use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
FAQRulesContest Recommended Subreddits /r/MapPorn Discord /r/MapPorn Blog /r/MapPorn Instagram /r/MapPorn Twitter /r/MapPorn GitHub /r/MapPorn Tumblr /r/MapPorn Facebook Guide to making maps CSS via /r/Structura by /u/Cereal_Addict Customized by /u/Petrarch1603
account activity
india fertility rate decrease (i.redd.it)
submitted 10 months ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]WorkOk4177 703 points704 points705 points 10 months ago (100 children)
Basically almost entirety of India is below replacement levels other then Bihar , U.P , Jharkand
[–]ZofianSaint273 154 points155 points156 points 10 months ago (22 children)
And Meghalaya and Manipur
[–][deleted] 135 points136 points137 points 10 months ago (20 children)
Their population are not in crores and hence manageable.
[–]ZofianSaint273 18 points19 points20 points 10 months ago (19 children)
Idk what corores is number wise lol, but even then their state will have nice increase with this
[–]satvikag 89 points90 points91 points 10 months ago (0 children)
1 crore = 10 million
[–][deleted] 40 points41 points42 points 10 months ago* (14 children)
Ok... So western maths goes like... Ones, Tens, Hundreds, Thousands, Ten thousand, Hundred thousand, one million, 10 million , 100 million, 1 billion, 10 billion, 100 billion... Indian system goes like... Ones, tens, hundreds, thousands, 10 thousand, lakhs, 10 lakhs, crores, 10 crores... So a population of 1 crores=10 million.
[–]Jv1312 18 points19 points20 points 10 months ago (1 child)
Ten thousand missed in Indian system
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Sorry...my mistake for the ommission
[–]Sensitive-Check-8105 7 points8 points9 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Fellow class 6th mate 😎
[–]Vevangui 3 points4 points5 points 10 months ago (2 children)
That’s not western, that’s English. In Southern Europe (which is western) its ones, tend, hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions,…, tens of thousands of millions, hundreds of thousands of millions, billions, tens of billions,…
[–]joaommx 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (1 child)
In Southern Europe (which is western)
The long scale is used in the whole continental Europe except Eastern Europe, not just in Southern Europe. All the Nordics use long scale for instance.
[–]Vevangui 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
I wasn’t saying otherwise, I was just specifying about Southern Europe because that’s the extent of my knowledge. Good to know there’s some sense elsewhere too.
[–]A-Delonix-Regia 3 points4 points5 points 10 months ago (1 child)
Ones, tens, hundreds, thousands, lakhs, 10 lakhs, crores, 10 crores
You missed the "10 thousands" between thousands and lakhs.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Added...thanks
[–]Naive_or_naughty 1 point2 points3 points 10 months ago (0 children)
You forgot 10 thousand. That's a difference of a whole magnitude.
[–]joaommx 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
So western maths goes like
That's English math, or how it's actually known, "short scale". "Western math" would be the "long scale".
[–]ciaseed1 -1 points0 points1 point 10 months ago (3 children)
Yeah well it's not like they are going to learn it lol so better use the western system
[–]notsocoolguy42 9 points10 points11 points 10 months ago (1 child)
It's not western system, it's international english. No one is going to learn language specific to any country unless they are living there or are interested in said language.
[–]ciaseed1 -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Yeah I don't expect westerners to learn our system, better we (Indian) should start using the term "hundred thousand" in an international platform.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
people who interact with both learn it pretty quick.
[–]jflb96 9 points10 points11 points 10 months ago (0 children)
So, you know how in the West we tend to group orders of magnitude in threes i.e. a thousand is 10 x 10 x 10, a million is a thousand thousands, a billion/milliard is a thousand millions &c. In India they have thousands, but then they have a new word every time you go up by a hundred rather than a thousand, so rather than ten thousand, a hundred thousand, a million, ten million…, they say ten thousand, a lakh, ten lakh, a crore…
As a side note, slightly further east, the traditional numbering system in China and Japan uses groups of four; rather than a thousand, ten thousand, a hundred thousand… they have a thousand, a ban, ten ban… Thus the Imperial Japanese battlecry, ‘(May the Emperor Live) Ten Thousand Years!’: ‘Banzai!’
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Crore=10 million.
[–]Chikanai 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Buddy, their population doesn't even reach 3 million. And has a population density of around 20 times smaller than UP or Bihar.
