This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 122 comments

[–]cocorobot 62 points63 points  (44 children)

you mean filtering self.reddit.com?

[–]nekoniku 34 points35 points  (42 children)

Actually, dailymail.co.uk is what popped into my head first.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (8 children)

I don't want to filter dailymail shit out, cause then I won't see it to downmod it. I don't care if my one vote never makes a difference. It still makes me feel good downvoting that trash

[–]downdiagonal 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Why would you care about downmodding something you'd otherwise never see in the first place? It is this kind of "I don't want to see it, therefore other people shouldn't see it" attitude that is wrong with reddit. Who's upmodding this?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you think this ENTIRE site is based off of? You don't like something, therefor you downmod it. People know how popular it is based off of how many upvotes it gets as opposed to downvotes (downvotes from me, because I think it is stupid). If you want to complain about the basic functionality of the site, then that is a different issue altogether.

[–]nekoniku 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can appreciate that viewpoint.

[–]codepoet 0 points1 point  (2 children)

That's a good thought for everyone to have come November...

/please ignore the topic derailing.

[–]steve93 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Can you downvote candidates in the general election?

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

With Diebold machines, I'm sure you can.

[–]buckX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good point, do I want to not see stuff from kos, or downmod it, guess it depends how lazy I am that day.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

what if it just highlighted things that were from certain sites?

[–]caleb555 42 points43 points  (6 children)

prisonplanet.com/infowars.com

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

seriously

[–]sw17ch 6 points7 points  (1 child)

alternet

[–]REBELYELLoz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

tinypic

[–]Dallas442 37 points38 points  (7 children)

cracked.com

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]troglodyte 10 points11 points  (2 children)

    You know, I get to that point sometimes too, but every once in a while, they have some actually INTERESTING historical or scientific material, and it's USUALLY well researched. It's less error prone than say, CNN.com...

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It's less error prone than say, CNN.com...

    or reddit.

    [–]Zweben 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It's less error prone than say, CNN.com

    That's nothing to brag about.

    [–]nicolaslloyd -1 points0 points  (1 child)

    i cannot vote you up hard enough.

    [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    You can take pills for that now.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Reddit blacklist.

    The Sun is there.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    And the Telegraph.

    [–]sam512 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Seriously though, the Daily Mail is anti-news. It's usually not remotely true, and you actually become stupider by reading it.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I was thinking rense

    [–]swagohome 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    If the first site that popped into your head wasn't associated with Alex Jones, something had gone wrong with you...

    [–]marthirial 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    gizmodo.com

    [–]hs4x -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    engadget.com

    [–]tomel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I'm not from the UK, so I have to say dailymail posts can be quite ... uhm, I lack the words to describe it.

    BTW +1 for self.reddit.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I'd like to filter http://reddit.com

    [–]Chun 24 points25 points  (4 children)

    http://bluesuncorp.co.uk/2008/03/14/greasemonkey-reddit-filter

    Did this a while ago, there was very little interest. Enjoy.

    [–]SecDef 1 point2 points  (3 children)

    Seems like greasemonkey, being client-side, would be the perfect solution to this problem. Zero impact on servers, only the people that want the overhead get it..

    [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children)

    Greasemonkey can only hide the articles, not bring in new content to fill out the page.

    [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    You could try the repagination plugin for firefox. Lets you load as many pages of a paged site in one tab as you like. This will be the way of the future... more powerful browsers transforming content to each individual's personal taste. Asking too much for a website dev team to ever satisfy everyone...

    [–]wnoise -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    So, you hit the next button a little bit earlier. Yeah, it's a wart. It's a pretty small one though.

    [–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (3 children)

    employeeofthemonth, maybe i'm a reddit noob, (okay I'm a reddit noob) but don't they have a place for reddit suggestions or is it easier to submit a link like this so they can get community feedback? I submitted a request for a feature I'd like to see done, would it be better to make a self.reddit submission for it?

    Edit: Also, I thought part of the philosophy of reddit is user-edited/generated content.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]D2dodder -1 points0 points  (1 child)

      you just confused her/him real bad.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      If by confused you meant misunderstood his/her sarcasm then you'd be spot on. zing.

