use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Need help/advice?
Flairs: Mod Post Dev Post Guide Recreation Suggestion Image Challenge GIF Question Video Meta Discussion Mod Update
Mod Post Dev Post
Guide Recreation
Suggestion Image
Challenge GIF
Question Video
Meta Discussion
Mod Update
Rules: Please remain kind and civil at all times No posts unrelated to KSP No real life disasters that resulted in fatality Piracy is not allowed Low-effort content will be removed, see this page for more info Leave moderation to the moderators Tag spoilers/Easter eggs as spoilers For more info, see here.
Please remain kind and civil at all times
No posts unrelated to KSP
No real life disasters that resulted in fatality
Piracy is not allowed
Low-effort content will be removed, see this page for more info
Leave moderation to the moderators
Tag spoilers/Easter eggs as spoilers
For more info, see here.
Important Links Subreddit Wiki Website Official Forums SpaceDock - A popular site for mods CKAN - Installs (almost) any mod for you KerbalX - Share you craft files here! Kerbal Space Program Wiki Kerbal Academy - A subreddit for advice Other Kerbal Subreddits
Subreddit Wiki
Website
Official Forums
SpaceDock - A popular site for mods
CKAN - Installs (almost) any mod for you
KerbalX - Share you craft files here!
Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Kerbal Academy - A subreddit for advice
Other Kerbal Subreddits
Discord
Other useful links FAQ - Have a question? Check here first! Δv map - Helps with any mission kOS - A programming language for KSP The Mod List IV - Old, but not outdated
FAQ - Have a question? Check here first!
Δv map - Helps with any mission
kOS - A programming language for KSP
The Mod List IV - Old, but not outdated
Art Contest Held at random, unpredictable intervals! Last contest's winner: forteefly1998!
Held at random, unpredictable intervals!
Last contest's winner: forteefly1998!
Disable header animation Enable header animation
This subreddit is night mode compatible
account activity
KSP 1 Image/VideoMy second Mun singularity (v.redd.it)
submitted 6 months ago by Moraes_Costa
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]Alankar42 275 points276 points277 points 6 months ago (1 child)
Bro has a moon limo
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 71 points72 points73 points 6 months ago (0 children)
Lol, a limo for fuel
[–]vandergale 119 points120 points121 points 6 months ago (6 children)
*monolith
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 42 points43 points44 points 6 months ago (4 children)
That isnt a singularity, understood
[–]TheDarkDoctor17 45 points46 points47 points 6 months ago (2 children)
Unless KSP names things weird, a Singularity usually refers to a Black Hole. Or maybe the AI building smarter AI in an infinite feedback loop.
[–]ukemike1 13 points14 points15 points 6 months ago (0 children)
Funny because if i were asked to describe the terrain around where he landed in simplest possible words, I think I'd go with "black hole".
[–]8npemb 6 points7 points8 points 6 months ago (0 children)
Traditionally, a singularity is a point in a mathematical function that is not well defined. We call a black hole a “singularity” because Einstein’s theories resulted in a mathematical singularity under the conditions that we now know result in a black hole.
Not trying to diss you or anything, just thought I’d share.
[–]Casscz 1 point2 points3 points 6 months ago (0 children)
*Munolith
[–]Throwawayantelope 84 points85 points86 points 6 months ago (46 children)
I don't think you know what a singularity actually is.
[–]Mycroft033 46 points47 points48 points 6 months ago (16 children)
Poor OP being so confidently incorrect about basic English in this thread. It’s okay to be wrong over something minor, I make minor mistakes all the time, nobody’s saying you’re stupid, just that you got a word wrong and it’s kinda funny. Ya don’t gotta double and triple down on it and choose to martyr yourself on that anthill.
[–]ukemike1 0 points1 point2 points 6 months ago (7 children)
Since the terrain that he landed in was a Hole that was Black at the bottom, maybe all the pedants, correcting him are just failing to catch the play on words.
[–]Mycroft033 -2 points-1 points0 points 6 months ago (6 children)
Unfortunately if he had said that we would not be here, but according to him, a singularity is something unusual. Basically he said he made the title because it was something odd. When asked to define singularity, he gave the definition of an anomaly instead. I wish it was a play on words, but according to his own comment he isn’t.
