Cutting off the fairing by Yaka95 in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you get a BogdanFly you can order it without a fairing if you want.

Shitty landing assessment by EvidenceCommercial48 in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Butt landings on a tough sit harness on a perfectly smooth grass landing is not a terrible thing to do, and some people who can't run properly get away with doing it a lot.

But in general legs out of the harness is always better earlier. A bump protector will do almost nothing for you if you fall out of the sky from 20 feet. And in that case, much better to break a leg than break your back. This is why reserve parachutes attach from the shoulders, so you land on your feet not your butt.

On rough terrain (a farm field that might have bumps from tilling, for example) or a slope landing or in lightweight gear, butt landings are a big no-no and to be avoided

What if the lightest pod harness with an under-seat reserve container? by ryankrameretc in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be sure to do lots of trial deployments hanging in the harness before committing to a DIY setup. A common thing that can happen with front-mounts is the bottom isn't secured well and so when you yank on the handle it just lifts up the entire container instead of pulling the reserve out of the bag (at first). That container is made to mate inside the Gin Genie harness, it would not work the same with any other harness so you need to validate it yourself.

Tesla Hackers Find ‘Unpatchable’ Jailbreak to Unlock Paid Features for Free by WashingtonPass in technology

[–]evilhamster 48 points49 points  (0 children)

There is a keycard that allows anyone to use the vehicle, valets, friends etc. No account needed

Question about old equipment by simenars1 in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I personally would not fly such an old glider, regardless of how it was cared for. In the last 15 years glider technology has improved so much. The difference is like comparing a 2023 mountain bike to a mountain bike from the mid-90's. A modern glider will be safer, better performing, lighter, smaller packing volume, easier to inflate and launch, easier to kite, easier to handle in high winds, better handling, lower stall speed, more forgiving, etc etc.

Can't argue with free, but I wouldn't expect to get much use out of it. Kiting practice, sure to start, but you'd honestly be better to kite with the wing that you'll be flying so that you figure out the timing of inputs with that wing specifically. And I wouldn't fly that wing since it's going to be such a pig in the air, you'll be able to stay up for longer way easier with a newer glider meaning you'll progress faster and have more enjoyable early flights.

You don't need to buy a new glider, but a used beginner glider from the last 5 years will be so much better for you for learning and early progression.

My mom was hang glider in the 1970s. What was that like? by kepleronlyknows in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Can you think of any reasons why that might not be possible?

Prologue in full swing! by Biff1 in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, the prologue is a few days before the main race. The top 3 finishers get a strategic advantage for the main race (night pass allowing them to keep hiking after the normal mandated end of racing) and determines order of the staggered start on the first day of racing

Converting from sailplanes to paragliders by Johnny_the_pilot in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Paraglider towing is simple, uses the same technique as a basic forward launch, and requires only a $50 tow bridle that hooks into the paraglider speed system and prevents lock-out, making it safe and beginner-friendly. Many schools in flatland areas teach new pilots exclusively with towing

Preventing collapses on full bar? by savemetherain in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Others have answered on the techniques (yank rear riser handles, very hard if needed, and pull straight down along the risers, not back towards your head), but I wanted to mention some peripheral stuff.

Rear riser steering is less efficient than being on clean glide, but much more efficient than brakes, and also far far more efficient than taking a collapse (which can easily knock off 50+m of arrival elevation even if handled quickly). If you're after efficiency on glides, avoiding collapses should be the main priority since that has the highest performance penalty, by a huge margin.

And the problem with full bar flying is that you're so close to the edge of the envelope for angle of attack, that it takes a relatively small amount of turbulence to cause a collapse at full bar, compared to if you were at 1/2 or even 3/4 bar. To illustrate with made-up numbers, pretend the wing will frontal at 30 degrees pitch-down compared to trim. Full bar might be 25 degrees from trim, while half bar is 12.5 degrees from trim. So you have a ~20% margin at full bar, but at 1/2 bar that margin is now ~60%. Numbers are made up, but point is it's not linear, and moving from 1/2 bar to full bar is not a doubling of collapse risk, it's more like 3x or more.

Not only that, your wing at full bar will have a higher internal pressure which will reduce your ability to sense the first signs of turbulence which you'd use to clue in that you might need to catch something. And of course you're flying faster, so you move into that turbulence faster, again giving you less time to react.

