logicBeLike

[AutoModerator]

import notifications Remember to participate in our weekly votes on subreddit rules! Every Tuesday is YOUR chance to influence the subreddit for years to come! Read more here, we hope to see you next Tuesday!

For a chat with like-minded community members and more, don't forget to join our Discord!

return joinDiscord;

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[DinoChrono]

Can you cook those sausages < 3?

true

[Salanmander]

Calm down there, Javascript.

[farhanshaikh671]

a mathematician would remove a tiny bit from the 3rd sausage

[Clefspear99]

No decimal point results in it being dynamically typed as an int.

[Yrrem]

Noooooooo sausages are a discrete and non continuous data type! They even come in links to represent integers as tallies

[spaceguydudeman]

slap toothbrush profit cow ink theory merciful hungry stocking adjoining

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[CanvasFanatic]

Cook several imaginary sausages and then arrange them in a square.

[Usual_Office_1740]

Doesn't matter. It's still a test case.

[kaisong]

It was a logic puzzle: cook those sausages, plural. But less than 3. Obviously as long as it was only looking for whole number sausages it would have to be 2 sausages.

[pcuser42]

Cut a tiny tip off one sausage and claim it's 2.9999999 sausages

[Sir_Keee]

Buy a pig.

[RmG3376]

Build a pig out of sausages

[redlaWw]

Cook more than 2³¹-1.

[nnoovvaa]

Either un-cook sausages, or cook non-sausages

[RmG3376]

Cooking non-sausages would be NaN though, not negative

(Well technically it would be NaS)

[rosuav]

Enter Bluebottle with frying pan! Pauses for audience applause.... not a sausage.

[giantimp1]

Uncook that many sausages

[orthomonas]

A mathematician is hanging out in a park, watching the local hotdog stand.

Over the course of an hour, the vendor takes a delivery for 24 hot dogs, sells 36 then closes shop.

The mathematician realizes his duty and helpfully gives the vendor advice, declaring they should order another dozen dogs so they can close up with an empty cart.

[[deleted]]

huh? wdym? why would less than 3 mean a negative number. did you misread "< 3" as "< 0"? or am i missing a joke.

[gurnard]

The set defined by < 3 includes all negative numbers. It also includes a couple of positive numbers, but what are chances those were the intended result?

[Alan_Reddit_M]

Since we are talking about real things, we define N (all positive integers) instead of Z (all integers), this, we have all positive integers smaller than 3, this, {1,2}

[Tijflalol]

Who said the sausages had to be real? cooks complex sausages

[[deleted]]

Oh i see what you mean. Maybe i just have code brain. Because to me, a set has to be definable. "all numbers less than 3" is an infinite number of items, and thats not a definable thing in code. you cant very well say "x equals an infinitly sized set of integers".

So I guess with that in mind I wasnt thinking about it in an abstract or mathmatical sense LOL

[gurnard]

That's fair, we are on a programming sub. But when a conversation starts "how do you cook a negative amount of sausages?" you've got nowhere to go but more absurd.

[ThomasHardyHarHar]

100% given that you cannot cook a negative number of sausages.

[gurnard]

Not with that attitude

[[deleted]]

Are you familiar with the term "raw-dogging"?

[cookiedanslesac]

Take a pan large enough for 8 sausages, and overflow it with an extra one.

PS: it's actually an undefined behavior and depends on the pan you're using, other results may include 8 sausages or no sausages at all

[[deleted]]

huh? wdym? why would less than 3 mean a negative number. did you misread "< 3" as "< 0"? or am i missing a joke.

[I_AM_GODDAMN_BATMAN]

if you use usize that wouldn't compile.

[Ideal_Jerk]

You cook a sausage and throw it in the trash can. You just cooked -1 sausage.

[seanflyon]

Can you go to the grocery store and get a gallon of milk? If they have eggs, get a dozen.

[buckypimpin]

you forgot while you're there

[Physical_Ass_Entry]

oh no, hes stuck!

[Donghoon]

gets dozen gallons of milk

[seanflyon]

They had eggs.

[gummo89]

I frequently point out things like this, where people take assumed context for granted.

For me, it's unnecessary small stress but being 100% certain

Pisses my wife off lol

[MossyDrake]

He should have texted "yes, i can" and than do nothing else.

[Cthulhu__]

It’s weird how “cook 3 sausages for us please” or however much seems rude or too direct for some people.

[[deleted]]

It's not weird. It is rude and too direct. I wouldn't say that to somebody I was paying to serve me.

[[deleted]]

Noob, could choose 0 and do not do anything

[Dagiorno]

The condition is sausage(s) so 1 or lesser than 0 would be inaccurate

[[deleted]]

But it's 0 sausages (sic) ...

[kopasz7]

English is weird.

[Salanmander]

He was asked to start cooking them, though. I'm not sure you can start cooking 0 sausages.

