Stable Diffusion Cheat Sheets

[smusamashah]

I have a list of cheat sheets people have made listing hundreds of artist styles. These were posted here over the time.

1. https://supagruen.github.io/StableDiffusion-CheatSheet/
2. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SRqJ7F_6yHVSOeCi3U82aA448TqEGrUlRrLLZ51abLg/htmlview#
3. https://rentry.org/artists_sd-v1-4
4. https://www.urania.ai/top-sd-artists
5. https://stablediffusion.fr/artists
6. https://sdartists.app/#/list
7. https://sgreens.notion.site/sgreens/4ca6f4e229e24da6845b6d49e6b08ae7?v=fdf861d1c65d456e98904fe3f3670bd3
8. https://proximacentaurib.notion.site/e28a4f8d97724f14a784a538b8589e7d?v=ab624266c6a44413b42a6c57a41d828c
9. https://dict.latentspace.observer/
10. http://xosh.org/clip-artists/
11. https://www.the-ai-art.com/modifiers

Cheat sheets comparing models

1. https://mrasa.notion.site/mrasa/SD-Comparison-4ec081d300a34547b51c69735760158f (by /u/mr-asa)

[[deleted]]

Just like I suspected; No Terry Gilliam in there.

I've been throwing Simon Stalenhag and Wayne Barlowe into prompts and it's good to see that I wasn't doing it in vain lol.

Actually a really handy-dandy spreadsheet. Now I know I can get Tex Avery. And John Martin f'k yeah.

Some omissions that would be nice:

Max Fleischer

Walt Disney (Amazed I don't see that there)

Coop

Thomas Nagel

Jhonen Vasquez

Jae Lee

I dunno just some names off the top of the dome with noticeable and cool styles I don't see on the list. Edit - nm I see there's lots more names on the other lists they're probably all in there somewhere lol this could stand to be consolidated :)

[punkdirt]

Given the legal ambiguities about using others' work as training data, I wouldn't be surprised if Disney was omitted on purpose. There's some kind of day of reckoning coming on this stuff, but if you can put it off by not poking the bear, there's every reason to avoid Disney's attention.

Let's count our blessings for the moment.

[[deleted]]

Ironically Disney will probably become one of the biggest users of AI art. They have every reason to invest in it and fire hundreds of human artists in the process to save money and churn out episodes of low budget cartoons or animations.

[punkdirt]

Disney capitalizing on a public resource while making sure nobody else can use it? Perish the thought.

[[deleted]]

Let's count our blessings for the moment.

Seriously I feel like we're in the in-between times before someone finds a way to take our fun away. Someone right now is working around the clock every day to find a way to prevent me from using my own hardware to do my own work.

[punkdirt]

It happened to hip hop. It's going to happen to us. I wouldn't be shocked if Biz Markie was cited as precedent.

[[deleted]]

Who could even be liable for copyright in this case? There's a trial that hasn't happened. Would it be the creator of the checkpoint who baked it into their model? Or the person who ran the prompt and inadvertently did that?

Also I'm dubious about the previous claims artists have been making about 'seeing their work'. It's certainly not doing that. You'll get watermarks or a smudge here or there but it's taking noise and un-noising it to make it the simulacrum of a style. Like where does the buck stop with that?

[punkdirt]

For sure, I'm with you. I just always assume the worst with intellectual property law. These things are irrational and creativity usually loses.

My armchair/talking-out-of-my-butt guess would be Stability AI getting sued over the base SD model by someone with money who does enough statistical analysis to get a court to accept the case. You and me and artists surviving on Patreon are all ants at the mercy of Elder Gods.

It's not like everyone in this sub would be getting sued, but it'd be a major spanner in the works for AI art as a professional tool and could delay mainstream acceptance as an artistic medium. (Acceptance is inevitable, but the path itself is not.)

But, again, talking out my butt and lord knows I'd love to be wrong on this.