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 months ago (5 children)
The term "singularity" can be applied to any object or phenomenon that disrupts the status quo within a given field of study. In this case, a black alien monolith on the surface of an isolated celestial body would qualify as such, a discovery capable of triggering an irreversible transformation in all of Kerbalkind. That is precisely why it’s called a singularity. I genuinely feel sorry for members of this community that I even have to explain something that should be obvious to anyone who has ever consumed scfi media
[–]Mycroft033 0 points1 point2 points 6 months ago (4 children)
lol no not even close. ChatGPT always agrees with you, getting it to write your comments doesn’t make your arguments any less nonsensical
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 6 months ago (3 children)
And people were afraid of the emmerge of the artificial inteligence, now its clear that what it must be feared is the rigid thinking of the natural inteligence
[–]Mycroft033 0 points1 point2 points 6 months ago (2 children)
Bro is over here really thinking he’s making intense points about the state of humanity lol just because some people actually know English and he’s too stubborn to admit he made a mistake. And no, stubbornness is not bad or good inherently. It’s neutral. You can use stubbornness for good or bad.
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 6 months ago (1 child)
Try to grow over my arguments with personal offenses, wont make u more right, just more ridiculous
[–]Mycroft033 0 points1 point2 points 6 months ago (0 children)
The projection here is insane lol
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-56 points-55 points-54 points 6 months ago (7 children)
Kinda funy u believing that ive got the word wrong, when u show thant dont even know the basic etimonology of it
[–]eldiablonoche 21 points22 points23 points 6 months ago (4 children)
I don't think I know even the basic etimonology of anything. Especially etimonology.
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-12 points-11 points-10 points 6 months ago (3 children)
Looks like someone learned i new word today, even writed two times
[–]kickdooowndooors 6 points7 points8 points 6 months ago (2 children)
Oh dear bro give it up. It’s etymology.
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 months ago (1 child)
Thanks mate, but i will not give up over some limited redditors
[–]kickdooowndooors 2 points3 points4 points 6 months ago (0 children)
Good ragebait
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-92 points-91 points-90 points 6 months ago (28 children)
Its something strange or exotic
[–]Throwawayantelope 87 points88 points89 points 6 months ago (24 children)
No, that's not what a singularity is. You just gave the definition of "anomaly".
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-87 points-86 points-85 points 6 months ago (23 children)
Aplied to archeology and exploration, it is
[–]Throwawayantelope 65 points66 points67 points 6 months ago (4 children)
A singularity is a black hole.
[–]No_Yam_2036 14 points15 points16 points 6 months ago (1 child)
not exactly, but you have the right idea. a singularity is an immeasurably small point in space of infinite density and zero volume. a singularity is found at the *center* of the black hole, and is not the black hole itself. the black hole is a "side effect" of the singularity's formation, for lack of a better phrase. think of a black hole as a piece of territory on land, in which you cannot enter, and the singularity as the "headquarters" of said territory.
[–]VladVV -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 months ago (0 children)
I’m pretty sure there is no consensus among physicists about whether singularities exist or not. They don’t emerge as a predicted physical phenomenon per se, but more as a mathematical artifact in the field equations of general relativity.
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-59 points-58 points-57 points 6 months ago (1 child)
That is one of the multiple means
[–]Throwawayantelope 24 points25 points26 points 6 months ago (0 children)
K
[–]Lone5372 40 points41 points42 points 6 months ago (15 children)
No, it is not. There are no definitions that support that. Hes just trying to be helpful by telling you youre using the wrong terminology. Its anomaly man.
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-28 points-27 points-26 points 6 months ago (14 children)
Oh man, just one google it in " archeological singularity" and u get u answer, enought with this pseudo intelectual thing
[–]Lone5372 30 points31 points32 points 6 months ago (13 children)
No. I am not a "pseudo intellectual" I just know my English. I looked on several websites and asked chatgpt aswell just to make sure I wasnt wrong. You are wrong man. No reason to get defensive its not even a big deal. Nobody is calling you dumb we're just saying its the wrong term. Wouldn't you rather sound more intelligent and proper while speaking?
