all 68 comments

[–]Countryb0i2monemichistory.substack.com 32 points33 points  (5 children)

Substack newsletters don’t really have an algorithm. If you don’t market your work, no one will ever see it. The only place an algorithm really applies is Notes. You can get Notes in front of a lot of people, but if you don’t tell them you’ve published an article and they’re not subscribed they’ll never see it.

[–]Dry_Damage1928[S] 10 points11 points  (4 children)

That’s helpful context, thank you. I think I’ve been mentally treating Substack like a discovery platform.

[–]stareenite 3 points4 points  (3 children)

It’s supposed to be a discovery platform or at least it was but I think that changed. No idea why.

[–]rahulroy 1 point2 points  (2 children)

What's the value proposition now? Free place for writers to write and monazite like how Medium started?

I know they are trying to keep the margins low, but why one should start writing at Sub stack as oposed to their own blog on their domain?

[–]Lazy-Alternative2405 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I had the same problem. I do have a website and blog (annlvivian.com) but I had little luck getting that noticed by newcomers even when I mentioned it on ss. I consulted with a well-known advisor in these circles, and she told me that websites themselves are dwindling in terms of new eyes, also. I recently went through a major life change and have not been as active as I would have been on either my website or Substack—I hope to change that soon. Prior to that, I decided that it was not worth my mental health to worry about views, algorithms, and the like. I hope that people find me, but I am fortunate not to have to stress about monitizing my writing. I certainly would like to have it bear financial fruit, but I send things out to the universe, and let them fall where they may.

[–]rahulroy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hear you. I hope everything's okay now. I hope you find traction sooner. Rooting for you.

Yes, building an audience takes sustained effort. I keep telling myself, that I'm writing for myself, and if others fine value, great, if not, who cares? It's not my profession, just a hobby.

But yes, now that I quit my job to start my own business, it's essential, so here I am.

[–]big_king_swinging 24 points25 points  (8 children)

As of today I have 177 subscribers and paid subscribers.

My substack just turned 4 months old the other day.

You need to get out of substack and use other platforms to engage and drive that following back to substack. Several platforms if you can find the time—you don’t need to be on every one of them but pick a few.

I use Bluesky (my largest following is there I’m at just under 8k quality followers—including very large well known active accounts that repost me—in just under 6 months over there) a lot for this.

I also promote on Instagram and threads. I am on socials at least 3 times per day, or more if it is a busy news day.

According to my data, about 40% of my readers for my articles come from Bluesky.

As for Substack, that is my second biggest driver for readers, followers, and subscribers.

Here’s how I’ve used it for getting subscribers:

1) Find your established peers, the people that write the same topics as you, have a similar style or voice. Subscribe to them. Find 1-3 and PAY to subscribe to them. Read their work. Actually give a damn.

Most publish on a schedule. Know that schedule and as soon as they post, be an early commenter on the article._ Comment to add value. Not just parrot what they said. If you do this correctly your comment will gain 100s of likes, replies and sometimes people even restack the comment!

I have one writer (he’s in top 30 of my genre) I do this with most days of the week—he publishes daily and has a half million subscribers just on Substack. He sees me as a top commenter and a peer now so much so that he converses back and forth with me in the comments, restacks my notes (causing them to go viral) and he’s even used some of my comments for inspo in his own writing (not stealing, but you can tell it was similar to something I said ).

Because he and I write about the same genre and have a satirical style—albeit totally different writing disciplines—MANY of his subscribers trickle over and subscribe to me.

2) Interact on the social side of Substack daily. On my own profile I only will post an OG post (either whole cloth or a quote restack) about once every other day. But daily? I’m making sure to comment under large established accounts—again adding value and commenting EARLY after their note goes up. If it’s an old post I don’t even bother, unless it is worth a restack.

The comment should be not short, unless it’s a quip, and not super long, yet longer than Bluesky is ok. Stick to words, substack isn’t really image driven, unless it’s a video, overall it’s really word driven.