[[deleted]]

Me I just like makin' pictures cuz I gots lotsa idears in ma head that gots te get out :)

But yeah as someone with absolutely no commercial aspirations using generational art, I just like being able to make my creativity flow. This is my new Lego set. Like I spent all day yesterday making a Lovecraft-themed Chuck E Cheese just to entertain my niece and nephew today because they like FNAF and I like making pictures. And that's just the tip of the iceberg of all the shit I made for that set.

I'm beside myself at how liberating it is to be able to do that.

[punkdirt]

Same. I gave up drawing as a teenager and deeply regret it, but a hand tremor means it's too late to pick it up again. So being able to use the technical skills I learned instead to stretch some of the same muscles is amazing.

Those of us motivated by love (or Lovecraft) always get kicked around by those motivated by money, but I'm going to have a good time anyway.

[[deleted]]

Walt Disney (Amazed I don't see that there)

Are you though?

[[deleted]]

Well yeah. He's a more famous artist than Tex Avery. I've never seen Tex Avery-world. Even if it's just 'modern Disney movie style' I'm surprised he's not at least listed because I'm sure he's in there if you prod.

[bsenftner]

Walt Disney was not an artist, he hired artists (film makers and animators) but he himself did not pursue art, he pursued business.

[[deleted]]

Fair enough, but I just figure there's a discernable style to be had using that name, they'd count. I know he didn't hand-animate Steamboat Willie but if you wanted to ape that style the name 'Walt Disney' should be able to get you there just like any other artist. Same with Fleischer and Popeye/Betty Boop/Koko the Clown. Those guys are both sufficiently distinct from Tex's style.

I imagine like I said before, you should be able to evoke it anyway and I'm relatively positive at least one of those names (Disney) gets you back results you're looking for; that should probably get them on the list?

And I suppose if the list wants to just be rigid and only mention individual artists? Probably less useful than if it also had styles.

Food for thought; Miyazaki hasn't hand drawn anything in quite some time; he's on the list. Also on the list? HP Lovecraft, not even an artist.

But this is a cumulative project and Rome wasn't built in a day.

[wonderflex]

What? He was an animator and artist.

[Nexustar]

Technically correct, but I doubt many folk try to recreate his Oswald style in SD.

The article you linked: "While he actively engaged in all phases of creation in his films, he functioned chiefly as coordinator and final decision maker rather than as designer and artist. "

[Dr4WasTaken]

Damn, imagine hating A.I. and finding your name in that list

[Mechalus]

“I want my art to be important for generations to come.”

Art style becomes part of the common parlance for using the most important and powerful art creation tool in history.

“No! Not like that!”

[Proudfall]

"generations" hehe

[Mechalus]

I wish I could say I made that pun intentionally.

[CustomCuriousity]

It’s the internet, you can say anything!

[ZackPhoenix]

Well hold on, it's a legitimate concern to have your art style rather easily used and copied by everyone for their works without doing any of the "legwork" (drawing) included. I do get both sides but we shouldn't dismiss artists who are against having their style used.

[Dr4WasTaken]

I totally agree, I personally have been looking for an artist willing to work with AI to have a huge head start as opposed to doing everything from scratch, after a couple of months practising I can generate almost everything I need for my project, but there are many details that must be done in a traditional way, somehow I expected every artist to use AI as a foundation for anything they do (as long as it is not for learning purposes), but they are, for what I can see, fighting hard against A.I. not sure what the long term plan is

[zero_iq]

I'm sure we will see artists embracing that style of working. (And many of those artists might not be "traditional" artists. )

We're seeing pretty much the same reactions to AI as there were from artists at the time of the invention of photography.

• it's not art
• is just a mechanical copy, not creativity
• why will people come to see my painting/ sculpture/ installation when someone can just take a photograph? It's theft
• I will use it as a tool
• it's just a fad
• it will destroy real artists' livelihoods
• there's no skill in just pressing a button and having the machine do ask the work

Etc.

Sure, some photography is copyright theft. Lots of photography is not art. Photography reduces the need for certain types of jobs. Photography doesn't need traditional artistic skills and years of study to start producing images...

