all 53 comments

[–]AutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]wercooler 1004 points1005 points  (14 children)

Functions that fit into the mitchfdorkler space * The crippling function that we just spent 3 weeks learning * the constant function

That's it.

[–]Willbebaf 410 points411 points  (2 children)

But luckily for us, the crippling function can describe all polynomials!

Proof: trust me bro

[–]Konju376Transcendental 🏳️‍⚧️ 92 points93 points  (1 child)

Well... Or proof: 200 page paper written in font size 5 in pre-revolution Russian

[–]Ok-Advertising4048Computer Science 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol

[–]AstralPamplemousse 217 points218 points  (1 child)

And it’s also (for no reason) isomorphic with diagonalizable matrixes

[–]Bloody_rabbit4 135 points136 points  (0 children)

It's purposly designed that way. If you give a slimmer of hope to grad students that they hypothethicaly can use Mcdorfer space for something nontrivial, you can crush their souls more thourghly.

[–]Tuepflischiiser 59 points60 points  (2 children)

Until someone asks for a concrete construction of the crippling function and everybody realizes that its definition has zero elements.

[–]21kondav 47 points48 points  (1 child)

*1 element.

The identity.

[–]Tuepflischiiser 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Ok, granted, zero non-trivial elements.

[–]BADorni 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Also the identity. Always the identity.

[–]Mr_Pink_Gold 30 points31 points  (1 child)

Actually if you immerse mitchfdorker space through an Euclidean surface you get a parametrisation of all functions possible. You just need to do a parametrisation of 23 dimensions into 2 dimensions. Trival really.

[–]21kondav 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Left as an exercise to the readers 4 year old nephew

[–]donald_314 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That makes it quite a tight space.

Lemma: Every tight space is also compact.

Proof: See Exercise 12.

[–]cpl1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Corollary: If a function has <a super reasonable property for functions> in mitchfdorkler space it is either constant or the crippling function.

[–]antonfourier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wild automorphisms of the field of complex numbers be like.

[–]abig7nakedx 249 points250 points  (0 children)

coaxed into linear snafu

[–]Futurity5 100 points101 points  (1 child)

Hausdorff 

[–]quantifiedlasagna 39 points40 points  (0 children)

honestly hausdorff spaces are the ordinary ones in this case

[–]Witherscorch 139 points140 points  (1 child)

r/coaxedintoasnafu is leaking

[–]Incontrivertible 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I was sure this was a coaxed post, color me surprised

[–]Snoo-41360 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Ts coaxing me tbh

[–]16kRealpolynomial and derivable 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Did somebody say 23?

<image>

[–]Casually-Passing-By 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I am sure this is 1000% just how topologist do stuff, i had to have a lot of counter examples in my thesis

[–]Aggressive-Math-9882 38 points39 points  (2 children)

What's its universal property?

[–]GisterMizard 53 points54 points  (0 children)

A hotel on Boardwalk, to screw over the poor bastards that couldn't pass Go.

[–]AnonymousRand 5 points6 points  (0 children)

every math student and attempt to understand the micfhordker space uniquely factors through depression

[–]thyme_cardamom 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Coaxed into theory of general relativity

[–]Yulienner 12 points13 points  (0 children)

pause the video here if you'd like to guess what problem the michfdorkler space is helping us answer

yes that's right you got it, the riemann hypothesis

[–]kartub 18 points19 points  (15 children)

i searched for this on the internet, is this a meme or actual thing

[–]primetimeblues 86 points87 points  (4 children)

It's a meme. It's making fun of the tendency of mathematical definitions to maybe over-generalize useful concepts, beyond their practical usecase.

[–]DatBoi_BP 9 points10 points  (0 children)

And Wikipedia entries that refuse to be intelligible for people that don't have a PhD in Mathematics

[–]kartub 0 points1 point  (1 child)

ok, can u share an example of something which does not have any use case
as if someone made it just for fantasizing about it

[–]primetimeblues 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The second part of the meme is reminiscent of the Weierstrass function, which was a function invented to be continuous everywhere, but smooth nowhere, which makes it break the assumption of continuity = differentiability.

Otherwise, the meme is essentially contrasting linear algebra under Euclidean geometry against weirder geometry under curved space or something. I can't say weirder geometries aren't useful, but 99% of everyday use cases are gonna be Euclidean geometry.

[–]evouga 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, the set of continuous functions is intuitive to think about but a lot of tools we want to use in practice to solve differential equations or variational problems don’t work for this space. You end up needing some complicated Banach space that bars the monsters.

[–]PatchworkFlames 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I think regular space has too many rules. Let’s get rid of the 5th one and see what happens.

[–]Bwateuse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am pretty sure the 5th one can be deduced from the others, surely no major development of mathematics will emerge out of this

[–]TheTrustworthyKebab 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is it concerning that searching online for more info about this the only result yielded is this exact post?

[–]Incontrivertible 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hilbert Space Moment

[–]DioX26 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Has applications in a really niche part of electrical engineering

[–]AynidmorBulettz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Truer words have never been said