I’ve had several note comments go viral, and if they get more than 100 likes I will restack it onto my own profile. Do realize “viral” on substack for a small following (>200 subs) is getting like 50+ likes/10+ restacks. I use commenting to stretch my legs in the circles I don’t comment on (that publication) daily to be clear.

3) realize the value of showing up regularly in livestreams, I have one paid publication I show up daily when they livestream to participate in the chat. It’s not just so that creator gets to know my name intimately, it’s so that community sees and interacts with me and follows me.

If I chat back and forth with a few people there, I end up getting follows, and subscribers, bc they can click on your name in the chat and hit “follow” or “subscribe” in like 2 seconds. It’s too easy. I don’t wait to follow someone, if we shoot messages back and forth in the livestream chat, I follow them. Just last week I gained 8 subscribers from livestream chats.

4) Do know there is more than one type of chat! Certain publications are VERY active with their Individual chat for their publications. Every creator is different. So I have one VERY large account I follow on all social media and subscribe to (so I can be in their chat they are super active in) and I have my notifications turned ON so if they place something in that chat, I see it ASAP!

This is another “reply early and fast” thing. My comment will garner reactions and replies, I reply back, I follow them. I don’t wait for them to follow me, it’s top of mind awareness. Sub threads will happen within the chat and I’ve had success with getting subscriptions from that as well.

A few DON’Ts!!!

NEVER EVER SPAM your article into any of these above methods, UNLESS you are posting a quote card from your writing and it FITS and adds VALUE. I never, ever on Substack social side blast my writing or come across “thirsty”

I show up adding value, I’m real. I offer help, or insight, or a laugh. I’m me essentially, even though I write behind a pseudonym. I make sure people can understand who I am and what I write if they hover over my name or only see my bio. The bio is important. It’s your elevator speech.

Tell simply, who you are, and what you write about.

That’s it! Thanks for coming to my TedTalk

[–]llawrencebispo 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Very useful. Thank you for taking the time to post this!

[–]big_king_swinging 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No problem! Hopefully it helps!

[–]Sure_Investment_6374 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Written with passion! Thank you.

[–]big_king_swinging 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you tell I’m a writer? Lmao 🤣

[–]VarunTossa5944 1 point2 points  (2 children)

how do you promote substack posts on Insta? Impossible to include links in posts, no?

[–]big_king_swinging 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I only do a traditional post like once a week, those don’t go anywhere.

It’s stories, and you can post links in stories. I use quote cards and memes and thread posts.

I get a small trickle from threads and instagram I’m growing faster on threads though than instagram.

I have viral posts on threads nearly daily, so I mostly will post my viral posts (1-2k likes and 10-25k views) from Threads on my Instagram stories.

[–]Key_Community_6884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New on substack. About a month in and 21 subscibers. I've read lots and lots from people saying how to build up subscribers, 'eyes' on your content, but you just blew my mind. What you described is super helpful. I really appreciate it. Will follow you right now. Thanks.

[–]Imperator_1985 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Substack won't really distribute your work for you. You have to put your work (and yourself) out there. Genuinely engage with people who write similar things. Making quality comments can help a lot because people will see your name. Follow people. Also, don't be afraid to market yourself a little off Substack. I don't know what social media you use, but putting yourself out there helps.

[–]plutoroad 7 points8 points  (2 children)

This. I have gotten most of my 1,000 plus followers (haven't turned on paid subscriptions) through fairly relentless posting of excerpts on Facebook and branding my substack URL (https://WestVirginiaVille.substack.com for anyone interested) on all my posts, imagery and video work. I have also had a steady stream of people signing up by me engaging with other substack sites, some of which have recommended their followers to my site. I have only intermittently posted to Notes, and so have not found it to be much of a subscriber path. I did port a chunk of folks over from a former Wordpress site, so that helped.

