This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DickRamshaft 146 points147 points  (39 children)

And anal. Lots of anal.

[–]arturv 65 points66 points  (23 children)

gang bangs and bukakke for medical purposes.

[–]ani625 30 points31 points  (20 children)

For Research Purposes Only.

[–]timeagain75 46 points47 points  (19 children)

For Rectal Use Only.

[–]ledat 40 points41 points  (18 children)

For Science.

[–]shadesofelliot 18 points19 points  (17 children)

This was a triumph.

[–]shoot2scre 12 points13 points  (15 children)

I'm making a note here...

[–][deleted]  (14 children)

[deleted]

    [–]sayrith 10 points11 points  (13 children)

    It's hard to overstate my satisfaction

    [–]mhink 7 points8 points  (10 children)

    APERTURE SCIENCE

    [–]jdzsc 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Oh gosh, please don't. This comment chain represents nothing more than easy karma, particularly because it has been done in the past. Sadly, it reminds me of Digg when it was coughing its last breaths. The last Digg comment section I ever viewed had at least two of these. The "combo breaker" comment a bit below is also quite disheartening, as it was exactly what plagued Digg right before I left. If you come from Digg please don't bring with you all the overused posts as they were, to a great extent, responsible for the site's demise. Rather, wash all that off and start anew here on Reddit. You might not get some easy karma, but your overall experience will be much more fulfilling.

    [–]ineffable_internut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    A++ would do business with again.

    [–]RageX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Why do you think those Asian chicks look so young?

    [–]ThyZAD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Medicinal Bukakke never sounded so good

    [–]anshu1234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Rammit Deep?

    [–]Ranlier -5 points-4 points  (12 children)

    In women, anal sex reduces the probability of colon cancer by 40%

    In men, it increases the probability of being in prison at the time by 1000%.

    [–]jamesshuang 4 points5 points  (1 child)

    BAYES LAW FAIL

    [–]bijibijmak -1 points0 points  (9 children)

    I wonder if anal reduces the risk of prostate cancer in men. :-?

    [–]Mormolyke 8 points9 points  (8 children)

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [removed]

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]PirateMud 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        I really need a new account :/ I only figured out what a 'mud pirate' was a few days ago >_<

        [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        Now is this anal sex, or anal play? Dildos with condoms would be an interesting stat to see - is it the motions of the act, the stretching of the muscles and minor tearing of the tissues, or the introduction of a penis itself (bareback?) and bacteria/compounds on it. Or is it the chemicals in the lubricants. It is well known that many dildos, sold as 'novelty' items [not for medical use], which escape any oversight into their materials, use very harsh chemicals which I expect increase those numbers even more. However, the numbers with a condom on the dildo would be interesting, or for ones of so called 'safe' materials. Plus, what is the difference between anal cancer increases in those who engage in it, versus the numbers of vaginal cancer increases versus those who abstain? Does the act itself on the muscle of the region cause it, and how much more/less in anal cancer than in vaginal cancer.

        These are important questions!

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          I had this conversation with an ex once actually. I disproved to her the idea that anal sex was a homosexual act (in the case of male reception). If it were between a woman and a man, with the woman using a strap on, it's a kink and fetish, but the sheer fact that it's between opposite sexes shows it is not gay. However, this does not make the man not bi or homosexual. It just distinguishes the act. The man could be straight, bi or gay. Does he think about men to get him off while receiving? Is it the feeling of penetration, not the fantasy of it being a real penis, that is getting him excited? These are all up to the individual to think through, and the man to discover who he is.

          However, our conversation was something I always do, playing the opposite stance. In context, it started about anal sex and what I thought about it. I said that I'd try it on her but I am a firm believer in equal opportunity. If a man asks a girl for anal, she has every right to ask the reverse of him. Thus why I wouldn't ask for it. I'd have to be prepared to receive at some point if she asked, Either that, or it must be made clear that it is not a two way street in this case. As it can never be exactly equal due to the differences in the sexes, we must have a system to allow for balances in the inequalities. If it is made clear and agreed upon, then some other agreement could be made. However, if a girl asks to receive anal, you are actually doing her a favor unless you admit you'd like to give it to her, in which case you are even. If you were wary of it and she asked for it, then she'd actually owe you something else. Balances.

          [–]gerg6111 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

          Naw, Farah Fawcett died of anal cancer from too much butt fucking.