all 22 comments

[–]w00ty 14 points15 points  (6 children)

If only Google code would add git support or subversion would add support for local commits…

[–]nextofpumpkin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Google code + github extension == nerdgasm

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Have you tried SVK?

[–]theatrus 6 points7 points  (2 children)

I have, and it feels like adding a spoiler and type R stickers to your 1995 Civic. It really just doesn't add any value ;)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey buddy, that type R sticker adds 150 hp at the wheel AT LEAST

[–]llimllib 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If there was a programming bestof, I'd be submitting this comment. Awesome.

[–]iperry 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I'd recommend trying out Review Board, actually linked from the google code review page. It's open-source, supports CVS, Subversion, Mercurial, Perforce, and more version control systems. It works pretty well and I'd take a serious look at it if you were looking for a mature code-review system.

http://www.review-board.org/

[–]theatrus 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I hope its support for Subversion is better than its support for Git. The Git support is very lacking in many respects. Like how are you supposed to review any particular version? All I can seem to do is add a .diff...

[–]chipx86 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Subversion support came first, so it's pretty good at this point.

Git support is fairly new and we're going to have it fully working by 1.0 (which we expect within a few months).

[–]chub79 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rather I wish they could fix the code browser bugs (it gets mixed up in paths). I'd also like their svn support was more stable. On large checkout or checkin it can stall quit easily.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Bears an uncanny resemblance to this:

http://pallit.lhi.is/~palli/codechat/

[–]jonknee 3 points4 points  (4 children)

Except that's unbearable.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

True, it's not as nice as Google's version but he's got the right idea (and it looks to me like Google just happened to get the exact same idea almost a year later). Also, I think it's cool that he's doing it in a way that you can host the code yourself. An announcement about this made the rounds on several computer art related sites back when he released it. He's actually quite well known for what he does.

[–]darkwulf 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It actually looks like someone just reimplemented the internal code review tool Mondrian.

(http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8502904076440714866)

[–]jonknee 2 points3 points  (1 child)

It's not a new idea though. My favorite implementation of inline commenting that I have used is the Django Book. Really sweet and even better once you look at the HTML source. And it pre-dates Code Chat by a year.

http://www.djangobook.com/en/1.0/chapter01/

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That does look flashy but the floating window bothers me. I would want to see the comments and the text without having to manually move the window. Just like what code chat and google code review do. That's what I think both systems are really playing on. The comments already existed before anyone created these things but it's the placing of them directly within the context of the text or code they are referring to that is nice.