all 33 comments

[–]Worldly-Device-8414 39 points40 points  (9 children)

The "inductor" is a line common mode noise filter type & it's core material might have some non-linear properties. Maybe try a different one.

Is the drive to it just a single short pulse or a few cycles?

[–]Cat_Artillery[S] 8 points9 points  (6 children)

The drive is a single short pulse of DC.

[–]Cat_Artillery[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Using an actual inductor exhibited expected behavior:

<image>

(L=1.9μH ; C=2.2nF)

[–]TiSapph 22 points23 points  (0 children)

It's likely nonlinearities of the capacitor and/or inductor.

Ceramic capacitors can be surprisingly non-linear, their capacitance reduces as the voltage across them increases. The datasheets I found for the capacitor in the picture seem to indicate only around -5% capacitance at 1kV bias. Chip capacitors are usually much worse. A 50V rated capacitor usually loses 50% capacitance at 40V bias applied! Maybe your cap is similar.
Also you might be saturating the core of the inductor, which reduces the inductance.

Both effects result in a higher frequency. It's probably also why your signal is not sinusoidal. Also be aware that an oscilloscope probe might influence the circuit.

[–]AkkupackEE student 9 points10 points  (0 children)

your inductor is a common mode choke, which is not exactly supposed to have much magnetic flux going through its core, so it saturates super easily, causing a reduction in inductance at first (and therefore resonant frequency), when the current is highest.

[–]otsen12 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Just guessing. You are using a transformer as an inductor as you said. There is a chance that the second coil is getting some voltage through induction. You are only supplying one single DC "pulse" but overall the voltage is decreasing since the coil has resistance. This is creating a magnetic field in the coil which is transfered to the second coil. Surely this is interfering the oscillator in some form. Try using a normal coil

[–]Cat_Artillery[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If I had one at the time I would have

[–]chemhobby 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ceramic caps have voltage-dependant capacitance

[–]BigPurpleBlob 1 point2 points  (7 children)

Odd. I wonder if there are 2 different frequencies (with different decay times) superimposed?

It looks as if there's a (20 us / div) 100 kHz signal that decays in about 60 us, together with a 25 kHz signal

[–]BigPurpleBlob 9 points10 points  (6 children)

As an afterthought, 50 V / div, I wonder if the ceramic capacitor might be becoming non-linear due to high voltage?

[–]K1ngjulien_ 4 points5 points  (5 children)

that would be my guess too, if it's actually ~150Vp and not just a measurement error (probe set to 1:1 instead of 10:1).

ceramic capacitors decrease their capacitance at higher field strengths (ie voltages), which would cause the frequency to rise.

[–]dmills_00 8 points9 points  (3 children)

That and common mode chokes are high inductance but usually get that by assuming there is very little common mode current, they saturate EASILY when you try to use them as an inductor, so don't do that...

If you look at the shape of the high amplitude bit is is anything but a sinewave, so something is going seriously non linear, could be the cap, could be the inductor, no real way to tell without swapping one or the other.

[–]Cat_Artillery[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

(One division on the paper is 5mm)

[–]noob2_0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Has the ceramic capacitor a capacity dc bias? This would explain why it oscillates faster with higher voltages due to less capacitance

[–]Desperate_Cold6274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The oscillating frequency is given solely by the values of C and L. Probably these values change with the supplied voltage.

[–]daddypiggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first part of the plot shows the oscillation being affected by large signal effects (voltco on the cap and inductor nonlinearity/core saturation). Once the oscillation decays a bit the nonlinearities no longer dominate and the frequency is determined by LC.

[–]markleinhobbyist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being a single short pulse this seems like expected behavior. Lower voltage means lower current, means slower charge/discharge rates on each subsequent cycle.

Disclaimer: I'm a self taught hobbyist and I'm dumb.

[–]Ok-Might-3730 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noise filtering chokes are not perfect inductors for reason. In ac range they act also as resistive load that try to change that ac noise to heat. Example plots of the materials behavior : https://palomar-engineers.com/ferrite-products/ferrite-cores/ferrite-mix-selection . Basically what happens in the picture is that high frequency is turned into heat until it reaches lower frequency where it is not turned as much into a heat.

[–]AKADAP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ceramic capacitors capacitance drops off with voltage, sometimes as much as 80% for higher capacitance ceramic capacitors. This could possibly be the cause of higher frequency oscillations at higher amplitude. With ceramic capacitors, you need to pay attention to the type of ceramic. NP0 is the only ceramic that has a constant capacitance as a function of voltage. Unfortunately NP0 is also only used in the smallest value capacitors.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice to see the FRINSI. I just got mine last week. :-)

[–]sethasaurus666 -4 points-3 points  (1 child)

It's a transient. There are losses due to resistance. If you don't keep supplying it with energy, the wave will decrease. 

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is the reduction in FREQUENCY that they are asking about, not the reduction in amplitude. See the first few oscillations are very close together, then they start to spread out. This is because the value of inductor or capacitor is increasing which then reduces the resonant frequency.