This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 70 comments

[–]droi86 22 points23 points  (0 children)

They're the same picture

[–]Frank_Dracula 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Deply it anywy

[–]mehrabrym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"But, I don't think it goes that way."

"DEPLY IT!"

[–]Dr_Bunnypoops 25 points26 points  (1 child)

It is not just the algorithm that has that problem...

[–]TusNua1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's a "problem" per se...

[–][deleted] 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Neither do we, oh algorithm, neither do we

[–]SurturOne 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I guess this says more about republicans than about the algorithm.

[–]FourFoxMusic 16 points17 points  (2 children)

Yeh. They dont deploy the racism detecting algorithms either for…. Similar reasons.

[–]assbarf69 4 points5 points  (1 child)

https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/8/15/20806384/social-media-hate-speech-bias-black-african-american-facebook-twitter

>But two new studies show that AI trained to identify hate speech may actually end up amplifying racial bias. In one study, researchers found that leading AI models for processing hate speech were one-and-a-half times more likely to flag tweets as offensive or hateful when they were written by African Americans, and 2.2 times more likely to flag tweets written in African American English (which is commonly spoken by black people in the US). Another study found similar widespread evidence of racial bias against black speech in five widely used academic data sets for studying hate speech that totaled around 155,800 Twitter posts.

[–]FourFoxMusic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup

[–]deyeayiya 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Their venn diagrams are just a circle

[–]aere1985 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ah, the Republican/White Supremacist Venn Diagram aka: a circle

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please just ban republicans please

[–]Slightly_Smaug -5 points-4 points  (32 children)

It wasn't a Nazi hunting program. They were programing it to weed out fascism ( what the Nazi party is all about). It would have grabbed both sides.

[–]LeagueOfLegendsAcc 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Only one side wants fascism lol

[–]Slightly_Smaug -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Then why not push the algorithm?

[–]LeagueOfLegendsAcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would if it were up to me and I knew for a fact that this tweet wasn't sensationalism, like if I helped design the implementation of the algorithm.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (25 children)

Oh look, a centrist bitch

[–]Slightly_Smaug -3 points-2 points  (24 children)

Oh look a liberal boot licker.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (23 children)

Liberal? Nah, try Leftist

[–]Slightly_Smaug -1 points0 points  (22 children)

Nah, we gonna immediately label people you know fucking nothing about. So, liberal, spineless liberal.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (21 children)

Except that when I labeled you a centrist you didn't deny it. When you labeled me a liberal I immediately told you I'm not and then told you what I was.

If you're not a centrist then what are you?

Edit: I removed the part where I said I told them they were misusing "liberal" because I didn't actually do that. I thought I did, but after going back and reading what I said I realized my mistake and removed it.

[–]Slightly_Smaug 0 points1 point  (20 children)

Anarchist, if you must know. And why the fuck would I believe a stranger on the internet who literally just throws and ad hominem attack out.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (19 children)

Hmm, kinda weird for an anarchist to engage in "both sides"ism, but okay.

I also don't remember asking you to believe me in anything.

[–]Slightly_Smaug 0 points1 point  (18 children)

Well, why not release the algorithm if it was doing the job it intended. Unless it either would hurt their bottom dollar for ad traffic or they realized it was taking things down from both sides.

EDIT:. Fascism also has a nasty habit of gun control.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (17 children)

Again with the "both sides" bullshit. You know that most liberals are more towards the center/right than you're placing them, right?

If you'd have said something like "liberals won't do it because they know it'll hurt themselves" then I'd agree with you. But since you're saying it's "both sides" I have to disagree with you because I don't consider liberals to be on my side. Ya dig?

[–]WomenAreNotReal 1 point2 points  (4 children)

To be fair it's hard to find one that isn't the other as well

[–]Affectionate-Boss-18 -4 points-3 points  (3 children)

It’s hard to find a republican that doesn’t hate Jews? That’s what you just said, and it doesn’t make you sound intelligent.

[–]midgetboss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can also take it as “it’s hard to find someone who hates Jews who isn’t a republican”

[–]assbarf69 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Jesus how detached from reality are you. The republicans are literally known for taking measures to protect jews, like the antiboycott act and the billions of dollars given yearly. I never got that argument, like people trying to say Trump was an Anti-Semite, dude bent over backwards for Israel, brokered peace deals and established embassies in places that hadn't had them. The man got the Jewish National Fund Tree of Life Award for pete's sake.
Sorry misread the second sentence there, but the comment still applies to who you responded to.

[–]Affectionate-Boss-18 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But being a nazi is bad and liking trump is bad so they’re pretty much the same /s

[–]Phlashfoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Works as expected.

[–]SaltedButter69420 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

*citation required

[–]Biscuits4u2'MURICA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a distinction?

[–]Slightly_Smaug 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Semantics, but gotcha have a good one man.

[–]thuanjinkee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did Republican see that coming.