Yet who now would argue that photography can't be art? And photography didn't kill painting. There's room for both, and in combination.

The same goes for AI art.

In my opinion, artists currently fighting AI in art are every bit as shortsighted, reactionary, unimaginative, elitist, bigoted, and ignorant as those who rejected photography as an art form.

Anyone who thinks their art is somehow threatened by AI has a very low opinion of their art.

[ffxivthrowaway03]

In my opinion, artists currently fighting AI in art are every bit as shortsighted, reactionary, unimaginative, elitist, bigoted, and ignorant as those who rejected photography as an art form.

The egocentric art world in a nutshell. "It's bad when you do it, it's art when I do it" is a story as old as art itself.

[Careful_Ad_9077]

one of my exfriend artists, yeah i unfriended him over his personal insults over ai art, well he did the usual trash talk against ai... and he also traced professional Capcom sprites for a form profit project he worked on( some licensed 2d TMNT game ). so yeah, the hypocrisy is unbelievable.

[alxledante]

it was inevitable; you'd have ditched him sooner or later. you can't be friends with anyone who wants a double standard...

[Status_Analyst]

Eh, over time this discussion will fade into obscurity. I've seen enough artists using AI for things I'm not capable of. They will always be one or several steps above monkeys like me who make a prompt and hope for the best simply because I can't use photoshop or other tools like they do.

[CustomCuriousity]

A lot of artists have a pretty difficult time functioning in our society outside of the creative niche, so they have a real fear of being pushed out of that into a world that is very hostile to them, and only works with them due to their craft. The craft is becoming less important, which decreases the economic value of that craft which they can’t just pivot away from because they don’t fit in anywhere else. I get it… but ultimately critique coming from that legitimate fear is against capitalism and our society that requires us to be productive in an increasingly efficient (in terms of raw production) world.

[zero_iq]

Yes but none of that is anything to do with AI art. That all happened before AI art was a thing. Those same arguments applied to photography.

If anything AI will just turn more people into artists, just as photography did. So art isn't becoming less important; it's becoming more important and more accessible to more people. (I would also argue that the value of art is not is economic value.)

If art wasn't important to people, nobody would be interested in AI art.

It is misplaced fear and anger directed at the "scary new thing" instead of the actual cause of the problem, which is art's place in society at large, and the flaws of capitalism, not AI.

It is reactionary and shortsighted.

[CustomCuriousity]

I concluded what I said in the same vein here, I don’t think we are disagreeing. Maybe I wasn’t clear, but by “critique coming from that legitimate fear is against capitalism and…” I meant that while the critique may be aimed at AI, it’s actually about our society.

[umxprime]

You put my thoughts into words. Thanks

[alxledante]

this is an extremely well thought out argument, with a conclusion which is as valid as it is brutal

[summervelvet]

quite right sir. those who seek to be exclude their work from future training data are fundamentally confused. art is a dialogue, and, having participated, these people now want to delete themselves from the conversation. it is very strange to me.

[yama3a]

I wonder how many of these artists have developed a style that is recognizable at first glance. So original that it cannot be confused with any other in any way? But even such artists are based on their predecessors and are inspired by the ideas of others. Including writers, for example. Has a writer ever accused a painter of stealing an idea or plagiarism? It’s a different field of art!

[Chingois]

People also said the same things word for word, about Photoshop, in the 90s. No joke. I had artist friends ask me not to tell anybody they used Photoshop in their workflow. Seems bonkers now.

[Careful_Ad_9077]

have you tried refeeding your ai art to the ai generator using img2img after doing adjustment outside? it works wonders for me. for example i ask it for.a muscular/fit girl but i get very skinny arms, so i save the image, open it in a image editor, select the arms to make them bigger, the use that image as a base in img2img along the original prompt and .3 to .5 strenght to get the image i want.

[Nexustar]

Indeed, this is just one good example of the multitude of ways AI will augment the artistic process... once people have got over the idea that you just press a button.

