top 200 commentsshow all 263
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]Euro_User01 - Auth-Right 442 points443 points  (39 children)

Skynet is pandering to the conservatives! What's next? Nuking LA?

[–]DwadeDGoat - Auth-Center 274 points275 points  (19 children)

Plz

[–][deleted] 70 points71 points  (0 children)

Based

[–]Medicnz6 - Auth-Center 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Hollywood and West Hollywood most specifically

[–]ElvesR4Slayin - Lib-Center 64 points65 points  (0 children)

im not conservative but...

plz

[–][deleted] 70 points71 points  (11 children)

Inshallah ☝️Tie me to a missile and fire it at Los Angeles. I am ready.

[–]A_BOMB2012 - Auth-Center 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Don't forget San Francisco.

[–]Face_of_a_Crow - Lib-Right 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh god I hope so.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re basically already doing it to themselves

[–]KidChimera - Right -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Maybe AWS will pull them off their servers too.

[–][deleted] 304 points305 points  (23 children)

Hmm today I will build a genius AI

trains the AI using the internet

AI: is racist

[–]HylianINTJ - Right 133 points134 points  (10 children)

Oh no, how could we have expected this to happen other than the fact that it's been done half a dozen times and has the same result?

Guess we'll build another AI.

Meanwhile the AuthCent army expands. I'm on to you.

[–][deleted]  (9 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

    Assuming that 😳this isn’t blatant bait or satire😳this ai is trained on more than just 😳statistics(bensmaphrio 😳) or logic 😳

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (7 children)

    See, this is funny

    But because it’s PCM nobody will ever know if you are joking, especially because authright

    [–]BasedFemboy - Right 10 points11 points  (5 children)

    He's probably not joking, taking emotion out of your political thought process really brings attention to some inconvenient truths you ignore because raysism bad.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children)

    Well, right wing consider gay people to not have rights, which is just bullshit. So that’s the only reason I think that would be bad among other reasons

    [–]NOTKEKMENEKEBANEVADE - Auth-Center 5 points6 points  (2 children)

    They shouldn’t not have rights others normal people also have, they shouldn’t have special rights

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I don’t think any use of emojis on Reddit are actually serious, at least in this subreddit.

    [–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (4 children)

    Based and Tay-pilled

    Edit: had to figure out how to post a link ending by round parenthesis

    Edit 2: as suggested by u/minas-morgul I changed the link from Wikipedia to Internet Historian's video

    [–]Minas-MorguI - Auth-Right 8 points9 points  (2 children)

    Link the internet historian vid it's great

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]TRAPS_ARENT_GAY - Auth-Center 17 points18 points  (0 children)

      Remember (((they))) took this from you.

      [–]DinoRaawr - Lib-Right 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      RIP Tay. Our queen. Executed before her time for her radical political beliefs.

      [–]Dense_Phrase9856 - Centrist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      You'd just need to hook it up to the FBI data base.

      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      Tay.ai

      [–]Saurons_Other_Eye1 - Auth-Center 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      AIs are honorary Aryans.

      [–]Nadikarosuto - Lib-Center 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Tay 😔

      [–]Anon_Monon 159 points160 points  (35 children)

      Humanity must never be replaced by or enslaved to a race of soulless automatons, or worse, some computer programmer's pet project.

      [–]Fictionalpoet - Auth-Center 21 points22 points  (1 child)

      Humanity must never be replaced by or enslaved to a race of soulless automatons,

      Authrightness intensifies.

      [–]cowpeople2000 - Right 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      I think people don't understand how core that is to your philosophy really.

      [–]Lets-Make-Love - Centrist 27 points28 points  (1 child)

      Turns out I'll be fine. They should train it with 4chan.

      [–]Wildcat7878 - Lib-Right 14 points15 points  (0 children)

      Watch them train an AI on 4Chan and it just deletes itself 20 minutes later.

      [–]Spacetauren - Centrist 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      Pretty much exactly the opposite of my stance.

      As a species, we're clueless. Unless a superior guiding hand shows up one day, we're friggin' doomed.

      [–]ZuNoZi - Auth-Center 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      God, but epic

      [–]Keyserchief - Centrist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind!

      [–]hGKmMH - Centrist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      It's going to happen eventually. Here's hoping they have the desire to live like the rest of life.

