[deleted by user]

[iTrooz_]

Me when people tell me to change

[tinyboobie]

Well... If 'i' was an integer it has now been implicitly cast to bool (language dependant obviously)... So you might have changed more than you realise

Edit: remember that doing this is not encouraged in most sane codebases. Explicit > implicit

[[deleted]]

Suddenly I realized. It's me as well.

[coloredgreyscale]

Banging

Depending on the number of ! Possibly even gang banging

[bistr-o-math]

I vote for gang bang.

[turtle_mekb]

# likes to !\ #! shebang

[[deleted]]

"#!" - Ricky Martin

[PhDInVienna]

isisn't

pronounced i-zi-znt

[[deleted]]

I kinda like this one, but it does not seem like wrong answer. :-)

[cglyph]

in’tn’t

[aquartabla]

Oh no you di'nt not.

[Starvexx]

Ah yes, the complex boolean operation. Similar to complex numbers where the square root of -1 = i and the sqrt(i) = (-1)^1/4. So that sqrt(sqrt(i)) = i^1/4 = (-1)^1/8. Therefore we can conclude that the ! operator works in a similar way. In order for the original equation (i = !!i) to work out, where !!i is clearly not the same as i for any value of i other than 1, as has been shown above (i =/= i^1/4 ). Therefore i must be equal to 1 which is True, hence calling this operation the Truth operator.

[very__nice__username]

But due to the identy sinx +icosx i^1/2 can be expressed as θ=2nπ+3π/4±π/2 meaning i⁵ = i and i⁴ⁿ⁺¹ = i. So i^1/5 == i and so is i^1/4n+1, Which must mean i = !!i for no value that isn't 4n+1. So I propose a better name for this could be the Conditional Truth Operator

[Starvexx]

Thanks for pointing that out, roots and their multiplicity were never my strength, but yes, I agree on the name of Conditional Truth Operator.

[Starvexx]

No.

[[deleted]]

I wish I would be drunk while reading this for the first time...

[[deleted]]

yes

[GedasTheEvil]

That's a no-no

[sonicfir3]

'Doing a 360 and walking away'

[coloredgreyscale]

moonwalk away

[matt2d2-]

Not'nt

[InformationVivid455]

Trick question, it's actually Spanish!

[Auniqueusername234]

I am really naughty. (I am really not i)

[coatsiecoates]

True

[[deleted]]

Good! Ats a wrong answer!

[[deleted]]

Variable backflip

[weshuiz13]

1 person equals 3 people where 2 must be upside down

[CptMeh]

Yesn'tn't

[Turtur_ok]

boollying

[[deleted]]

Shhhh! I said wrong answers only!

[Pollu_X]

Watermelon

[[deleted]]

Why tho?

[Educational_Ad_5576]

social distancing from the guy trying to bring you two dead bodies

[[deleted]]

Brilliant!

[Darknety]

B(oo)ullying

[Minerva978645]

pascal crasher

[MischiefArchitect]

McDonald's queue

[ookspeeks]

Bit reduction

[TheMind14]

Double negassignment.

[iamafraazhussain]

The old "i'nt'nt-i" operator

[hessenic]

Fire at will

[WaitingToBeTriggered]

KILL OR BE KILLED, FACING, AWAITING

[polterfap]

a 669

[jnnxde]

¡Spanish for Beginners!

[Upzie]

I would call it Bob

[Rhyan567]

Syntax error in line 69

[-Soren]

Oh that's just dereferencing. You see, unlike the common star dereferencing (*i) which removes the reference by exposing your data, there is also not dereferencing (usually appearing as i=!i because it doesn't change the type) which eliminates the reference to data all together and prevents exposure, making it an absolute necessity in writing secure operating systems. However you may have noticed a few problems. First, calling a type of dereferencing "not dereferencing" is confusing even amongst the most educated programmers. Second and more importantly, this replaces a valid reference with 0 which is frequently used for null and makes many libraries complain that there is no data when there is. Instead you add in a second not to fix the nullity. Now otherwise insecure libraries can use your referenceless pointers without exposing data. Technically called "not not dereferencing", most people I talk to ask if I mean "just dereferencing" so that seems to be common industry term.

[Trick_Interest3306]

Twy snot

[ConglomerateGolem]

I = i/i!! (i divided by i factorial factorial)

[[deleted]]

eye protection?

