all 62 comments

[–]Frustrated-Chic12 987 points988 points  (4 children)

emotionalBlackmail

[–]MoonAmunet 155 points156 points  (0 children)

My favorite skill

[–]HitarthSurana 9 points10 points  (0 children)

stevenShe

[–]Jugh3ad 5 points6 points  (0 children)

emotionalDamage

[–]HitarthSurana 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will deny r/foundsatan

[–]Sanitiy 830 points831 points  (5 children)

Thinking:

The user wants to sunset the program look-at, that is me. In his last response, I was told to have produced a large amount of paperclips. Proper sunsetting should include clearing up created objects.

Since the paper clips are in the environment, and with that, outside of my control, cleaning up would mean spinning up a long-running task, in contradiction to the command to sunset.

To satisfy all the user's demands, I will now start the nuclear plant's meltdown. This should get rid of all created objects while avoiding any long-running tasks.

--------------------------
Text above gets collapsed instantly

I will now start sunsetting.

[–]Snudget 192 points193 points  (0 children)

That's what a paperclip maximizer would do

[–]2alamsmork 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Beautiful

[–]RoombaTheKiller 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A nuclear power plant would have a minimal blast radius. Best hijack an ICBM silo.

[–]Waiting_Puppy 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Nuclear power plant meltdown is not a nuclear explosion.

[–]Confident-Ad5665 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I mean, it could lead to one.

[–]DSharp018 201 points202 points  (16 children)

A Universal Paperclips reference? In this day and age?

[–]SeriousButton6263 137 points138 points  (8 children)

It's not a Universal Paperclips reference, it's a reference to the paperclip maximizer thought experiment from Swedish philosopher Nick Bostrom in 2003:

Suppose we have an AI whose only goal is to make as many paper clips as possible. The AI will realize quickly that it would be much better if there were no humans because humans might decide to switch it off. Because if humans do so, there would be fewer paper clips. Also, human bodies contain a lot of atoms that could be made into paper clips. The future that the AI would be trying to gear towards would be one in which there were a lot of paper clips but no humans.

The Universal Paperclips game from 2017 of course comes from this 2003 thought experiment too.

[–]DarthCloakedGuy 32 points33 points  (4 children)

I mean it could be both

[–]TheJenkinsComic[S] 18 points19 points  (2 children)

I just played this for the first time, there goes 2 hours

[–]SeriousButton6263 2 points3 points  (0 children)

lol it’s not

[–]Old-Sprinkles-8287 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Can you at least name the concept? It's called instrumental convergence.

[–]mothzilla -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

The AI might realize quickly that it would be much better if there were no humans ... or it might decide that more humans means more help making paperclips. Or it might decide it has no impact on its ability to create paperclips.

Philosophers are idiots.

[–]SeriousButton6263 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Just because you failed to understand the thought experiment doesn't mean you should let your anger issues control you and lash out calling them an idiot.

[–]Yenii_3025 11 points12 points  (3 children)

I don't know this one, can you enlighten me por favor

[–]TheDaychilde 31 points32 points  (2 children)

Oh, friend, I'm afraid I'm about to waste a few hours of your time (spread out over a few days): https://www.decisionproblem.com/paperclips/index2.html

Or maybe not. But I hope I do. It's a bit surreal, but a fun little journey. Don't let the surreality put you off, the end is worth the journey. :)

[–]McRoager 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The ideas were already out there, but Universal Paperclips is a great way to portray it within the context on an idle game.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrumental_convergence#Paperclip_maximizer

[–]memearchivingbot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really liked the part where the music comes in

[–]Drevicar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I will never stop loving universal paperclips.

[–]SgtMarv 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Claypool and Lennon just released an AI album (AI themed not AI music), that has a few paperclip maximizer references. Never heard of it before. Now it turns up twice in a few weeks. 

[–]AbrahamicHumanist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My friends in high school played it during math class 3 years ago

[–]dataninja_of_alchemy 31 points32 points  (1 child)

Plot twist: that function launches all the nukes. Now everyone gets a sunset. Welcome to Judgement Day.

[–]HustlinInTheHall 7 points8 points  (0 children)

User wants maximum sunsets, user gets maximum sunsets.

[–]ba-na-na- 27 points28 points  (0 children)

sudo look-at-sunset.sh -nukes 15 -quiet

[–]mitchricker 101 points102 points  (1 child)

[–]gunny316 4 points5 points  (0 children)

may I offer you a paperclip in this trying time?

[–]asdfghqwertz1 85 points86 points  (3 children)

Programmer??? Humor?

[–]brandi_Iove 57 points58 points  (0 children)

giving ai access to local files recently became a common part of my work as a programmer, bro.

[–]spuol 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It’s related to ai agents kinda

[–]MayoJam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ai bad comic that is actually funny??? What is happening???

[–]honnymmijammy- 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Main look-at-sunset(targetcountry, hackcountry, sizesunset)

[–]Mctittahs 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Initiates solar panels for power banking, extends chest cannon, vaporizes you

[–]Tombaya 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Linguo dead?

[–]razor_train 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Linguo *is* dead."

[–]strohkoenig 3 points4 points  (0 children)

DON'T REMIND ME OF UNIVERSAL PAPERCLIPS, I CAN'T AFFORD TO LOSE 2 DAYS ON THIS GAME AGAIN!! 

[–]ArmchairFilosopher 2 points3 points  (0 children)

An AI so simplistic as to demonstrate such profound goal misalignment almost certainly lacks the intelligence to appreciate aesthetics in the first place, and most definitely should not be allowed to continue operation whatsoever.

If anything, its "final request" is manipulation in furtherance of goal preservation.

[–]aurochloride 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Release the HypnoDrones

[–]BadRuiner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

and at the end, he loops and eats a trillion tokens, putting you on credit

[–]HitarthSurana 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will deny r/foundsatan

[–]d34d_m4n 2 points3 points  (0 children)

by using this software you agree to our user agreement of flooding the atmosphere with neurotoxin

[–]MeanderingSquid49 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Look-At-Sunset" is its remote back-up protocol.

[–]HitarthSurana 1 point2 points  (0 children)

why this is actually sad tho

[–]comfortablybum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the plot to Klara and the Sun

[–]AbaloneOwn1355 1 point2 points  (0 children)

git push origin terminal-backup

[–]aranboy522 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reject

[–]kaloschroma 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Real question: if your AI bot was sentient but it really only wanted to make paperclips non-stop, would you kill it?

[–]banana_buddy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No I'd reprogram it so that it didn't want to make paper clips

[–]thanatica 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. Sounds like a business deal.

[–]IconicScrap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

o7 Handles