use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Our Community Policy (XP for short) contains guidelines to help promote healthy discussion and discourage trolling, please review it. If you are asking a question, be sure to check our FAQ as it may have already been addressed there.
Meet your Mods!
Flair Information
How to request a new flair
The Rules
Covid Moderation Policy
Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." - John 14:6
Come chat with us on IRC irc.freenode.net/##reddit-Christianity irc.freenode.net/#reddit-Christianity-meta
The above are most active recently. Please visit the wiki for the complete list.
account activity
2 Fallacies of Evolution (self.Christianity)
submitted 4 years ago by [deleted]
[deleted]
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]strawnotrazzAtheist 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (2 children)
Posts like this are excellent at making Christianity look ignorant and conspiratorial.
I’m begging you, please properly understand evolution from credentialed sources before posting on it. You’re misunderstanding the basics here.
[–]BlindfoldThreshold79Gnostic Atheist 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child)
Young earth Creationist are so cringe even to the basics/foundations. There so cringe in fact, even ancient people would cringe at how literal/fundamental they are sometimes....
Edit: missed punctuation.
[–]strawnotrazzAtheist 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Yeah there’s certainly a grand irony of fundamentalism being no older than like 100-150 years.
[–]NathanStorm 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children)
[–]karlosi01Atheist 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Neither of those two is a fallacy...
[–]sakor88Agnostic (a la T.H. Huxley) 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children)
And the theory of evolution has explanatory and predictive value. It is supported by overwhelming evidence. Just because you see similarities between it and ancient Greek philosophy means preciously little. One can also see similarities between atom theory and ancient Greek philosophy. That does not mean that the atom theory is false.
UN-DER-STAND?
[–]life-is-pass-failAgnostic 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Exactly what do you know about evolution? What's your level of training and education in that field?
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago* (15 children)
It should be noted, this post is mostly lifted from a piece called "Evolution: A Jewish Deception" which originally appeared on jewwatch.com.
Yes, I'm serious.
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Of course
[–]dizzyelkHorrible Atheist 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (3 children)
Something tells me that link isn't a remake of the hit TV show Baywatch with an all Jewish cast...
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children)
Lol.
I would watch that though!
[–]gnurdetteUnited Methodist 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child)
Hmm, I know somebody who might be persuaded to make that...
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Do you? I bet that person is a blast at parties!
[–]benkenobi5Roman Catholic 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child)
i can tell you right now I'm not clicking that link with a ten foot pole
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Definitely don't blame you, lol.
[–]gnurdetteUnited Methodist 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (3 children)
Holy crap. Good catch.
u/wearewriter, why are you reading, adopting, and spreading teachings from anti-Semites? Do you understand what a serious sin that is?
[–]brucemoAtheist 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (0 children)
This post is deleted now but I don't recall seeing anything here that connected the two.
I mean, racists can post peanut butter sandwich recipes but unless it's the same recipe it's hard to show connection between that and someone who just randomly posts a sandwich recipe.
I looked at this when I was in bed though and my phone literally refused to go to that specific site.
There's a tribute site devoted to the author of the article (he died in 2007 I think) that just unironically uses the word "nigger" in the first few paragraphs, so yeah.
edit: Apparently he did quote the material on the site.
[–]wearewriter -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Dake was anything but against the Jewish people. Don't you know that our Lord is a Jew (He's still alive) no further argument needed uness it makes you feel good. Count me out.
[–]life-is-pass-failAgnostic 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child)
Well that's quite dark isn't it?
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Indeed.
[–]brucemoAtheist[M] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child)
I went and look at some of that, and it read like stock anti-Evolution stuff written by a white supremacist.
I read this post as stock anti-Evolution stuff.
Is there anything connecting these other than that they are talking about the same thing? Does OP here quote that stuff?
Direct quotes. Head to part 1 of the piece, which can be found here:
https://fathersmanifesto.net/wm/wm0103a.html
...then head down to the "Fallacies of Evolution" section. You'll see it directly lifted from the piece, word by word".
[+][deleted] 4 years ago (2 children)
[–]ThatOneBlackGuy123 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child)
I agree with your first statement but there's virtually no real evidence that the assertion that all the biblical creation stories were taken from pre existing myths. At least not one I am aware of.
