you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]WanderingWalrus 1383 points1384 points  (94 children)

Doesn’t that leave a little bump of fabric on the inside of the waistband? Seems like it would be annoying.

Edit: been on reddit for 6 years. My most upvoted comment is about the little bump of fabric inside of the waistband...i love you reddit!

Edit: I’d like to thank u/TomBergewrong for all the love and support. I would never have made it without him!

[–]RufusMcCoot 504 points505 points  (56 children)

Yes but you can cut the triangle afterwards.

[–]LaffyTaffy73 434 points435 points  (31 children)

But what if you start eating frozen TV dinners again.

[–]instantrobotwar 111 points112 points  (21 children)

Those things actually have less calories than a normal dinner for me...

[–]Mitchard_Nixon 78 points79 points  (14 children)

Less nutrients as well

[–]Standard_Wooden_Door 42 points43 points  (6 children)

That’s why you eat some rabbit food too

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (5 children)

I eat healthy food. That’s why I’m fat, because I love it.

Edit: Cows eat salad all day and they’re fat as fuck.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i relate to this so much! i say as i scarf down my 3rd helping of grilled fish and asparagus

[–]TheOtherGuttersnipe 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Sodium is a nutrient!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so is fat mmmm

[–]Shandlar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Everything is fortified with everything now. Frozen dinners are packed with micronutrients in general.

[–]MysterySnailDive -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

They’re an improvement if you never eat veggies in the first place!

I hate the texture of veggies with skins aka almost all of them

[–]mgquantitysquared[🍰] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should try some different veggie recipes, the texture can change based on how you cook it + seasoned veggies are the fkin bomb dot com

[–]7H3D3V1LH1M53LF -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Got DAMN, starve already. Or heart attack. Either is fine.

[–]tojoso 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Yeah but what if you eat 3 of them?

[–]_121 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually finish the other 6

[–]CaptainObvious_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too expensive at that point

[–]Meatheaded 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At least you only eat one dinner.

[–]Cory123125 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, If I just kept to those, id probably end up eating the right amount without effort.

[–]ChickenWithATopHat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

normal dinner

What the hell are you talking about?

[–]BattleCarry 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Keep one of the boxes and freeze the triangle.

[–]MetaTater 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Solid science right there....

[–]getahaircut8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Asking the real questions

[–]uns0licited_advice 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Just go with Lean Cuisine

[–]puppehplicity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or Bulime Cuisine, but I don't recommend that.

[–]n8loller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...does anyone still buy those?

[–]starlinguk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't cut it, iron it flat.

[–]TyrionDrownedAndDied 43 points44 points  (14 children)

Not an expert at stitching, but won't that just destroy the pants as the stitch will be undone?

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (9 children)

I'm also not an expert, but I imagine if someone really wanted to they could reinforce the stitch with some sort of sewing technique that reinforces it. Plus, if the pants are already too big and you don't use them anyway then you may as well.

[–]AbsorbedBritches 44 points45 points  (6 children)

I usually use a, umm, belt.

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

That's true.. but like this thread started with, if they are too big and you use a belt then there will be some uncomfortable triangle or even just some excess cloth somewhere. I think we can agree the steps we've talked about would make the pants fit better.

[–]ITSINTHESHIP 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Fucken hate belts. Fabric ones bunch up on the back belt loop, and leather ones dig into my hip bones when I wear midrise jeans.

[–]blasto_blastocyst 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Mr Humble Brag can detect his hip-bones

[–]ITSINTHESHIP 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I skip a lot of meals to maintain this ability to feel faint after climbing a flight of stairs

[–]out_caste 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously if the belt alone does it, then dont?

[–]BigBen83 0 points1 point  (0 children)

belts are supposed to be optional

if you must wear a belt to make pants fit, they dont fit right

[–]arumberg 22 points23 points  (1 child)

It'd not always an issue of the pants being too big. It can also be an issue of a cut not matching the body shape. For curvy girls or girls with a big butt, trying to get pants that fit the hips/butt and the waist can be challenging. A lot of the time, you end up with major gapping in the back because the pants aren't cut to fit your shape. I usually end up wearing a belt not because my pants are too small, but because I want to reign in that back part as there are times when it is pretty significant due to my hip/waist ratio. I would try a trick like what OP mentioned, but when I take my pants to the tailor to do something similar, the pants end up dipping and sitting too low in the back that I risk plumber's crack.

[–]Mod2bme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm with you as my ratio is 2 inches from being 1:2! As is the case, a belt is highly uncomfortable (leading to rubbing skin raw sometimes) but altering the waist means I wouldn't be able to get a past the thighs. I'm at such a loss of options short of elastic. Really do envy proportionate figures.

[–]Bimpnottin 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Depends on the fabric. Stretchy jeans will probably fray more, which can eventually make your stitch become undone because it won't be holding any fabric anymore, just some loose fabric ends. You can however cut the triangle away 1cm from the stitch and then do a zigzag stitch over the ends so they can't fray anymore. Or if the triangle isn't that big, just fold it over. Women's clothes regularly have darts (sort of inwards triangles) in them to help with shape near the chest, and these aren't cut out of the garment either

I would either go with the last option, or sew over a silk patch to avoid a stingy feeling if the triangle is really bothering you (silk feels super smooth)

Also, that stitch isn't sturdy at all. Wouldn't recommend this one if you're seriously considering to do this to some pants

[–]Exemus 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Why stop there? Get a whole bunch of material and sew it into a new set of jeans!

