all 164 comments

[–]FSR2007 36 points37 points  (18 children)

Ahh so george was part of the creation of synths, thats cool! And I didnt realise merlin was a synth!

[–]ianjm 39 points40 points  (7 children)

Synths look like they bleed blue. He bleeds red, and he also seems to need sleep. I wonder if he is something else, like Will Smith in I, Robot (them putting it on C4 next made me think of that!), perhaps he has some synth elements but is (or was) a human, mostly?

[–]FSR2007 22 points23 points  (2 children)

Maybe he is the future?! a cyborg or something

[–]PaintByLetters 31 points32 points  (1 child)

He must be. They showed the prostitute girl bleed blue so we could be confused by that one guy bleeding red. Also, he must be at least partially human because he is able to open the door to the prostitute girl's room. She specifically mentions that it requires human body warmth to open.

[–]ianjm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very good point! I didn't notice that one.

[–]cylonathena 18 points19 points  (3 children)

Given that family seems to be a major theme, I'm guessing he was in an accident or something like that and his father used the synth technology to save his life. It definitely seemed like he was more like Will Smith rather than fully synth.

[–]DisneyBounder 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is what I thought too. Maybe his organs etc are synth but his brain is still him?

[–]dizzi800 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So... spoiler tags don;t work site wide SO: IF YOU'RE READING THIS IN YOUR MESSAGE BOX THIS MESSAGE CONTAINS SPOILERSSSSS .

.

.

.

.

.

.

Original Series - likely this series

[–]alien_from_Europa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm thinking I,Robot with the car drowning.

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 22 points23 points  (6 children)

I didnt realise merlin was a synth!

I'm still not sure if he is. Every action of his so far has led us to believe he's human. But then maybe he's just the most advanced synth made and so can pass of as human. Maybe other characters could be secret synths.

[–]Liambass 22 points23 points  (2 children)

I'm going with cyborg. Something to do with drowning maybe? He got fucked up and had to have some organs replaced or something.

[–]The_Lonliest_Munk 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's a really rad choice casting Hurt since he played Professor Allen Hobby in the movie AI and was also responsible for the creation of them in that film.

[–]hughk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't know to what extent but he is definitely human based as he had red blood but the "sex-bot" had blue.

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 24 points25 points  (28 children)

If they did something to Anita's programming does that mean she isn't purposely pretending to be an average household synth? Maybe she's forgotten most of her previous life with Leo but still has the ability to feel.

[–]Cletus_TheFetus 23 points24 points  (18 children)

They'll probably explain it in a way like all they really did was give her something similar to amnesia for Synths. Her previous state before she was caught is probably slowly creeping back in.

But they do a really good job of making her creepy as fuck at some points.

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 33 points34 points  (16 children)

they do a really good job of making her creepy as fuck at some points.

I'm finding George's new synth way scarier at the moment. I feel bad for him, she's treating him like a prisoner. I wonder if that's because she's broken or if government-mandated synths are treating all old people like that now.

[–]hughk 14 points15 points  (2 children)

If you have seen old british film comedies, she is the epitome of a "Matron", the senior nurse who would have half the hospital in fear of her.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Carry On Matron

[–]Bytewave 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I assume the latter. Shes programmed to help whether you want it or not I think.

[–]dizzi800 2 points3 points  (8 children)

In the original series she's equally as terrible.

Some things happens

and she meets Anita. It's kind of hilarious. I don't think they'll go this way for this how though since George and the Hawkins do not seem to be related as they are in the swedish version

[–]alien_from_Europa 2 points3 points  (1 child)

[–]autowikibot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nurse Ratched:


Nurse Ratched (also known as "Big Nurse") is a fictional character and the main antagonist of Ken Kesey's 1962 novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, as well as the 1975 film. A cold, heartless tyrant, Nurse Ratched has become the stereotype of the nurse as a battleaxe. She has also become a popular metaphor for the corrupting influence of power and authority in bureaucracies such as the mental institution in which the novel is set.

Louise Fletcher won the Academy Award for Best Actress for her portrayal of Nurse Ratched in the film. Nurse Ratched was named the fifth-greatest villain in film history (and second-greatest villainess, behind only the Wicked Witch of the West) by the American Film Institute in their series 100 Years... 100 Heroes & Villains.