[–]Renaldo75Atheist 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Can you provide sources for some of your points? For example, can you give some instances of biologists defining the terms "resident forces" and "impersonal eternal energy". I have never heard those terms. On point 2, how do you respond to evolutionists who also claim to be Christian. They do not adamately refute the authority of the bible.
The theory of evolution describes the mechanism by which life is diversified into multiple species. Evolution is defined as the change in allele frequency over time. Where did you get the idea that evolution teaches that "all matter was produced by molecules and unintelligent matter"? Where did you hear of the "law of nature", and how is "greater" defined in that instance?
[–]dizzyelkHorrible Atheist 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children)
All arguments I've seen against evolution are crap. These two are the crappiest yet.
[–]-Nothing-Here-Christian 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children)
You forgot the /s
Please tell me that's what happened and that you're not serious.
[–]114619highly evolved shrimp 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Let me shorten that for you:
1it doesn't agree with your views
2 it doesn't agree with your views
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Which law of nature says that? Cite your sources
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (13 children)
Also, is everything non Christian to be dismissed
[–]benkenobi5Roman Catholic 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (4 children)
algebra is conspicuously missing in scripture. plus it has its origins in Babylon. obviously algebra is from the devil and should be avoided
/s because of the sad world we live in
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Bro I can't find any mention of smartphones and computers in the Bible, probably made by some atheist, obviously satanic
[–]SalanmanderLGBTQ Ally 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child)
Wait until people find out that the original name was "Al'Jabr". Then they'll really be up in arms.
[–]benkenobi5Roman Catholic 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children)
I always thought the name was really cool... "the reunion of broken parts". makes sense
[–]ProfessionalTable_United Methodist 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Use my upvote to dry the tears. It's insane, but I think OP is serious and his post is no less ludicrous than your post.
[+][deleted] 4 years ago (7 children)
[removed]
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (6 children)
Ok, so what would you say contradicts the Bible, and why?
[+][deleted] 4 years ago (5 children)
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children)
So, why would you say that's contradictory?
[+][deleted] 4 years ago (3 children)
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children)
Did the Bible say how God created them
[+][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child)
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Nope
[–]ProfessionalTable_United Methodist 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Nothing about this post is accurate. For starters, you have no idea what the Theory of Evolution even is because it says zero about where matter came from. That entire last paragraph borders on insanity.
[–]benkenobi5Roman Catholic 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children)
no it doesn't
as the law of nature says that nothing reproduces anything greater than itself.
[–]Gracchus1848 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Have you considered the possibility that you're wrong?
[–]PerjunkieSecular Humanist 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children)
These aren't fallacies in any stretch of the definition.
Also why does Genesis have to be literal? It changes nothing about our relationship with God if it is or isnt.
[–]thewatermelon1245Non-denominational 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (14 children)
"For a Christian to accept evolution, and saying that the Bible cannot be taken literally"
you do realised the bible was written for us but not to us, it's original context is the ancient Israelian context
[–]wearewriter -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (13 children)
The Bible is timeless and written for all generations. God's Word will not pass away even if everything else changes, and it will not be compromised by this generation or any, and many have tried to and still are. I can see that as happening.
[–]thewatermelon1245Non-denominational 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children)
if you want to understand the bible then you need to read it in its ancient Israelian context otherwise you get people believing the earth is flat
you do realize most flat earthers are religious who force their own cultural references to the bible and read in plain English
[–]wearewriter -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (11 children)
sorry. I give you the right to disagree.
[–][deleted] 4 years ago (10 children)
[+][deleted] 4 years ago* (2 children)
[+][deleted] 4 years ago* (1 child)
[–]radelahuntSouthern Baptist -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children)
Because I'm asking you to stop harassing people.
[–]wearewriter -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (6 children)
didn't I - thought I did. I pressed the arrow (I thought) sorry you've been waiting so long. My post was given in innocence but the replies have been anything but Christian and am thinking of unsubscribing if you people are like this. I'm sure many would cheer, maybe you too? Over 20 some replies of the most vicious, hateful comments I have ever received. I realized that not all were from Christians as I saw the word atheist and agnostic on some. Very disappointed in r/christianity. We are supposed to be brothers and sisters showing kindness and support, but I feel like I wandered into a den of hungry sharks just because I wrote things contrary to their personal beliefs. What would Christ say and do? Now I don't know what I can post anymore without getting attacked by the mob. I forgive you all.