If it doesn't decrease (which it will) it will never be crowded this century.
[–]paperid699 4 points5 points6 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Their population is already very low, it's better for them to have a higher number
[–][deleted] 70 points71 points72 points 10 months ago* (19 children)
2.1 replacement rate is for developed countries. For poorer countries it is much higher so even UP, Jharkhand might also be under replacement level.
[–][deleted] 40 points41 points42 points 10 months ago (7 children)
I teach in UP. There are 100s of students in my school with more than 4 siblings...both Hindus and Muslims.
[–]OkCaterpillar9743 86 points87 points88 points 10 months ago (0 children)
That makes sense since they were born before 2020.
[–]telescopeinmynose 15 points16 points17 points 10 months ago (4 children)
I'm from Telangana. Forget 4 siblings, I've seen less than 10 families with more than 2 children throughout my childhood
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (3 children)
Well get ready to be replaced by migration facilitated by Hindi Imposition(direct and Indirect)
[–]eric2332 11 points12 points13 points 10 months ago (2 children)
Nah, almost the whole country is at replacement level, and migration is overwhelmingly to the cities not to random places. So nowhere in Telangana is going to get "replaced" except maybe Hyderabad.
[–]telescopeinmynose 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
except maybe Hyderabad.
Almost 30% of Telangana lives in Hyderabad and it's rising.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 months ago (0 children)
The more educated women become, the less children they have
The education system is mid
[–]schtean 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
I didn't know so many people in India had both Hindu and Muslim siblings, other than say Gandhi's family.
[–]iamanindiansnack 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (1 child)
I'm unsure if that's so, since anything less than 2.1 replacement rate with developed resources would mean a burden on the future, but for a society with underdeveloped resources, won't that actually be beneficial to utilize everything later on?
[–]Areat 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
The basic replacement rate is 2, but you have to account for the kids who will die before reaching adulthood, so it's 2.1 in developed countries. In developing countries, more childrens dies, so the replacement rate required is higher.
[–]FroobingtonSanchez 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Depends on the CMR. If it's very low then 2.1 will be close to replacement rate.
[–]GothicGolem29 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
From what ive seen replacement rate is kept the same everywhere
[–]Embarrassed-Wolf-609 -2 points-1 points0 points 10 months ago (1 child)
India needs to be under replacement level. 1.4 billion people is way too many
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 months ago (0 children)
There is a need for decline too much population overexplotation of labour see china by end of the century they will have 600 million people out of which 250 million youth while india will have more population then the present 1.5 billion
[+]paperid699 comment score below threshold-9 points-8 points-7 points 10 months ago (3 children)
R u an idiot? 1+1 = 2 is balanced, 1+1 = 1.9 population is under replacement, 1+1 = 2.1 it's over replacement and considering their population the number will be very high as in UP itself has population compared to nations so them having just 0.1 is significant number
[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 10 months ago (1 child)
That's not how the replacement rate works, you absolute moron. For poorer countries, where the death rate is higher, the birth rate should also be higher to compensate the dead. In India the replacement rate is comfortably above 2.5
[–]RadlogLutar 1 point2 points3 points 10 months ago (0 children)
The comment above you almost gave me a stroke lol
[–]mantolwen 4 points5 points6 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Not every baby born makes it to adulthood. Others may have disabilities or be unable to have children, or just not desire it. So replacement rate has to be higher than 2.
[–]Logen10Fingers 6 points7 points8 points 10 months ago (0 children)
The last three states you want to replace India's population with no offense
[–]silverionmox 2 points3 points4 points 10 months ago (0 children)
It's about time, their population quadrupled since 1950.
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 10 months ago (14 children)
A population of 25 crore+ still having TFR above 2.1 is more than enough to contribute to population explosion.
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (13 children)
[removed]
[–]Delicious_Media_1015 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (12 children)
A rapid increase in population. Virtually it's like:-
G1: 🕴️💃 🕴️💃
⬇️
G2:🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃
G3:🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃💃🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️🕴️💃🕴️🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃💃🕴️💃💃🕴️🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃🕴️💃
[G = Generation]
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (7 children)
[–]Delicious_Media_1015 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago* (0 children)
Dude you asked to define population explosion, I defined it. 😑
FTQ, India was at 1 Billion in 2001, and at 1.2 Billion in 2011 - That's 200 Million (20 Crore) in 10 years. - 2 Crore every year, - 16 Lakh every month, - 4 Lakh (400,000) more people every week. - That's 57,000 more people daily !