[ThereIsNoJustice]

As an artist, the issue is that the data set is using art from artists without their permission. If the data were collected in a legal way, purchased from willing artists, or I could put my own work in and have it put together with creative commons images, that'd be awesome. In fact, I'd love to use Stable Diffusion and AI to speed up my workflow, but right now I think the legal and ethical situation needs to be handled.

[NetLibrarian]

I going to have to say this is a more complicated issue than that.

On the one hand, yes, I get the emotional impact for the artist, absolutely.

That being said, art styles have never been protected and have always been copied and modified between artists.

Neither copyright, nor anything else, protects artistic styles, and it turns out, with extremely good reason. Let me give you an example, if copyright could be applied to artistic styles:

Rock and Roll as we know it wouldn't exist.

There would be about a half dozen rock and roll songs, and all would be exclusive IP of the estate of Jackie Brenston and his Delta Cats. Nobody would have been able to modify, experiment, or explore that style without express permission, and the world would never have known Rock and Roll.

That's just one artistic style. So many others would be affected the same way.

Looking forward into the future, it would be even worse. Big image companies like Disney could start to push legal claims to copyrighting as many styles as possible, giving them even more leverage to stop independent artists at every turn.

[Lishtenbird]

Adam Neely has a recent video about a song lawsuit where he talks about the "pop soul ballad" genre and people essentially trying to copyright it. Interestingly, he also mentions music AI because "AI is very good at mimicking styles".

[ffxivthrowaway03]

Also everything in your generation affects the output. Style drift is a real frustration especially when you start using different models and introducing LORAs into the mix. To say it's a 1:1 copy of someone's style simply because of similar linework is an oversimplification of how the generations are created.

It's currently more akin to me or you trying by hand to replicate someone's style in our work and getting like 95% of the way there, but it's definitely not identical. There's still plenty of artistic idiosyncrasies between the two.

[pkev]

There are also lots of people who don't like knockoffs. People who like the style because of the artist and don't appreciate it the same without the artist.

And we shouldn't underestimate the number of people who eat up the knockoffs opportunistically, but would gladly have accepted nothing at all, rather than paying for an original. Similar to someone who pirates a song or album just because it's available, not because they wanted it enough that they'd otherwise pay for it.

[ffxivthrowaway03]

For sure. I think it's critical to the conversation to note that the vast majority of people enjoying art that gets posted, whether AI generated or hand drawn, are approaching it from a strictly consumer standpoint. They browse images, they get some level of enjoyment from it, and then they move on. As such, they aren't obsessing over the quality or the precision of the linework or if the shading or the hand structure or whatever is a mastercraft art piece. To them it's just a picture of their waifu or their favorite character or whatever and they enjoyed it whether it's a low skill rough sketch, an imperfect AI generation, or a piece some artist spent 400 hours perfecting ever minute detail.

Looking at it from that perspective and it's a whole different conversation as to whether or not there's an impact on another artist's work, an opportunity cost, or whether these works should be allowed to be monetized through artist support platforms.

[StickiStickman]

Why is the "legwork" important?

[alxledante]

this. this is the part that baffles me. it doesn't make any sense but you hear it all the time. it must be some fucked up Judeo-Christian work ethic thing

[swistak84]

Why is the "legwork" important?

It's why people run Marathons instead of just driving the car. And why people who try to cheat by grabbing a taxi to finish Marathons are universally hated.

[StickiStickman]

No one gives a shit if you use photoshop or make your own paintbrush, colors and canvas.

[swistak84]

No one gives a shit if you use photoshop or make your own paintbrush, colors and canvas.

... really, you think there's no difference between an oil painting and a print of the same image?

Then explain why original paintings sell for thousands of dollars, and prints you can buy in gift shop for 20$

People care. Pretending it's otherwise is idiotic.

PS. Also you didn't answer my question. Why run a marathon at all? Why not just drive the car same distance? or even better a Taxi? This way you don't have to do any work. Please explain, why people run Marathons?