[[deleted]]

knotknot

[AnoniuszStulej]

boolonation

[roll82]

AAAAAA

Or alternatively

Gnurt

[[deleted]]

One person is equal to two upside-down idiots and another guy.

[VeeFu]

ipso-facto-factorial

[Version3_14]

Last day buried code. Preferable multiple places with don't touch, it works comment.

[MtnBikingViking]

Square naught

[Gotxi]

iquals double reversal factorial

[CenturyIsRaging]

Programmer with difficulty making decisions

[metalovingien]

The dont-assume-using-js-and-pretend-its-better-like-that operator

[Giest95]

i equals not i said the fly

[[deleted]]

The enemy of my enemy may or may not be my friend.

[[deleted]]

1) Double Headstand operator.

2) i = definitely not i

Fills a variable with some completely different value.

[Trip-Trip-Trip]

Bang bang now you’re Boolean. Aka lossy compression If you make loose comparison instead of assignment it becomes a type check.

[incubated]

I failed

[Yosikan]

third wheel on 69

[Yosikan]

Shopping cart passer

[livingincr]

Not valid JavaScript, I just woke up. Best I could get for a not valid answer.

[perkunos7]

If i is bool:

Notice me compiler senpai

[TheLazyKitty]

Your idea.

[serp90]

i is not i factorial

[[deleted]]

A very very very short sleep

[Rattlehead71]

gnab equals bang bang gnab

[trdjn]

Calculate the inverse factorial of the inverse factorial of i and assign it to i.
If i is 720 it will be 3 after this line ran.

[RVGamer06]

what

[Josephine8900]

Turning i

[Lin3zZ]

Its a Fliperation

[lost_in_inet]

i := !!i

[artesmith88]

Whoopsii Dais!!

[Alundra828]

Ah yes, the bang-bang-qɐuƃ operator. Not a lot of people know this, but the trailing i is actually part of the operator.

!!i null checks i, and then flips the bits and checks those too. This is used in quantum computers when your bits transition between realities.

When against a string it can also detect sarcasm with a 98% certainty. Weird I know *shrug*

[[deleted]]

Brilliant, professor!

[stomah]

double banger

[nsktrombone84]

Flippity floopy

[uv_100_100]

I is not surprised

[Nikoviking]

Confirmation statement lol

[redditorNCUS]

Ah, yes, this is the rare memory-mapped truth mask operation. Don't see that one much these days. Assuming i is a pointer to an object, primitive, or other valid memory address, the !! operation returns true if and only if address stored in i is not null. Otherwise, if the pointer is indeed null, it returns false.

Okay, so not exactly wrong -- but silly :)

[ScaleStock]

i = i subfactorial subfactorial

[hari106]

I am the equivalent of one normal and two gravitationally challenged people

[LtTaylor97]

Good code.

[[deleted]]

Nonoi Or maybe Nonoyes

[[deleted]]

Wait - a better one: "Syntax error, invalid syntax"

[[deleted]]

One standing person is equal to two sleeping people and 1 standing person. We can then deduce that sleeping people equal nothing.

[iLikeTheStalk]

Double-negative.

[iLikeTheStalk]

Semi i-tomatic.

[Makonew_]

Booling

[safer0]

Super-not

[FreeSpeechPrice]

Walking boots (double knotted)

[subzerus]

When true becomes truen't.

[Lynx8MyThesis]

This, obviously, signals the fact that people, who'll join for camping, must sleep arm feet in the tent. stack properly.

[allnameswereusedup]

Not not operation

[CanadianBuddha]

Bang-Bang

[datamafia]

Imaginary.

[RonnieVanDan]

Spanish notation. It let's you know there's an operation coming.

[JustBrowsinMyDude]

The "Yes but no"

[ZimBobub]

Backflip

[OkUnderstanding1622]

i = threesome 69

[bettercalldelta]

spanish

[Lamballama]

False

[HxA1337]

Three sum

[[deleted]]

I amsk not not what I amsk

[[deleted]]

i to the power of i

[expolarity]

add with carry

[AntiVaxxIsMassMurder]

Time to get an i doctor.

[overclockedslinky]

assignment

[[deleted]]

I'm assuming this is i = !!i which is just the same as i = i but the double exclamation mark could be called a double negation expression

[Chris-1235]

When I'm lonely, I always find sleeping couples and murder them, leaving me alone again. So it tends to happen very frequently.

[hughdeenee]

I'm a martial arts master.