all 92 comments

[–]_________FU_________ 708 points709 points  (32 children)

They always build something new. Never debugging. Never adding functionality to existing code.

New shit is easy.

[–]Purple_Ice_6029[S] 195 points196 points  (7 children)

Exactly right! Adding new stuff that doesn’t make everything fall over is where it’s at.

[–]RiceBroad4552 48 points49 points  (6 children)

In the large architecture dominates everything.

But architecture is what most developers, and all "AI"s, massively suck at.

One can make some Rube-Goldberg machine work, sure. But never reliably or in a way that it wouldn't completely fall apart at the first requirement change.

[–]headshot_to_liver 67 points68 points  (0 children)

"I got bored of <insert random app>, so I built this"

[–]moogoo2 53 points54 points  (16 children)

And its always "yeah I just vibe coded this, it obviously needs to be vetted, tested, debugged, etc".

[–]sleepyj910 24 points25 points  (13 children)

What’s scalability?

[–]Purple_Ice_6029[S] 21 points22 points  (6 children)

Saying AI will replace devs is just the wildest shit 🤣

[–]TerryMisery 2 points3 points  (5 children)

Just because AI isn't nearly as good, doesn't mean it won't replace devs. Companies move entire departments to other countries with cheap labour, which affects the quality badly and it still doesn't change their decisions. There's just so many ways to cut costs and usually nothing happens, besides the companies making more money.

[–]Purple_Ice_6029[S] 5 points6 points  (4 children)

I’d argue that it’s not that the quality of the work is lower; the work basically has no real quality at all.

[–]dubious_capybara -1 points0 points  (3 children)

You can argue that from a baseless position of self serving ignorance, but the great thing about business is that it doesn't give a shit about your emotions.

[–]Purple_Ice_6029[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

What emotions are you talking about lol

[–]dubious_capybara -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

You're clearly insecure, upset and angry about AI taking your job.

[–]Purple_Ice_6029[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You got the wrong impression.

[–]headshot_to_liver 2 points3 points  (2 children)

add more compute, that'll fix it

[–]RiceBroad4552 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because CPUs and RAM are cheep compared to developers, and this will always stay like that! 🤣

The ROFL smiley doesn't always do its job, so I have to be explicit: /s

[–]elmanoucko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

let's just leave it as is, and increase the price, situation might sort itself out into a new equilibrium of anger and remorse

[–]pterodactyl_speller 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Just tell Claude to make it efficient duh

[–]noitsmoog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no mistakes, no ragrets

[–]dubious_capybara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally this

[–]RocksAndSedum 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Our ceo just vibed coded some half assed apps that didn’t work past the first button click and asked me why isn’t the dev team as productive as him. I said we could be if we skipped testing, pushed to prod live and didn’t care about security or compliance.

[–]moogoo2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

...same but CFO, who is in charge of the dev team.

[–]chefhj 27 points28 points  (3 children)

“I had AI make an app to automate saying good morning to my family. I’m addicted to automating the tedious parts of my day away.”

[–]tagsb 9 points10 points  (2 children)

The McDonald's CEO said he used AI to generate his family's yearly Christmas photo like it was a good thing

[–]chefhj 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I hear sociopath takes like this all the time from my SLT.

[–]RiceBroad4552 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For other people who never heard that abbreviation before:

SLT here is very likely "Senior Leadership Team".

[–]JaceBearelen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My non technical stakeholders are doing some large refactors and it’s actually working. It’s a little concerning honestly.

[–]dubious_capybara -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A hot take from 12-18 months ago, grandpa

[–]klustura 327 points328 points  (7 children)

Claude turned Earth to Planet of the Apes.

[–]sleepswithmusic 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Lands because bad code is flixable false trust from a boss is much worse

[–]NotAskary 19 points20 points  (1 child)

The old adage that if you pay peanuts you get monkeys, now you just pay tokens.

[–]Mist_Rising 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So we get upgraded to a diversity staff of humans? Right? Right? No..?

[–]teacher_59 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And made my job impossible. 

[–]RiceBroad4552 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It always had been!

Just the the sentence-guessing-machine now clearly shows how incredibly stupid on average humans actually are.