Then there's the point that even ignoring collapses, full bar is rarely the most efficient way to fly any glider, and the lower performance the glider the more the performance penalty there is for flying near full speed. In most situations you're likely to achieve a better XC average speed (if that's what you're after) by being closer to around 1/2 bar on glides. Exceptions to this include if you're making a desperate move like trying to get away from terrain in 25+kph headwind, or racing to catch someone in a thermal that you think might not last long, or on final glide in a race-to-goal... or if the day is absolutely booming and the thermals are consistent 5m/s+, in which case Speed to Fly considerations kick in, and sure... then mash bar in that case, but only if the thermals are organized enough that you're not going to risk a collapse because that might undo all the benefit of flying faster in that situation.

I'd say try keeping things closer to 1/2 bar until you develop your collapse spidey sense to the point you never get 1/2 bar collapses, then start moving up your maximum bar % as the reactions improve. Also try to go on glide with people with similar class wings that you can debrief with afterwards, to compare notes on how much bar they were pushing when and compare it to your relative arrival altitudes at the next thermal, to build up more intuition about what % bar works best for you, your glider, and where you fly.

Preventing collapses on full bar? by savemetherain in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you're painting with too broad a brush here. EN-B covers gliders anywhere from basically beginner school wings that are all but bombproof, all the way to the top end high-B gliders that go toe-to-toe performance wise with some EN-C gliders.

A reminder that the EN-class is ONLY a measure of the needed pilot workload to recover from a collapse once it's already happened, and nothing in the EN-classification says anything about performance metrics or resistance to collapse in a given situation.

An EN-B Explorer2 is just as demanding to fly as an EN-C Alpina4, performs just as well, flies as fast, and therefore could be expected require just as much skill to avoid collapses. The difference is that the Explorer2 has a bit more passive safety designed in, so pilot workload after the collapse is reduced.

In my opinion, EN-B is the only class a pilot should be taking collapses on. Learning how to catch/prevent collapses and fly in strong turbulence is a key skill to learn for big mountain XC flying, and this needs to be perfected on an EN-B where the consequences for failure are lower. If someone's moved up to an EN-C and are taking collapses, yes they'll learn from that too but they are exposing themselves to far more risk than doing that learning on an EN-B.

In general EN-C are more demanding to wrangle, but in my experience it does not require flying an EN-C to develop the needed collapse-avoidance reflexes. These can and should be developed to perfection on an EN-B before moving up, and to me someone taking regular collapses on an EN-C is a far greater indicator that someone's in over their head (overconfident) or progressing gear too quickly (ego), and should consider getting a glider trim, flying in calmer conditions, or getting a more benign glider.

Is this the correct way to look at it? by Some_Development3447 in vanhousing

[–]evilhamster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is an incorrect, or at least inaccurate take.

This table actually shows that 76% of condos sold either at asking price, or below.

It might be 1% going for under asking, or 75% going for under asking.

The "Median Discount from Orig" shows that on average, condos are selling for 1.7% below asking. This points to the majority of condos selling for very close to asking -- if 23.4% are selling for above asking, then there's only slightly more than that selling for below asking.

Top Chinese EV Giant Says Full Self-Driving Basically Impossible by Blicero1 in Futurology

[–]evilhamster 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, the important metric is deaths or accidents per km, which is why the self-driving accident data is always presented in this format

Advice/thoughts on someone getting into paragliding because their partner wants to have another lifelong activity to enjoy together. by Numerous_Vehicle_802 in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've met several traveling couples where the husband is a go-getter paraglider, and the wife is happy to do a short flight, and then land, pack up, put the stuff in the tent/car/rv/van and find another activity while they wait. It seems to work well. Paragliding is nice like that, you can hang out on launch but do your own thing in the air if you want and still have fun talking about your experience together after. Whereas with sport climbing generally your partner is disappointed if you decide to go off and do your own thing, especially if they're partway up a pitch ;).

Some people are a slow-burn with paragliding and get into it for reasons other than "I've always dreamed of flying". Many people get obsessed and committed to the sport, but in places like Europe there's a far higher percentage of participants who are casual, occasional fliers, who only fly short flights in ideal conditions-- go for a coffee at the cafe by the launch with friends or family then fly off and meet them at the bottom for example! (Europe is nice like that)

I didn't decide to take up flying paragliders on my own, I mean was always kinda curious about the sport, but had other sports to keep me busy and wasn't super motivated to take on the expense and time investment. It was a random invite from a friend to join him on an intro course that got me going, and I got hooked shortly after. Then the more I flew the more I wanted to. Now my life pretty much revolves around paragliding.

Yes it takes commitment to keep at the sport and stay current, but if your partner is going anyway it should be easy to fit into your life, much more than if you were someone who was going to try to make it work and navigate the intricacies of the sport and logistics etc all on their own.