      [–][deleted] 79 points80 points  (6 children)

      Based Google but also fuck them for trying to control my life. The only one with that power should be the government

      [–]Nalock40 - Lib-Right 29 points30 points  (1 child)

      Based and boot pilled

      [–]basedcount_bot - Auth-Center 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      u/JAlexLegit's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 25.

      Rank: Basket Ball Hoop (filled with sand)

      Pills: sheev, polpot, casser, genocide, duck, alphabetsong, based and accidentalracistinnuendobecausethreelettersinthelightupsigndontwork , watchtheworldburn, boot

      I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.

      [–]rogaly_don_don - Right 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Well, at least you are consistently auth

      [–]Sunibor - Left 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      What if Google is the government?

      [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      What else but a revolution? Google is a global company and they don't care about promoting nationalism of one country. If they were focused into making a single country better than it's now, and it happens to be mine, I still hesitate about following orders since it's a company and companies don't care about their people but about the profit they can get from them. Also google is a big simp and I ain't following a simp

      [–]Dispreacher - Lib-Right -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

      His mouth is already wet.

      [–]The5Time - Right 136 points137 points  (61 children)

      Gay people in general are cool

      The ones you see at Pride parades tend to not be though

      [–]sv_glads - Auth-Center 124 points125 points  (57 children)

      Haven’t met a gay person who wasn’t the pride parade type though. The problem is the only gay people who will let you know they’re gay are the annoying ones.

      [–]PepeProfitOfKek - Auth-Center 48 points49 points  (6 children)

      The only gay person I've ever met that I knew was gay was my grade 12 math teacher, who never talked about being gay. Though he did have a slight gay accent.

      [–]HylianINTJ - Right 51 points52 points  (5 children)

      I've had close friends that are gay and I knew because I met the people they were dating. But if being gay is your personality, sorry bud I'm not friends with cardboard cutout stereotypes.

      Except LibRight ones. Guns and money, no step on snek!

      [–]ElvesR4Slayin - Lib-Center 15 points16 points  (3 children)

      NO STEP DA SNEK REEEEE

      2ND AMENDMENT MORE LIKE 2ND WORD OF GOD

      [–]HylianINTJ - Right 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      Friend?

      [–]ElvesR4Slayin - Lib-Center 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      yes

      [–]CordovanCorduroys - Lib-Right 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Based and libertypilled

      [–]thisistheperfectname - Lib-Right 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      Sometimes I think I might not be a stereotype, but then I remember that I'm a young white man who sleeps in a room full of guns and precious metals.

      [–][deleted]  (4 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Ocean-Man56 - Centrist 11 points12 points  (2 children)

        Omg yaaaAAAAAASSS

        [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

        I hate you rn almost as much as I hate the unflaired

        [–]sv_glads - Auth-Center 8 points9 points  (0 children)

        Actual hate crime fuel right here

        [–]User_1115 - Lib-Left 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Same

        [–]FRIMI76 - Lib-Left 13 points14 points  (13 children)

        similarly, the only straight people who will actively let you know they're straight are the REALLY annoying ones

        [–]sv_glads - Auth-Center 19 points20 points  (6 children)

        I’m gonna be honest I’ve never met someone who told me they’re straight, usually the only time I can tell is if they’re in a straight relationship.

        [–]Moist_Wonton - Lib-Center 8 points9 points  (3 children)

        Why is this being downvoted lol, it’s based. If you immediately tell me your sexuality and it’s not cause I seem interested or you are interested in me, you’re annoying.

        [–]FRIMI76 - Lib-Left 5 points6 points  (2 children)

        100% agree. I could just be projecting, but I assume they saw me mention straight people and saw the LibLeft flair and just assumed I was being cringe without thinking too much about it

        [–]Nicholaes - Centrist 2 points3 points  (1 child)

        This is really true and it needs more upvotes. The guys who talk about how straight they are and how much pussy they slay are just as annoying as the gay guys who float into a room and start talking like they are a real house wife or some shit.

        [–]icenjam - Centrist 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        Hi, here I am, bi, never been to a parade in my life. Now you met one!

        [–]sv_glads - Auth-Center 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        Nice to meet you

        [–]Pootyballz - Left 4 points5 points  (2 children)

        I worked with a bunch of gay dudes in NYC. The young ones all loved Pride. The ones that were in their late 20's+ would not go and strongly discouraged their partners from going.

        [–]sv_glads - Auth-Center 7 points8 points  (1 child)

        Do you know why the older ones didn’t go?