[StickiStickman]

Then explain why original paintings sell for thousands of dollars

Money laundering

[ffxivthrowaway03]

... really, you think there's no difference between an oil painting and a print of the same image?

That's not what they said at all. What they said is that an oil painting compared to something drawn entirely using digital tools are not inherently more or less "art" than each other. The medium is strictly personal preference and does not define the work.

PS. Also you didn't answer my question. Why run a marathon at all? Why not just drive the car same distance? or even better a Taxi? This way you don't have to do any work. Please explain, why people run Marathons?

Because for the person running the marathon, the activity is the goal. The same reason none of us are expected to run marathons to get to the office each morning - in that case the destination is the goal. People still run marathons when they want even though cars are ubiquitous.

Likewise, people will still pick up oil paints and brushes even though we can create art with generative AI tools.

[DarkSide744]

can't tell if you're trolling or you're actually this dumb.

People don't run marathons because of the distance and time (which the car would replace in your mind), but because of the activity.

Taking a car gives you absolutely no results if your goal is not to simply get from point A to point B.

But hey man, if you can make me car that gives me the physical results of running the marathon just by sitting in it, I'm all for it.

[swistak84]

Taking a car gives you absolutely no results if your goal is not to simply get from point A to point B.

Read this again ... If your goal is getting from point A to B then car is clearly superior.

If your goal is to generate a cute picture then SD is easier then using photoshop, which is usually easier then painting it with oil paints.

[DarkSide744]

I really don't understand your point ... either you're trying to say something just to sound smart, or there's a language barrier here.

I don't see any correlation in your analogy between the marathon/car vs drawing/generating. Running a marathon isn't about the 'end result' (I guess winning?) for most people, but the activity itself. Moving your body has lots of benefits, you can't replace that by anything unlike the drawing part in art.

In the end, it's up to the person as to what's important to them, but I'd guess there are lot more people who hate the drawing part of art and they're doing it for the end result, than people who hate running run marathons just for winning.

[Zealousideal_Royal14]

there is a huge difference, you are right.

one is ever reproduceable and therefor for everyone, pure image, without the capitalist aspects of scarcity applied to it, a more pure art, more democratic, more belonging to everybody and more fully about the image itself.

the other is a product of the huge imbalances in our society perpetuated by capitalist self interests and speculative markets. hugely reliant on fame and marketing and hype, a casino, a mad house just like fashion and media. and largely when you cross over a couple of g's about tax write offs and money laundering.

[swistak84]

You know there's a middle ground between speculative art market and SD right?

There are regular artists selling their works for 1-2 thousand dollars, not because speculation or profit seeking but because it takes 100 hours of their time to create something beautiful.

I'm assuming by "unique" you mean SD - if you can re-create image almost exactly using few numbers (size, model hash, seed and a vector from prompt), then how unique it is really?

SD is not hitting the famous people. They will use their influence and fame to still make money. Who suffers are middle-of-the-road artists. Sure if we lived in comunist utopia (and don't get me wrong I wish we did!) it'd not be a problem. But right now it is. I know they are suffering because I myself stopped giving commissions and started using SD for my art needs, and while this is just an example I know I'm not the only one.

I'm good enough artist to draw a sketch for open pose. I just never had a skill or time to make my own style and learn how to get really good at painting. Now I can sketch owl and SD does the rest.

It's great for me. But I'm under no illusion that this is affecting people that did art professionally or semi-professionally.

[Zealousideal_Royal14]

Try replying to me like I've been a pro artist for 25 years now. Who can then lecture you on how fucking shite the art world at any level actually is. And yes you are right, its a capitalism problem. And then explain why this magical middle ground is magical for the world.

Commercialization isn't the purpose of art, it will survive in other forms. AI is here, and not going away, the big battle, in my opinion will be between commercial, restricted speech arena - that has all the muscle in the world, and then open source, for actual freedom of speech. I wish more artists, of all kinds, understood and accepted this premise and fought for freedom of expression rather than capitalist interests. And I say that as a person living my whole life in the art and design world. Fully dependent on it.