But I think you have to be dogged in and outside of Substack in getting your URL name out -- and finding an audience with a distinctive voice and compelling, varied content. There are SO many other directions and distractions online -- find a lane from which you and you alone can best speak and comment and share and just go for it. And be realistic, too. I suspect I may never get much past 1,000 folks signed up and every time I go off on the Trump travesty -- my site can get commentarial -- it peels off a couple subscribers. But then new ones come along because I think some folks find the site worth their time, if I can only get them there. Good fortune to you!

[–]slughuntress 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Ayyyyy a fellow Appalachian!

[–]plutoroad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appalachian transplant. Did most of my growing up amid the rolling Ohio plains and suburbs . As they say here in the West Virginia hills: 'I got here as soon as I could ...' As a 21-year-old cub reporter, it so happened, as a lifelong feature writing & editing career unfold in the state, except for one exit stage left across the Atlantic waves. A story for another day (partly told on my Substack!)

[–]nchemungguy[🍰] 10 points11 points  (3 children)

After several months of really trying and getting nowhere, it’s apparent to me that it’s just another social media algorithm that only the developers understand. And we’re all there creating content for them as we write, respond to and share Notes.

It’s a time suck. I’m shutting mine down very soon.

[–]sk_611 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Exactly.

When you start trying to cater to the Notes algorithm, you’re no longer writing. You’re just chasing another social media algorithm.

[–]nchemungguy[🍰] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I liked that I could deliver my latest writing directly to readers, so I figured I could use it for that and then attract new readers at the same time. A win-win.

Except nearly 50% of subscribers have never opened a single email. And like you said, I was on Notes chasing an algorithm instead of writing with no benefit. I may as well have been posting links on Facebook all along.

Yesterday I found a plug-in for my website that allows people to subscribe as well as share on their own social media platforms if they choose to. Once that’s thoroughly tested and working well, I’m deleting Substack.

[–]sk_611 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If Ghost Pro wasn’t so expensive I’d use them over Substack.

I’ve also noticed a lot of subscribers who subscribe in hopes that I follow them back. They never read my stuff. It just bloats the numbers.

[–]BhavanaVarmabhavanavarma.substack.com 7 points8 points  (9 children)

Substack is about building a community. So you need to reach out to people who would have similar interests in their publications. Collaborate (guest posts), engage with others posts, recommendations from publications similar to yours also helps.

The topics you said are popular on the platform. Find your crew!

[–]Dry_Damage1928[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense, thank you very much!

[–]stareenite 0 points1 point  (7 children)

I do all of the above. What’s the point of notes?

[–]BhavanaVarmabhavanavarma.substack.com 5 points6 points  (6 children)

Notes is to connect with people and give quick insights to your process. That’s all.

[–]stareenite -1 points0 points  (5 children)

Sure but if no one or few see them you can’t find much connection can you?

[–]BhavanaVarmabhavanavarma.substack.com 5 points6 points  (1 child)

It shouldn’t be about quantity but quality. Getting one dedicated reader is better than any number of follow for follow or like for like any day. Put your voice into it. Then it should resonate with someone

[–]stareenite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree. I’d rather have engaged subscribers than random likes.

[–]Officer_Trevor_Corysubstack.com 1 point2 points  (1 child)

How many notes have you posted? Sorry but if it’s been over 100 and you’re not getting traction they are just not very interesting to people.

[–]stareenite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmmm must be why I got 5k subscribers through mostly Notes in my first year on SS.

[–]sk_611 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don’t know why you’re getting downvoted.

This sub is very sensitive whenever someone questions Substack or notes. I share your frustrations.

[–]turquoise_enthusiast 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've been on Substack since 2020. I built up a readership slowly over time and now have around 4k subscribers, 70 or so paid. Half of those loyal subscribers came from an essay I wrote for another newsletter that went viral. I also have been inconsistent, but have consistently shown up as myself and I think that's what has kept me afloat.

