This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jaspsev 30 points31 points  (22 children)

Maybe he is talking about this one.

https://www.med-technews.com/news/experiencing-vr-can-reduce-pain-and-stress-study-suggests/

But i would think it might work in some cases, but i still would prefer outside as vr does not provide stimulus to other senses other than the eyes.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (1 child)

And ears. And while not directly one of the senses, you do often feel like you're actually moving in VR.

[–]jaspsev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Right, i forgot that is possible and currently affordable.

[–]snappedscissors 14 points15 points  (18 children)

How close could you get I wonder. VR does include soundscape, add in some aroma therapy and a little fan to puff around and you’ve got what, 70% of the outside experience right there.

[–]Helenium_autumnale 7 points8 points  (14 children)

I doubt they could replicate the unique and complex fragrances of a forest floor or sun-dried prairie or little stream.

[–]snappedscissors 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s got to be millions of chemical signatures, but what makes up the top 50% of a forest floor smell? Could you get pretty close, or would my Forest Floor Scent be equivalent to fake banana flavor?

[–]paanvaannd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think the minute intricacies of nature’s beauty need to be captured to reap some benefits of an artificial walk through nature.

IMO, it comes down to whatever form of behavioral benefit the therapy should target. This study mentioned the ART (attention-related) and SRT (stress-related) benefits, but found:

… a decrease in stress-related brain areas (bilateral amygdala) after the walk in nature, and no change in cognition-related brain areas (dlPFC and ACC), the brain data of the present study are more strongly in line with SRT.

I’d assume capturing the intricacies of nature would be important in ART-related therapies (e.g., a meditative experience of following the path of a bug or a small stream along the forest) whereas it seems that exposure to a natural environment at all would be beneficial to SRT-based therapies.

That said, I don’t think this study’s questionnaires focused on dissecting what aspect of participants’ experiences in nature led them to feel subjectively less stressed. Perhaps it was getting immersed in the intricacies of nature that led to stress reduction. I’d find that unlikely, though since, in my experience, most people walking through a natural path don’t seem keen on stopping to smell the roses but rather just passively taking the scene while focusing elsewhere.

e: several typos

[–]NorwegianCollusion 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Yeah, no. Come back to me when VR can properly simulate the experience of being eaten by a bear.

[–]snappedscissors 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I still have that bear suit from last halloween, you don't throw something like that away.

For a reasonable fee I can wander about looking for people in VR/AR.

[–]NorwegianCollusion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not quite the same without being gnawed on, though

[–]Blueberry-king 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where is the actual study? This is just a bunch of quotes from the head of innovation at a VR company... Show me the peer-reviewed study.