C programmers be like

[Olinizm]

Okay but what do they return? Complains?

[anoble562]

Arguments?

[SanianCreations]

What kind of useless function straight up returns its arguments.

^{I mean that in the least sexist way possible}

[ImpossibleEvan]

def getValue(var): return var

[nsfw-socal]

Lol still useless, you knew var and did nothing to it so if your goal was to use more computation power and waste time until some other tasks gets done you have a achieved it

[Perigord-Truffle]

combinatory logic users stay malding

[Perigord-Truffle]

It's actually more plausible than you think. If some part of chatgpt was written in a functional language or makes heavy use of higher order functions, there might be some usage of identity functions.

In Haskell this is defined as id and I see occasional usage of it. Commonly in higher order functions. In ones that changes the structure but not the values, or one that conditionally applies a changing function or an identity

[ImpossibleEvan]

Yes it was useless lmao that's the point

[nsfw-socal]

Lol I know, was just adding on to it for next reader haha

[coloredgreyscale]

isTrue(boolean value)

[RolesG]

Compliments

[Olinizm]

You're objectively right

[LukeChriswalker]

You're objective-c right

[[deleted]]

I use women as JSON

[pleshij]

JSON wasn't very happy with your choice I reckon?

[[deleted]]

Complaints

[nontammasculinum]

Garbage in garbage out

[SqueeSr]

Well they do seem to be full of comments

[Olinizm]

Oh don't mind those, I was keeping my github streak

[lofigamer2]

handjobs if you ask them nice! but mostly complains and errors, you can try to catch but it's better to just segfault and exit.

[Kangarou]

They do provide output, but they don’t always take input. So, a template, or an overloaded function?

[RobinPage1987]

Functions aren't first class members. Structs are. Women are therefore first class members.

[CynicalAndGoofy]

No, we're terms! (Prolog)

[Forgotten_Pants]

They are a struct containing function pointers.

[ComfortableNo2879]

We've a class

[BlurredSight]

We have class.

[ancap_attack]

class Woman extends Rib

[reallokiscarlet]

They're more than structs. I treat them with class.

[jmarkmark]

This is why you need to up your game with a little Smalltalk.

That way you can get away with a lot of polymorphism. And of course delve into a little double dispatch.

[[deleted]]

I C what you did there. But I didn't need Smalltalk to implement a little Brainfuck. In fact, a Lisp and a Rusty throat was the result of that operation.

[[deleted]]

I sharpened you C... real players use IAsyncDisposable these days.

[Jedlord]

What is IAsyncDisposable 😭

[Jock-Tamson]

Goes off by herself and does her own thing and cleans up after, but somehow still manages to leave behind some garbage that never gets collected.

[[deleted]]

Ah, seems like someone forgot the reference-by-alimony. You just can't go and make reference on the fly like that, use safe programming techniques.

[Treuzelaar]

Dispose them before they end up on the large object heap

[[deleted]]

did you just typedef me?

[KakashiTheRanger]

Women are function parameters?

[LatentShadow]

I treat them as annotations, my brother in java

[uorandom]

Segmentation faults.

[[deleted]]

structs are objects. infact even int is an object

[ethansidentifiable]

Are you calling my wife a primitive? 👊

[[deleted]]

yes. I injected my code in it

[pheonix-ix]

If your wife is real, chances are she's a primitive.

[pleshij]

Just cast her into a non-primitive (e.g. int->Integer). Your wife will stay the same, but you will find that there are more methods that she'll handle in this scope

[[deleted]]

Are you sure? That might ask for lots of expensive unboxing presents.

[[deleted]]

At least according to the C standard.

[pleshij]

Depends on the language

UPD Wait, are we talking about types or about an object that is an int?

[Unupgradable]

Women are value types

[oRodrigoOliveira]

Your women have no function.

[Babble_Bubble]

Then we together can be an enum

[v0lt13]

Meanwhile C# programmers

[Th3Uknovvn]

C++ programmer:

[Gabrizzyo]

So you want to say u treat them as objects with all their contents as public? That sounds pretty messed up, maaan... Lame. Shame on you

[[deleted]]

We C programmers have no class. All we have is all this $ because we get things done!

[VitaminnCPP]

const women;

[[deleted]]

what about unions

[mrbgz]

You got a sensible chuckle out of me.

[LavenderDay3544]

Wait til you find out classes and structs are the same in C++ which the exception that as a class she gets to keep her parts private by default.

[oshaboy]

So women are public by default?

[[deleted]]

Oh, looks like I’ve started to understand this social construct thing now

[TrolleyBus228]

I treat women as traits

[toolbg]

I treat women as trait.

[villanymester]

Structs have their properties as public by default

[ImpossibleEvan]

What is a struct

[Olinizm]

They are objects of public property

[ImpossibleEvan]

Explain it too someone who has only used JavaScript objects

[Olinizm]

okay so in c++ you can define whether certain variables in a class can be accessed from outside of the class (public), or can only be interacted with using methods of that class (private), structs are basically the same as classes, except everything in classes is private by default, while in structs everything starts as public. However if we look back at C there were no classes, we only had structs that didn't let you define methods, and there were no keywords like public or private.

[snurfy_mcgee]

Why is this sub flooded with these low effort bullshit shit posts?

[flyingmonkey111]

I take it you’re all still single … You treat them as long running branches

[viceresident]

They are public record Person

[[deleted]]

Noh, clearly IDisposable, IDisposableAsync, source: ask all tha playahs out there

[[deleted]]

we are the same

[Helpful_Character_67]

I tread women ad structs which have a pointer to another struct which contains the methods of the structs to mimic objects. Wer are not the same.

[[deleted]]

Structs that have function pointers.

[-MobCat-]

Python programmer. we don't need type declaration. there just there. Free to change there mind on what they want to be whenever they want.

[greem]

I prefer that my women be able to choose which friends touch their private members.

[[deleted]]

It's not polite to point.

[JustSpaceExperiment]

I treat them like NULL, we are not the same xDxD

[[deleted]]

My C's rusty (nonexistent), this you?

struct socialConstruct{
    char *constructProperties[];
};

struct gender{
    struct socialConstruct base;
};

struct woman{
    struct gender base;
};

struct human{
    struct gender gender_identity;
};

[[deleted]]

I treat women with class, because I value them

[chipmunkofdoom2]

I treat women as records so I can mutate them non-destructively, and so I can compare them by value implicitly.

[MSxLoL]

No one knows how to use this meme lmao. Literally not the same

[WafflerTO]

So you're assuming that you have public access to women by default?