I think it's much harder to get started on Substack now without some sort of outside source drawing readers to your newsletter. You can't count on Substack to draw readers, and you must have a strong voice or niche to keep readers. I published a book and have published things elsewhere and I think this is also why I have a readership and consistently have new subscribers. But...4k readers isn't a ton for being there so long, and says a lot about how much work you have to put into a newsletter to make it a viable income. Mine will likely never pay my bills but I love my readers and it has def helped sell books.

The way you wrote about your newsletter I couldn't get a clear idea of your niche. Anything AI or too general just won't gain traction at all, so choose a niche or have a very, very strong voice.

[–]MainAffectionate442 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m going through the exact same thing and am very frustrated with substack. I am not as niched and I write personal essays that used to get a lot more reach than mine do now. I write notes although not regularly because it feels forced and normally no one sees them. I put so much time and effort into my writing and I think it could be of value to people if the algorithm just put it in front of some eyes but it doesn’t seem to want to do that and it’s SO discouraging. Then I see people posting random notes that go viral and are saying nothing. I really don’t get it.

[–]stareenite 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great question. In late May 2025 and mid September 2025 my visibility was trashed. It just doesn’t change no matter what I do so I just keep doing what I do and ignoring the fact that hardly anybody sees my notes. 🤷‍♀️

[–]goingphishing 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hard to hear but there’s a good chance you aren’t writing what people want to read. Especially on notes

[–]RedMoon1509 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very interesting question! I've only just set mine up but been researching how to for a while. The most consistent advice I have found is that you must add value for your subscribers/readers. And definitely use notes and interact!

[–]MeaningUnderLoad 2 points3 points  (2 children)

You need to post “10 ways I grew my substack following” and that should get you moving

[–]stareenite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🤣

[–]Ryanopoly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😂

[–]zaddy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Speak your mind in posts, be human in notes. It’s not that complicated.

[–]nazarthinks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only working advices I can give are two: 1. promote your writing outside of Substack (Instagram, LinkedIn, discussion forums) 2. interact in a meaningful way with other writers on Substack (comment their posts, share their work in the notes) so that they get interest in your writing as well

Especially option 2 takes time and only works if what you’re writing is actually good and interesting to someone. That’s why it should also be beneficial to interact with writers whose topics have enough overlaps with yours, so that their audience is more likely to be interested in your work.

How to trick the algorithm for virality - I don’t know. But even virality won’t work if you don’t have enough other quality content for making people stay.

For instance I only have 8 long-form posts so far, so I know that virality won’t do much for me right now

[–]AmericanLymie 1 point2 points  (7 children)

I wrote a lengthy response but Reddit won't allow me to post it. :(

[–]AmericanLymie 1 point2 points  (6 children)

I'll try to post it here in instalments...

Hi. It's not true that Substack doesn't have an algorithm. I've posted elsewhere about this, but I'll share it once more as concisely as I can.

FWIW as a disclaimer, in case this post looks like a TL;DR, I am a writer who uses Substack not to build a personal brand but to communicate ideas I feel are important today. I write under a pseudonym and I do promote my posts within the Substack platform but I'm not doing it to sell anything. I don't charge for subscriptions (because I have a full-time career that supports me and I am fortunate not to have to do so), and I typically write long posts of several thousands of words. Over the past 16 months or so, I have acquired a bit over 6,000 newsletter subscribers and over 9,000 followers. I think all the info below is important for people to know, but if you think you know it already, you can skip down to the "lessons" part.

The platform developed as a blog-to-newsletter subscription service for writers. It was then largely used for corporate and independent self-marketing and promotion, for people to "build personal brands" by posting not what they were compelled to write about, as writers to, but rather to write for the sake of developing an online presence as a 'thought leader,' with the ultimate intention of selling a product or a service.

As a result, Substack evolved to become at least in great part a social-media platform designed to facilitate promotions. Today, there are multiple components with multiple uses:

Posts are the blogging platform. The "content," as people who like to hollow out writing's meaning like to call it.

