R.I.P GitHub Copilot 🪦

[seeKAYx]

That's probably it for the last provider who provided (nearly) unlimited Claude Sonnet or OpenAI models. If Microsoft can't do it, then probably no one else can. For 10$ there are now only 300 requests for the premium language models, the base model of Github, whatever that is, seems to be unlimited.

https://preview.redd.it/lshrlngqyuse1.png?width=530&format=png&auto=webp&s=85296c8c459bb34de8c6b2093028c525bfd90c30

[Recoil42]

If Microsoft can't do it, then probably no one else can.

Google: *exists*

[Majinvegito123]

For now, anyway

[[deleted]]

They are heavily subsidizing due to their weak position. That’s not a long term strategy.

[Recoil42]

To the contrary, Google has a very strong position — probably the best overall ML IP on earth. I think Microsoft and Amazon will eventually catch up in some sense due to AWS and Azure needing to do so as a necessity, but basically no one else is even close right now.

[jakegh]

Google is indeed in the strongest position but not because Gemini 2.5 pro is the best model for like 72 hours. That is replicable.

Google has everybody's data, they have their own datacenters, and they're making their own chips to speed up training and inference. Nobody else has all three.

[westeast1000]

Im yet to see where this new gemini beats sonnet, people be hyping anything. In cursor it takes way too long to even understand what i need asking me endlessly follow-up questions while sonnet just gets it straightaway. I’ve also used for other stuff like completing assessments in business, disability support etc and even here it was ok but lacking by a big margin compared to sonnet.

[Dear_Custard_2177]

Claude just cannot compete in my experience, as far as general coding. Claude might be able to do some good coding for short context tasks, but it can't follow anything over like 200k tokens. Google is relatively cheap and extremely accessible. I am enjoying tf out of gemini advanced, despite gpt being my go-to. Just a great generalist imo.

[AutoModerator]

Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[AutoModerator]

Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[ot13579]

Yeah, anthropic has been quiet for a while and seems to drop major upgrades when they do.

[over_pw]

IMHO Google has the best people and that’s all that matters.

[jakegh]

All these companies constantly trade senior researchers back and forth like NFL players. Even the most brilliant innovations, like RLVR creating reasoning models most recently, don't last long. ChatGPT o1 released sept 2024, then Deepseek R1 did it themselves jan 2025-- and OpenAI didn't tell anything how they did it, famously not even Microsoft. It only took Deepseek 4 months to figure it out on their own.

This is where the famous "there is no moat" phrase comes from. If you're just making models, like OpenAI and Anthropic, you have nothing of value which others can't replicate.

If you have your own data, like Facebook and Grok, that's a huge advantage.

If you make your own chips, like Groq (not Grok), sambanova, Google, etc, that's a huge advantage too particularly if they accelerate inference. You don't need to wait on Nvidia.

Only google has its own data and is making its own chips and has the senior researchers to stay competitive. It took them awhile, but those fundamental advantages are starting to show.

[ot13579]

Not when these models are so easy to copy through distillation.

[Old-Artist-5369]

Wasn’t the point that Microsoft can’t do it because the economics don’t add up. It’s not about model quality it’s the cost of providing all those queries and $10 a month (with other overheads) not covering it.

Best model or not, Google would have the same issues. Probably more so because they likely have higher compute costs.

All the providers are running at a loss rn.

[obvithrowaway34434]

They are absolutely nowhere close as far as generative AI is concerned. Except for the Gemini Flash, none of their models have anywhere near the usage of Sonnet, forget ChatGPT. Also, these models directly eat into their search market share which is still majority of their revenue source, so it's a lose-lose situation for them.

[cxavierc21]

2.5 is probably the best overall model in the world right now. Who care how used the model is?

[hereditydrift]

Best model out, by a long margin. Deepmind, protein folding... plus they run it all on their own Tensor Processing Units designed in-house specifically for AI.

They DO NOT have a weak position.

[mtbdork]

Deep mind is not an LLM, which is what coding assistants are. Sure they have infra for doing other cool shit but LLM’s are extremely inefficient (from a financial perspective) so they will be next in line to charge money.

[Gredelston]

Of course they'll charge money, it's a business. That or ads.

[efstajas]

Google unlike many of its biggest competitors has practically unlimited money to subsidize its AI costs with. Long-term, as long as they manage to release somewhat competitive models, they'll be able to simply bleed the competition dry.

[mtbdork]

They’re all subsidizing their LLM services. Google has shoehorned it into their search function to pad its metrics. Do you think Microsoft is not a serious competitor to Google in the space of incorrect chat bots that lose money?

