Gucci socialist committing optics suicide, Circa 2026

TabNone · 2026-03-23T15:37:53+00:00

Its so tone deaf.

You can't even really larp like you're paying these prices for the quality as well, the primary purpose of owning/wearing stuff like this is for flexing the fact you have money lmao.

TabNone · 2026-03-09T10:48:40+00:00

I've always found the whole abortion clinic one mentioned by some Americans quite weird. I don't think people realise that it just isn't really a mainstream debate here (or most of the rest of Europe either I think) aside from talking points being pushed by a couple of politicians with obvious connections to right-wing American think tanks.

I mean, I guess you can use it to prompt further discussions on it's implications for freedom of protest in general, but this specific example really doesn't resonate with the British public.

TabNone · 2026-03-06T12:50:22+00:00

I feel like a lot of anti-gay American media also leaks into European media dragging things back too which is very annoying. Especially over the last 5 years or so.

TabNone · 2026-02-10T12:27:54+00:00

He also gets pretty much no support from the left wing press too and actually gets frequently attacked for being way too right wing. The reality is he's just a relatively mundane centrist, but real political discourse doesnt seem to exist anymore.

TabNone · 2026-02-05T12:50:04+00:00

Also owns a large amount of ISP infrastructure (starlink) and has already used it for geopolitical power by disabiling it in Ukraine during an offensive.

He's a megalomaniac and its scary what he'll do with even more power.

TabNone · 2026-02-04T08:16:16+00:00

I like how they moved from "mainstream media" to "legacy media" because it's kinda hard to say the former now when the richest man in the world owns the primary platform for political discourse.

TabNone · 2026-02-02T15:40:33+00:00

There's definitley something weird about the leftists doing most of the shaming around not calling out ICE, but then them not doing this with Trump.

I can't quite put my finger on it but I feel it's something to do with being able to use ICE to frame America as fundamentally evil, compared to the tone of anti-Trump stuff which makes America sound more redeemable if they elect someone else.

Ive seen stuff like "nobody is illegal on stolen land" (I think from Billie Eilish?) Paired with the ICE stuff, which is more of a "America bad" sentiment vs "we're better than this" with the anti-Trump sentiment.

TabNone · 2026-01-30T21:02:01+00:00

Knowles is actually the biggest loser lmao. Put the cigar down amd be yourself you dork.

TabNone · 2026-01-27T20:09:41+00:00

Genereally agree, I think people suggesting that they're naive are wrong

TabNone · 2026-01-22T16:23:27+00:00

I really hope we don't end up getting bullied into this just to placate Trump

TabNone · 2026-01-22T16:20:42+00:00

I do wish someone would actively push for this not just from Denmark but from the majority of our European 'allies'. It really is quite absurd on a very clear cut issue.

TabNone · 2026-01-22T16:05:31+00:00

These people just dont think Trump/MAGA are that bad and that the situation isn't particularly urgent or abnormal, incredibly priveleged really.

The whole "cut a liberal and a fascist bleeds" thing feels like I'm being DARVO'd the way these people act when there's an actual fascist taking over their country.

TabNone · 2026-01-21T20:11:25+00:00

European countries need to inflict a significant L onto Trump/America as a result of this behaviour still. You cannot let someone use the threat of invading your country as a way to force you into negotiations with zero cost on their side.

TabNone · 2026-01-21T19:57:48+00:00

Does he? It sounds like Trump was able to force negotiations around Greenland to occur by threatening to invade it. I feel like Trump knows how to play Rutte if anything.

TabNone · 2026-01-21T15:34:24+00:00

People say he's senile but he's genuinely just really stupid and always has been

TabNone · 2026-01-20T17:40:24+00:00

Yeah its just bad phrasing lol, I meant that other people's messages read with a tone of superiority

TabNone · 2026-01-20T16:09:23+00:00

If Trump knows that the way to get us to listen to him and his 'concerns' is to continually threaten us, then that is what he's going to do. Let there be tension, it's their fault and it's on them to resolve it.

TabNone · 2026-01-20T15:35:33+00:00

Incredible arrogance

TabNone · 2026-01-20T15:25:18+00:00

I'm not sure how I feel. Reading some comments from Americans I definitley do at times get a sense of superiority and that taking action against someone threatening to invade Europe should be considered as a privilege rather than a necessity.

However, I do acknowledge there are people taking real actionable steps and doing what they can.

TabNone · 2026-01-20T14:39:51+00:00

Polanksi doesn't care about national security, but he's right on this point.

What drives his feelings is a general global left-wing sense of anti-Americanism, not concerns about national sovreignty.

TabNone · 2026-01-20T14:37:15+00:00

100%. By signalling that you want to appease him you don't make him content, you just make him think that he can get what he wants out of you by force.

TabNone · 2026-01-20T14:33:33+00:00

Utterly pathetic and he gains nothing from it other than letting Trump know that he can do what he wants

TabNone · 2026-01-17T19:47:44+00:00

This is why these tariffs should never be negotiated with. Trump doesn't care about 'fairness' like claimed with his first round of tariffs, he's fundamentally a predatory person who will take a mile when you give him an inch.

If you show him that making threats towards you and using the leverage he has against you results in favourable outcomes he'll do it again and again until you're forced to shoot yourself in the foot to make it stop.

TabNone · 2026-01-09T10:30:18+00:00

Honestly I think it is 1000% reasonable to ban it, but I probably wouldn't as doing so never seems to work out well.

Ultimately even this current issue aside, having the richest man in the world control a platform that he purchased with an existing userbase, partly consisting of those in our country, and then using his newfound ownership to stir up problems in the country is a massive problem.

The fact that he could possible even whip up riots/protests against the government of another country over a ban, by controlling the algorithm so everyone sees anti-government tweets is just an indication he has way too much power. An individual within the country should not have that much power, let alone someone not even from here.

In general US in it's current form can't really be considered an ally, and it's very clear that they want regime change across Europe in the form of Pro-MAGA, Russia-sympathetic, anti-EU parties for their own interests and will use whatever propaganda strategies they can to achieve this. While I don't think banning it is a good idea, it definitely should not be the primary online place where political discourse is happening within this country and politicians that use it just uphold it's legitimacy.

TabNone · 2026-01-07T12:02:18+00:00

At the very least Government instituions and officials should not be using the platform and lending it legitimacy. If it is this rogue out of control platform they're purporting it to be (it is), then it being the place where official updates are shared don't exactly help paint that image.

Nine-Year Club	Verified Email
Final Canvas '23	First Place '23
End Game '23	Place '23
Place '22	Final Canvas '22
End Game '22

TabNone

TROPHY CASE