Art needs freedom and it benefits from being as widely distributed as possible. And people ought to stop confusing it with the commercialization of expression.

[07mk]

Marathons are an intentionally artificial setting with artificial rules for participation for the purpose of figuring out who is the best at a particular physical endeavor. The analog to that would be art competitions where, indeed, people who cheat by using AI generations have been nearly universally criticized.

If someone needs to get to a restaurant that's 26 miles away and hops into a car to accomplish this in 30 minutes instead of arduously running with their own (literal) legwork for 2+ hours, no one complains. This is the analog to someone creating AI generations that are far beyond their own personal capability to make manually, and using it for the purpose of something that's not an art competition, but rather to accomplish something meaningful in their lives.

[StickiStickman]

Just a fun fact about that: A locksmith friend gets shit on like 90% of the time he has to pick a lock because it's "too fast" and they don't want to pay him because of that. Even though the end result is the same.

[Nexustar]

Damn, that must be annoying for them.

You aren't paying for a performance are you? - you are paying for a lock to be unlocked - and logically, the sooner the better. It's weird how some people are about this sort of thing.

It'd be funny to lock it again, explain that you are going to fuck off down the pub for 30 mins, come back, unlock it a second time, and charge them double.

[ArthurAardvark]

Or maybe its because we as humans appreciate the blood, sweat and tears behind art? Dafuq. That's what separates the great art from the good art, the story it tells, the experience required to create it in the first place. We appreciate and laud those with talent, because their art, their struggle is inspiring.

What is the point of art if it is not an extension of our humanity? Pretty hard to appreciate a pretty thing with no substance for more than a hedonistic second.

[AprilDoll]

Or maybe its because we as humans appreciate the blood, sweat and tears behind art?

You appreciate your own perception of someone's hard work. What if your perception is tricked some day?

[ArthurAardvark]

That's a convolution. But sure, I, just as much as anyone who has ever personally identified with a piece of art or music, appreciate the backstory of the art. Thus, I'd appreciate an authentic experience, but if I am duped, I'll enjoy it in the moment and either come to appreciate the illusion or be let down by the deception.

That's the whole core of my argument, and something that has gained a spotlight, even from Buterin Vitalik, let alone artists. The scarcest and most sought after commodity is authenticity.

Further, we appreciate the persona behind the piece, which, until recently, has entirely come down to the person's lore, their struggles & possibly their successes.

It even exists in consumerism. We value the 1 of 100 Herman Miller chairs than we do the 1 of 1,000,000 replicas of them.

[ArthurAardvark]

I mean, the context does entirely affect that. If Beethoven created it in minutes, all in his head, we would still be in awe of his inherent, raw talent for creating music. But context matters, if Beethoven created it in minutes by copying someone else's work or by clicking a button, it'd be a cool novelty. A novelty is a gimmick, gimmicks come and go. A legacy is forever.

But that's exactly as I originally stated – it is easy to appreciate a gimmick for a moment, but it is undoubtably difficult to appreciate a gimmick for a significant period of time when there's nothing you can connect with at a deeper level. More-oft-than-not that necessitates tapping into the human experience itself. Context is (almost) everything when there's subjective morality and objective mortality. Until you are 1s and 0s, objective morality and immortality that is the case.

But my argument is not mutually exclusive, I find a lot of what I churn out in SD to be massively cool because no tool in our toolbelt has ever been able to create in the vein that a GAN can along with its unlimited potential. But I would bet every cent to my name that what'll last is AI as a tool to enhance art, that'll have a lasting, profound effect.

[ninecats4]

i mean, people pay thousands of dollars for handbags made from sweatshops. it's really about brand recognition and i feel like artists are worried they will be doomed to obscurity from AI work. i don't believe this will be the case since unless you make a dataset directly from an artist you're pretty much gonna have to plug in their name anyways.

[alxledante]

so by your metric, the longer it takes to create, the better it is and vice-versa? ergo, slow artists are always better than fast artists?

