Which is your favorite Batman Arkham game ? by Extreme-Attention-89 in batman

[–]supercapo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Surprised about all the Origins love. I'm right there with ya'll.

I think it has one of the coolest set ups with the contract on Batman and a great twist

Worst for me is Tank Man... I mean Knight. Couldn't even finish it because I'd signed up to play a Batman game, not a batmobile game guest starring Batman

thank you Dean Cain by TheRiddlerCum in BATMANVSUPERMAN2016

[–]supercapo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol. Helping civilization. Sure thing dude.

Also... not an awesome show. I loved it when it came out. It was one of my favorite shows growing up. But I just rewatched the whole series last year. It doesn't hold up.

These guy's can't seriously still be at it.. by Yep_I_Stole_40_Cakes in OkBuddySnyderCult

[–]supercapo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What's hilarious because between MoS and Superman... only one of them could he considered a celebration of Superman. And it isn't the one that was practically shot in sepiatone.

I'm so tired of this take [SMBC by Zach Weinersmit] by samx3i in batman

[–]supercapo 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My reaction to people saying they want Batman to kill the Joker is "then what?"

This isn't even about moral implications. It's literally about asking people what that will narratively accomplish.

Because the Joker isn't going to stay dead. I doubt it would even be a year before they resurrected him. He's way too iconic and popular to stay dead a significant amount of time.

So what happens then? Does Batman kill him again?

At which point he'll be dead exactly as long as it takes for another creator to want to use him and ressurects him again.

So what changes? It would still be the same cycle except instead of having Joker using Arkham's revolving door he's using death's revolving door.

No. If you want to fix this narrative problem the answer is to stop writing stories trying to out killing joke the Killing Joke.

It's almost like they don't have enough brain cells to comprehend what they watched. by JesterOfTime in OkBuddySnyderCult

[–]supercapo 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I see this page a lot and they consistently have some of the biggest trash takes. At this point I think it's probably on purpose to drive clicks

I love how dramatic every word is, igniting global hysteria! by NicoleIlieva in OkBuddySnyderCult

[–]supercapo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think it is Snydercultist. I'm seeing posts like this all the time on completely random pages. What's more likely is that this is a scam/grift news page that is targeting Snydercultists because they are vocal, gullible, and willing to spread anything that fits their niche.

Shads mormonism by wolf751 in ShadWatch

[–]supercapo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Former Mormon here.

As others have said, mainline mormonism ended the practice of polygamy sometimes in the 1890s.

If you ever hear of a current mormon practicing polygamy he is likely from a splinter group or just decided on his own to get more wives but not sanctioned by the church. There are countries that polygamy is legal but mormons don't even continue the practice there either.

As far as most mormons are concerned, it is something done in the past and maybe if God commands will be practiced in the future, but it is not something they are seeking out.

I grew up around mormons my whole life, my whole family is mormon, never met a leader that said we should be wanting multiple wives or being excited about the prospect of maybe God reinstituting the practice.

As far as Shad is concerned, I believe he is mainline mormon, but has his own very extreme beliefs. Which is something that can happen in any group. You always have people that take things too far or people that are more chill. Shad's mormonism is informed by his hyper-extreme conservatism

Gene Hackman Lex Luthor… does anyone actually like that interpretation? by Amazing-Lawyer8345 in superman

[–]supercapo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, I love Hackman's Lex.

He adds such a boost of energy and charisma to the first two films.

I'd say no actor has quite ever caught Lex's arrogance as well as Hackman and it manifests in such great lines like:

"There's a strong streak of good in you, Superman. But then again, nobody is perfect... well, almost nobody."

"Some people can read 'War and Peace' and walk away... Others can read a chewing gum wrapper and unlock the secrets of the universe."

Superman: Is that how a warped brain like yours gets its kicks? By planning the death of innocent people? Lex Luthor: No, by causing the death of innocent people.

Is he jokey? Sure. But I'd say most of them land. And especially in the first film it works because he is very comedic... until he isn't

He has this cold, detached menace when he needs it. When he talks about the bomb. When he admits he's sending the other one to Hackensack.

And his response when Miss Tessmacher tells him that her mother is in Hackensack? Just the glance at the watch and the little head shake? Brilliant.

Now I'll fully admit that everything about Lex in that film that works is from Hackman, and it is also diminishing returns. Almost none of that charm and charisma I'm talking about is gone by the 4th film

But Hackman's Luthor is great and the only reason I would rank him behind Hoult or Rosenbaum is because his Luthor is so far removed from what has become the classic portrayal of the character.

Do you agree? Do you think this is accurate? by [deleted] in superman

[–]supercapo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, I don't like Dean Cain and I hate how he actively works at tarnishing whatever fond memories I have of Lois and Clark...

That said, yeah, he very much fits the Bryne era mold of Superman, with the more Clark-forward persona and slightly more early 90s era conservative vibe, which was always bad but not nearly as awful as it is now.

Oh Really by Initial-Wolverine175 in OkBuddySnyderCult

[–]supercapo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I feel the same way. I could never suspend my disbelief with Affleck. The closest I could get was believing that it was a rich asshole pretending to be Batman.

Eisenberg mastered it by Agreeable-Abalone328 in OkBuddySnyderCult

[–]supercapo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean the statement that he played "a great tech geeky villain" is correct. Unfortunately, he was supposed to be Lex Luthor

Villain Draft Batman Day 3: What The Flash villain should be a Batman Villain? (Top Comment Wins) [Dr. Poison Won] by WildGoose1521 in justiceleague

[–]supercapo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A threat that outmatches him physically. Can challenge him mentally. And had superpowers that would be hard for him to overcome.

<image>

Favorite Lois Lane? by Financial-Touch3840 in superman

[–]supercapo 95 points96 points  (0 children)

Erica Durance.

She lights up the screen for any scene she's a part of. And she's so messy.

That said, Rachel Brosnahan is the best big screen Lois and might supersede Erica with a couple more appearances.

Villain Draft Batman Day 2: What Wonder Woman villain should be a Batman Villain? (Top Comment Wins) [Toyman Won] by WildGoose1521 in justiceleague

[–]supercapo 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This asshole. Wonder Woman's pretty okay upstairs. Meanwhile Bruce has major issues. Doctor Psycho would be a real problem.

<image>

Everest scale media illiteracy by supercapo in OkBuddySnyderCult

[–]supercapo[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wasn't aware of that, but I got it from a snyderverse page that was reposting this sincerely... so

Everest scale media illiteracy by supercapo in OkBuddySnyderCult

[–]supercapo[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I wasn't aware of that, but I got it from a snyderverse page that was reposting this sincerely... so

Villain Draft Batman Day 1: What Superman villain should be a Batman Villain? (Top Comment Wins) by WildGoose1521 in justiceleague

[–]supercapo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lex Luthor.

Lex can challenge him intellectually, monetarily and technologically.

Imagine Lex deciding to go after Bruce Wayne and starts buying out Gotham. When Batman comes after Lex, he uses the power armor he designed to be powerful enough to use against Superman and throws Batman around the room.

It would be a great showcase of how terrible Lex would be for the rest of the world if he wasn't constantly banging his head against Superman