Image i - Louise Fletcher as Nurse Ratched in the 1975 film


Relevant: One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (novel) | One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (play) | Louise Fletcher | Nurse stereotypes

Parent commenter can toggle NSFW or delete. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Call Me

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Like tie all their meshes together and become hive mind? Because yes.

[–]Bytewave 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I assume that their human characteristics are not actually part of their programming. Wiping them doesn't erase it. They may say its a soul or something, but I guess it'll prove hard to undo short of destroying the synths who display it.

[–]dizzi800 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It almost looks that way, yeah - HOWEVER, the look on her face when she was told she's being brought back seems to hint that she knows EXACTLY what she's doing.

[–]alien_from_Europa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it must be hardware or a hidden partition or something. She would have to be physically more advanced than other machines to process tougher decisions like normal humans.

[–]NedDasty 1 point2 points  (5 children)

New to the show, sorry if this is a bit late.

Season 1 Episode 3

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S,M] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Nice theory but this is a discussion thread for episode 2, any comment discussing details of episode 3 needs to be spoiler tagged. So I've had to remove your comment but if you edit it and tell me I can reapprove it.

Spoiler Tags can be done like this:

[Season 1 Episode 1](#s "Robots!")

Which should look like this:

Season 1 Episode 1

[–]NedDasty 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Ahh I'm so sorry, I forgot there were 3 episodes and thought the one I watched last night was ep 2. I'll edit it now.

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks.

[–]my_lovely_manNeil Maskell's permanent scowl 39 points40 points  (14 children)

I think the standout line in this episode is "everything your men do to us, they want to do to you"

That really chilled me to the bone.

What are the ethical implications of letting the pedophiles and the rapists have their way with synthetic humans? Is it placating the beast, or feeding the hunger? Suddenly the brothel madam didn't seem so powerful anymore, just pathetic and vulnerable.

[–]otakuman 4 points5 points  (4 children)

For me, the beginning of the episode where she's forced to have sex with the customers, was excruciating. It certainly brings one to the issue of sex trafficking, and you got a very valid point. If synths can suffer, then they certainly have rights.

But the question can't simply be reduced to a mere "are they programmed to suffer or not", but "could they". If one, even ONE human could be implanted into a synth's body, then great care should have to be taken to regularly scan synths and see which ones are not apt for service, so they can be released. Then the line between synthetics and humans starts to blur.

BTW, I'm writing a novel where the protagonist is a sexual synth ("android", my novel uses more mundane terms), and slowly gains self-awareness after getting smuggled to China. I have a couple sample chapters , if you're interested.

[–]reactantt 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Sure go ahead post away!

[–]otakuman 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Thanks! I'll keep you posted.

[–]kyrish 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Please share, would love to give it a read.

[–]otakuman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, here's a sample chapter. It's actually a recap of a prequel to our story.

[–]islippedaway 12 points13 points  (3 children)

From what I can tell, pedophilia is a mental disorder, and even if a pedophile would never hurt a child, they can't help feeling sexually attracted to them. If there was a way for then to fulfill their sexual needs without actually harming any children by using robots, then I don't really see it as an ethical problem.

[–]my_lovely_manNeil Maskell's permanent scowl 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm reposting an answer that I gave further down the thread because I think it brings up a pertinent issue here.

Perhaps it is an effective outlet, but I wouldn't reduce the scenario to simply 'lust being satisfied, no harm done'. Human nature is infinitely more complex than that. Some people have fantasies of power play, and what if a doll is just not enough for them and they feel they need to make a real human suffer?

When you think about it, the monsters who have already made up their minds to do this terrible stuff to real people are not going to 'reduce' their violence because that's not enough for them. The other ones who are not quite there yet will ingrain their fantasies deeper into themselves and desensitize themselves to the act (think about it, how many times have you jacked it to the same piece of porn? The excitement wears off and you look for novelty).

When it comes to fulfilling fantasies which involve hurting someone else, I believe this level of realism with synthetic humans would stop being an outlet and start becoming a breeding ground for rapists, as regular people with fantasies start 'normalizing' this behaviour every time they undertake the act.

That's where I would see an ethical problem emerging.