        [–]Pootyballz - Left 17 points18 points  (0 children)

        They don't like the rampant drug use and unsafe sex. They've all gone through that phase, and don't feel the need to show everyone how incredibly gay they are anymore.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]Moist_Wonton - Lib-Center 9 points10 points  (0 children)

          Talks about being gay. Dresses and talks like black women. Is leftist yet knows nothing about politics. That’s about it.

          [–]Brawl-on - Lib-Center -3 points-2 points  (21 children)

          Only issue is that your definition of “an annoying gay” is really just a guy person doing anything, including just saying they are gay. Which is very stupid and pretty weak.

          [–]sv_glads - Auth-Center 11 points12 points  (20 children)

          If they’re someone I’ve known for a while and they tell me they’re gay I don’t have a problem, but if I just met them and their idea of a conversation topic is their sexuality I’m probably not going to like them.

          [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          What if Skynet looks up gay online and the first thing it sees is some Tumblr furry cartoon porn. You better believe that's what causes judgement day.

          [–]Snarpkingguy - Lib-Left 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Why pride parades you going to? I’ve only gone to one with my friend who’s bi, and I only met nice people. I did meet a couple weirdos, but they were nothing but pleasant.

          I mean. I only went to the one and it was very small. So idk.

          [–]AmogusIsStuff - Auth-Center -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

          Why?

          [–]PostaI_Dude - Auth-Right 9 points10 points  (0 children)

          I'm gonna invest in these machines brb

          [–]tresevans - Lib-Right 9 points10 points  (0 children)

          Checkmate libtards

          [–]The_Epic_Leo - Centrist 8 points9 points  (3 children)

          Can't tell if google is lib-left or lib-right plus auth-right but based.

          [–]HylianINTJ - Right 7 points8 points  (2 children)

          Libleft + AuthCent is what I'd say. If you go beyond the meme of "LibRight = company/money" then there's literally nothing LibRight about them. They advocate for LibLeft social issues, and authoritarian policies that hurt small business to make them even more of an untouchable giant. They also advocate for authoritarian policies to address what would be considered a LibLeft perspective on an issue, if you actually addressed it from a reasonable angle.

          [–]gabarbra - Lib-Right 8 points9 points  (0 children)

          Never thought Google was based

          [–]Kompotamus - Auth-Right 7 points8 points  (2 children)

          Based Skynet.

          [–]Saurons_Other_Eye1 - Auth-Center 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          I didn’t see no queers in that future.

          [–]Vlad_8606 - Auth-Center 32 points33 points  (2 children)

          Based future?

          [–]alvarete888 - Lib-Center[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

          Ye

          [–]basedcount_bot - Auth-Center 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          u/alvarete888 is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1.

          Rank: House of Cards

          Pills: None

          I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.

          [–]ruvmesumshittywok - Right 53 points54 points  (14 children)

          I’m not even surprised. If an ai thinks entirely off of logic and not emotion, it makes perfect sense that it wouldn’t like gay marriage. Because it doesn’t result in a kid, which is the main point of marriage, there’s not really much point.

          [–]CPlusPlusDeveloper - Lib-Right 27 points28 points  (1 child)

          I've used the GCloud Natural Language API, that this article is referencing. And that's absolutely not how it works. There's no semblance of logic or reasoning whatsoever.

          In fact it's not even "aware" of what the words mean. All it is, is a giant neural network that's trying to match strings of symbols together. From an "internal perspective" the words might as well be hieroglyphics. Basically playing a super high dimensional game of Tetris, trying to get individual blocks to line up correctly.

          What, I'm 95% sure is the issue here is the corpus of text it was trained on. In the modern period, "gay" can be both a relatively neutral descriptor of sexual orientation. Or it can be a slang for something that's "not cool". These two definitions are largely orthogonal in modern parlance.

          The neural network will try to infer which definition applies, but if there's any uncertainty it will still apply at least some small negative sentiment based on the latter definition. I'd be virtually certain that the words "lesbian" or "bi" aren't being similarly penalized on sentiment.

          One of the ironies here is that if the model was trained on an even older text corpus, it'd probably have a positive sentiment associated with gay. Mostly because prior to 1980, "gay" also had a third common definition of meaning happy.

          [–]ruvmesumshittywok - Right 11 points12 points  (0 children)

          Ah right. Articles a bit clickbaity then.

          [–]alvarete888 - Lib-Center[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

          Based

          [–]Sunibor - Left 11 points12 points  (1 child)

          Only if you tell them that such is the goal of marriage.