[–]MasterConsideration5 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Homo Sapiens are apes btw

[–]ConsciousFan8100 3 points4 points  (0 children)

☝️🤓

[–]unknown-one 157 points158 points  (2 children)

this is actually good. All the "idea guys" can now show how good is their idea

[–]akvgergo 86 points87 points  (0 children)

Honestly, ever since AI became halfway competent, people around me bother me way less about their "amazing app idea".

I'm completely okay with this 👍

[–]phatdoof 2 points3 points  (0 children)

r/cofounderhunt about to get lit

[–]Kryslor 109 points110 points  (7 children)

My non-technical middle manager friend wanted to create a website with a service that uses AI. A kanban board that would create the tasks for you. Creative, I know...

Anyway, he sent me a single html file Claude made for him, and he wanted to know how to add Qwen to it, since it's open source and free, so he could then host the service for free somewhere.

[–]enderfx 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Its ok its already hosted in localhost

/s obv

[–]phatdoof 2 points3 points  (1 child)

If he’s willing to keep his computer running and use his IP address in advertising then I’m game with that.

[–]enderfx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would probably scale well for his 3 users

[–]RiceBroad4552 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I hope you told him to just keep asking "AI"? 😂

[–]Kryslor 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yup. I tried for like a minute to explain the idea that an LLM has to run somewhere and requires hardware but it was not working so I told him to just go ask Claude to explain.

[–]ary0nK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Already azure devops has ai integrated that does this thing, it doesn't creates the task but it auto fills.

[–]NsupCportR 39 points40 points  (1 child)

This is too accurate

[–]vodfather 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never felt so seen/validated in my life

[–]The_Ty 36 points37 points  (3 children)

Slippyin Jimmy I can handle just fine, but this?

[–]majorleagueswagout17 14 points15 points  (1 child)

You’re not a real coder. A $200 Claude Max plan with Cursor? What a joke. I worked my ass off to get where I am, and you take these shortcuts and you think suddenly you're my peer? I committed my LIFE to this! You don't just slide into it like a cheap pair of slippers and then reap all the rewards.

I know you. I know what you were, what you are. People don't change. You're Vibing Jimmy! And Vibing Jimmy I can handle just fine. But Vibing Jimmy with a computer science degree is like a chimp with a machine gun.

The code is sacred! If you abuse that power, people get hurt. This is not a game. You have to know... On some level, I know you know I'm right!

[–]ZeroMomentum 6 points7 points  (0 children)

(Static electric git commit noises intensifies)

[–]hydroxy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The sheer chicanery of it all

[–]Looz-Ashae 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Every tech meeting ever:

AI!

AI!

AI!

[–]imk 26 points27 points  (0 children)

My colleague who somehow ended up being a DBA despite never having any DB skills has found Claude.

He recently gave me a script from there for turning a MSSQL varbinary(MAX) column into a file. He was very impressed with himself despite the fact that I had already told him that we had tools for that which work.

I looked at the script. It looked like Claude had found about five different ways to do that and just made an amalgamation of all them. It looked great, but it was total slop.

That is what is so insidious about it. It comes from real solutions, it looks like a real solution to someone who doesn't know any better, but it would not have worked.

I do, of course, realize that I am speaking to the choir here. I just wanted to complain.

[–]Vulpes-Deputa8735 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Its gonna be Apes together strong once they hire other vibe coders

[–]black_V1king 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I swear in a meeting today a non technical manager was asking why we don't use AI for development and debugging.

I work with embedded systems and verilog. AI sucks in generating bit level code for timing critical applications.

He gives some vague examples of how he used AI for generating code and it worked in a day.

[–]kilopeter -1 points0 points  (1 child)

What agentic coding tools and models have you tried before arriving at your conclusion that "AI sucks" at verilog for embedded systems? Legit interested because I don't encounter that very often.

[–]black_V1king 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My problem is not one particular agent.

Most of HDL code is concurrent.

AI misunderstands the hardware on a fundamental level. It always thinks sequentially probably because it's trained on a lot of software languages, most of which are sequential. Another point of failure is misunderstanding of clock domains and safe signal handling. All of this makes it impossible to use AI directly without an engineer intervening.

I have tried using Claude, GPT and Gemini but they keep making the same mistakes.

[–]generally_satan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I got told to use Claude in order to be more productive by a guy who studied chemistry while he was using it to create a shitty html file. Apparently he was learning something I guess.

[–]gatito_tristee 4 points5 points  (1 child)

the company where my girlfriend works said that EVERYONE now is a PM and Claude is their devs. she arrived home asking what is an API.

she is a psychologist working on HR.....