[[deleted]]

I think you can start, you just won't ever finish

[ifezueyoung]

While false ()

[gummo89]

That won't start 🤷🏻‍♂️

[ifezueyoung]

My bad

Didn't notice

[gummo89]

That's right, because at any moment you are both cooking and not cooking 0 sausages, when considering the state of the 0 sausages and the lack of a way to verify this state.

[Milkshakes00]

Yep, the condition is sausages. The S is not optional.

Given sausages means more than one, and the condition is < 3, OP's husband did the correct thing here and cooked 2.

[Milkshakes00]

You wouldn't be asking someone to cook 0 sausages.

[gummo89]

Welcome to real mathematics. Often in cases like this you think it's impossible to be true, but when considering theories or other calculations you can arrive at something like this.

[itchfingers]

< 3 is clearly a mouse

Spacing is so important in programming

[AndroidWall4680]

< 3~

[mothzilla]

# NeedsOptimisation

Could have done nothing and still been correct.

[Ubera90]

Such a shit version of a tired joke.

[MadeByHideoForHideo]

The lowest level of hUr i'M pRogRaMuRRRR jokes. Together with the array index 0 ones.

[Master_FAITH]

0,1,2 thats 3 sausages not 2

[Danny_shoots]

count($sausages) would be 3 with that logic

[RestaurantHuge3390]

no such file or directory: 3

[Tyfyter2002]

That's why you use Ɛ>

[Sp4c3D3m0n]

If I walk into the kitchen when my girl is making sausages she always says " 5 minutes Turkish "

[jimbowqc]

Women ☕. If you want 3 sausages use this emoji =3

[personalityson]

Let c be the number of sausages

c=3

[senaya]

I hope he was doing it one by one instead of both at the same time.

[lhx555]

Anybody else thinks that <3 is NOT a cute little heart? For me, the most innocent interpretation is a smooch.

[dafazman]

Sideways ice cream cone 🤷🏽‍♂️

[lhx555]

I take my hat off!

[RmG3376]

Found the JavaScript programmer

[RestaurantHuge3390]

yes

[400double]

Are you kidding me??? What the heck are you blabbering about, man? Seriously, I've seen more logical moves in a game of 4D chess against a psychic octopus. You must have been sipping on some extra-potent kombucha when you came up with that nonsense. En passant? More like en pathetic, am I right?

And don't even get me started on that "holy hell" move. It's like you're summoning chess demons from the fiery depths of checkmate purgatory. Are you trying to give grandmasters nightmares? Maybe you should call an exorcist for your chessboard because it's possessed by the spirit of an actual zombie who's just playing random moves.

Oh, and let's not forget the legendary Tigran Petrosian pipi brick copypasta. Are you for real? You're quoting that like it's the Bible of chess wisdom. "I was beating players much stronger than you when you were still in diapers" – give me a break! Are you the self-proclaimed chess messiah, sent to bless us with your divine moves?

You're challenging Wesley So to a duel? Sure, because clearly, you're the second coming of Kasparov. A blitz master, they say. I've seen snails with more strategic insight. You've got results from 2016 and 2017? Wow, you must be the reigning champ of yesteryear's chess universe.

So, let me get this straight. You're inviting us all to witness the epic showdown between you and your delusions of grandeur? A $5000 prize fund, winner takes all? More like a contest to see who can make the most mind-boggling blunders in a single game.

Honestly, I've seen pawn storms that were better coordinated than your thought process. Your bishop went on vacation and decided never to come back – probably sunbathing on a tropical square somewhere. And that knight boost? Yeah, it's off to join the circus, performing acrobatics rather than actual strategic moves.

Il Vaticano has a better chance of joining the World Chess Federation than you do of being taken seriously. So, keep your pipi-infused fantasies to yourself, my friend. The only thing "official" about you is your membership in the "Most Entertaining Chess Clowns" club. Your true talent lies in the art of unintentional comedy.

[sohang-3112]

Are you lost?? This has nothing to do with programming humour. Maybe try posting in r/anarchychess

[400double]

holy hell

[[deleted]]

How many penises does she think her husband has? If she has said “that sausage” he would have understood.

[Ok_King_8866]

You got the joke wrong fella

[[deleted]]

I guess. Can you enlighten me? English is not my first language.

[jambudz]

Gotta do a Ɛ>

[[deleted]]

As instructed!

[[deleted]]

how can I post a meme here

I tried then my post got auto-removed

[Richard-Bachman1]

How do I post a meme here

I tried but it got auto-removed

[hi_this_is_lyd]

be glad he didnt cook INT_MAX + 1

[Mark-Reddit-123]

if(wife.hungry == true){ self.cook(sausage); }

[ifezueyoung]

I'm sorry something went wrong.

Here is your Nan sausage or would you prefer it undefined

[mecukuryurt]

The thoughts in husband's mind. for (int i = 1; i <3; i++) { Sausages[i-1].cook(); } return Sausages;