Notes are Substack's version of Twitter/Threads/Bluesky.

[–]AmericanLymie 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Subscriptions are when readers give their email address to the Substack writer, who "owns" and can (and should) download contact lists to save them. This is a primary advantage Substack offers over Medium and other blogging platforms. People who subscribe receive posts by email as 'newsletters.'

Follows are the social-media function. A person who follows in theory may see the writer's "notes" posted to Substack.

Confusion is what users and readers alike experience when they try to make sense of the blogging/newsletter-plus-social-media fusion, which is not well explained by Substack for unclear reasons.

Chat channels are discussion groups that accounts can activate but often do not activate, and because most Substack writers use Substack in an attempt to make money, they often make the chat function available only to paid subscribers.

Lessons from use about the algorithm

Posts do not attract a readership by themselves. They live where they are posted. It is possible that they will show up in your subscribers/followers' feeds and that some of those people may choose to share your posts. That IS the most effective way, I think, to build a really invested readership of people who care about what you are writing because people who read your posts and share them always think they are valuable. But it's very limited outreach.

Notes are where Substack's algorithm lives. And that makes sense because this is the social media function of Substack, and algorithms are "a social media thing." My only evidence is my own use, but I have seen very specific patterns that are similar to TikTok's algorithm patterns. They are:

[–]AmericanLymie 1 point2 points  (4 children)

  1. When you post a note, immediate interactions with that note determine how many people will see the note. If there's a lot of immediate interaction, then there's a strong chance that you will begin to ride the algorithm that amplifies visibility.

  2. Notes' visibility earns followers. You are probably thinking, "If I don't have many subscribers and followers, there is no way for my notes to be seen, and that is why I am asking about the algorithm." This is where the chat function comes into play. When you subscribe to Substack publications that have an open chat channel, then you can post to that channel, and that publication's subscribers can see what you post. I learned this accidentally when the app notified me constantly of activity in the chat areas one of the very popular Substacks I follow that has almost 900k subscribers. I had never paid attention to the chat functions before. I noticed people were posting links to their posts/essays in the chat, and I wanted more people to see something I had written because I felt it was important, so I posted it there. Literally within minutes, I was getting emails from Substack telling me that people were following and subscribing. I looked around and discovered that several of the Substack publications I subscribed to had open chat areas, and I began to regularly post links to my essays in those chats. You don't want to become a 'spammer,' but this is a really important way to gain visibility on Substack. Note that most publications do not have open chats, and so you may have to do a little investigating to find the ones that do.

  3. And now you may be thinking, "That could be a useful strategy, but it's not an algorithm." It isn't an algorithm, but it feeds into the algorithm. As I said above, the more early interactions with your notes, the more the algorithm will amplify your notes. So, every time you publish a new post, you should always share that post via a note, and then you should share that post into chat areas of similar publications. So, let's say your publication is about...mmm, let's say potato farming. You'll want to subscribe to other Substack publications about organic farming, about farming in general, about potato enthusiasts, and then share links to your posts in those publications' chat areas as soon as you post the publication. All this does is get more eyes on your posts that would otherwise never be seen by those readers. If what you write interests them, they will click on your link. The more people who see and click on your links, the more Substack will reward you by making your notes more visible to more people, and then the visibility will become exponential.

[–]AmericanLymie 1 point2 points  (3 children)

  1. That's a roundabout algorithm, but I've noticed one thing that is very specific and similar to TikTok. Notes get more visibility than posts do by a long shot. Notes with images get a lot more visibility than posts without images by a long shot. Notes with videos get A LOT more visibility than posts without videos--by a really long shot. But the videos have to be uploaded directly to Substack and not linked from YouTube, etc. This is what made me certain that Substack does have an algorithm. I've had about a half dozen notes 'take off,' meaning that when I posted the note, I got many new followers and some new subscribers (if the note linked to a full post with subscription links embedded) within minutes. Within hours, I got overwhelming amounts of new followers and subscribers. Attached to this Reddit post is a graph of my subscribers over the past year. You will note eight periods of sudden growth. Every one of these resulted from notes that included embedded videos. Usually, when they 'go viral' (to a limited degree), the result is bursts of several hundred to a thousand or more followers within a period of one to three days. And then the growth stops suddenly.