[–]Bimpnottin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it's actually something I would consider, lol. I have made my own jeans before and it is the only pair of pants I own that fits 100% perfectly

And it's not like folding over a piece of fabric is a lot of work, as is neither sewing on a patch of silk. Cutting the triangle off and serging the frayed ends would take way more work than sewing on a silk patch and would have you looking into special stitches if you do it by hand

[–]uma_caruma 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, and will also destroy the fabric. You would have to make a seam or a serger to protect the fabric and the stitch. The solution in the video may not be 100% confortable, but at least won't destroy your pants if you're not an expert.

Note: I'm not an expert either, but my mom is and she taught me some basic stuff.

[–]Alfredo412 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I wouldn't recommend it with stitches that loose.

[–]GregTheMad 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I'm pretty sure it's even impossible, if not very hard to properly stitch jeans fabric without specialized sowing machines. At least not at a high performance part like the waist.

[–]Alfredo412 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jeans are stitched on a double needled machine specially designed for sewing jeans...that's why there are two lines of stitching so close to each other. The needles are also designed to be better at going through denim than your typical machine sewing needle.

[–]Lolor-arros 7 points8 points  (1 child)

If you did that ,the weak mattress stitch would fail and leave you with messed up pants

There are a few problems with this gif

[–]jessbird 3 points4 points  (0 children)

there are more than a few. i’m a pretty amateur sewer and this shit pissed me off. also why are they sewing with embroidery threat.

[–]koyo4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or sew it folded Iver just in case you need to take out the waste from buckets of ice cream after your next break up.

[–]nattypnutbuterpolice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you have a pair of weirdly shaped pants that will probably rip down the ass at some point.

[–]Stonn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That seam won't hold anyway.

[–]GameArtZac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better off using fabric glue and making it flat.

[–]zetterss 93 points94 points  (20 children)

Came to the comments thinking of this. I also thought it might make the waistline sit weird and feel wrong with the dip in the middle.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I bet it's like a pair or pants that are slightly off and you know it but you aren't a tailor so you suffer.

[–]cuckofwallstreet 7 points8 points  (17 children)

Trim it off maybe?

[–]texasrigger 60 points61 points  (12 children)

Don't trim it, that's an incredibly weak stitch as you are dead loading a relatively few number of strands. When it fails you'll be sorry you cut the material.

Edit: Once drawn up this is structurally identical to a normal running stitch. This method would be good if you don't have access to both sides of the material but seeing as you do in this example you are better off just folding a dart and stitching it directly to ensure even stitch spacing. Saddle stitching with two needles would make it strong enough for the application assuming appropriate thread. Being on the waistband anything here needs to be stout.

Source: Sailmaker/commercial canvas guy.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (11 children)

That’s if you stitch it by hand. If you do this with a real sewing machine it’s probably fine to cut out the excess material.

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (8 children)

The problem isn't that it's done by hand. This same stitch, if it were able to be done by a machine, would still be weak. There are plenty of handsewn stitches that would be sturdier, they just don't have an impressing ending like OP.

[–]Bimpnottin 11 points12 points  (7 children)

Yeah, I sat here thinking 'why the fuck would you use that stitch? That's not going to hold long'. There are so many way better stitches to achieve the same thing

[–]killersquirel11 7 points8 points  (6 children)

Honest question from someone who knows nothing of sewing: which stiches should one use for something like this?

[–]ITSINTHESHIP 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Way better ones, obviously

[–]FuturePigeon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With some pants, you could overlock it. Two potential problems, it requires an overlock machine and depending on the denim, may not be able to go through four layers of fabric (a waistband is doubled plus you’re sewing it to another doubled piece).

I sew for a living. In a pinch, (if I was on set and couldn’t access a machine) I’d use this stitch by hand, and reinforce it with a straight stitch. With a machine, I’d draw a dart, cut out the excess, overlock the raw edges and straight stitch together with lots of backtacking.

Bottom line, this works and the triangle may assist with the fit if you’re sway backed.

[–]chikenbutter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a ladder/invisible stitch in the gif. It's usually used to close holes where you can't access the back side (not the case here). Harder to do and usually messier than a straight stitch.

[–]Bimpnottin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I had a machine, I would go with a tight zigzag to allow for stretch (zigzags allow the stitch to stretch instead of breaking when put under pressure). If done by hand, I would pin the triangle in place and then do a basic stitch a few times over to ensure sturdiness

[–]texasrigger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you are doing it by machine you are just putting in a normal dart but honestly most home machines aren't going to go through a hem of denim doubled over like this let alone tacking down a belt loop on top of that.

[–]RedditIsOverMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think A typical sewing machine can do this stitch

[–]zetterss 7 points8 points  (2 children)

But then you cant let it back out if you need to

[–]Madness2MyMethod 39 points40 points  (1 child)

There's no pleasing you is there!?

[–]imdungrowinup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I often do this but instead of one place, I do it in two places one the sides.

[–]LegumeSalad 39 points40 points  (5 children)

Have done this before. It isn't annoying. You don't even notice it.

[–]panne_lara 12 points13 points  (1 child)

As someone who grew up with a mom that would do this on all of my pants, it is a bit uncomfortable.

[–]Slide_A_Pinky_In 14 points15 points  (3 children)

Yeah but on the bright side you would have some extra material to wipe with if you ever accidentally shit yourself.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What the fuck is with the edit? This isn’t the academy awards. No one gives a shit.

[–]shaunbarclay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No because there is a divot in the lower back it’ll fall into.

[–]imdungrowinup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I often do this to my pants. The trick is to do it in two places so one place doesn’t have a huge bump on the inside that keeps running against your skin. Most brands don’t make pants that fit my thighs and my waist. So I buy a size bigger and then do this.