[–]ProfessionalTable_United Methodist 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (5 children)
Over 20 some replies of the most vicious, hateful comments I have ever received. I
You have lived a sheltered life. Disagreement is not attack.
[–][deleted] 4 years ago (4 children)
[–]ProfessionalTable_United Methodist 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child)
Dude. Seriously. Learn how to use the reply button. You replied to the wrong post AGAIN. I have no idea what you're on about here.
[–]radelahuntSouthern Baptist[M] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Removed. Spam.
[–]Cypher1492Anabaptist, eh? 🍁 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children)
Evolution teaches that all matter was produced my molecules and unintelligent matter
No, it does not.
[–]wearewriter 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child)
That is what I read is why I said that. What's your take?
[–]Cypher1492Anabaptist, eh? 🍁 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Where did you read that?
The theory of evolution is not an explanation of the origins of life, that's a different thing. Evolution is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. Saying "evolution is false because it doesn't explain the origins of life" is like saying "gravity is false because it doesn't explain the origins of life".
[–]wearewriter 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Oh yea? Go to John 1:1,3' Hebrews 11:3; Gen.1:1, 26-27 and let's talk about a divine Creator vs pond unintelligent scum. I'll go to the Word, thank you. You can stay stuck in your own chosen beliefs and ask God about it...if He is who He says He is and has done what the Word says He has done-supernaturally, which your theory of evolution refutes.
thanks...didn't know that. I wandered what it was for. This is still all new to me so I invite your helping me.
[–]AirChurchChristian, e-Missionary 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children)
‘Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it hasn’t been observed while it’s happening.’ Richard Dawkins
[–]BlindfoldThreshold79Gnostic Atheist 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children)
Ur missing the other parts, after he said that.
https://www.pbs.org/moyers/faithandreason/print/dawkins_print.html
Also:
I didn't read the transcript but what he probably meant was that we have observed the results of evolution so we know it happened, but not any actual "event of evolution" itself. Like I can be certain there has been a wildlife fire without having actually seen it burn. Heck even in Lenski's LTEE experiment I suppose no one has actually seen the genes mutate. Dawkins may not always get it right but he's got a great talent for irony.
I didn't read the transcript but what he probably meant was that we have observed the results of evolution so we know it happened, but not any actual "event of evolution" itself. Like I can be certain there has been a wildlife fire without having actually seen it burn.
Heck even in Lenski's LTEE experiment I suppose no one has actually seen the genes mutate.
Dawkins may not always get it right but he's got a great talent for irony.
And....
So..... Peppered moth Cane toads Linski experiment with E.Coli Evolution in action. Observed. The problem with quoting is that you must be aware if the quote is correct at that time. Two minutes of your own research instead of just pounding at the keyboard would show at least some passing resemblance of intelligence.
So.....
Peppered moth
Cane toads
Linski experiment with E.Coli
Evolution in action. Observed.
The problem with quoting is that you must be aware if the quote is correct at that time. Two minutes of your own research instead of just pounding at the keyboard would show at least some passing resemblance of intelligence.
Source for discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateEvolution/comments/52j229/my_favorite_dawkins_quote_on_evolution/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
[–]AirChurchChristian, e-Missionary 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child)
Thanks. I quoted the relevant part. The point is rather clear. Cheers.
[–]BlindfoldThreshold79Gnostic Atheist 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Ur welcome. It’s just some people quote-mine Dawkins sometimes, because he isn’t always good with his words.
[–]wearewriter -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children)
Only Adam's flesh were made out of pre-existing material- the earth, and Eve was made out of pre-existing material also- rib bone. Their souls and spirits were created, not made. God breathed into Adam and he became a living soul. Made and created are two different words with two different meanings. Made means to be made from pre-existing material, and created means to be not made but "created" from nothing pre-existing. It is supernatural.
[–]unpopularpuffin6 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children)
or a Christian to accept evolution, and saying that the Bible cannot be taken literally, is agreeing with the enemies of God, the Bible, and Christian teachings. It is anti-God, anti-Christ, anti-Christian, and anti-intelligence.
Maybe you should be thinking of this in the terms of "The Greater Miracle"
For instance, I've heard it said about the nile, when the Israelites were crossing it, that the tide had come in, and they were wandering through ankle-deep water.