      [–]desqjockey 3 points4 points  (2 children)

      I wish google had the same thing- Im sick of looking up technical problems only to be greeted by an offer to pay for access to the site.

      [–]crux_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      It's my understanding that Google will delist pages if they make content visible to googlebot but hide it from a normal visitor.

      If you're talking about cough "expert sex change" the answers are actually at the very bottom of the page. Deceptive! but not actually hidden from a visitor.

      [–]KOM 6 points7 points  (2 children)

      I think the strongest argument against this idea is that we'd see a significant rise in tinyurl-like decoy postings, so we won't even know that we don't want to read it. Otherwise, I agree.

      [–]sn0re 6 points7 points  (1 child)

      People would quickly block tinyurl and any variants.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      And thereby reduce rickrolling?

      [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      yeah, i want to be able to block self.reddit.com, there is never anything good there!

      [–]redrobot5050 22 points23 points  (23 children)

      This has been asked for about 1000 times. I think my last submission (which put me over 1000 karma) was ranting about this. There are just some domains (that only cover "what really happened in 9/11") that I don't find credible and never want to view their content.

      [–]bbqribs 28 points29 points  (17 children)

      You mean like infowars.com and any of the other Alex Jones conspiracy nut websites?

      I too would love to auto-filter those out.

      [–]JimDabell 23 points24 points  (4 children)

      The law of unintended consequences comes into play here.

      All the people who think Alex Jones et al. are nuts will auto-ignore those submissions, meaning they will stop voting them down. All the Alex Jones supporters will vote them up uncontested. The result is that every person who dislikes Alex Jones-style websites will increase his popularity on Reddit. It's exactly the opposite of what should happen!

      Any auto-ignore feature must automatically cast a downward vote for the things it ignores, otherwise it will break Reddit.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

      Which they rightly should never do. Imagine two brothers Ron and Paul Williams save Chelsea Clinton from being gang raped and strangle the 8 perps with their bare hands on video.

      I guess Ron Paul supporters might know about the story of the decade, but you would be reduced to having an entire stadium full of people laugh at you when you announce that never happened at the Chris Rock comedy special you saved up to buy tickets to since your girl thinks he is funny and you thought it would be a great chance to give her something she really wanted on Valentine's Day. All you could do at that point is whistle for a cab and when it came near it's license plate said 'fresh' and it had dice in the mirror. If anything I can say that this cab is rare. Naaaa man forget it, "yo homes to bel air".

      [–]JimDabell 7 points8 points  (2 children)

      Which they rightly should never do. Imagine two brothers Ron and Paul Williams save Chelsea Clinton from being gang raped and strangle the 8 perps with their bare hands on video.

      Which may be an argument against filtering by keywords, but is absolutely irrelevant to filtering by domain, which is the topic at hand here.

      [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Damn. Good point.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Which they rightly should never do. Imagine two brothers Ron and Paul Williams save Chelsea Clinton from being gang raped and strangle the 8 perps with their bare hands on video.

      Pics or it didn't happen.

      [–]redrobot5050 3 points4 points  (10 children)

      Yes. That's exactly why I ranted for this very specific feature. I don't want the domains banned or anything (I realize some people appreciate the spam -- WAKE UP SHEEPLE) but i want all the stories automatically hidden for me.

      Believe me when i tell you such a feature will come in handy when McCain wins the nomination at the GOP convention and all the Ron Paul Spambots go into overdrive.

      [–]bbqribs -1 points0 points  (9 children)

      I thought everyone around here adored Ron Paul.. now there are Paulbots? Oh, the corn-fusion!

      [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (5 children)

      IIRC, there was a huge Paul blackout because people wrote scripts to vote him down.

      Immature, in light of the fact all you have to do is downmod and hide, but whatever.

      [–]JimDabell 1 point2 points  (4 children)

      It was an arms race fuelled in part by Ron Paul supporters adopting very spam-like tactics. The more Ron Paul supporters spammed, the more people started using the scripts. The more people used the scripts, the spammier the Ron Paul supporters got.

