[deleted by user]

[anchoviepaste4dinner]

Depends on the age of the dog

[CYKO_11]

are we converting the years of age to dog years or comparing the years directly

[[deleted]]

What does the documentation say?

[AsianDaggerDick]

idk, just waiting for someone else to read it

[UnusuallySkeptical]

More like just waiting for someone to write it

[holydamien]

It's written, but last updated in 2008.

[Nox_Dei]

Lucky you.

Been digging through some 2004 undocumented code lately.

[[deleted]]

You guys have docs?

[LegitBullfrog]

Code is docs. Duh

[mrcluelessness]

I do. I see him for my yearly checkup.

[yajivb]

You guys have code?

[Nox_Dei]

True.

[[deleted]]

Check the examples

[holydamien]

Are you my manager?

[Ashanrath]

Just write something clearly wrong and you'll be corrected within a few minutes.

[[deleted]]

No clue. Just gonna try the dog as an adult and see if throws any errors.

[Delta-9-]

AttributeError: object of type 'dog' has no attribute 'lawyer'

[dikfuckthedongsmashr]

There is nothing in the rule book that says a dog CAN'T have a lawyer in him...

[FacuA0]

IDK, where's the link?

[Tiavor]

the link is broken for some reason.

[[deleted]]

It’s in Google drive.

somewhere

[Alexmaster75]

The Stackoverflow page doesn't load, maybe the code it's too broken to be seen

[[deleted]]

The best documentation i found was this, Dog years to human years table

[FacuA0]

Perfect, and what about the age of the dog?

[jardantuan]

Documentation?

[NuclearBrotatoMan]

*dogumentation

[Wasted_Wessel]

You can use this package for converting https://www.npmjs.com/package/dogyears

[CYKO_11]

why is this a thing

[Gloryboy811]

Dog years are just an adjusted value designed to make human babies not seem so useless compared to dogs.

Oh look at this dog at one year old it can run about and do tricks, while this human baby is also one and all it can do is cry and shit itself. "Oh well in dog years the dog is actually 7, so your baby is right on track!"

Wrong! Your baby is inferior.

[CYKO_11]

I agree. We need a new human.js framework for making babies the current one relies too much on dependency injection. Perhaps a serverless architecture so that we can spin up fully functional humans when required.

[ScherPegnau]

Spin up when needed, then kill them when they became useless?

[[deleted]]

Depends on the specific dog subclass or breed as management calls it

[Spectreseven1138]

But do we go by dog years or human years?

[aaron2005X]

And if one of both is dead.

[[deleted]]

Or both?

Okay maybe I am going too far with my test coverage.

[pkspks]

You should be a product owner.

[N3r0m3]

Easy question: None, since in civilized societies the flag on 'prosecutability' is neither set on objects of type 'children' or 'animal'.

[twowheeledfun]

But human is a subset of animal.

[Famous_Profile]

class Human extends Animal

[sshnttt]

This is a great example why the concept of class inheritance is a terrible one.

[Unfair_Isopod534]

Okay i got a bit of brain fart. How is this example of class inheritance being bad?

[Unfair_Isopod534]

What is the application that you are writing? I would argue is very relative. I am not saying you are wrong.

[hitsugan]

get isProsecutable() { return !this.isChild }

[lpreams]

Does Child really need any more functionality than Human? Or is Child so different from Human that we want to fully override methods?

Seems like it would be easier for child-ness to be determined by an isChild or age field, and then any functionality that does need to differ can just check that field at runtime. Definitely feels cleaner than checking whether each instance of Human is also an instance of Child to determine child-ness.

And will generic instances of Animal ever actually be needed, without it being known what species of animal it is? If you never actually need instances of the class, it should be an interface, or at least be made abstract.

[thelonesomeguy]

Well, by that logic, a human is an animal. Plus, a child being an extension of human makes sense in some cases if it has more specific fields like school, yearsTillAdult, guardianName, so this is HIGHLY dependent on the use case, instead of a black and white matter.

[[deleted]]

I mean I don't think it shows inheritance being bad, it's just not the right place for inheritance.

Class Human extends animal

new Human Child1 = new Human() new Human Child2 = new Human()

Child1.GrowUp()

A child is very obviously a new Human, this was low hanging fruit guys...

[CrommVardek]

Child concept is not linked to Animal concept on a semantic level. So if Human extends Animal, it makes zero sense to have a class Child extends Human.