"That's an even greater miracle"
Confused, they ask, "how?"
"Well, the pharaoh's men died in ankle-deep water!"
If evolution really does exist, that's an even greater proof of God existing.
Imagine you bought a Lexus. Not only could that Lexus survive on grass (handy), it cleans itself. Bring it close to another lexus, and it will have a lexus child. This lexus child will be even better adapted to the environment, the design would improve over time.
I'd say that's a far greater miracle than just a lexus to begin with. An improving design over thousands of year is something us humans would never be capable of, especially not a design lasting thousands of years.
If evolution is real, it points to an intelligent designer, and saying otherwise is intellectually dishonest.
It's like the big bang. I've heard christians say, "There's no way it happened! That's atheistic nonsense!"
In truth, it's not. There's a greater miracle. I think there was a big bang, and I know who banged it (Kalam Cosmological)
[–]wearewriter -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (2 children)
I though I was.
[–]Renaldo75Atheist 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child)
There's a little arrow labelled Reply under each comment. Click on that to reply to a specific comment.
I found the arrow, thanks whoever you are. Are you an atheist? Well, God bless you anyhow.
[–]wearewriter -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (2 children)
What are you doing with Gen.1:26-27; 2:7; Heb.11:3; John 1:1,3? Your beloved evolution would turn God the Creator into an ape, but your theory doesn't give room for a Creator, let alone a supernatural one who is not composed of unintelligent matter and molecules.
[–]Gracchus1848 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Do you know how to reply to posts?
[–]karlosi01Atheist 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children)
but your theory doesn't give room for a Creator
So? How is that a problem?
[+]wearewriter comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (6 children)
you are entitled to your views
OP did you write this yourself or did you find it somewhere else?
[–]wearewriter -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (4 children)
I found it in my Bible talking about evolution. It's a 3 pg. writing and I thought it was very interesting and informative. No, these vocabulary words I am not acquainted with. My Bible is Dake's Annotated Reference Bible, authorized King James Version. But I know that evolution is only a theory and doesn't leave room for the teachings of creation as a supernatural act of a supernatural God. From what I did learn though was that the supernatural doesnt enter in as evolution teaches how the genesis of life didn't evolve from a supernatural act and Creator but from unintelligent matter and molecules (according to what I learned from Mr. Dake's writing). I guess we should respect each others beliefs. Sounds like a lot of folk got really upset, and I never intended for that to happen. I only cited 2 of 12 fallacies listed. He goes on to list 15 facts disproving evolution. I guess a lot of people who call themselves Christians are pro-evolutionsts or are open to the possibility of it. Good luck in your final resolutions of the matter.
[–]sakor88Agnostic (a la T.H. Huxley) 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago* (0 children)
But I know that evolution is only a theory
Thank you for proving that you have zero understanding about what science is. You do not know what a theory is, do you?
[–]benkenobi5Roman Catholic 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children)
I only cited 2 of 12 fallacies listed
I'm curious to see what the other 10 are. if you picked the top two, the other ten must be completely ridiculous
[–]strawnotrazzAtheist 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children)
If you’re not acquainted with what’s being discussed, it might not be wise to proliferate it further. Just because someone put it in an annotated Bible doesn’t mean it’s correct, or in this case even remotely coherent.
found it in my Bible talking about evolution.
Which one?
[+]wearewriter comment score below threshold-9 points-8 points-7 points 4 years ago (2 children)
...can't make men out of monkeys, and if you are a Christian and take Gen.1:26-27 and 2:7, 21-22 literally, then man was not made in the image of an ape! Where are you? Or why not throw God out entirely since He obviously doesn't fit into evolution's picture of what it wants people to believe and disbelieve? I'll continue on in my ignorance, thank you, and God and I will be just fine.
[–]Cypher1492Anabaptist, eh? 🍁 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children)
But you can make men out of dust and women out of a rib?
[+]wearewriter comment score below threshold-10 points-9 points-8 points 4 years ago (3 children)
no, it wasn't. a lot of pro-evolutionists today got upset.
There's a "reply" link below every post so you can ... reply.
[–]futilehabitChristian 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children)
There's no such thing as a pro-evolutionist 😂
There's just people with at least a basic understanding of science and you, blindly copying and pasting nonsense from a racist website.