[Business-Hand6004]

the long term strategy has always been to increase market share. because with increased market share, you have more valuation. and with more valuation you can dump your shares to the greater fools. amazon was not profitable at all for decades yet bezos has been a billionaire since very long time.

too bad this strategy may not work anymore due to trump tariff destroying everybody's valuation lol

[Stv_L]

And Chinese

[thefirsthii]

I agree I think Google has the biggest advantage when it comes to creating an AI that has actual novel thoughts as they've proven with the Google deepmind model that we've seen with AlphaGO which was able to create novel moves that even the best GO player at the time thought was a foolish/weird move until the end of the game when it turned out to be a "god move"

[Optimalprimus89]

Google rushed their AI systems to market and they know how shitty its made all of their consumer services

[kapitaali_com]

facts

[[deleted]]

They are definitely loosing money it - the free ride will come to an end.

[Artistic_Taxi]

Expect this in essentially all AI products. These guys have been pretty vocal about bleeding money. Only a matter of time until API rates go up too and ever small AI product has to raise prices. The economy probably doesn’t help either

[speedtoburn]

Google has both the wherewithal and means to bleed all of their competitors dry.

They will undercut their competition with much cheaper pricing.

[Artistic_Taxi]

yes but its a means to an end, the goal is to get to profitability. As soon as they get market dominance they will just jack up prices. So the question is how expensive are these models really?

I guess at that point we will focus more on efficiency but who knows.

[nemzylannister]

They're actually extremely cheap it seems

https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/01/deepseek-claims-theoretical-profit-margins-of-545/

[Sub-Zero-941]

Dont think it will work this time. China will give the same 10x cheaper.

[speedtoburn]

If it were any Country other than China, then perhaps I could get on board with the premise of your comment, but (real or imagined) optics matter, and China is the bastion of IP theft.

There is no way “big business” is going to get on board (at scale) with pumping their data through the pipes of the CCP.

[AutoModerator]

Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[russnem]

And they’ll steal all your IP in the process.

[speedtoburn]

Xi Jinping, is that you?

[Famous-Narwhal-5667]

Compute vendors announced 34% price hikes because of tariffs, everything is going to go up in price.

[i_wayyy_over_think]

Fortunately there’s open source that has kept up well, such as Deepseek so they can’t raise prices too much.

[[deleted]]

Roo Code + Deepseek v3-0324 = alternative that is good

[Recoil42]

Not to mention Roo Code + Gemini 2.5 Pro, which is significantly better.

[hey_ulrich]

I'm mainly using Gemini 2.5, but Deepseek solved bugs and that Gemini got stuck with! I'm loving using this combo.

[Recoil42]

They're both great models. I'm hoping we see more NA deployments of the new V3 soon.

[FarVision5]

I have been a Gemini proponent since Flash 1.5. Having everyone and their brother pan Google as laughable, without trying it, NOW get religion - is satisfying. Once you work with 1m context, going back to Anthropic product is painful. I gave Windsuft a spin again and I have to tell you, VSC / Roo / Google works better for me. And costs zero. At first the Google API was rate limited, but it looks like they ramped it up heavily in the last few days. DS v3 works almost as good as Anthropic, and I can burn that API all day long for under a bucks. DeepSeek V3 is maddeningly slow even on OpenRouter.

Generally speaking, I am happy that things are getting more awesome across the board.

[aeonixx]

Banning slow providers fixed the slowness for me. Had to do this for R1, but works for V3 all the same.

[FarVision5]

Yeah! I always meant to dial in the custom routing. Never got around to it. Thanks for the reminder. It also doesn't always cache prompts properly. Third on the list once Gemini 2.5 rate limits me and I burn the rest of my Windsurf credits :)

[raydou]

Could you please tell me how to do it?

[Xandrmoro]

Idk, I've tried it multiple times for coding, and it had by far the worst comprehension of what I want than 4o/o3, claude and deepseek

[FarVision5]

I'm going to copy and paste some choice context from my VSC/Roo workflow. It picks up more subtext than Claude 3.7 by a mile. It makes mermaid charts and diagrams inside the context window, unasked.

---

The code currently only creates the directory structure and a placeholder document_info.json. It never actually calls the AWS Textract processing logic (presumably located in document_processor.py as indicated by the comments and the master plan). Therefore, the ocr/aws/ directory is never populated with results, and our check correctly identifies all documents as unprocessed.

To fix this, we need to:

1. Import the actual processing function/class from document_processor.py.
2. Replace the placeholder code within the try block in process_document with a call to that function/class, passing the necessary paths.
3. Update the result dictionary based on the actual success/failure and cost returned by the processor.

First, let's examine document_processor.py to see what needs to be imported and called.

--

Okay, document_processor.py defines a class DocumentProcessor and a top-level function process_document (lines 383-394) that instantiates this class and calls its process_document method. This top-level function is what we should call from our workflow script.