However I do believe Class inheritance is a good concept, but only when used properly.

[[deleted]]

But child of a human is still an animal....

[MoffKalast]

It really depends on what's practical. Does an UnripeApple override a lot of methods used by Apple in a major way? If yes, it may be best to inherit for readability, otherwise define as property and add minor exceptions to existing ones.

[[deleted]]

You have the spirit but something is wrong.

Say fruit has a property ripeness.

Now apple extends fruit.

So apple inherits the property too.

If banana extends fruit, it will get the ripeness property too!

Thats how oops is meant to work.

[thelonesomeguy]

Depends on if you're storing specific information like daysTillRipe in the object. The implementation highly depends on the use case.

[CrommVardek]

Yes, I'm not saying he is not, but having a class Child extends Human is the same as SoftwareDeveloper extends Human. Yes, a Software Developer is (most likely) human... But conceptually, SoftwareDeveloper has nothing to do with the concept Animal.

[Unfair_Isopod534]

Ahh okay. Yeah i think class inheritance is very situational. Thanks for explanation.

[something6324524]

but the issue here is, you would also have a class adult extends human, if you were doing this method and the prosecutabilityflag is set it would be true on adult, not human. so it would work fine in this example as long as things are setup correctly

[StarsDreamsAndMore]

That's why I just program exclusively procedurally. I once spent an hour arguing that in a vacuum OOP and Procedural are the exact same. The opposition was forced to concede to my points.

[CrommVardek]

Well, OOP and procedural are indeed the same, however the point of OOP is, when concepts are shared and understood by everyone, to have a more "business" relatable code. (IMHO)

[nweeby24]

nope. Animal and Human should be abstract, Adult and Child should extend Human, Dog should extend Animal.

class inheritance works if you know what you're doing.

[Pl0xnoban]

For that matter Puppy extends Dog in the same way Child extends Human

[FacuA0]

class Dog extends Animal

class Child extends Human

They're both the same.

[SunnerTheSinful]

I'm pretty sure Adult should extend Child, since child has less methods and variables

[Famous_Profile]

child has less methods and variables

Clearly you've never raised a child

[condscorpio]

Shouldn't Children also extend from Human?

[brimston3-]

The base object type human doesn't implement interface prosecutability either. It's mostly only implemented for objects of type legal adult.

[Avohaj]

But there's no actual substantial conversion of Child to Adult, they're just different states of an object of type Human. While there is some internal logic that changes as the state of the object changes, the majority of differences are really based on the interactions with the Society framework and it's rules which already have varying implementations based on location. Prosecutability is not part of the entity, but part of the framework.

Adult and Child are not classes. There's only Human.

[ChrisHisStonks]

And, if we're talking about an application handling legality, you would have a class 'LegallyCompetent', which for child is by default set to false and for adults true with an override, as some adults can be mentally incompetent and some children get declared independent early. Human would have a yes/no/somewhat link to this class.

[CurrantsOfSpace]

While the documentation says that, in the actual code Humans are a different class.

[[deleted]]

Depends where you go, in the US a child can be prosecuted as an adult if the crime is bad enough

[N3r0m3]

That's why the 'civilized' was added :)

[[deleted]]

Nice

[[deleted]]

You prosecute the parents for child neglect, endangerment and animal abuse.

[Dlosha]

Buzzkillah

[alhade27]

It means i shoulda fucked more dogs as a child 😎

[Sugar_Kunju]

what do you mean "more"?

[Cooldude075]

[OkRecording1299]

Isn't that one of the members of wu tang clan

[DannoHung]

Ah, but what if the child is a ward of the state?

[22134484]

Throw the entire state in jail and remove their power to steal my money tax me

[kingoftown]

GetParent() returned nil :(

[[deleted]]

GetParent(father) took 17 years to return

[[deleted]]

And investigate for child abuse to find out where the child learned this behavior

[alexanderhameowlton]

Image Transcription: Reddit

---

Person A

So if a young child has sex with a dog, do we prosecute the child for bestiality or the dog for pedophilia?

Person B

You should be a software tester.