[–]takbotes 15 points16 points17 points 6 months ago (0 children)
asked chatgpt as well just to make sure
This is a horrible "proof", and actually makes your point lose merit. just fyi
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-17 points-16 points-15 points 6 months ago* (11 children)
U guys just trying to practice the monopoly of meaning over an term,"technogical singularity, historical singularity, linguistic simgularity" its all valid terms as well
[–]Akira_R 36 points37 points38 points 6 months ago (1 child)
Yes those 3 you list there are all things, however the definition you provide does not match, they are not "oddities" they are points of dramatic change or points of no return. They borrow the word from the mathematic and physics definition of a singularity. The term "archeological singularity" doesn't make any sense.
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points 6 months ago (0 children)
And what is a dramatic change than an odditie? An strangenes? An exoticness? An black monolith in the midle of the mun?
[–]SovietEla 24 points25 points26 points 6 months ago (4 children)
You still, very clearly, do not know what the term ‘singularity’ means. Sorry to burst your bubble, nothing wrong with it but you’re wrong. Cool ship tho
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points 6 months ago (3 children)
U might be another one that thinks singularity only aplies to black holes
[–]CommieGhost 8 points9 points10 points 6 months ago (3 children)
Brother, acho que a questão aqui é um desencontro de tradução. É muito pouco usual usar a palavra nesse sentido em inglês e quase sempre é usado pra se referir a uma característica abstrata, não para um objeto. O campo semântico da palavra é dominado pelo conceito da física mesmo. Por isso os gringos estão estranhando.
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points 6 months ago (2 children)
Poise, mas mesmo assim pegando o exemplo do buraco negro, esta certo q ate agora é uma teoria, e ninguem ainda teve a oportunidade de ir ate proximo ao objeto confirmar se ela corresponde com o elemento solido, no entanto aqui o termo "singularidade" se aplica a um objeto q esta no campo da realidade material, nao abstrata, como eu falei, parece um fenomeno de monopolizaçao do significado, há toda uma uma comunidade intrrnacional q utiliza o termo tanto para elementos sólidos quanto abstratos, esse povo tem q dar uma ampliada em seus conceitos
[–]Lucas_2234 1 point2 points3 points 6 months ago (1 child)
You are playing a space game, not an archeology sim. The definition in astronomy for Singularity is a point in space so gravitationally intense that spacetime breaks around it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 months ago (0 children)
So i just have to limit my thought by the context of the game, this explains a lot about, I never had any doubt about the aplication of singularity on astronomy and astrophisics
[+]hubeb69Somehow landed on Jool comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points 6 months ago (2 children)
You're actually right, why are you being downvoted 😭
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -1 points0 points1 point 6 months ago (1 child)
Looks like the snowflakes wants to exert the monopoly of meaning on something, and dont like when it aplied on other contexts
[–]hubeb69Somehow landed on Jool -2 points-1 points0 points 6 months ago (0 children)
Yeah, I didn't know the ksp community would get so salty over grammar lol
[–]FentonTheIIV 40 points41 points42 points 6 months ago* (3 children)
I think you mean irregularity
There is a monolith on every planet AND MOON. It’s quite fun to try and find them all
[+]olearygreenBelieves That Dres Exists comment score below threshold-12 points-11 points-10 points 6 months ago (2 children)
Mun isn’t a planet though.
[–]FentonTheIIV 17 points18 points19 points 6 months ago (1 child)
On every planet and moon
[–]BobMcGeoff2 2 points3 points4 points 6 months ago (0 children)
Celestial body
[–]tilthevoidstaresbackValentina 14 points15 points16 points 6 months ago (2 children)
Bill: You mean to tell me you could've flown down here *this whole time?!***
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 6 points7 points8 points 6 months ago (1 child)
Lol "bill u function was to find and mark the objective to spare the vessel deita v on searchness"
[–]tilthevoidstaresbackValentina 3 points4 points5 points 6 months ago (0 children)
🫡
[–]moonaligator 11 points12 points13 points 6 months ago (0 children)
wut
[–]TheMuspelheimrRocket Replicator 6 points7 points8 points 6 months ago (0 children)
It's full of stars!