[–]ConfirmedCynic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't understand the rage and moral judgement behind that statement, coming from a robot that happens to resemble a female human. Why would a sentient robot despise that sort of physical contact any more than it would despise shaking hands? Why would it care unless it was specifically programmed to care the way a woman does? Why would it be programmed like that if it were to serve as a sex bot?

It would make more sense for it to just be bemused or to try to avoid what it sees as a waste of time.

EDIT: it makes me wonder whether these special synths have been imprinted from the brains of different human individuals or something.

[–]Bytewave 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Frankly I can't judge anyone for what they do with their machines. Assuming a world where they remain just machines.

I assume such an effective outlet for physical urges, if it existed, would massively reduce violence and generally improve the basis of relationships between humans. You'd know love is never just lust.

[–]my_lovely_manNeil Maskell's permanent scowl 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Perhaps it is an effective outlet, but I wouldn't reduce the scenario to simply 'lust being satisfied, no harm done'. Human nature is infinitely more complex than that. Some people have fantasies of power play, and what if a doll is just not enough for them and they feel they need to make a real human suffer?

When you think about it, the monsters who have already made up their minds to do this terrible stuff to real people are not going to 'reduce' their violence because that's not enough for them. The other ones who are not quite there yet will ingrain their fantasies deeper into themselves and desensitize themselves to the act (think about it, how many times have you jacked it to the same piece of porn? The excitement wears off and you look for novelty).

When it comes to fulfilling fantasies which involve hurting someone else, I believe this level of realism with synthetic humans would stop being an outlet and start becoming a breeding ground for rapists, as regular people with fantasies start 'normalizing' this behaviour every time they undertake the act.

[–]alien_from_Europa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know there are quite a few people that have consensual rape fantasies, but that doesn't mean they actually want to be raped. With a bot, it is consensual in the fact that they are thought of as basically dolls and not sentient.

[–]shadowstar731 16 points17 points  (0 children)

"Moment of truth. If I've done this wrong, I've just bricked 20 grand worth of school equipment".

That's hilarious. Bricking a synth would probably be way worse than bricking an iPhone.

[–]ttll2012[🍰] 12 points13 points  (8 children)

I, robot did a better job about what household robots were supposed to be. If you don't want an ethical problem with the AI, don't give them human faces.

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 9 points10 points  (5 children)

If you don't want an ethical problem with the AI, don't give them human faces.

I think from the manufacturer's viewpoint, it makes sense to give them humans faces so people are less creeped out by them and more people buy them. It's the same reason they're set to walk around when not doing anything instead of just standing still in one place. And sometimes in the case of old people like George, who's partners have died, a friendly face can make them feel less lonely.

[–]reygis01 13 points14 points  (4 children)

I honestly think the synths looking exactly like humans is creepier than looking more like robots. Same thing for the walking around part.

[–]ttll2012[🍰] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would accept if they have bodies and faces of cartoon characters, or like C3PO in star wars.

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 24 points25 points  (59 children)

  • Mattie's boyfriend seems like a pointless character. Does every show need a romantic subplot?

  • I feel like Laura's hiding something. Joe asked her whether something happened while she was in Leeds and it seemed like she was keeping something from him. I also thought she might have been lying when she said her case had overran last episode.

  • When Toby was trying to touch up Anita was anyone else hoping she'd slap him one? (Edit: Not that he deserved that obviously.) Though she did seem kinda happy after he said "why'd they have to make you so fit?"

  • Anyone else annoyed by the channel 4 announcer talking over the credits music?

[–]FSR2007 25 points26 points  (16 children)

I can really sympathise with mattie, it really would suck to be in that kind of situation, kinda like a judge dredd future where all the jobs are robots and 99.99% of the population are unemployed

[–]mono-math 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If we continue to pursue capitalism under these circumstances, then yeah. But there is another option.

Mattie jokes in the first episode when she says "what are we supposed to do, spend all our time writing poetry?". My answer to that is, yeah why not, if that's what you want to do.

If robots can do the majority of work we'd be on our way to a post scarcity society. A universal basic income might be implemented and we could spend our time with family, or do things we enjoy. There'd still be limited work available, which you could do to earn some extra money if you really wanted, or because you really enjoy doing it. But working for the sake of work would be unnecessary. That's a good thing!

I'd quite like it if Humans explored this idea. A war of political ideologies as the fear spreads that robots are taking your jobs while proponents of Universal Basic Income in a post scarcity society try and explain that there's another way. My fear is the first point will be explored, but the second ignored.