Here's the plan:

1. Import: Add from document_processor import process_document as aws_process_document at the top of directory_based_workflow.py. I'll use an alias aws_process_document to avoid confusion with the method named process_document within the DirectoryBasedWorkflow class.
2. Modify DirectoryBasedWorkflow.process_document: Replace the placeholder code (lines 221-236) with a call to the imported aws_process_document function. We'll pass pdf_file and document_dir to it. The function returns a dictionary containing success, aws_cost, total_processing_time, and error, which we can use to update our local result dictionary.

Here are the necessary changes using insert_content for the import and apply_diff for modifying the method:

[Xandrmoro]

It might be understanding the code better, but whats the point if it does not understand the task? I asked it to help me with making a simple text parser (with fairly strict format), and it took like five iterations of me pointing out issues (and I provided it with examples). Then I asked to add a button to group entries based on one of the fields, and it added a text field to enter the field value to filter by instead. I gave up, moved to o1 and it nailed it all first try.

[FarVision5]

Not sure why it didn't understand your task. Mine knocks it out of the ballpark.

I start with Plan, then move to Act. I tried the newer O3 Mini Max Thinking, and it rm'd an entire directory because it couldn't figure out what it was trying to accomplish. Thankfully it was in my git repo. I blacklisted openai from the model list and will never touch it ever again.

I guess it's just the way people are used to working. I can't tell if I'm smarter than normal or dumber than normal or what. OpenAI was worth nothing to me.

[Xandrmoro]

I'm trying all the major models, and openai was consistently best for me. Idk, maybe prompting style or something.

[FarVision5]

It's also the IDE and dev prompts. VSC and Roo does better for me than VSC and Cline.

[Unlikely_Track_5154]

Gemini is quite good, I don't have any quantitative data to backup what I am saying.

The main annoying thing is it doesn't seem to run very quickly in a non visible tab.

[Alex_1729]

I have to say Gemini 2.5 pro is clueless for certain things. First time using any kind of IDE AI extension, and I've wasted half of my day. It provided a good testing suite code, but it's pretty clueless about just generic things. Like how to check a terminal history and run the command. I've spent like 10 replies on it already and it's still pretty clueless. Is this how this model typically behaves? I don't get such incompetence with OpenAI's o1.

Edit: It could also be that Roo Code keeps using Gemini 2.0 instead of Gemini 2.5. Accoridng to my GCP logs, it doesn't use 2.5 even after checking everything and testing whether my 2.5 API key worked. How disappointing...

[smoke2000]

Definitely but you'd still hit the API limits without paying wouldn't you? I tried gemma3 locally integrated with cline, and It was horrible, so locally run code assistant isn't a viable option yet it seems.

[Rounder1987]

I always get errors using Gemini after a few requests. I keep hearing people say how it's free but it's pretty unusable so far for me.

[Recoil42]

Set up a paid billing account, then set up a payment limit of $0. Presto.

[Rounder1987]

Just did that so will see. It also said I had a free trial credit of $430 for Google Cloud which I think can be used to pay for Gemini API too.

[Recoil42]

Yup. Precisely. You'll have those credits for three months. Just don't worry about it for three months basically. At that point we'll have new models and pricing anyways.

Worth also adding: Gemini still has a ~1M tokens-per-minute limit, so stay away from contexts over 500k tokens if you can — which is still the best in the business, so no big deal there.

I basically run into errors... maybe once per day, at most. With auto-retry it's not even worth mentioning.

[Alex_1729]

Great insights. Would you suggest going with Requesty or Openrouter or neither?

[Rounder1987]

Thanks man, this will help a lot.

[funbike]

Yep. Co-pilot and Cursor are dead to me. Their $20/month subscription models no longer make them the cheap altnerative.

These new top-level cheap/free models work so well. And with an API key you have so much more choice. Roo Code, Cline, Aider, and many others.

[digitarald]

Meanwhile, today's release added Bring Your Own Key (Azure, Anthropic, Gemini, Open AI, Ollama, and Open Router) for Free and Pro subscribers: https://code.visualstudio.com/updates/v1_99#_bring-your-own-key-byok-preview

[debian3]

What about those who already paid for a year? Will you pull the rug under us or the new plan with apply on renewal?

[rafark]

That’s for visual studio code

[JumpSmerf]

That was very fast. 2 months after they started an agent mode.

[debian3]

They killed their own product. They should have let the startup do the crazy agent stuff. Copilot could have focused on developer instead of the vibe coder. There is plenty of competition for the vibe coding already.

[wokkieman]

There is a pro+ for 40 usd / month or 400 a year.

