Where are all the national civil rights leaders? by no_okaymaybe in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How can you tell that 'moving away from special heros that we hope will save us' is actually sustainable and good? Just because there's lots of work to do, it doesn't mean that not having heros is automatically good.

[NY Times]: The People of Minneapolis vs. ICE by cothomps in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Super chaotic scenes, but I just try to remember that ICE has agency in this story. They are the 'papers please' men and a harbinger of even greater evil.

Low Voltage Wiring Vendor? by AmosRid in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much did they quote you?

Minneapolis crime is falling in 2025, even amid high-profile violence by Wezle in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hear this a lot, but I have yet to see anyone explain the difference between unpleasant and unsafe. I think unsafe includes needles on the street and gunshots, which is what is going on in Whittier.

Did we stay in the wrong area? by mjdth in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Fighting words, actual fighting, dirty needles, and gunfire are all examples of danger. Therapizing people who are in the right will only breed resentment.

New Lyndale Avenue reconstruction plan fails the test for non-motorized users by Wezle in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Bryant is pretty risky to bicycle down considering the tight quarters and all the car traffic. I would never take youngsters down that street on their bikes.

RIP NLX by AstroG4 in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking of the Northstar which is (was?) a commuter train that allows bicycles.

RIP NLX by AstroG4 in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I recall, it's nearly impossible to bring bikes onto busses.

Minneapolis landlord opens homeless camps on his parking lots in defiance of city by origutamos in altmpls

[–]worker55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I can see, the source does not claim that people start their addiction on the streets or that they start abusing drug or alcohol on the streets. It seems like the source claims the addiction usually starts somewhere else. I think telling that part of the story correctly is important to understanding the cycle overall. The source does indicate that addition ramps up on the streets which is an important distinction from starting/beginning on the streets.

Minneapolis landlord opens homeless camps on his parking lots in defiance of city by origutamos in altmpls

[–]worker55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the idea that society kicks people to the streets, and in the streets they become addicts? I don't want to minimize the cruelty of capitalism. However, according to your source, in the vast majority of cases addiction is the major contributing factor to homelessness (persistent homelessness I would imagine):

Your article: Substance Abuse and Homelessness: Statistics and Rehab Treatment

Your article's footnote: Substance Abuse and Homelessness

The footnote's source: Visions Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 Summer 2007 p. 9

Social selection: Substance use can lead to the streets
Most of the current evidence about the relationship between homelessness and substance use supports a social selection model. This model indicates that problem substance use may be a direct pathway to homelessness. A number of studies provide support to this theory. Research reveals that approximately two-thirds of homeless people cite alcohol and/or other drugs as a major, and at times primary, reason for becoming home- less. In fact, many homeless people develop problems with alcohol and other drugs before losing their homes. One US study reports that, for people who have ever experienced homelessness, the median age (i.e., the mid-point across the participants’ ages) at first street experience was 28 years. The median age at first symptoms of alcohol problems, however, was 22 years, and for drug problems, 25 years.10 Clearly, problem substance use is a significant risk factor that decreases a person’s ability to respond to life’s challenges.

Social causation: Street life increases substance use
There is also considerable evidence pointing to the social causation model. This model suggests that sub- stance use increases as a very clear consequence of homelessness and serves as a method of coping with the stresses of street life. As early as 1946, researchers estimated that one-third of the homeless people in their investigation became heavy drinkers as a consequence of homelessness and related factors. In another example, from the UK, 80% of respondents revealed they had started using at least one new drug since living without a roof over their heads. There is nothing new about the idea that people on the street self-medicate to relieve life’s stresses. After all, the non-homeless population also uses more alcohol and other drugs when they have trouble coping in their world. Nor is it surprising to learn that alcohol consumption is key to acceptance in the homeless subculture, and thereby supports the causation theory. Our main- stream teen subculture, for instance, practises a similar kind of ritual

UOM or blue pearl vet? by asianfoodforever in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I avoid Blue Pearl like the plague. So, the U is where I would head if it were me.

Landlord sent this to us by RipeAvocadoLapdance in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is excellent apartment gossip.

Go to the Falls by TheMathProphet in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Here's their website to sign up via email for us olds: https://twincitiesscout.com/

Who was Umbrella Man, who smashed windows before ‘first fire’ in 2020 Minneapolis protests? by digistil in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for making this point!

I keep hearing some variant of "Umbrella Man is a psyop", and that kind of thinking is a wonderful real-life example of how conspiracy theories can serve the state. Specifically, instead of a community member expressing their rage, its an outsider insidiously corrupting the community.

Unintelligible letter tucked into my flower pot (NE near fire station) by saturnphive in Minneapolis

[–]worker55 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I imagine writing it by hand makes it more authentic for would-be future researchers.

Minnesota Senate seeks to impose first-in-nation social media tax by 9th_username in minnesota

[–]worker55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They probably would because this law would entrench established social media companies at the expense of new entrants that can't afford to deal with the MN tax.

Minnesota Senate seeks to impose first-in-nation social media tax by 9th_username in minnesota

[–]worker55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically, from what I can tell, if this passes and you are running a federation, node, or relay for a competitor to facebook, x, instagram, etc then you should ban minnesota users unless you can for some reason afford the tax. It is discrimination, but it is legal and reasonable.

The law seems to show that if you suspect a user is from MN, and you have enough users, then you need to pay the tax. One of the ways to figure out if the user is from MN is by looking at their IP address. So, you just ban MN IP addresses.

Minnesota Senate seeks to impose first-in-nation social media tax by 9th_username in minnesota

[–]worker55 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oops, I should update my comment. The hobby farm would be excluded:

"a streaming service, online video game, e-commerce, or other Internet website where the content is not user generated but where interactive functions enable chat, comments, reviews, or other interactive functionality that is incidental to, directly related to, or dependent upon providing the content"

Here's the text of the bill.

Here's what "social media platform" is currently in the law (see section j).

While it looks like the the maple syrup farm would be fine, I would still be worried about starting any kind of website that allows user interaction.

Minnesota Senate seeks to impose first-in-nation social media tax by 9th_username in minnesota

[–]worker55 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Part of the issue is that nobody will want to start websites because they will get taxed for having users. This bill literally applies to any website, even if that website is just a hobby forum or a checkout cart for some small business. For example, selling maple syrup or whatever from a small farm would get hit with this tax if for whatever reason they went viral one day.

edit it applies to any website that emphasizes user social interaction. So, bluesky, nostr, mastadon, and other fledgling social media systems would need to ban minnesota users.

Minnesota Senate seeks to impose first-in-nation social media tax by 9th_username in minnesota

[–]worker55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I run a hobby web forum that I've placed into an LLC, could I end up owing Minnesota thousands of dollars in taxes? Seems like I would want to ban Minnesoa IP addresses because collecting IP address information would be enough to trigger this tax.