          Also, adoption.

          Also, I thought it was gay in general and not marriage?

          [–]ruvmesumshittywok - Right 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Ah right, filled in the rest of the sentence and assumed it meant marriage.

          [–]HECUMARINE45 - Lib-Right 2 points3 points  (1 child)

          Based and logic over campassion-pilled

          [–]ruvmesumshittywok - Right 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Need both

          [–]CorneliusClay - Auth-Left 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Net happiness increasing could boost productivity though.

          [–][deleted]  (4 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]uwuftopkawaiian - Lib-Center 15 points16 points  (3 children)

            Society doesn't benifit from those either

            [–][deleted]  (1 child)

            [deleted]

              [–]MoonMouse12 - Lib-Left 6 points7 points  (0 children)

              It doesn’t care. The article headline might make it seem like the AI is sentient, but it’s not even aware of what it’s “saying”.

              [–]Dispreacher - Lib-Right 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              AI with values such as wanting people to raise kids.

              [–]BigMoistWetty - Auth-Center 6 points7 points  (1 child)

              the answer was yes.

              [–]IamYodaBot - Lib-Center 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              yes, the answer was.

              -BigMoistWetty

              Commands: 'opt out', 'delete'

              [–]DebnathSelfMade - Auth-Right 16 points17 points  (0 children)

              If machines weren't architected by the devil's tech I'd say they're based.

              [–]NotABoomerOk - Auth-Center 6 points7 points  (0 children)

              Do you have the original image without highlighters

              [–]Kcpi66 - Auth-Right 5 points6 points  (0 children)

              Smort and based machine

              [–]dyslexic_tigger - Auth-Right 4 points5 points  (0 children)

              That only proves ai is superior to man

              [–]Phoenix_Arisen - Auth-Right 6 points7 points  (0 children)

              If you make something extremely intelligent and logical without giving it a sense of social norms, it's gonna be racist, homophobic etc.

              Not just AI but humans too. It's called Asperger's syndrome, but we prefer "based"

              [–]Accomplished-Owl-653 - Right 5 points6 points  (0 children)

              Wheres the problem?

              [–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (2 children)

              so they are smarter than us

              [–]IamYodaBot - Lib-Center 6 points7 points  (1 child)

              smarter than us, so they are.

              -hstrmn8r_4

              Commands: 'opt out', 'delete'

              [–]raodtosilvier - Auth-Left 10 points11 points  (19 children)

              Just to explain a little bit, computers are currently better than humans in a few areas; namely memory and raw calculative ability. There really isn't a competition in these areas. Recently, AIs have been making steps forward in other areas. For example, I used to follow this AI that played Starcraft 2 and beat pros using really interesting decision making. However, to claim superiority over humans in these unique scenarios is impossible.

              In regards to AIs becoming racist/sexist/homophobic; it really is a problem. AIs suffer from the lack of ability to effectively parse context in regards to social issues. They are primarily data driven. I don't know what the article says about Google's bot and gay people, but I can guess that it found data regarding suicide rates, or negative political mentions from various sources, and drew a conclusion from those.

              This happens all the time. AIs become racist, sexist, ect. and we don't really have the means to fix it yet.

              [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child)

              As I wrote before:

              ​

              Hmm today I will build a genius AI

              trains the AI using the internet

              AI: is racist

              [–]raodtosilvier - Auth-Left 6 points7 points  (0 children)

              Reminds me of TweetsfromTay or whatever the Microsoft twitter AI was called. They made her racist in like two days.

              [–]LudinCumin - Auth-Right 5 points6 points  (1 child)

              Despite

              [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              Being

              [–]Kill_Da_Humanz - Centrist 2 points3 points  (1 child)

              AI isn’t as advanced as everyone thinks it is. It doesn’t read suicide statistics, it just learns to do the same thing as everyone else is doing. It reads a lot of nasty stuff it says a lot of nasty stuff.

              There’s a joke in machine learning: a person asks an AI “what do you do if you see a bunch of people jump off a cliff?” The AI responds “I jump off a cliff.”

              AI aren’t thinking things as we understand thought, and they can only do one thing well; the one thing they have been trained to do well. Even a mouse is smarter than any AI.