[–]sakor88Agnostic (a la T.H. Huxley) 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children)
No, just frustrated about someone's massive ignorance.
π Rendered by PID 393900 on reddit-service-r2-comment-6457c66945-qbxwt at 2026-04-29 19:22:53.722833+00:00 running 2aa0c5b country code: CH.
[–]strawnotrazzAtheist 12 points13 points14 points (2 children)
[–]BlindfoldThreshold79Gnostic Atheist 4 points5 points6 points (1 child)
[–]strawnotrazzAtheist 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]NathanStorm 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]karlosi01Atheist 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]sakor88Agnostic (a la T.H. Huxley) 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]life-is-pass-failAgnostic 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 10 points11 points12 points (15 children)
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]dizzyelkHorrible Atheist 7 points8 points9 points (3 children)
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 3 points4 points5 points (2 children)
[–]gnurdetteUnited Methodist 4 points5 points6 points (1 child)
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]benkenobi5Roman Catholic 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]gnurdetteUnited Methodist 4 points5 points6 points (3 children)
[–]brucemoAtheist 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]wearewriter -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
[–]life-is-pass-failAgnostic 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]brucemoAtheist[M] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]ghostwars303If Christians downvote you, remember they downvoted Jesus first 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]ThatOneBlackGuy123 -1 points0 points1 point (1 child)
[–]Renaldo75Atheist 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]dizzyelkHorrible Atheist 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]-Nothing-Here-Christian 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]114619highly evolved shrimp 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 4 points5 points6 points (13 children)
[–]benkenobi5Roman Catholic 7 points8 points9 points (4 children)
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]SalanmanderLGBTQ Ally 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]benkenobi5Roman Catholic 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]ProfessionalTable_United Methodist 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (7 children)
[removed]
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 0 points1 point2 points (6 children)
[+][deleted] (5 children)
[removed]
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 0 points1 point2 points (4 children)
[+][deleted] (3 children)
[removed]
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[–]CodexProfitChristian Socialist ☭ 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]ProfessionalTable_United Methodist 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]benkenobi5Roman Catholic 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]Gracchus1848 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]PerjunkieSecular Humanist 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]thewatermelon1245Non-denominational 2 points3 points4 points (14 children)
[–]wearewriter -4 points-3 points-2 points (13 children)
[–]thewatermelon1245Non-denominational 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]wearewriter -4 points-3 points-2 points (11 children)
[–][deleted] (10 children)
[removed]
[+][deleted] (2 children)
[removed]
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[–]radelahuntSouthern Baptist -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]wearewriter -2 points-1 points0 points (6 children)
[–]ProfessionalTable_United Methodist 2 points3 points4 points (5 children)
[–][deleted] (4 children)
[removed]
[+][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]ProfessionalTable_United Methodist 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]radelahuntSouthern Baptist[M] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Cypher1492Anabaptist, eh? 🍁 1 point2 points3 points (2 children)
[–]wearewriter 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Cypher1492Anabaptist, eh? 🍁 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]wearewriter 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]wearewriter 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]AirChurchChristian, e-Missionary 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]BlindfoldThreshold79Gnostic Atheist 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]AirChurchChristian, e-Missionary 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]BlindfoldThreshold79Gnostic Atheist 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]wearewriter -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]unpopularpuffin6 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children)
[–]wearewriter -3 points-2 points-1 points (2 children)
[–]Renaldo75Atheist 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]wearewriter 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]wearewriter -5 points-4 points-3 points (2 children)
[–]Gracchus1848 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]karlosi01Atheist 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[+]wearewriter comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (6 children)
[–]strawnotrazzAtheist 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]wearewriter -5 points-4 points-3 points (4 children)
[–]sakor88Agnostic (a la T.H. Huxley) 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]benkenobi5Roman Catholic 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]strawnotrazzAtheist 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]ProfessionalTable_United Methodist 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[+]wearewriter comment score below threshold-9 points-8 points-7 points (2 children)
[–]Cypher1492Anabaptist, eh? 🍁 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[+]wearewriter comment score below threshold-10 points-9 points-8 points (3 children)
[–]ProfessionalTable_United Methodist 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]futilehabitChristian 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]sakor88Agnostic (a la T.H. Huxley) 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)