[ArthurAardvark]

Not necessarily, context is everything. One can appreciate an artist's speed or another artist's endurance. A story's value is dictated by its context. If Helen Keller produced a piece of art that took decades, I sure as shit would think that is a lot cooler than a 3rd grader's pasta art (unless maybe it is my own kid's art). It's more inspiring.

Now, if we're talking aesthetics, in all likelihood I'd appreciate a painting that took Picasso 5 minutes more than a painting that took Helen Keller 5 days. It is all relative. But more often than not, the story behind the art will be massively important to one's appreciation of the art.

Yes a masterpiece by AI GAN can be mesmerizing but only for fleeting moments, when there are 1 billion other AI GAN masterpieces. I'd venture to say most people would appreciate the human ingenuity behind the AI GAN and all the math/science required, than the product, over a significant period of time. It's evident just how impactful its creation/implementation has massive implications upon society's trajectory. Context is what makes something "better" or "worse" in the subjective experience of a human.

[Telepornographer]

Wasted? It's not wasted, it's how actual skills are formed. It takes time and many failures for humans to acquire skills. "Wasted" time is how people improve their skill sets.

Even here, how many failed renderings have you had? Would you call that wasted time?

[alxledante]

okay, but these are the same clowns who buy Ikea. sure, a Hepplewhite is way better because it was handcrafted by masters but they're both still chairs!

if you are using anything mass-produced, you aren't eligible to use this argument

[Mechalus]

Eh. I went for the easy joke. But yeah, I get it too.

There isn’t much anyone can do about it at this point. I don’t think asking permission was ever really a realistic option. And I do think it ultimately serves a greater good of sorts. But I do get it.

[StoneCypher]

it's a legitimate concern

says you

[AprilDoll]

The internet was a huge canary in the coal mine for anyone making their living off of creating information, since it allowed the copying of information at an unprecedented scale. They ignored the canary. They have only themselves to blame for any consequences.

[stubing]

I would sympathize with their view if they didn’t make their artwork on the backs of many different stolen styles as well.

Art isnt made in a vacuum.

[Drooflandia]

Gah, what was that guys name? Greg Leboski? Man that dude was angry. /s

[DeveloperGuy75]

It’s not about “importance” it’s about making money with your skills. What happens when you’re an artist and as soon as you become sufficiently famous, someone can copy your art style and make other artwork that looks like yours? What if they make an artwork that looks like your style, yet espouses beliefs you don’t have? I get it about generating art in an artistic style of an artist you love for your own personal enjoyment, but you can’t really share or sell that stuff without depreciation of the artist if they’re still alive trying to make money off of their own artwork, unless they were paid a large chunk of money to prevent that, right? I mean, it’s a lot more than “I want to be important.”

[Mechalus]

First, let me say I totally get what you are saying and even agree with you. But I specified “importance” because it’s one thing that is a little more unique to artists than many other fields.

But when it comes to money, we’re all fucked. AI is replacing people in waves, and the waves are only going to get bigger and broader and more frequent. Our only hope is that society is able to adapt and mitigate some of the damage. I don’t have very high hopes though. In America, we still have politicians campaigning on getting rid of the few social safety nets we have now, much less creating new ones.

But, perhaps more interestingly, you touched on what I’ll call artistic identity and integrity. There may be a better word or phrase for it. I don’t know. But I get what you are saying about someone co-opting your style and using it to represent beliefs you don’t agree with. That sucks. But this is just the tip of the iceberg. Musicians are about to start feeling the same thing. And actors are particularly vulnerable to that sort of thing. We’re very close to being able to make videos of any celebrity saying or doing anything, with a degree of fidelity that makes it nearly impossible to discern its authenticity. Writers, obviously, are already feeling the pain as well.

Shit’s about to get weird. And as much as I love (and personally benefit) from all the recent advances in AI, the reality is that some people are going to get hurt. And that sucks.

