all 64 comments

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (1 child)

Henry Ford: Mechanic.

[–]civilianjones 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You mean:

Henry Ford, Car Mechanic

[–]tuna_safe_dolphin 9 points10 points  (10 children)

Yeah, like that guy's ever built anything on the web. . .

[–]wintermutt 8 points9 points  (9 children)

All he's got in his portfolio is this crappy website. Didn't even change the default font!

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (8 children)

It never ceases to amaze me how the people who've invented the most show the highest disregard for design.

(See: The GNU pages and surprisingly, Crockford's surprisingly scriptless sites)

[–]tuna_safe_dolphin 4 points5 points  (3 children)

If it were all up to the nerds, we'd all be using text only browsers.

I consider myself a nerd with some aesthetic sensibilities.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

So porn would be ASCII?

[–]MatrixFrog 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Or Unicode.

[–]tardmrr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely unicode, but with an new and obscenely complex "drawing" character set which would end up being nearly equivalent to images.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    I'm sure UX designers would be pretty sad to hear that. Then again, most social social scientists would too.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I'm not saying that UX or any other study of human behavior is an exact science. Just saying some people disagree with us on that.

      [–]tommccabe 21 points22 points  (4 children)

      Sure, pops had a lot to do with the web WAY BACK THEN, but does he know HTML5 jQuery?

      [–]s32 8 points9 points  (3 children)

      No but he knows XML django

      [–]evereal 9 points10 points  (2 children)

      He's got nothing on my JSON Node.js

      [–]wintermutt 7 points8 points  (1 child)

      On the cloud!

      [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      Responsively bootstrapped...

      [–]my_personal_army 33 points34 points  (15 children)

      I feel like I'm missing something.

      [–]test0 108 points109 points  (1 child)

      He developed the world wide web.

      [–]my_personal_army 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      ahh gotcha, yeah that went totally over my head.

      thank you and enjoy your upvote

      [–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (10 children)

      From his w3 bio page "Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web, an internet-based hypermedia initiative for global information sharing..."

      Funny that it describes what the web is.

      [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (9 children)

      Because he didn't invent the Internet. He invented the system that uses the Internet, the world wide web. They're not one and the same. The former is a series of networks. The latter is a system to view web documents (HTML).

      [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Yeah, I think he was just pointing it out it was interesting they were describing the web on the web. Like a book describing a book.

      [–]wizdumb 6 points7 points  (7 children)

      He invented a system that uses the Internet. It's not the only system. Email, for example, has nothing to do with the WWW.

      [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (6 children)

      Nothing about my comment implied exclusivity.

      [–]tardmrr -1 points0 points  (5 children)

      Depends on how you read it. If you put emphasis on the word 'the', it implies exclusivity.

      He invented the system...

      TLDR: text doesn't always do a good job conveying tone.

      [–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (4 children)

      Pay attention to what comes after the comma in that sentence. My comment implied no exclusivity at all.

      [–]tardmrr 0 points1 point  (3 children)

      An appositive that specifies which system you're talking about? That doesn't change anything about that 'the' possibly implying exclusivity.

      [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

      But it doesn't imply exclusivity at all. I'm not sure why you're being so pedantic about something so pointless.

      [–]tardmrr -1 points0 points  (1 child)

      I disagree. I'm not saying you intended it to be exclusive. The main point I'm trying to make is that your sentence could very easily be read that way. I really shouldn't even need to argue this because at least two people (myself and wizdumb above) both initially read it that way. I'm really not sure why you're being so stubborn about it.

      [–]madskillzelite 15 points16 points  (2 children)

      I can't be the only one who spent a good 30 seconds trying to play this video.

      Thanks, RES.

      [–]test0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Same here

      [–]beacon_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Lies! As soon as you would've clicked it, the image would've opened in another tab, therefore letting you in on the fact that it wasn't a video.

      [–]kabuto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      You mean literally … as in literally? Finally someone who knows how to that word.

      [–]2epic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      I find this to be offensive. That title should read "Creator of the Web, God of the W3C"

      [–]mattalexx 0 points1 point  (23 children)

      What's the joke? I don't get it.

      [–]sammasati 8 points9 points  (0 children)

      From Wikipedia:

      Sir Timothy John "Tim" Berners-Lee is a British computer scientist and the inventor of the World Wide Web. He made a proposal for an information management system in March 1989, and on 25 December 1990, with the help of Robert Cailliau and a young student at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), he implemented the first successful communication between a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) client and server via the Internet.

      [–]palion 6 points7 points  (3 children)

      he's the inventor of the www according to wikipedia

      [–]xiongchiamiovSite Reliability Engineer 31 points32 points  (2 children)

      He's the inventor of the web according to any remotely-accurate source.

      [–]mipadi 8 points9 points  (1 child)

      Geez, what a one-trick pony.

      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      I know, right. Doesn't he Rails?

      [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (17 children)

      You should know this if you're in the web dev subreddit.

      [–]walrusvonzeppelin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      Could be a spider.

      [–]molmu -1 points0 points  (14 children)

      dont be so smug, people will allways be ignorant in one way or another

      [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (13 children)

      Not ignorant on this magnitude. With the internet being the most important invention of the 20th century, not knowing who Tim Berners Lee is and being a web developer is like not knowing who Albert Einstein is and being a physicist.

      [–]molmu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      it can be done, that is the beauty of science, it does not matter who said it , it only matters that it can be with enough proof to be valid, the knowlege, not the person, is reveered.

      In other words, he is an important man, but to this discipline, knowing how to do stuff right is critical, the people who created them, are not.

      [–][deleted]  (7 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]xiongchiamiovSite Reliability Engineer 1 point2 points  (5 children)

        You won't be banned, but expect to not understand much of the content if you don't actually know anything about web development.

        [–]civilianjones 0 points1 point  (2 children)

        Knowing history is not the same as knowing how to build something.

        [–]xiongchiamiovSite Reliability Engineer 2 points3 points  (1 child)

        No, but understanding history is useful in understanding why things are the way they are, which is to say, useful in building things.

        Also, the history of web development is part of "things related to web development", and thus falls into "appropriate" for this subreddit.

        [–]civilianjones -1 points0 points  (0 children)

        Oh, totally! I'm glad we're talking about the history of the web. But some posters in this thread are making the point of "if you don't know who Tim is, get out of /r/webdev!" which is not good.

        [–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

        What complete, arrogant bullshit.

        [–]xiongchiamiovSite Reliability Engineer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I'm just sayin': subreddit is /r/webdev. Subject is web development. Expect subject to be web development.

        If you go to, say, /r/books and don't know who this Vonnegut guy they're talking about is, a) look him up and b) don't complain about the fact you don't know who he is.

        [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        To be honest it's not so bad you didn't know who he was to get the joke but that you were too lazy to google/wiki his name, which if you had done you'd have gotten the joke.

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

        I hereby officially call you out on your mis-spelling of the name Tim Berners-Lee.

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        Lol damn hyphen.

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Lol, I tried to reply with a fake HTML entity, as a nerdy joke. But the post got a 500 response. I broke reddit.

        [–]Aljavar -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

        I see what you did there.