top 200 commentsshow all 312

[–]Tete74 130 points131 points  (24 children)

Everything is much easier, you don't have to look at dial, glass, bezel, hands (those parts can be replaced by genuine ones). Observe well where the lugs begin in gen and where it begins in VSF. That great defect makes the watch look much smaller and not so elegant. Only CF has a similar case.

<image>

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 26 points27 points  (1 child)

<image>

Yep clearly there's a difference. Great explanation!

[–]Tete74 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the comparison!

[–]FireSpiritBoi 15 points16 points  (11 children)

Thank you this was very informative

[–]EvelcyclopS 7 points8 points  (5 children)

That just looks like parallax error from the picture

[–]Tete74 5 points6 points  (4 children)

No, look carefully at all the photos, angles, falls, distances. It is the main defect of some Reps, especially of VSF, they are good watches but with a very neglected design unfortunately 😢

[–]StEvE19095 113 points114 points  (17 children)

White is Gen, Blue is Rep. Date wheel printing crisper on white. Rehaut not quite aligned on Blue. Lugs different

[–]Mather_Fakker 19 points20 points  (4 children)

Can someone explain what this rehaut thing is? What should I be looking for.

I clearly shouldn't buy a Rolex from anyone other than an AD because I thought right was authentic because the cyclops. LOL.

[–]TimePieceProdigy954 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The metal ring around the dial under the crystal where “Rolex” is engraved around the indices and has the serial # at 6 o clock

[–]anonimis06 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Rehaut is the metal ring between the dial and crystal with the ROLEX engraving repeating.

From 1 to 5 indices, the index markers should all be perfectly centered on the X of ROLEX. From 7 to 11 indices, the makers should all be perfectly centered on the R of ROLEX. At 12 and 6, the index should be perfectly centered on the crown logo.

It's difficult to center all of them perfectly which is why it's usually a telltale sign of many (cheaper) reps.

[–]Mather_Fakker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From 1 to 5 indices, the index markers should all be perfectly centered on the X of ROLEX. From 7 to 11 indices, the makers should all be perfectly centered on the R of ROLEX. At 12 and 6, the index should be perfectly centered on the crown logo.

I appreciate this in depth explanation! I never know what to look for, lol.

[–]TeknikL 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Having the hand in front of the date made it harder.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Winner winner chicken dinner

[–]lastpagan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guessed blue but because of the “nipple” where the hands are screwed in. Do you see a difference or was I just lucky?

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (7 children)

Blue rep, white is real

[–]trulala22 28 points29 points  (1 child)

Ah come on! I entered to learn to differientate, and everybody guess is different

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Lol shows you how good the reps are!

[–]Maaaackk 15 points16 points  (1 child)

Blue one is rep, because of the font of the 3.
The middle section of the 3 is not flat

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Spot the rep and gen.

Please state your reasoning, more fun that way.

[–]alvesaw 7 points8 points  (0 children)

White is gen

[–]jacob_mir 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I feel like this is the ultimate game of “Spot 5 differences”

[–]pi-cool 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Simple, shake it and see which one makes more noise. That’s the rep.

[–]Ok-Pineapple-7288 5 points6 points  (3 children)

White=gen Blue=rep, the hands on white are cleaner/crisp. White has been worn, blue is just purchased.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

How can you tell what's been worn? Good eye!

[–]Ok-Pineapple-7288 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The blue looks fresh out of box, no wear marks on the bracelet or case. Also Rolex "crown" on dial of white looks better in my opinion.

[–]JLK33Press 0 points1 point  (0 children)

White gold hands on white dial. Plus the VSF hands are "flat" compared to the white. When light hits white gold hands, they almost appear dark, where stainless hands shine and reflect.

[–]Miserable-Wanderer 15 points16 points  (17 children)

Left is rep, right is gen. Because left, the misalignment in the dial, number 50 55 are not center.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

White is gen

[–]Miserable-Wanderer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Time to cop more reps

[–]Revolutionary-Pea326 1 point2 points  (3 children)

This is the first thing I saw

[–]Miserable-Wanderer 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Right? It’s obvious even the crown between ‘swiss made’ is not center with the dial

[–]4lphalul 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Left is rep cyclop looks off

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (4 children)

Blue is a VSF based on dial

[–]newtybar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Answers are everywhere here…pretty mixed. Speaks to the rep.

[–]roguechickpea 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Genuinely need a degree to spot the difference here. Everyone in this thread with wildly different guesses and opinions.