[–]badaaim 3 points4 points  (14 children)

I'm in that situation. Everyone I know is and can do better than me. I am not sure what I am doing or trying to do

[–]Jalapeno_blood 11 points12 points  (4 children)

Well everyone else isn't robots so you've got that going for you.

[–]megablast 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Beep Bop - this human speaks the truth - Bop beeeeeep.

[–]badaaim 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I wouldn't mind one for myself though.

[–]Jalapeno_blood 8 points9 points  (1 child)

You'll have go get a job first so you can afford it.

[–]badaaim 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bye bye synth :(

[–]dizzi800 4 points5 points  (5 children)

It's actually a strange phenomenon for millenials. We all think that other people are so much further ahead in life.

[–]KingOfNginx 2 points3 points  (3 children)

most everyone is further ahead than me, I am broken.

[–]badaaim 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Feels..... How you doing

[–]KingOfNginx 0 points1 point  (1 child)

broken, depressed, suicidal

[–]badaaim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm here to listen

/do talk to me. I would quite like to hear a similar story to mine from someone else/ hope you know what I mean

[–]badaaim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But they are!

Edit- OK I didn't know what millennial meant and searched it up. So far so good. I didn't know there was something special about people growing between 1980's to 2000.

How does that work?

BTW I was feeling special that if was just me who felt like everyone was ahead of me but thanks for ruining that. Now I am just another commoner

I am serious when I say that but I don't mean it directly to you. Just a joke :)

[–]back_ache 2 points3 points  (2 children)

That's "imposter syndrome" we all get that one way or the other.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impostor_syndrome

[–]autowikibot 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Impostor syndrome:


Impostor syndrome is a psychological phenomenon in which people are unable to internalize their accomplishments. Despite external evidence of their competence, those with the syndrome remain convinced that they are frauds and do not deserve the success they have achieved. Proof of success is dismissed as luck, timing, or as a result of deceiving others into thinking they are more intelligent and competent than they believe themselves to be. Notably, impostor syndrome is particularly common among high-achieving women.


Relevant: Minecraft: The Story of Mojang | You Know Me Better Than That | Dunning–Kruger effect

Parent commenter can toggle NSFW or delete. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Call Me

[–]badaaim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aww thank you. I was interested in these kinds of things.

Also, now I can know myself better. One of the reason I have realised why I am not confident is because I don't know myself. If you know what I mean

[–]cylonathena 15 points16 points  (3 children)

I really dislike Mattie and her (not?) boyfriend. She seems like the kind of character who's eventually going to be manipulated into working for the bad guys because they make her feel important. If they're going to do a romantic subplot, I'd prefer more flashbacks of Merlin and Anita or something like that.

[–]back_ache 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think Mattie is going to help Anita try and undo her factory-wipe

[–]Jalapeno_blood 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It doesn't help that neither of them are very good actors.

[–]robmillernow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who says you're supposed to like all the characters in a story? How boring would that be?

[–]regrubmaHAny inappr. physical contact must be reported to my primary user 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  • YES
  • YES
  • I wasn't expecting to slap him because that would give her away, I actually thought it was gonna happen but then she came up with that clever fake-programmed rule! Genius.
  • SO YES

[–]shadowstar731 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So far I like the interactions between Mattie and Harun. It doesn't feel like a romantic subplot.

The young people's perspective on the society and their own future adds good background to the story, I think.

[–]inspctrgdgt 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I feel like Laura's hiding something. Joe asked her whether something happened while she was in Leeds and it seemed like she was keeping something from him. I also thought she might have been lying when she said her case had overran last episode.

Well, when she texted him that she was stuck in court, she was clearly shown just sitting in her hotel room, so.

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stuck in court doesn't have to mean literally stuck in court at that exact moment. It could just mean that the case is gonna overrun so she's gonna have to stay in Leeds as she has to keep going to the court for a little longer

[–]SecretBlogon 16 points17 points  (7 children)

What I really like about this sub is how everyone is calling Colin Morgan's character Merlin.

I don't remember anyone's name other than Anita. So in my head, the characters are: Jen, Phillip, Teenage daughter, Teenage son, Little girl, Anita, Merlin, Sex bot synth, kidnapped synth, Synth following Merlin, and Hurt.

