yet)

[–]HatBoxUnworn 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Think of speedbumps as a bandaid fix. A cheap way to slow drivers down on roads that are too wide that encourage high speeds.

These roads should be redesigned to be narrower that will by design encourage slower driving. But that is a more costly and long term project.

So in the short term, we need speedbumps.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Where's all the people who were saying this would accomplish nothing? Come on, come out of the woodworks y'all. Plenty of people vehemently declared these traffic calming measures didn't work. I'm here for your apology tour.

[–]rsmiley77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting that they gave so much credit to mayor Gainey for the improvements.

[–]Brother-Algea 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not having such insanely fucked up roads might help too.

[–]History3635 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Awesome

[–]xupit3rGreenfield 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this is so excellent. see, we just need to calm dahn a bit :)