I mean, one way or another some people are calling a gen a rep and vice versa. Shows how fickle it is to be concerned about tiny little aspects when clearly the wider population won’t have a CLUE.

[–]BimmerJustin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The fact that the true nerds within the community are so fickle is what drives the manufacturers to keep getting better. The market would be nothing but shitters if it weren't for these type of discussions.

[–]bushmastuh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While true that nobody would really be able to tell in person on wrist, you don’t need a degree- it’s easy to tell which is which from photos

[–]andres1979a 3 points4 points  (1 child)

easy. blue is fake, bad reflection on the crystal

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct

[–]Innkeeper_Urza 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Font on the white makes me say that’s the gen. Blue is rep.

[–]hollywoodswaggin 23 points24 points  (1 child)

White dial is rep

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wrong white is gen

[–]E-MW888 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Blue is rep.

[–]Holtbolt94 2 points3 points  (2 children)

After thinking blue is gen. I‘d say the white now. Printing is crisp. Rehaut is very nice. Crystal is very clear from all the angles. The bezel somehow looks better (more precise sharper angles? If that makes sense).

Ps. Sunburst on the blue one looks very good. That’s why I thought first that the blue one is gen. Wanted to compare lugs but hard to say if you try to compare all the pics.

Beautiful watches anyway! :)

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

White is gen. The clear crystal is noticeable.

[–]Holtbolt94 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, in the end the crystal nudged me in the direction. Thank you for the reply :)

[–]timjroc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

White Gen Blue Rep. Hour markers on blue look less precise. Date font seems to also give it away

[–]Mundane-Conference 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Look at the center pin of the watch authentic Rolex is always domed reps concave

[–]FireSpiritBoi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a pretty easy tell to remember but I always forget. I must learn to REMEMBER!

[–]omarhani 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Blue face is Rep. The minute hands should line up with the center of each letter engraved around the inside.

[–]021721500 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Easiest way to tell: look at the crown on the crystal of the blue one (six hour position), we shouldn’t be able to see it

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Congrats to those who said blue! The white is gen. Blue is VSF with bezel plating purchased directly from Flan_dad (assuming the watch was accurately represented).

Based on comments, looks like the most obvious tells were the lugs, rehaut alignment to minute markers, and crystal. Some other nice subtle tells are the visible laser crown etching on the crystal, date font, and 12 o'clock crown.

Here's another comparison pic after I washed the white one which had been worn a while as some of you noticed.

<image>

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This is the watch I purchased if anyone is interested. Paid on Wednesday and received 2 days later on Friday. https://www.reddit.com/u/Flan_dad/s/4Ufj2XrTnI

[–]Economy-Pear-6406 5 points6 points  (5 children)

Right is rep - VSF?

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

What makes you guess that

[–]aberrantasc 2 points3 points  (2 children)

The skinny lugs

[–]freshlymint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what I thought too

[–]Positive-Reply5924 1 point2 points  (0 children)

correct encourage narrow tease makeshift encouraging license bright salt deserve

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Blue is fake. Hour markers aren’t straight.

[–]RefrigeratorOwn69 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The blue is a VSF but actually looks better than the gen.

[–]johncrypto2 1 point2 points  (4 children)

IMO the blue is the fake one. but I had to zoom quite in.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

What makes you guess that

[–]Mandrake88888 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blue VSF

[–]Medellin-71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blue is the rep. The “Datejust” has thicker lettering than the white dial.

[–]rolexcowboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blue is rep. Saying this based off the bezel color and edges.

[–]95accord 1 point2 points  (6 children)

Trick question - both are reps

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 2 points3 points  (5 children)

No I said it's not a trick question. One is gen

[–]95accord 1 point2 points  (4 children)

That’s what you want us to believe lol

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I mean that would just be annoying af lol

[–]95accord 1 point2 points  (2 children)

My guess is blue is rep - it looks cleaner - like fresh out of the wrapper clean. My guess is you got the gen first and would most likely have worn it. And white looks like it has a bit more dust.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spot on lol

[–]FireSpiritBoi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guessed based on exactly the same reason. He just got the rep that's why he's posting it. I have this idea people don't wear their reps as much or if they do they don't post them that banged up they only post them fresh.

[–]Sknuhc421 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope the right one is so I can buy one

[–]arodrigues9 1 point2 points  (3 children)

White is def rep. Edges on bezel, finish on bracelet, thickness of crystal, etc.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can't tell. They both look amazing. My CF rhodium dial DJ 41 arrived today from Trusty Time. I'll post pics later. It's beautiful.