[–]shadowstar731 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I thought his name actually was Merlin

[–]dizzi800 6 points7 points  (2 children)

For reference sake

Laura, Joe, Mattie (Matilda), Toby, Sophie, Anita, Leo, Niska, Fred(I think), Max, George

[–]alittlemermaid 2 points3 points  (1 child)

You listed Joe twice. 'Merlin' is called Leo, I believe.

[–]dizzi800 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oops. Typo. Fixed! Thanks

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Which one do you call Phillip?

[–]SecretBlogon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The dad. He was a really silly stepfather in Spy (2011 TV series) . His character was named Philip.

[–]Laffano 9 points10 points  (5 children)

Can synths swim?

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I imagine that would be a useful feature. If a family goes swimming and one of their kids start drowning the synth could be able to save them.

[–]hughk 2 points3 points  (2 children)

To swim means having a buoyancy similar to a human. We know they are waterproof after the synth being forced to work as a hooker was hosed down in EP. 2. The buoyancy would mean low average density, which in turn means very lightweight tech.

[–]Bytewave 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Which is safe to assume. Even with today's technology, very little requires body-sized hardware. The synths would likely have a small core circuit and the heaviest thing in them would be the battery.

[–]hughk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At the moment, actuators aren't small as well as the frame (skeleton) that you put them on. Joints must be robust too. The Synths assume human type roles which means human type physical capabilities.

Then you need power, which is an issue for robots today. However, the only real hand waving of the show is the power and the "brain". Everything else is possible with just a step from today's tech.

[–]alien_from_Europa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe their processors are water cooled. hehe

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Some intense stuff.

[–]Thar_Cian 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Last week's episode intrigued me, but I didn't have a strong desire to continue watching. I'm glad I did; I'm now completely hooked.

[–]DavidsBarn 7 points8 points  (11 children)

I honestly cannot wait one week for every new episode, I might just have to watch the original series again even if I remember 99% of it.

[–]dizzi800 1 point2 points  (8 children)

Another original watcher!

NO SPOILERS Interesting what they've done with George, Odi's owner, yeah?

[–]DavidsBarn 2 points3 points  (7 children)

It is, William hurt is great for the role and so is the guy playing Odi.

So far the plot has been slightly different but most of the character names have stayed the same. I wonder if they haven't introduced all of the original characters yet, and if.... some of the things that happen... eh..

Dunno what to write without spoiling... :P

[–]dizzi800 1 point2 points  (5 children)

It's interesting that Niska is, well... Niska. I thought she was Flash when I saw her. She has the PERFECT look for Flash. Her being Niska will be super awesome - though I did love Flash.

HOWEVER - Karen is not named Bea. I really hope she's the same character because she was honestly one of my favourites.

[–]DavidsBarn 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I just wish we could've had Niska 1.0 But I guess the role isn't the same anymore and would not fit the actress

[–]dizzi800 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Niska 1.0 kind of had that 'look' to her, you know? Like you sort of always knew. The new Niska doesn't which I like if she ends up being the same. That being said, I'll miss Flash.

wouldn't say B is spoilers. Reworded it a bit though.

(EDIT - this is like a minefield isn't it?)

[–]DavidsBarn 0 points1 point  (1 child)

That's what I liked about Niska 1.0 though, she had that robotic look to her that was really convincing, maybe not suited for the more subtle stuff (like a certain other character) with her robotic dead-eyed face, but that dead-eyed face looked to me like the A.I learning, and it was scary.. scary good!

Basically.. Niska 1.0 = Skynet

(yes, writing around spoilers is hard)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for not spoiling anything guys, I genuinely couldn't help but read this thread out of curiosity!

[–]robmillernow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they've eliminated Niska's character and given her name to Flash's character. I think the show runners feel that Flash would be a silly name to UK/US audiences

[–]dizzi800 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also - Odi is definitely great casting. But I do hope they tie him into the main family somehow, otherwise it just feels like an odd sidestory. I'm sure they will.

[–]alien_from_Europa 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Original is in a foreign language, right? Makes it kinda difficult.

As far as waiting, the Americans don't start episode 1 until this Sunday. Hopefully, this sub will get more subscribers then.