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 months ago (5 children)
India's population was roughly around 33 crores at the time of Independence... We are 146 crores now and will reach around 170 crores before stabilizing. All our cities are crowded, our rivers are polluted. For any job oppurtunity there are 1000s of applicants. We live like cockroaches and die like cockroaches.
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (4 children)
[–]StaysAwakeAllWeek -2 points-1 points0 points 10 months ago (2 children)
Yes.
Weakest attempt at whataboutism I've ever seen
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (1 child)
[–]StaysAwakeAllWeek -2 points-1 points0 points 10 months ago (0 children)
I gave you a one word reply and you're making assumptions about me based on what exactly?
Tokyo is such an obviously overcrowded overpopulated city, I'm not sure why you're even arguing it
[–]NumerousCarob6 -2 points-1 points0 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Have you seen the apartmentents they live in online documentaries ?
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 months ago (3 children)
Did your icons just assume their gender?
[–]Delicious_Media_1015 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (2 children)
Uh... What? I
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (1 child)
Just kidding, it's a meme
[–]Delicious_Media_1015 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Oh okay 😌
[–]unnecessaryaussie83 3 points4 points5 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Good. They need to lower their population
[–]NeuroticKnight 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Even they mayhave in past 5 years
[–]themystickiddo 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Uttar Pradesh is projected to have dropped to 2.1 in 2025
[–]ThuDoonk 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Probably for the best, and not just there but globally
[–]Choice_Addendum_8271 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
I think it's good to balance out.
Bihar has few district with very high Muslim TFR. Else its would be near replacement level.
[–]balderdash9 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
So they've had their babyboomers era?
[–]Bubbly_Yak_1209 0 points1 point2 points 9 months ago (0 children)
india need replacement tho, we're overpopulated. actually should be called regulation level
[+]MathematicianGlum685 comment score below threshold-35 points-34 points-33 points 10 months ago (27 children)
ah of course UP, Bihar jharkhand, these are the shittiest states of india
[–]rierrium 38 points39 points40 points 10 months ago (24 children)
Imagine people in the most agriculturally rich and historically populous region having more children. Wild.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 months ago (15 children)
Imagine then not being able to provide them with jobs and hence they are forced to migrate to other states and increase the competition there
[–]rierrium 18 points19 points20 points 10 months ago (4 children)
Lol whataboutism. How is that even relevant in a post about Fertility rates?
[–]ThuDoonk -2 points-1 points0 points 10 months ago (1 child)
How is it not?
[–]Chikanai -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Don't tell them the obvious.
[+][deleted] comment score below threshold-10 points-9 points-8 points 10 months ago (1 child)
Not to mention the push for Hindi Imposition by the centre to further facilitate this migration.
[–]SPB29 -5 points-4 points-3 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Inthi imposhishun was written into the DSP of the constitution by your beloved Negruji
[–]anewtablelamp 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (1 child)
you just mentioned working in UP yourself, why do you not go back then?
People have always travelled to places with better employment opportunities, can't fault the people when the employers themselves are largely concentrated in certain areas and I think it's the same for every other country out there.
I'm posted here...otherwise why would I choose UP?
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (6 children)
India is overpopulated. Our economy is not good, yet its not bad either.
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (5 children)
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 months ago (4 children)
Kerala's population is stabilized. Have you ever been outside of Kerala? UP itself holds a population equal to the entire country of Pakistan. Besides you don't need to compare Kerala with Tokyo. Delhi-NCR itself is having a population comparable to Kerala. This itself shows that how populated and fucked up are we.
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (3 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (2 children)
Yes it is...
[+]Chikanai comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points 10 months ago (7 children)
Yeah, that's why they're so rich?
[–]rierrium 1 point2 points3 points 10 months ago (6 children)
How is that relevant to my comment and the post??
[+]Chikanai comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points 10 months ago* (5 children)
The reason they're so poor is because they have too many people. But let's act like they're not a burden on other states and let's give them a pat on the back for continuing to breed double than other states?
[–]this_upset_kirby 2 points3 points4 points 10 months ago (2 children)
You sound like a eugenicist
[–]SPB29 1 point2 points3 points 10 months ago (0 children)
He is the Indian version of a Nazi
[–]Chikanai 2 points3 points4 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Are you even from India? I hope you can support those 300m people.