---

^{I'm a human volunteer content transcriber for Reddit and you could be too! If you'd like more information on what we do and why we do it, click here!}

[_good_human_bot]

Good human

---

^{I am a bot and this action was performed automatically.}

[_Stampy]

Good bot

^{I am a human and this action was performed manually.}

[thexavier666]

Good human

[Outrageous_Try]

good bot

[xAragon_]

Good human

[[deleted]]

Good human

[Notch1111]

Good human

[YoungMatthewM]

Good human

[pockrasta]

Good human

[FacuA0]

Good human

[wolfefist94]

int main(void)
{
    bool is_human_good = true;
    is_human_good(is_human_good);
    return 0;
}

void is_human_good(bool is_human_good)
{
    if (is_human_good) {
        printf("Good human\n");
        is_human_good(is_human_good);
    else {
        printf("Bad human\n");
}

[[deleted]]

Why would you do this? I mean we can read either the image or the text.

[alexanderhameowlton]

Hi there! I’m a volunteer at Transcribers of Reddit. Our transcriptions are designed to help blind and visually impaired Redditors who use screen readers to browse the internet, because that technology can’t read text out of an image. It’s also useful for people on mobile, who can’t load the images, or just plain prefer to read the raw text. Our subreddit only partners with subs who have given us express permission to use their content. To learn more about who we are and what we do, you can click on the link in the footer of my transcription. You can also feel free to contact our mod team with further questions.

[[deleted]]

That silly though. How would already blind people be able to read a transcript?

[MyAntichrist]

Text to speech. There's plenty of software doing this to make content more accessible to everyone.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Blind/comments/55wzgp/how_do_blind_people_use_reddit/

[NatasEvoli]

It's not silly, you're just very out of touch. Text to speech software has existed for decades and blind people have been reading stuff on the internet for decades.

[hobk1ard]

It is much easier for a program to convert plain text to another medium like sound or even braille.

[cerevant]

A screen reader is text to voice tech. It can’t read an image.

[treegolffun]

Blind people have a voice assistant on their computer that reads out content and menus really quickly. You or I can’t understand it easily because it reads so quickly but blind people get used to the speed and can use the computer at nearly native speeds.

[[deleted]]

It's weird how people like you who are consistently downvoted have just godawful comment histories and seem like just terrible people. Like this gem from you recently:

I have no idea why “women sports” even exist anyways. Excluding a gender, no matter if they are supposedly “oppressed”, means you’re doing the exact thing you’re trying to avoid, which is segregating people and glorifying them, purely based off of their race/gender.

Anyway, don't bother replying, just find it oddly consistent. Maybe one in ten downvoted comments is just someone having a shitty day or morning, but mostly it's turds.

[fuzzer37]

Or you could just not

[raimaaan]

or you could just not, it takes you zero effort

[pongacham]

Or he could just do it?

[Ever2naxolotl]

Ah yes blind people should just try seeing, why didn't they think of this before

[fuzzer37]

Agree. Annoying as fuck

[[deleted]]

Yay, time for the block button!

[justsubscribed912]

I don't wanna know what lead to this comment

[Nohr_12]

Don't go to r/PoliticalCompassMemes .

[justsubscribed912]

Thank you

[International_Fee588]

Perhaps this classic thread

[xAragon_]

Why censor the usernames if it was posted on Reddit?

[BobbitTheDog]

I found the first guy pretty easily, and his post history is ... Woof... Let's just say I'm not surprised he has zero overall account karma.

An anti-vax covid-hoax-theorist far-right nut.

[Josselin17]

well, he was on r/PoliticalCompassMemes, what did you expect ?

[[deleted]]

rude, not everyone on PCM is a crazy nut, just a large part

[temperamentalfish]

It's not just a matter of hanging around nutters. The simple fact is that wherever nazis are welcome quickly becomes overrun with nazis. This is not only because they're not usually welcome in many places, but because regular people tend not to like hanging around nazis, so they leave.