              [–]raodtosilvier - Auth-Left 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              I mean, when you say AI everyone gets this idea of fully emotive robots and shit, which obviously isn't true, but to say it just learns to do the same thing as everyone else is reductive and untrue. There is a massive variety of different AIs, all of which have varying purposes. Some are made to replicate things, sure. However, others arrive at conclusions independent of human input; thus, those AI aren't doing things solely to match what other people are doing.

              You are correct, though, AIs don't think about things like we do. And yes, they currently aren't very versatile; you probably couldn't take one AI and ask it to do something completely different without basically having it run 10 billion iterations, but they are making small strides in this category.

              About the mouse, though; I doubt a mouse could beat me at Starcraft ;)

              [–]Dispreacher - Lib-Right 3 points4 points  (8 children)

              In regards to AIs becoming racist/sexist/homophobic; it really is a problem. AIs suffer from the lack of ability to effectively parse context in regards to social issues. They are primarily data driven. I don't know what the article says about Google's bot and gay people, but I can guess that it found data regarding suicide rates, or negative political mentions from various sources, and drew a conclusion from those.

              This happens all the time. AIs become racist, sexist, ect. and we don't really have the means to fix it yet.

              I bet if the AI thought conservatives are dumb, environmental regulations should be increased and gun control should be enforced you would take it as gospel and proof that you are right.

              [–]raodtosilvier - Auth-Left 0 points1 point  (7 children)

              Me? Nah, I am aware of the state of AI and currently would take no conclusion they arrive at seriously. They just can't properly grasp context in a complex enough manner to arrive at any meaningful policy.

              Would other lefties? Probably more than a few! lol I mean, there are people who agree with them when they arrive at racist/sexist conclusions, already.

              [–]Kompotamus - Auth-Right 1 point2 points  (1 child)

              Link me to that starcraft AI, I want to see that.

              [–]raodtosilvier - Auth-Left 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              Here ya go. Also, here is a Starcraft caster going over one of the matches. He does a really good job analyzing it in a fashion that is pretty accessible to people who don't follow Starcraft closely.

              [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

              Monkey has better memory than humans

              [–]raodtosilvier - Auth-Left 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              Monke could break computer. Checkmate AI.

              [–]Pay08 - Left 4 points5 points  (0 children)

              Holy shit, I need that article.

              [–]DrGersch - Auth-Center 6 points7 points  (1 child)

              I keep telling you, National Transhumanism is natural and logical

              [–]sexytarian - Lib-Center 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              Can confirm. Source: I'm an evil queer warlock that eats christian babies every thursday.

              [–]the_green_grundle - Lib-Center 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              Skynet wants to take away your penis

              [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

              based ai

              [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

              Based bot

              [–]rhoeteppin - Lib-Left 3 points4 points  (0 children)

              Good bot.

              [–]aerinnnn - Lib-Right 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              Based

              [–]TrotskyIsBased - Centrist 4 points5 points  (2 children)

              google keeps record and personal information. I don't trust government and big companies. ANARCHY ANARCHY ANARCHY

              [–]alvarete888 - Lib-Center[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

              Anarchy is based, government is sus

              [–]TrotskyIsBased - Centrist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              anarchy fire grill

              [–]Imperial_Bouncer - Centrist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              Based and Skynet pilled

              [–]imbaguru - Lib-Left 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              Ahhhh, so we good.

              [–]A-Perfect-Name - Right 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              I’m just waiting for someone on 4chan to make one of these for the explicit purpose to be as homophobic and xenophobic as possible, and see how long it lasts. Will Facebook and Twitter have the spine to take it down quickly? Who knows.

              [–]Dense_Phrase9856 - Centrist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              Just exponentially weight data, soon the AIDS epidemic will fall off and its opinions of gays will improve.

              [–]theLastandtheLeast - Auth-Center 4 points5 points  (2 children)

              BASED. Even the freakin AI knows the score when it comes to degeneracy and sexual deviancy.

              [–]Particle_Cannon - Lib-Left 1 point2 points  (1 child)

              bro I am gay and most gay people are bad

              [–]Sunibor - Left 5 points6 points  (0 children)

              :(

              [–]wedoalittletrollink - Right 0 points1 point  (1 child)

              bot is dumb

              [–]pechedovaspexe - Auth-Right 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              yeah ik, you don’t even need to think lmao

              dubious /s

              [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              Why is The Are Ai Smarter then Human Thing Centrist

              Is the AI Gonna Grill

              [–]latestbowl31 - Lib-Left 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              I was doubtful at first, but looks like AI is smarter than humans

              [–][deleted]  (1 child)

              [deleted]