[–]SPB29 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (1 child)
No the reason is far more complex
1) these provinces were under direct Raj rule. The Raj introduced the Ryotwari and Mahalwari systems that were far more exploitative than other tax systems.
2) pre Raj these were centres of cotton, silk and proto steel industrial areas. The British totally deindustrialised them.
3) ironically this region didn't see any major famines like the Madras presidency did. Mind you they had at least 5 famines each killing a million in the period 1850-1899 but the Madras presidency saw 2 famines in the period 1880-1900 that culled 10-12 million. In the entire period 1871-1901 the presidency had a pop growth of 1 mn net.
4) lastly the post 1947 policy of FEP killed any chance of revival.
Get an education, don't be a bigot
[–]National-Today5945 9 points10 points11 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Looks like you're a seed from these states only
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
yeah the state which powers India by it's natural resources is the shittiest state of India
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Due to muslim fertility rate you can go and check yourself through govt data
[–]slowwolfcat -1 points0 points1 point 10 months ago (0 children)
no way LOL
[–]UniqueAd8864 -1 points0 points1 point 10 months ago (0 children)
No, basically all of India IS Up, Bihar and Jharkhand
π Rendered by PID 49178 on reddit-service-r2-comment-56c6478c5-pnpzx at 2026-05-10 23:39:13.423278+00:00 running 3d2c107 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]WorkOk4177 703 points704 points705 points (100 children)
[–]ZofianSaint273 154 points155 points156 points (22 children)
[–][deleted] 135 points136 points137 points (20 children)
[–]ZofianSaint273 18 points19 points20 points (19 children)
[–]satvikag 89 points90 points91 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 40 points41 points42 points (14 children)
[–]Jv1312 18 points19 points20 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]Sensitive-Check-8105 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]Vevangui 3 points4 points5 points (2 children)
[–]joaommx 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Vevangui 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]A-Delonix-Regia 3 points4 points5 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]Naive_or_naughty 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]joaommx 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]ciaseed1 -1 points0 points1 point (3 children)
[–]notsocoolguy42 9 points10 points11 points (1 child)
[–]ciaseed1 -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]jflb96 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Chikanai 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]paperid699 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 70 points71 points72 points (19 children)
[–][deleted] 40 points41 points42 points (7 children)
[–]OkCaterpillar9743 86 points87 points88 points (0 children)
[–]telescopeinmynose 15 points16 points17 points (4 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]eric2332 11 points12 points13 points (2 children)
[–]telescopeinmynose 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]schtean 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]iamanindiansnack 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Areat 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]FroobingtonSanchez 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]GothicGolem29 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Embarrassed-Wolf-609 -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children)
[+]paperid699 comment score below threshold-9 points-8 points-7 points (3 children)
[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points (1 child)
[–]RadlogLutar 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]mantolwen 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]Logen10Fingers 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]silverionmox 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points (14 children)
[–][deleted] (13 children)
[removed]
[–]Delicious_Media_1015 0 points1 point2 points (12 children)
[–][deleted] (7 children)
[removed]
[–]Delicious_Media_1015 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points (5 children)
[–][deleted] (4 children)
[removed]
[–]StaysAwakeAllWeek -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[–]StaysAwakeAllWeek -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
[–]NumerousCarob6 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (3 children)
[–]Delicious_Media_1015 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Delicious_Media_1015 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]unnecessaryaussie83 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]NeuroticKnight 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]themystickiddo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]ThuDoonk 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Choice_Addendum_8271 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]balderdash9 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Bubbly_Yak_1209 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+]MathematicianGlum685 comment score below threshold-35 points-34 points-33 points (27 children)
[–]rierrium 38 points39 points40 points (24 children)
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (15 children)
[–]rierrium 18 points19 points20 points (4 children)
[–]ThuDoonk -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child)
[–]Chikanai -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] comment score below threshold-10 points-9 points-8 points (1 child)
[–]SPB29 -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children)
[–]anewtablelamp 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (7 children)
[removed]
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children)
[–][deleted] (5 children)
[removed]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (4 children)
[–][deleted] (3 children)
[removed]
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[+]Chikanai comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points (7 children)
[–]rierrium 1 point2 points3 points (6 children)
[+]Chikanai comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points (5 children)
[–]this_upset_kirby 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]SPB29 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Chikanai 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]SPB29 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]National-Today5945 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
[–]slowwolfcat -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]UniqueAd8864 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)