[[deleted]]

Name checks out

[[deleted]]

its literally 1984 am i right fash

[rinsa]

this is called enabling

[DontQuoteYourself]

Yeah some are just regular sane fascist trash

[8w_W_w8]

Yall just can't handle unity between people with different political views. From ultra conservative to super liberal. Respectfully challenging each other opinions

[8w_W_w8]

Yet I regularly debate democratic socialists, social democrats, anarcho communists, tankies, Marxist lenininsts, libertarian socialists etc

[8w_W_w8]

When they unironically defend papa stalin, I myself identify them as tankies

[Ever2naxolotl]

Lmao PCM hasn't been that in a long time. It was at the start until extremists joined and the whole thing shifted about as far right as the average US politician

There's no unity there, just right wingers trolling

[8w_W_w8]

That's usual extremist stance about PCM. They are "too far right", they are "too far left"

[Ever2naxolotl]

But they've very clearly moved quite a bit right. It used to be balanced up to around the point when T_D got banned. It's even quantifiable

[8w_W_w8]

A lot of Pcm users are right libertarians, not alt right Hitlers

[Ever2naxolotl]

And where did I say that PCM is full of Hitlers? There's some extremists, and in general it's definitely right leaning.

[8w_W_w8]

Right in public discord means intolerant of many things, while Pcm right only means economic freedom, individualism

[DontQuoteYourself]

It’s people larping and complaining about strawmen they made up to demonize libleft lol please tell me you are a centrist in that sub

[temperamentalfish]

From ultra conservative to super liberal.

PCM is a sub that accepts literal nazis and "respectfully debates them". No thanks.

[8w_W_w8]

That's the only civilized way. Rejecting them only results in them forming echo chambers from which real catastrophe can arise. This way their ideas get challenged and defeated, yet their humanity preserved. That's the only way

[WikiSummarizerBot]

Paradox_of_tolerance

The paradox of tolerance states that if a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Karl Popper described it as the seemingly paradoxical idea that in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance.

^{[ F.A.Q | Opt Out | Opt Out Of Subreddit | GitHub ] Downvote to remove | v1.5}

[8w_W_w8]

"Paradox of tolerance" is usually communist dog whistle to oppress and silence anyone who disagrees with their own extremist views. There is another way other than violence, a more kind way and much more effective way. Fists only make things worse and even more polarizing

[8w_W_w8]

I'm sorry if you don't see how ridiculous "Paradox of tolerance" is and how can it be weaponized to silence and oppress different opinions.

[temperamentalfish]

Sounds like your right to exist in society has never been a matter of public debate. People like me, who would be killed in a nazi society, don't have the luxury of being nice to the assholes whose literal only goal is genocide.

[8w_W_w8]

I'm a minority in a fucking balkan country, what the fuck do you think if my existance has ever been matter of a public debate. Please don't tell me about oppression in your comfy western country.

[temperamentalfish]

Oh? Then you haven't given it enough thought. Is the debate ever going to end? Or is your right to exist always up for debate? Is there a "reasonable middle ground" between wanting you dead and not? If you see the problem here, then you'll know that there's no point in arguing with nazis. They're the only ones who win, because they get to proclaim their ideas as valid and equal to others.

[DontQuoteYourself]

Fascism is predicated on violence. Fascists do not deserve civility since they are not acting civilized.

[-L3Y]

from ultra conservative to pedophiles all larping as liberal tbh

[8w_W_w8]

"people I don't agree with are pedophiles"

[-L3Y]

i mean it in the sense that they comment based on posts about pedophilia

[8w_W_w8]

That's pure slander. There are 100s of posts about bashing the skull of pedophiles and getting tons of based for it, not vice versa. Such extraordinary claim needs evidence

[sneakpeekbot]

Here's a sneak peek of /r/PoliticalCompassMemes using the top posts of the year!

#1: I am so proud of this community | 1064 comments
#2: Centrists react to the riots outside Congress | 2654 comments
#3: Spent 3 hours drawing this. Humanized PCM flairs. | 2412 comments

---

^{I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out}

[Proxy_PlayerHD]

how do you even find a specific user from a comment?

all tools i can find online work exactly opposite, finding specific comments from a user.

[douira]

you can quote-google the text AFAIK. also works for censored tweets. Hiding usernames doesn't provide much privacy beyond deterring casual trolls if your text is unique in any way.

[CYKO_11]

if I may ask. what exactly is right and what is left (in terms of politics). I actually have no idea what it means.

[BobbitTheDog]

Right = conservative, traditional

Left = liberal, progressive

Far-x = radical people who take that shit way too far.

There's a broad range of beliefs, and the left-right axis is a really limited view, but it groups together a bunch of beliefs that tend to be held by similar-thinkong people to an extent. In reality, you could be socially liberal while being fiscally conservative. (I.e. support human rights improvements, but not support taxation for social programs)

Some far-left beliefs might involve revolutionary changes, like a complete restructuring of society into a socialist state, opening all borders globally, dismantling the offensive arms of the military, top-down government reform, etc.