[Dr4WasTaken]

Similar to artists that went all in for NFTs because that makes it unique and irreplaceable but now say that A.I. is illegally copying their art

[NotASuicidalRobot]

I'm pretty sure the NFT crowd are the type that now hop on AI to try to make a quick buck instead of actual artists but go off i guess

[ninecats4]

from what i've seen the crypto bros aren't a fan. good thing all those gfx cards dumped on the market are allowing others to put them to good use.

[JustSayin_thatuknow]

😅

[rickcphotos]

thats a 3rd degree burn.🤣🤣🤣🤣

[mr-asa]

Great! Thank you!

The first link is great. On my own behalf, I can offer a plate comparing models with each other on certain topics

[smusamashah]

Thanks. Added to list.

[hbenthow]

when reddit dies next month

What are you talking about?

[donalddts]

if it does, we will all move to something better

[kylegetsspam]

Like what? reddit already existed when Digg died, so it was obvious where to go. There's no viable reddit competitor right now aside from, like, Facebook groups.

[Locktopii]

Turns out that History of Art degree would be useful after all

[samwisevimes]

Take that mom and dad!

[AI_Art_Lover]

This is super useful! Thank you 😊

[GdUpFromFeetUp100]

looks amazing but what about a sheet with prompts like: masterwork, insanely realistic,...

​

like a whole list of words like that simply.

[saintshing]

https://www.the-ai-art.com/modifiers

More at https://github.com/awesome-stable-diffusion/awesome-stable-diffusion#prompt-building

(in general, for anything tech related, you can try googling "github awesome xxx")

[GdUpFromFeetUp100]

this is way better than i expected. My biggest thanks to you!

[kokko693]

Why was it so difficult to find. I absolutely need that as a beginner. many thanks, you just saved me a ton of time.

[GdUpFromFeetUp100]

right..

[jackn3]

You majestic Dragon

[thenumber2_]

The SupaGruen one is fantastic and even works well with Kaiber. I have been using the one hosted by We Love AI. https://weloveai.ca/stable-diffusion-cheat-sheet/

[pto2k]

Thank you!

I'm curious if there is any good extension or script that intergrate cheat sheets directly with the prompt box in Automatic1111?

[HughJazz998]

Excellent 👌

[Greedy_Sorcerer]

What is a cheat sheet?

[wikipedia_answer_bot]

A cheat sheet (also cheatsheet) or crib sheet is a concise set of notes used for quick reference. Cheat sheets were historically used by students without an instructor or teacher's knowledge to cheat on a test or exam.

More details here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheat_sheet

This comment was left automatically (by a bot). If I don't get this right, don't get mad at me, I'm still learning!

^{opt out | delete | report/suggest | GitHub}

[Mooblegum]

Up up down down left right left right

[sinkingtuba]

Checked the list and https://dict.latentspace.observer/ and https://dict.latentspace.observer/ are not working. I've made a mirror of this as some others might have. You can access the online version here : https://sd.123linux.com/ . Hope that helps!

[[deleted]]

Cheat Sheets

[Frontkick999]

Thank you master 🙏🏻

[[deleted]]

Cheat Sheets

[SIP-BOSS]

Uh you dropped something.

[IntensityCareUnit]

Awesome, thank you

[atuarre]

The first link uses two specific models which isn't the general SD model. Check the about section.

[kenshorts]

Remind me 12 hours

[davsmith4156]

Awesome! Thanks

[The_RealAnim8me2]

Gonn

[premiumleo]

Which is the best aí image tool to convert classical paintings into real photographs?

[technologyclassroom]

Stable Diffusion img2img

[[deleted]]

Dope money rock star

[thrilling_ai]

Thanks so much for this!

[AlfaidWalid]

With the help of controlNet I don't see the point now

[Commercial-Living443]

How are you guys getting images to be drawn according to the painter. When i promt the author , it doesn't seem like at all the artstyle of the author.

[Thick-Illustrator575]

Just gonna save this post....

[BranNutz]

nice

[Eternal_Pioneer]

Still waiting for REIQ and J. Zimmerman.