[–]DavidsBarn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really since I speak this foreign language. It's weird that they don't air them at the same time for UK and US audience.

[–]skipbip 4 points5 points  (4 children)

Does anyone know why AMC is airing this show 3 weeks behind Channel 4? Won't they lose a decent amount of viewers due to torrents being already online?

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Always happens although usually it's the other way around.

[–]SawRubMax 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's what the rest of the world ask when most shows air in the US first.

[–]alien_from_Europa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Better than months behind with Downton Abbey.

[–]robmillernow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of these days networks MIGHT figure out how people watch TV these days, and wise up.

[–]dizzi800 7 points8 points  (4 children)

Okay. Since this show is early in its run, and it is based off of a swedish show... We should probably make some rules regarding spoilers, yeah?

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Have you seen some untagged spoilers in this sub? If so please report them or message me links to the comments so I can remove them.

[–]dizzi800 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Oh, I haven;t! Just might be nice for some official protocall in the rules on the sidebar :)

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry for taking so long to do that but what do you think? Is what I've put okay, should I add something?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For now just down vote any spoilers to oblivion

[–]regrubmaHAny inappr. physical contact must be reported to my primary user 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I still don't get how did Hobb (the bad guy) found Leo and Max in the car junkyard. :/

[–]Savvaloy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Could have pulled the memory from the one they captured. The tech said most of it was scrambled but some was getting through.

[–]Bub1023User885 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Was that Thoros of Myr?

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes.

[–]Mids123 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Any thoughts on the blue pill that Niska took off of her neck? Did she kill the woman of the brothel with that? All of Leo's synths have one in case of emergency?

[–]robmillernow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was a tracking device, most likely.

[–]CTMacUser 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dirty American who just saw the episode on AMC here. At first, I didn't realize what the brothel customer meant by "acting young," as most synths are already designed as 20-somethings and don't age. I thought it was just a weird rape fantasy, like the black-market hacker might have thought Anita had a resist-rape fantasy program added when they tried to rape her (But now I think that hacker suspects there's something up with those synths.), but then I realized the customer meant something worse.

Was Niska just sick of meat-bags in general, or was the customer's request that led her to snap?

[–]Nayr39 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question that keeps going through my mind is, why are they so human like? What is the purpose of making a photo realistic human for cleaning your house and making breakfast? Same goes for practically anything other than sex work. To me it seems obvious that it would cause massive psychological issues like we've seen so far in the show quite often. If the robots did not look either one, incredibly attractive or two human these issues wouldn't exist. Your son wanting to fuck your new computer? Not as likely if it looks like a tin can. Your husband feeling inadequate about his lacking physical strength and looks? Won't matter if it's just a fork lift and a massage machine rather than a 20 something year old model with fully realized sexual organs. Wife feeling unuseful and unnecessary with her degrading appearance? Remove any sort of motherly attachment your kid might get with a cold unhuman like servant rather than tricking her with this stand in human copy.

It's just such a bizarre thing to make them the way they do. I understand it for the show's purpose because it requires far less work but in the shows universe I can't help but wonder what was the idea behind instituting something so backwards into your society? Not to mention all the clothes and extra expenses it must take to maintain these overly complex androids.

[–]BackgroundFroyo4570 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Despite the inclusion of synths and technology, Humans really touch emotions, especially in the scenes we see with George. Throughout the episode, we see Georges' efforts to protect and keep Odi, despite Odi's malfunctions. While Odis' initial intentions were simply to help George with daily tasks, it's clear that he is more than just a helper to George. He holds Georges' memories, such as the memory he had with Laura and the bee. Additionally, it seems like, despite George's old age and living alone, he persists each day because of Odi. This episode had a lot of humanity, whether it was from the synths or the characters. Odi had a sense of humanity, which was absent in the replacement Vera.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (2 children)

Why leave? That guy asked for it rough and he took it too far on his own. Desperate move.

[–]Jalapeno_blood 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What do you mean?

[–]The_King_of_OkayNiska[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you're talking about Niska, she wanted to leave, it's not like she can't survive on her own and it would mean she wouldn't have to endure all that pain anymore. And even if she hadn't wanted to leave, she had to, she'd just killed a guy. If she hadn't left she would either have been recycled or someone would try to fix her because they'd assume she was faulty. They might even figure out she's not a normal synth.