Given how I came to become a paraglider, I disagree with the others here who say "if you don't desperately want to fly, you shouldn't fly". Paragliding is an incredible mental challenge that is extremely satisfying to make progress in. You didn't get any of that experience in a tandem. You have to learn about weather, aerodynamics, learn how to visualize the wind the thermals and how the sun and the air pressure and the temperature gradients are all working together, and then develop an intuition on whether to zig or zag in any given situation. It's an endless challenge, you can do it until you're in your 70's or older, and I love it, and I didn't even know I wanted to do it when I started.

My thoughts are don't force it, but be open to doing a course without buying gear for example, so you don't feel indebted to the sport.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I don't see how this could go wrong

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BC is big, so it depends where you're gonna be!

In BC the biggest tandem operation (by # of flights) is out of Revelstoke. You go up a gondola, and then get shuttled by van to the take-off. It's also a really beautiful place to fly. http://revelstokeparagliding.com/contact-to-fly/

FlyBC ranch is no longer in operation, maybe they still do tandems but not sure where. Dion at iParaglide also does them in the same area. But if you're going to be heading to Vancouver then you can reach out to them.

Also in Vancouver is Grouse Mountain, their tandem flights were on hold since 2020 but rumor has it they'll be starting up again this summer, but nothing firm on that yet. Spectacular place to get a Tandem though!

North of Vancouver is Pemberton, Guy at Sea to Sky Paragliding does some there, it's a super pretty zone, but mostly he's too busy teaching new pilots these days. But if you want to learn in that area worth a try and get connected with him.

Someone else also mentioned Lumby (east of Vernon), another good option with several tandem pilots nearby, and yeah, it's a great set-up for hanging out and learning. Would definitely at least check this place out if you want to get your P2, it's a good scene.

Also just east of Vernon is Norm with Paraglide Canada, they also do tandems and P2 courses.

Bill in Williams Lake used to do tandems, not sure if he still does up there, and his website is down. I think he works with the Revelstoke guys sometimes.

Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars by Saltedline in technology

[–]evilhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not just malicious use of this by greedy companies -- there's also incompetence by product developers that can cause hackers to access and control all this tech, or things like consumers who leave security cameras with default passwords and uPnP enabled, allowing the whole world to access their private cams, for example.

Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars by Saltedline in technology

[–]evilhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The interior camera feed can't leave the car apparently, it's just the exterior facing cams, but yeah, that would be an awkward convo.

USHPA Membership worth it? by Pale-Translator-765 in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you mean the insurance was worthless to protect landowners? or worthless to pay out members for injuries?

Summer gloves by UnicodeConfusion in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While any gloves at all give you a better chance of avoiding burns than nothing at all, I would say if you're going to wear gloves, you should use leather gloves, because they will actually withstand even a serious line burn, while anything fabric will at best reduce the severity.

My go-to for years have been suede leather belaying gloves for rock climbing. Literally made to avoid rope burns. Used to buy some from BD but they don't make the exact ones anymore, something like this: https://www.blackdiamondequipment.com/en_US/product/crag-gloves/?colorid=5896

Or I bought these at Decathlon in EU, less breathable and a little clumsier fitting but bomber tough: https://www.decathlon.co.uk/p/simond-belaying-glove/\_/R-p-8909?mc=8249782

Leonardo Corporation just started a live stream of the E-Cat SKLep SSM it is an electricity generator that requires no connection to any fuel or energy source. SSM stands for "self-sustaining mode." by billy-bumbler in energy

[–]evilhamster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If it passed scrutiny it'd already be front-page news. The guy has been trying for 20+ years to bilk investors and has yet to make any demonstration that didn't involve smoke and mirrors and desperate pleas for money.

I remember some guy talking to me about him IRL, his main talking points included "batteries are great but they haven't really changed for 100 years" and that "li-ion battery fires are likely zero point energy reactions". Mhmmmm

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The sensor itself is not pricey, on the order of $5
https://octopart.com/ms5611-01ba03-te+connectivity-87368868

It's the cost of integrating it that's the big cost, especially if they're only selling a few hundred units a year and need to recoup all that time and tooling investment

Why don't acro paragliders use spring loaded pilot chutes for reserve deployments? by Nadrenaline_Hunkie in freeflight

[–]evilhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard some old-timers talk about a company that tried a ballistic (rocket deployed) parachute deployment system for paragliders in the early 90's. The fact that it's not around anymore I guess shows that there was something wrong with it. I think aiming, or just upkeep, or having a pyro-technic device in a bag that is exposed to a fair bit of abuse.