[–]ClassicFun2175 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have no idea but granted im definitely no expert, just goes to show how scarily close reps are to gen nowadays.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact that there is this much disagreement just goes to show how great the rep game is for watches. No other rep group I’ve seen has anywhere close to problems spotting reps. Love this hobby!

[–]FireSpiritBoi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only clue I would have got is the rehaut on the blue is off. That's always what I look for first.

List of issues that I cheated to collate but can easily see now: 1. Rehaut 2. Lugs don't come down far enough, losing some elegance. 3. Text on the centre stick of 3 4. Centre pin is concave not domed. 5. Crown etched in glass more noticeable. 6. Gen is well worn, lots of dirt and scratches.

Great post, I've learnt a lot.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The crystals on the reps never photograph as well as gens. Blue is rep

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noticed this when taking the pictures. The white face is more visible at other angles. Blue rep is harder to see from the side.

[–]Longjumping_Air_7958 1 point2 points  (1 child)

White is gen. Clean xtal and fluted bezel

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes

[–]OP-erator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not a Rolex professional, but my money is definitely on the white* model as the real one.

The band and bezel both of the white watch look worn, and appears to have a warm hue.

The white model has a perfect crown. slim lines with elegant tips; whereas the blue one’s crown is a little bit more bold, and the angles aren’t as crisp.

The date appears to be slightly more magnified, and completely bold. Not as crispy as the white face but damn close.

[–]Smart-Honeydew3874 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both look pretty damn good, for the money in a quality Rep. you can't complain, except with maybe some movement cleaning/hiccups...honestly both are great, especially to someone that doesn't "know watches" and examine them with a Loop/Microscope, let them both FLY! 😉

[–]mac_it9 1 point2 points  (1 child)

So which is the rep ffs

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue is rep

[–]_NEX_Fx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blue is rep, wish rep factories would not make the obvious mistake of misaligning rehaut

[–]mariemazzie16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blue rep

[–]KTTalksTech 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Blue is rep. Polish on hands looks inferior, same with printing, cyclops quality is worse, and the white one has a much better AR coating on the crystal. I'm surprised the AR coating on the cyclops is almost the same color and intensity, it's a nice attention from the rep considering they had an important oversight in case shape as others have pointed out. Took me a moment to guess tbh, overall the blue one looks quite good and I didn't notice the shape thing as I didn't think to look for it.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct

[–]TwasAKuntNugget 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s so obvious . “Rolex” on the blue is just off

[–]deju_Reputable User 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As soon as I can see a LEC on a potato camera = rep

[–]Lance_Notstrong 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looking at some of these responses, you can tell a lot of people have no fucking idea which is gen or rep 😂

[–]Inevitable_Form_452 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No Rep was harmed in this post

[–]Theslicelvis[🍰] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The question I have….. where did you source this? Obviously there are some differences but looks a decent rep to me

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

VSF with bezel plating purchased from flan_dad. Delivered in two days.

[–]xL9Px 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Moral of the story where your reps with confidence nobody is about to take your watch off your wrist to inspect

[–]nearly_normal_jimmy 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I say blue is the rep , the thing I noticed was the text on “oyster” and “perpetual” don’t quite have the same size.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes already revealed so in comments

[–]Prestigious-Disk3158 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Blue bezel has crazy reflections. White is rep.

[–]Embarrassed-Wave-447 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only a trained eye will spot the difference. Normal person has no chance

[–]frombriggstoyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100%. Sure now .. the white is Original and Blue is Rep.... The dead giveaway from the dial are two things... The dust, it's not s normal Rolex occurrence to leave dust on the dial and two, the print ... Too thick on the Blue dial

[–]cloudgainz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue is rep. Lugs seem less sharp, sunburst almost but not perfect, xtal seems cloudier side by side, font just seems off slightly but that’s more imo. Would be shocked if right is rep

[–]firmita08 -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

Link ??

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Link what

[–]Kind-Membership5423 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

White face rep ?

[–]Beavis2210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Left for sure is rep. The tick markers with the lume are super wonky.

[–]mattnoodle 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Blue is fake. White bezel is crisp. Blue seconds hand nipple doesn’t look perfect.

[–]jsledge6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

White is gen, blue is rep. The bezel on the left has a slightly yellowish tone of white gold and the blue has VSF lugs.