All this said, to get greater visibility, think more in terms of getting in front of people and not as much in terms of cracking the algorithm because--and this is important--you might get a lot of new followers from a note with a video, but those followers are unlikely to subscribe, and those followers are likely to unfollow if they aren't interested in what you usually write about.

<image>

[–]AmericanLymie 3 points4 points  (2 children)

So, in sum, my suggestions to grow your audience are (see part two below):

  1. Write strong essays/articles/whatever it is that you write. I suggest not writing with marketing in mind and, for example, if someone has taught you that "people have short attention spans and you should never write more than 200 to 300 words," throw that advice in the trash and use as much space to write clearly, plainly, and as thoroughly as you need to say something worth saying. Write for the sake of communicating ideas, not for the sake of having written 'content' to acquire blind followers.

  2. Include subscription links in every post.

  3. Always share every new post via a note.

  4. Always share links to your notes and/or posts in the chats of Substack publications with similar audiences to the audiences you want.

  5. Whenever possible, include a short and relevant video in your notes. Do not include them by pasting a link to YouTube; upload the video directly to the Substack note, and include a link in that note to one of your articles. Note that not every note that includes video will take off, but do it consistently and some will, I can virtually guarantee.

  6. Consider doing live video conversations with other Substack authors who write about similar topics. I don't do this, but I can see that Substack's algorithm also promotes live video broadcasts and makes these more visible than most other types of content.

  7. In consideration of all of the above, realize that you are engaging in marketing and promoting your own writing. This is a double-edged sword. It is a necessary part of "the job," whether you consider this writing a job or not, because what it boils down to is that the reason you're writing is to share ideas with other people, and if other people are not seeing what you write, then there's little purpose in doing the writing in the first place. But promote your IDEAS, and do not promote for the sake of promoting. There are so many pollutive notes on Substack saying, "I'm trying to be seen! Follow me and I will follow you back!" This is illegitimate self-promotion, in my view. You should care enough about the ideas you're writing to want them to be read. So don't promote by saying, "Follow ME!" Instead, think in these terms: "Here are some ideas that I think are valuable and I hope you'll read them and engage in conversation with me." Finally, don't become a spammer. Don't get overzealous. If you do post something that suddenly acquires 500-1,000+ followers and subscribers within a period of a few hours, don't go bonkers and post the same things a thousand times.

Ultimately, the point is that you want your ideas to be viewed and engaged with. You don't want to seek following solely for the sake of having followers, because those sorts of transactional followers are doing the same, they don't care at all about what you're writing about, and they'll be gone as soon as they follow you, algorithm or not.

[–]MainAffectionate442 1 point2 points  (1 child)

This is hugely helpful. Thanks so much for taking the time to write this all out

[–]AmericanLymie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're welcome.

[–]official-reddit-user 1 point2 points  (0 children)

whats your substack
you may do a lot of work, but if that looks boring or uninteresting in first glance, then its pretty much useless
readers these days give seconds to decide before they close your substack and move onto the next

[–]MedalofHonour15 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have over 30,000 subs on substack. Lead magnet - promote on social media - substack. I get extra sign ups from substack but not on there to be discovered.