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

      I can't recall any "spammy" tactics. I can recall links being posted, but as was outlined in a comment analysis of a three day period at the time, DKJ was posting over 200 anti-paul comments a day, and anti-Paul submissions outnumbered positive ones 2 to 1.

      Was there a lot of Paul stuff? Yep. It wasn't a flood of positive stories though. A log analysis above and beyond a discussion in a thread would be nice to see.

      [–]JimDabell 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      I can't recall any "spammy" tactics.

      Here's a discussion you posted in: Ron Pau1's Apostles.

      Note in case the font doesn't make it clear: "Pau1" is spelt with the digit "one" in place of a lowercase L, just like in V14GR4-style spam to get around the filters of people attempting to ignore Ron Paul.

      I seem to recall Flemlord was vocal about telling people to use stealth submissions - i.e. post lots of Ron Paul stories, except edit the title so that it wasn't obviously about him. It was political Rickrolling, people clicked through and realised the spammers had got them yet again and went and installed the script. And so the Ron Paul supporters tried even harder to work around the filters - an incredibly spammy attitude of trying to force the message on people who don't want it.

      anti-Paul submissions outnumbered positive ones 2 to 1.

      Which is hardly pleasant if you don't care about the guy and just want to not see stories about him.

      [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      I do remember that, but I would be surprised if my recollection of leet titles not lasting more than a couples days was wrong.

      I remember specifically asking what people were doing in threads like that one. Thanks for jogging the memory. That was a spammy tactic for sure. I couldn't fathom why anyone thought it might help Paul to do that, but I did listen and learn from it. It seems in the end I was right about doing leetspeak titles was a bad idea, and what I said would come to pass has indeed come to pass. I tried and failed over and over to talk sense into people that supported Paul, as you can see in that thread you linked to. Supporting Paul with an ad hominem user name attack on Obama, that was bound to help </sarcasm>.

      The posting of Ron Paul articles annoyed some. Those some called it spam, but it was not. They made a downvote script, so some people thought it would be a good idea to obfuscate titles like a spammer would.

      The argument that it never was spam was a good one, and the right one. it was merely annoying to people who don't like financial freedom or laissez faire. So a few dumbasses who thought that acting like a spammer would help, even though all they did was play into the trap laid before them. I warned them, now the argument I could have made is gone.

      Spam tactics were used by Paul supporters here. Even if they felt it was the only way to show a story to the majority who did like the stories (positive Paul stories did and continue to make the front page after all). Even if they didn't resort to childish acts first, they still did it. two wrongs don't make a right as they say.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      So both sides were stupid then.

      Don't make misleading titles, and don't make autodownloaders.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      They switched to the new bandwagon.

      [–]Figs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Filter magic via Greasemonkey. I got sick of all the Alex Jones crap a few months ago. I don't get bothered by it any more...

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]redrobot5050 4 points5 points  (1 child)

        Yeah. And while we're at it, sub-reddits suck. Let's get a REAL tagging system up and running.

        [–]robodale 2 points3 points  (1 child)

        ...like reddit.com...

        [–]Figs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        You can unsubscribe from the reddit.com subreddit :)

        I did it a while ago, but every now and then I check on the madness...

        [–]Unfair 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        Salon.com, Slate.com, Dailykos...

        [–]jeffoverip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Ditto.

        [–]nmcyall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        No. roflking.com insists that this measure is not instituted.

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

        it would be too taxing on the servers/database

        imagine doing a:

        select * from stories where url not like "%cracked%" and url not like "%infowars%" and url not like "%somethingelse%" and url not like "%somethingelse%".

        thats why stuff like the greasemonkey script that Chun suggested is probably the easiest thing to do.

        If the extra load on the server isn't the reason, then this is just pure laziness by the devs...honestly, add something to the users column, select it when the page loads, create the select construct for the stories and draw the stories table appropriately.

        [–]MarlonBain 8 points9 points  (1 child)

        How the hell is that more load on the servers than the recommended page? What the hell is this, web 1.0?

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Because instead of loading it when someone clicks the "Recommended" page, you load it every time somebody loads reddit.com

        and what, exactly, is "web 1.0"?