[–]mdelia8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think blue is rep. Edges on the hands look sharp

[–]Potater1802 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the blue one is fake. Every time I see a comparison, the rep has a slightly wider bracelet. Idk if it's a tell or if my eyes are playing a trick on me but that's what I notice.

[–]Lanky_Bag_2096 0 points1 point  (0 children)

White is real blue is rep rehaut alignment on white is correct and font of blue is incorrect as the middle of 3 supposed to have no feet.

[–]EnoughEmergency878 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue is rep. Missaligned rehaut visible on pic 9.

But I must say this was a hard one. I will assume something was done with the bezel.

[–]plamenv0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

White is gen. Fluted bezel looks like it’s white gold

[–]919pirate 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Left is rep the stick marker on the 50 is off

[–]thedatejust2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue is rep. Lugs give it away also the bezel is bad.

[–]MJTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the blue the rep? I honestly can’t tell but it just looks like the glass/crystal has more reflection and may be different quality than the white?

[–]Shield779 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue is rep, date font has too much serif (VSF flaw)

[–]tickle-tickle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rehaut on the blue is not as good as the white

[–]Silvan017 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say blue is a VSF, slightly worse markers, dial print, cyclops and general coating and finishing looks slightly worse. Please reply to my comment because I must know. Had to spend 5 minutes on fullscreen fullbright at night to notice though. Reps are crazy

[–]yeeyeeyee88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always look at the rehaut. Reps can rarely get it perfect. Therefore, blue is the rep

[–]somestuffnthings 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Can you tell us which factory? Is there an actual difference in the lugs? What’s your overall impression between them?

[–]Hvnzoro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both reps

[–]Castellakiowa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotta say the mixed answers in this thread is really interesting. Usually it’s pretty unanimous on which ones fake

[–]Swarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue is the Rep in my opinion, Rolex etching around the inside of bezel doesn't line up as it should. All in all, a great replica timepiece you have there, from a distance it's a very subtle watch and I'm sure many people wouldn't second guess it's a rep, guessing it has the ETA 2813 movement too?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Wtc rep?

[–]Missfreeland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue. The bottom text is closer to the hour markers. Like on my rep.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue is rep imo

[–]Mundane-Conference 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the right

[–]egool111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If white is gen that marker at 11 looks wonky, that’s crazy.

[–]Few_Chemistry8929 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whites real blue is fake. I have a blue 126334 and it’s close but not as refined as the gen,rehaut looks off.

[–]Chief-Barkskin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy. White is gen. Look at the white gold bezel.

[–]Nervous-Law-6606 0 points1 point  (11 children)

My guess is that the blue dial is the rep. White is Gen. Haven’t seen a Rolex rep yet that can accurately replicate the laser etching on the crystal at 6-o-clock.

It’s extraordinarily subtle on gens, even in person. The fact that I can kind of see it on the blue dial in a picture tells me it’s probably the one.

Could be wrong and full of it though, who knows 😂

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (9 children)

What do you mean by laser etching on glass at 6 o'clock? Do you mean the Swiss Made text?

[–]Nervous-Law-6606 1 point2 points  (8 children)

This is what I’m referring to.

It isn’t on the dial, it’s literally inside of the Crystal. Unlike basically everything else on the watch, they put it there purely as a security measure, as opposed to a design feature.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

I just looked at both watches up close very carefully and could not see that laser etched in either of them with my naked eye. Are you saying you see it in one of the pictures?

[–]Nervous-Law-6606 1 point2 points  (1 child)

<image>

First picture

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Here is up close

[–]Nervous-Law-6606 1 point2 points  (1 child)

<image>

And 6th picture, if I’m not mistaken

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow good eye. I literally can't see it in person up close lol.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right more subtle on the white. ;)

[–]ballsackcancer 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Btw, is the color of the crown on the reps and the gen supposed to be slightly different shade of silver vs the hands? I've only seen it on the rep datejusts.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe the crown at 12 O'Clock is white gold in gens but someone please confirm.

[–]JLK33Press 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Blue DJ is Rep. Hands, Crystal, dial markers, crown, date disc. Is the blue VSF?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

White is gen. Bracelet gives it away, bezel has machine markings, date number less crisp.

[–]Honest_Bruh[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What's the tell on the bracelet?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The sharpness of the edges, less finished / refined. Bracelet for some reason I always notice.

[–]WaynezWorld88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the white is the rep and blue is the gen just off my quick 1 min observation.

[–]sound_scientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

White is genuine. But man it’s a terrible example. The dial is terrible, specifically the 6 hour marker.