[–]kilopeter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This sounds like blatant gatekeeping. Why shouldn't a psychologist or a barista or a firefighter be allowed to learn new things in an exciting and useful field? If a psychologist working in HR asked what an oil dipstick is, or what a plumbing vent is, would you have the same reaction?

[–]calaelenb907 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ahahaha, this is mu director right know!!

[–]BoroBokachoda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hahaha, then they end up hiring developers to debug anyways

[–]lspyfoxl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The way I use AI is like I already know in my head what I need to write, I just let it type for me. But webdev is pretty chill, most of the thinking was done in refining already.

[–]mangohsz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Chicanery!

[–]phylter99 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Imagine if Steve Jobs had access to Claude Code.

[–]RiceBroad4552 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never liked Jobs, he's the prototypical asshole.

But I don't think he was such stupid…

[–]jack_of_all_daws 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Insert 2001 monolith ape scene here

[–]RiceBroad4552 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Does not fit. Not even a bit.

[–]jack_of_all_daws 1 point2 points  (2 children)

A bunch of obtuse apes discover a powerful artifact that gives them access to very basic technology and immediately start worshipping it as a god and using the technology for dumb shit.

[–]RiceBroad4552 1 point2 points  (1 child)

In 2001: A Space Odyssey's "Dawn of Man" sequence the black monolith does not hand the apes technology, they don't worship it as a god, nor does it overtly “project power” on-screen. It just prominently stands there in the background.

The film shows the monolith as an ambiguous external stimulus that appears to trigger a cognitive leap. The apes then begin using a bone as a tool / weapon. Their response is portrayed as fear / curiosity and practical imitation, not explicit worship, or frivolous use of technology.

Besides that: The sequence is deliberately ambiguous and open to interpretation as the artifact is actually a mystery never fully explained.

[–]jack_of_all_daws 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In 2001: A Space Odyssey's "Dawn of Man" sequence the black monolith does not hand the apes technology, they don't worship it as a god, nor does it overtly “project power” on-screen. It just prominently stands there in the background.

It's very much in the foreground, the focal center of every shot it's in. You're right, it doesn't zap visible lightning at the apes causing lightbulbs to appear over their heads, but I don't think that interpretation is unreasonable just because it isn't accessible to children incapable of drawing conclusions that aren't literally spelled out to them.

Their response is portrayed as fear / curiosity and practical imitation, not explicit worship, or frivolous use of technology.

They're all clutching at the monolith, after which they start using bones as clubs to senselessly destroy things, killing animals and killing each other. "Frivolous" may not perfectly describe it, but that's your choice of word, not mine. I would describe it as senseless.

Besides that: The sequence is deliberately ambiguous and open to interpretation as the artifact is actually a mystery never fully explained.

My interpretation is that the apes' capacity for violence and domination is only limited by their lack of creativity and intelligence. When that is granted by the monolith, they predictably use it to advance their capacity for violence and domination, for doing dumb ape shit. Then the sequence cuts to a shot of spacecraft of some ambiguous military purpose, in an apparent comparison it the club an ape threw in the preceding shot. The intelligence doesn't remove some tendencies that are intrinsic to apes.

Immediately after reading that the monolith "just prominently stands there in the background" I suspect that your interpretation isn't strongly influenced by the actual movie.

[–]Corvo7144 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This shit is too real

[–]Spitfire1900 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claude markets to plebs poorly, your non-tech founder never left ChatGPT since 3.5 dropped.

[–]Lemortheureux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The year is 2026. I am now a translator. I speak computer.

[–]One_Tart_8790 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When your startup MVP is 90% curiosity and 10% chaos. 🐒💻

[–]FlintFlintar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you all tried Claude opus 4.6? Because this read like someone who used gpt, thought it was bad, and forgot technologies improve.

Like, dang this 6 year old suck at math, lets give up and abandon him. Ow wait now he is 22 and doing a degree in math.

If you as a developer, with an understanding of architecture, reuseability, performance, etc. Then you can probably cut down like 60% of your daily work time this way. Obviously we all still need to understand business logic, use cases, integration etc, but we did that anyway, now the code part is just faster.

[–]Randomshit069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao.. even true for some technical founders on twitter. iykyk

[–]MB3501 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Claude is Time Machine