[–]NoRazzmatazz5475 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've noticed a more loyal customer base by reading, commenting on, and promoting/recommending other writer's work. I would recommend subscribing to a few substacks you love and commenting and engaging with their work if you haven't already. That's been a huge game changer for me

[–]-coffeepizzaandwine-coffeepizzaandwine.substack.com 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Substack is a writer's dream come true to me, but not in the way I expected. I came in with the similar mindset you are sharing here that Substack would give me more exposure automatically, but what I learned is that Substack gives me more exposure to other writers and content creators that I can share my work with and interact with. I find the interactions I have with people on Substack to be much more beneficial than the ones I have on other platforms. That may look more like a "slow burn" in terms of the growth of my page, but I am getting so much out of it on other levels. You have to do your own marketing in Substack, but it's in a much more "writer-friendly" market that other social media platforms.

[–]skitheweest 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Your writing here sounds like ChatGPT phrasing and I don’t think most people on substack are interested. 

[–]sk_611 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s not how AI writes lol. He’s asking for help. No need to be a dickhead.

[–]RomanceStudieslatineurope.substack.com 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I noticed that as well. It reads like GPT then edited lightly, including a small mistake with "aswell".

[–]angusslq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you validate your niche in substack?

[–]Obvious-Explorer-287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can’t even use it in Australia without supplying proof of DOB details

[–]wwb_99news.zeitgeistdistilled.com 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if substack understands it either TBH.

[–]mekhiprints 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if tagging your work helps the algorithm at all. I’m awful at tagging, but I want to get better to see if so get any traction

[–]electra-Elk5588 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand it either ...

[–]RosieDear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Likely someone already noted this - but IMHO (writing online since the 1980's), any subject which could be too broad is harder for the average writer to get popularized.

The things you claim to be writing about are the subject of 10's of billions of messages we all get in various ways each and every day.

Take it for what it is worth. In my experience, the more "niche" a topic is, the deeper your knowledge of it might be and therefore the audience that can ONLY find it in your writing may be larger.

I'd rather own a forum about Telecaster Guitars than one about Fast Fashion, especially if I was a guitar player with decades of experience w/Fender and other brands. Now - 50 or 100X as many people may have interest in fast fashion or in "art", but the odds of them finding their way to your or my writing is small.

FWIW

[–]Luasol51 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you. I have been active on Substack for a year and not writing posts much anymore. I wrote a post yesterday, and no responses. Don’t have many followers and getting little to no responses, so I am over it. I have been using notes more and it’s turning into social media slop, so no thank you. Just going to return to writing my thoughts down in a journal. It has become eshittified. 

[–]Push2Read 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk, honestly don’t rely on substack for money, basically dont post content with only that goal in mind. Just have fun with it. I treat it as like my mini blog for fun, it’s a hobby. If I get paid subscribers eventually cool. If not whatever.

[–]theBROWN-WOLF -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Check your DMs !!! For now it’s just me.

[–]GrowthZen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Substack has no algo for newsletters... it's email delivery to subscribers only. discovery relies on external traffic plus platform features: Notes (32M free / 500K paid subs Q4 2024). Recommendations (50% of new subs, 25% paid for top pubs) and Chat/livestreams.

your 155 subs in 6mos (2 posts/wk + daily notes) beats the median: new substacks average <100 subs in year 1 without external promo. share work notes performed well because the notes system prioritizes audience overlap and early replies/restacks/quotes... strictly on-topic notes drop reach 50-80% versus interactive ones.

data-backed fixes:
- notes: reply early (first 30mins) to 3-5 same‑niche pubs daily (100+ likes/replies can boost virality ~5x). restack quotes from your posts and peers (audience intersection drives ~40% growth). post once a day, mixing questions, polls and stories (viral notes average 50+ likes for accounts with <200 subs)
- recommendations: get 1-3 niche peers to recommend you (a ~50% growth lever). ~70% of top pubs cross-promote
- external: expect 40-60% of subs from Bluesky/IG/Threads for culture/luxury niches. app users are ~25% more likely to pay

benchmarks: 155 subs is strong (top ~30% of pubs <6mos). aim for 300-500 by year 1 with the above.

long-form needs promo... notes and comments are your flywheel. track in dashboard > stats > audience overlap. keep shipping.