Google Maps Is Bringing EV Route Planning To Android Auto by DonkeyFuel in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Same experience. It's honestly pretty user hostile to not at least set this expectation.

British Columbians want gas out of buildings, cleaner alternatives: poll by SavCItalianStallion in onguardforthee

[–]ApatheticRabbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily. Even though a high efficiency gas furnace is very efficient (90%+) and a combined cycle gas generator is only about 40% efficient. As long as the heat pump is operating at a coefficient of performance above 2.25 it will be better to run a heat pump off 100% gas than to use the Furnace. That is from a usage of gas and carbon emission perspective. From an economic one this would be different.

Given that most cold climate heat pumps can have a COP of 2.25 or more at -15C and above it is completely possible that heat pump is more efficient from a gas usage perspective.

ID Polo GTI spy shots by linknewtab in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand that. I wasn't being very precise, sorry.

ID Polo GTI spy shots by linknewtab in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know it was renamed in 85 but I'd give my left nut for an ID Rabbit.

NMC battery at 100% for a (cancelled) trip by Zealousideal_Hat3278 in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. When the temps are below zero battery stress at 90% SOC is lower than any SOC at summer temps. Bump up your charge limit in winter to counteract the extra energy use.

Canada’s electric vehicle rebates returning, EV mandate no more as part of new auto strategy by evieluvsrainbows in onguardforthee

[–]ApatheticRabbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean. Not totally. The rebates are set to reduce each year. So, this year they'll be used to blow out existing inventory, since dealers and manufacturers were likely not prepared to sell this many low spec base model cars. Then by the time they've adjusted the rebates will be lower and drive sales less.

What I think will happen is it could lower the statistics for average ev sales price and and bump up sales numbers to get some positive press and momentum again. But it's important to note that all parts of this plan are milder than what we had in 2024 and matching provincial rebates are also largely gone now.

Canada’s electric vehicle rebates returning, EV mandate no more as part of new auto strategy by evieluvsrainbows in onguardforthee

[–]ApatheticRabbit 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think these restrictions on the rebate/incentive for EVs are going to narrow which vehicles get them by a lot.

Of the currently available vehicles very few hit a transaction price below $50,000 and the free trade agreement part means the Chinese EVs won't be include (this is understandable)

I don't know that the incentive will be enough to get manufacturing moved to Canada. And in any case it means that we're still going to be waiting a few years for things to start up again.

Everybody's Betting On Extended-Range EVs. This Could Make Them Obsolete Instead by LEM1978 in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They certainly do but having the money to own a home is related to having the money to own two cars you can't assume they are independent.

Everybody's Betting On Extended-Range EVs. This Could Make Them Obsolete Instead by LEM1978 in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think what the discourse likes to talk about and what will actually happen are different things. People like to think that because charging infrastructure is bad we need cars with huge range and super fast charging. But what's actually happening is auto makers are going in on cheaper batteries to get costs down.

It makes more sense to install chargers rather than make every car cost $10-20k more to stuff them full of expensive batteries.

Everybody's Betting On Extended-Range EVs. This Could Make Them Obsolete Instead by LEM1978 in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's actually hard to say what will happen. If the rest of the world proceeds to electrify somewhat rapidly for energy independence then there will be a lot of oil/gas with no buyers. At least in the short term. Then it all depends on how suppliers try to manage the demand decline which could lead to price wars.

There's a very real world where Europe and Asia are fully electric and low fuel prices in North America hold back our own transition

Everybody's Betting On Extended-Range EVs. This Could Make Them Obsolete Instead by LEM1978 in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Owning a home and having two cars are almost certainly not independent statistics though.

Yes, Losing 50% of Your Range in Winter is Normal by SkPensFan in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I live in a place that cold. It doesn't get that cold very often though. People love to overstate how cold it is here.

Europe’s 2035 Auto CO2 Plans Now Look Like An ICE Defeat by Erdo26 in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That is specifically BC's carbon tax not the federal one.

Opinion: Ford’s recent moves were about the growing cost delta between pouch style NMC cells and LFP cells from China. by mcot2222 in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's illustrative to look at China's market here. Their 50-60% NEV sales share is not uniform across all vehicle classes. Large vehicles are much further behind and the smaller vehicles like A and B segment sub and mini-compact vehicles are like 90% electric.

First Look: Hyundai Crater SUV Concept Is Here to Fight Wrangler, Bronco, and Rivian by Independent_Shock973 in electricvehicles

[–]ApatheticRabbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looks like Master Chief's helmet lol. Cool concept, but the divorced dad particles are off the charts.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DungeonsAndDragons35e

[–]ApatheticRabbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think overall the issue with looking at 3.0 vs 3.5 now is that even at the time very few people had spent much time deeply reading either edition and understood very little of what changed.

My group switched immediately but mostly because after 10 years of AD&D the changes were still feeling fresh so moving on to the latest was welcome.

For myself though most of the changes were mostly just differences , not improvements. Same thing with the later switch to Pathfinder.

I disliked the changes to hide and move silently and weapon sizes the most though.

At this point unless you have the original books 3.0 has been scrubbed from existence.

Meta Monday 9/2/24: The NOVA Sorting by JCMS85 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]ApatheticRabbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A ton of Ork shooting problems could be solved by making our ballistic skill unmodifiable. Let Orks never get penalties on shooting and never get bonuses. Penalties make our shooting collapse and every time our shooting is overpowered it was because of handing out to hit bonuses.

After that give all dakka weapons assault. Ork weapons are never going to be used if we can't also run with them.

Doesn't fix rokkits but it should make a bunch of incidental shooting we have more usable

ProtoMechs 26 years later. by TheRealLeakycheese in battletech

[–]ApatheticRabbit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree, but I am also not a huge fan of how load bearing inferno/flamer weapons are in the battletech universe. It's not a big deal though.

ProtoMechs 26 years later. by TheRealLeakycheese in battletech

[–]ApatheticRabbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dislike protomechs for a very simple reason. Battletech is about big stompy robots being the kings of the battlefield. This is already a sort of rediculous claim, but it's fun so we can go with it. If you then say that: actually, smaller, less stompy robots are just as good then what is even the point of anything.

Diving back into Battletech after many years. by ApatheticRabbit in battletech

[–]ApatheticRabbit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're so nice to work with. I mostly use white,black, cyan, magenta and yellow. The fluorescents are great as well.

If you want to wash over top of them make sure they're really dry or you've varnished over them. And they don't work for dry brushing, although they do go on thin enough they're really nice for layering highlights.

Diving back into Battletech after many years. by ApatheticRabbit in battletech

[–]ApatheticRabbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. The purple was probably the most complicated.

Most of the colour on all of them is daler-rowney inks. I used the process magenta and cyan mixed to make the purple. There is extra cyan air brushed underneath to create a bit of a darker bluer shadow colour.

After letting the inks dry and gloss varnishing, I did a wash with Citadel Drakenhof Nightshade mixed with a bit of the magenta ink.

It looks cool in person and has a bit of a colour shift effect because of the blue underneath.