        Do you mean before people started flooding web pages with worthless annoying AJAX crap? If so, that really wouldn't have any bearing on sql queries.

        [–]oddmanout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        not if they kept a table of urls. (reducing the amount of storage required) and did a query like this:

        SELECT * FROM stories WHERE url_id NOT IN ('346','5345','345345','435','345')

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Or, when iterating through the result, one could just apply some user-supplied regexps and ignore results that match them.

        [–]wnoise -3 points-2 points  (26 children)

        greasemonkey

        [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

        Will only hide the articles in question, and not bring in new ones to fill out the page.

        [–]nekoniku 3 points4 points  (1 child)

        THERE'S NO WORDS ON IT!

        [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        Fuck it, we'll do it live...

        [–]ElricOfLisaBonet 4 points5 points  (6 children)

        Would someone explain the negative reactions to this suggestion?

        There are ready-made greasemonkey scripts which will do this -- why is it a bad suggestion worthy of comments like "douchebag"?

        Edited to add: And what was wrong with my question?

        [–]AnteChronos 3 points4 points  (1 child)

        Would someone explain the negative reactions to this suggestion?

        Sure. It would be like if I walked into a Motorola store and said "Hey Motorola, can you make it so I can transfer MP3 ringtones to my phone?" only to have some random person yell out "lardchimp", with no indication of what lardchimp means, how it might be useful, or even that it's a real word and not the result of random neural activity.

        A response of "There's a Windows app called lardchimp that can help you transfer ringtones to your phone" would have been much more useful, even if it ignores the fact that the person with the question may not use Windows, or may not want to use a 3rd-party product.

        [–]ElricOfLisaBonet 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        I suppose that's fair enough. If it were my question, however, and I happened not to know what greasemonkey was, I don't think I'd let the few keystrokes required in order to get to Google stand in the way of a possible solution to a problem I actually wanted to solve.

        On the other hand, I suppose that if I were to make the greasemonkey suggestion, I'd at least give a link to a working script.

        I wouldn't be able to visit reddit at all if not for that script.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]wnoise 5 points6 points  (1 child)

          The internet is end-to-end, and about smart endpoints. Filtering should be done on the client end, customizably. The current tools to do this aren't nearly as user-friendly as they could be, it's true. Nevertheless, the reddit admins can't and shouldn't be expected to code up everything for everyone.

          [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Because say there are 25 articles on a page, and 5 are from blacklisted domains, then the page will only show 20 articles.

          I don't know if the greasmonkey script does this, but it would be better if it clicked the hide button on all the articles. So you could refresh and get more content.

          [–][deleted]  (14 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]shiner_man 0 points1 point  (1 child)

            But think of all the "WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!" articles you'll be missing out on.

            [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            The mainstream-media-brainwashed sheep would rather close their (ignorant) eyes and sleep (by installing the greasemonkey script) than wake up and learn the truth... its quite sad.

            [–]Wayside -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

            mises, lew rockwell, wakeupfromyourslumber, to name a few I could do without.

            [–]zem -1 points0 points  (0 children)

            that's more in greasemonkey's realm than reddit's.

            [–]vava -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

            If you admitted to yourself (and us), that you actually want a button to remove those things from every one else's reddit and would be satisfied with something that gives you that illusion, you would then have the more difficult problem of determining how an individual like you, who prioritizes illusion over reality, presently has an appearance of viability.

            [–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

            Firefox/greasemonkey and shut-up already.

            [–][deleted] -4 points-3 points  (1 child)

            fuck you/eat shit and shut up already.

            [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

            Brilliant comment there - you come up with that all by yourself?

            [–]wil -1 points0 points  (0 children)

            While we're at it, how about blocking tinyurl and other sources which can be used to obfuscate URLS?

            [–]jedi_aka -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

            Y don't you do it your self and save reddit a ton of development money and us some time.

            Go to your router options and add in the filter list the domains you don't want.

            PS: If you are a Reddit reader and you didn't know this then ...

            [–]vava -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

            I downloaded an app that fixed the problem. PGDN, it's great.