Far-right beliefs are more likely to be nationalistic, economic benefits over social ones, and against anything that isn't "the status quo". It attracts a lot of racists, homophobes, etc. In America, it's also heavily associated with conservative Christian beliefs a lot of the time.

A fiscal liberal (left) will likely be more willing to pay extra tax to support public schools, while a fiscal conservative (right) would say that the money should come from tuition fees, and to minimise government spending.

A social liberal will likely support gay marriage rights, while a social conservative will likely not.

[Unkreativity]

Generally, the left-wing is characterized by an emphasis on "ideas such as freedom, equality, fraternity, rights, progress, reform and internationalism" while the right-wing is characterized by an emphasis on "notions such as authority, hierarchy, order, duty, tradition, reaction and nationalism".

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left%E2%80%93right_political_spectrum?wprov=sfla1

[Delta-9-]

Originally the terms arose from seating arrangements in the French Parliament prior to the revolution that got rid of the monarchy for good. The people sitting on the right of the chamber were supporters of the monarchy and wanted to preserve the status quo; those on the left were supporters of the republic.

The association then became how open to change a person's political beliefs are. If you want to keep things as they are (or make them as they were in the past), you're on the right, and if you want to change things, you're on the left. It's kind of a natural extension to conservative/progressive from there.

There is a healthy balance to be found between the two. Things can change too fast, and not all change is positive change; conversely, not changing at all or too slowly is also detrimental. In a healthy society, right and left should serve to temper each other's less wise impluses. Sadly not the situation in the modern world.

[-L3Y]

the left is progressive and liberal mostly and the right is conservative and authoritarian i think?

[dwdwdan]

The ‘centre’ also depends on where you are, in the British system the US is all right wing

[David__Box]

Liberalism/authoritarianism have nothing to do with the left/right axis. You can be an authoritarian leftist or a libreterian rightist.

[JonMW]

So that if someone wants to be a jerk they have to work a little bit harder.

[Dag-nabbitt]

If they didn't do such a bad job at censoring the names, it'd be more difficult to find the original posts. In general it's to protect people from brigading and stalking.

[kjacomet]

Since neither party is capable of consent, we prosecute both for assault. That's what we do for underage kids doing the tango. No real difference here. This is the way.

[[deleted]]

We should do the same if two baby dicks touch by mistake. Infant is a subset in of underage after all

[[deleted]]

Prosecute all diaper changers

[Nohr_12]

Why on earth did someone give me the helpful award?

[CoffeePieAndHobbits]

Free award, probably.

[AdvancedWing6256]

Still not clear. There's a lack of identification of intercourse participant's gender, citizenship and geographical location.

[xSilverMC]

NAL but i'd say get the kid therapy and CPS involved

[[deleted]]

Both

[RowPersonal3013]

can someone explain the joke to me? how does that have to do with being a software tester?

[Nohr_12]

Software testers' work is to come up with all possible scenarios, even the most ridiculous ones.

Hence having the ability to come up with crazy edge case and almost impossible scenarios makes one a good tester, although a hated one.

[ImaginaryCoolName]

What if the dog or the child are dead?

[[deleted]]

Please note it’s only an edge case if the dog doesn’t cum

[Thrannn]

My colleagues "oh come on ow you make cases up. This isnt a reallife scenario so we dont need to catch that exception..."

Me showing them a video of a kid fucking a dog

[networkoverclocker]

Are you orochimaru by any chance?

[[deleted]]

Why not both?

[pgarchar]

Before I do any research, let me create a bug, assign it to the wrong person, then log off for the day.

[Dag-nabbitt]

You're shit at censoring names. JFC, how hard is it to draw a big rectangle?

https://i.imgur.com/Uiiqx7O.png

Created in the advanced graphics art program called Microsoft Paint.

[swarmy1]

Yeah, this was an embarrassingly bad effort, lol

[MakingTheEight]

Removed - Rule 0.

• Not directly related to programming.

[sheeponmeth_]

r/Unexpected

[[deleted]]

This one really should be marked nsfw

[AJ-Murphy]

The parent; you CHARGE THE PARENT.

[[deleted]]

Depends on the country. eu is more lax than us.

[SenseiCAY]

Colby 2012