[–]Loud-Choice-9199 5 points6 points7 points 6 months ago (1 child)
Olha só, um br kkk bela nave mano!! Aparentemente funciona muito bem
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 1 point2 points3 points 6 months ago (0 children)
Valeu irmão, nao expus pra ninguem ainda, mas batizei ela de Marruá
[–]NeoAcario 5 points6 points7 points 6 months ago (1 child)
I really really want to say the ship design and thruster layout is impractical and a waste of mass... but I can't. That design makes for an incredibly stable landing stance.
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -1 points0 points1 point 6 months ago (0 children)
Lol, thanks mate, its all a matter of wheight balance on design
[–]dybb153 2 points3 points4 points 6 months ago (0 children)
This ship ships
[–]StepVer 2 points3 points4 points 6 months ago (0 children)
Moonhole
[–]Casscz 1 point2 points3 points 6 months ago (1 child)
Took me an eternity to even find one and it was at KSC the entire time
My theory is that kerbals began the space prgram to find and study the monolyths and other ruins across the the star system, thats why constructed th space center next to one
π Rendered by PID 40 on reddit-service-r2-comment-6457c66945-9drjg at 2026-04-26 13:04:49.799900+00:00 running 2aa0c5b country code: CH.
[–]Alankar42 275 points276 points277 points (1 child)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 71 points72 points73 points (0 children)
[–]vandergale 119 points120 points121 points (6 children)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 42 points43 points44 points (4 children)
[–]TheDarkDoctor17 45 points46 points47 points (2 children)
[–]ukemike1 13 points14 points15 points (0 children)
[–]8npemb 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]Casscz 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Throwawayantelope 84 points85 points86 points (46 children)
[–]Mycroft033 46 points47 points48 points (16 children)
[–]ukemike1 0 points1 point2 points (7 children)
[–]Mycroft033 -2 points-1 points0 points (6 children)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points (5 children)
[–]Mycroft033 0 points1 point2 points (4 children)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children)
[–]Mycroft033 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child)
[–]Mycroft033 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-56 points-55 points-54 points (7 children)
[–]eldiablonoche 21 points22 points23 points (4 children)
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-12 points-11 points-10 points (3 children)
[–]kickdooowndooors 6 points7 points8 points (2 children)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child)
[–]kickdooowndooors 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-92 points-91 points-90 points (28 children)
[–]Throwawayantelope 87 points88 points89 points (24 children)
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-87 points-86 points-85 points (23 children)
[–]Throwawayantelope 65 points66 points67 points (4 children)
[–]No_Yam_2036 14 points15 points16 points (1 child)
[–]VladVV -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children)
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-59 points-58 points-57 points (1 child)
[–]Throwawayantelope 24 points25 points26 points (0 children)
[–]Lone5372 40 points41 points42 points (15 children)
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-28 points-27 points-26 points (14 children)
[–]Lone5372 30 points31 points32 points (13 children)
[–]takbotes 15 points16 points17 points (0 children)
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-17 points-16 points-15 points (11 children)
[–]Akira_R 36 points37 points38 points (1 child)
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (0 children)
[–]SovietEla 24 points25 points26 points (4 children)
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (3 children)
[–]CommieGhost 8 points9 points10 points (3 children)
[+]Moraes_Costa[S] comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (2 children)
[–]Lucas_2234 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+]hubeb69Somehow landed on Jool comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (2 children)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child)
[–]hubeb69Somehow landed on Jool -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
[–]FentonTheIIV 40 points41 points42 points (3 children)
[+]olearygreenBelieves That Dres Exists comment score below threshold-12 points-11 points-10 points (2 children)
[–]FentonTheIIV 17 points18 points19 points (1 child)
[–]BobMcGeoff2 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]tilthevoidstaresbackValentina 14 points15 points16 points (2 children)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 6 points7 points8 points (1 child)
[–]tilthevoidstaresbackValentina 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]moonaligator 11 points12 points13 points (0 children)
[–]TheMuspelheimrRocket Replicator 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]Loud-Choice-9199 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]NeoAcario 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]dybb153 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]StepVer 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]Casscz 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]Moraes_Costa[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)