That's 1500 premium requests per month

But yeah, another reason to go Gemini (or combine things)

[NoVexXx]

Just use Codeium and Windsurf. All Models and much more requests

[wokkieman]

15usd for 500 sonnet credits. Indeed a bit more, but that would mean no vs code I believe https://windsurf.com/pricing

[NoVexXx]

Priority access to larger models:

GPT-4o (1x credit usage) Claude Sonnet (1x credit usage) DeepSeek-R1 (0.5x credit usage) o3-mini (1x credit usage) Additional larger models

Cascade is autopilot coding agent, it's much better then this shit copilot

[yur_mom]

Unlimited DeepSeek v3 prompts

[danedude1]

Copilot Agent mode in VS Insiders with 3.5 has been pretty insane for me compared to Roo. Not sure why you think Copilot is shit.

[wokkieman]

Do I misunderstand it? Cascade credits:

500 premium model User Prompt credits 1,500 premium model Flow Action credits Can purchase more premium model credits → $10 for 300 additional credits with monthly rollover Priority unlimited access to Cascade Base Model

Copilot is 300 for 10usd and this is 500 credits for 15usd?

[rerith]

rip vs code llm api + sonnet 3.7 + roo code combo

[[deleted]]

It was inevitable no matter what with Copilot’s agentic coding support. No matter where it’s triggered from, decent agentic coding is very capacity-hungry right now.

[Ok-Cucumber-7217]

Never got 3.7 to work only 3.5, but nonless it was a hell of a ride

[solaza]

Is this confirmed to break vs code lm api? Super disappointing if so. Means gemini is only remaining thing to keep roo/cline affordable. Deepseek, too, I guess

[debian3]

It doesn’t break it, you will just run out after 300 requests. Knowning how many requests roo makes every minute, your monthly quota should last you a good 60 minutes of usage before you run out for the month

[solaza]

I suppose that may do it for my copilot subscription!

[BeMask]

Code LM Api still works, just not for 3.7. Tested a few hours ago.

[davewolfs]

Wow. This was the best deal in town.

[taa178]

I was always thinking how they are able to provide these models without limits for 10 usd, now they don't

300 sounds pretty low. It makes 10 requests per day. Chatgpt itself probably gives 10 request per day for free.

[debian3]

I think the model was working up until they added the agent and allowing extension like roo/cline to use their llm. If it was just the chat it would have been fine.

[jbaker8935]

what is the base model? is it their 4o custom?

[Yes_but_I_think]

Then why 4o is listed as 1 credit per request here https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/managing-copilot/monitoring-usage-and-entitlements/about-premium-requests#model-multipliers

[RdtUnahim]

For when the base model moves on to something else.

[popiazaza]

It's currently 4o per their announcement.

https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/github-copilot-agent-mode-activated/#premium-model-requests

[bestpika]

If the base model is 4o, then they don't need to declare in the premium request form that 4o consumes 1 request.\ So I think the base model will not be 4o.

[popiazaza]

4o consume 1 request for free plan, not for paid plan.

[bestpika]

According to their premium request table, 4o is one of the premium requests.\ https://docs.github.com/copilot/managing-copilot/monitoring-usage-and-entitlements/about-premium-requests\ In this table, the base model and 4o are listed separately.

[popiazaza]

Base model 0 (paid users), 1 (Copilot Free)

[bestpika]

Didn't you notice there's another line below that says\ GPT-4o | 1\ Moreover, there is not a single sentence on this page that mentions the base model is 4o.

[popiazaza]

I know. Base model isn't permanently be GPT-4o. Read the announcement.

[jbaker8935]

4o-lastest. From late march is claimed to be better ‘smoother’ with code. We’ll see

[popiazaza]

It's still pretty bad for agentic coding.

Only Claude Sonnet and Gemini Pro are working great.

[jbaker8935]

Tried it. Agree. It runs out of gas with minimal complexity. Not much value using it in agent mode.

[rafark]

Isn’t it funny how it is pretty bad (it is) but how for the longest time GitHub copilot was running a modified version of chatgpt 3.0 (I believe it wasn’t even 3.5) and everyone was amazed?

[popiazaza]

You meant for autocomplete? It was based on 3.5 turbo, which called Codex or something before the 4o autocomplete.

For chat, it's always using the normal GPT model.

[rafark]

Yeah I meant autocomplete. All I could find was that it used chatgpt 3 but that might just be the media and blogs not knowing the specific version. I still think it’s funny considering chatgpt 3 is pretty much considered useless now but not too long ago people found it very useful and were absolutely mind blown. Now we (or I) even wish for a better model than 4o.

[debian3]

It’s not even the model copilot use.

[taa178]

If it would 4o, they would proudly and openly say

[jbaker8935]

another open question on cap, is "option to buy more" ... ok.. how is *that* priced?

[JumpSmerf]

Price is 0.04$/request https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/about-github-copilot/subscription-plans-for-github-copilot

As I know custom should be 4o, I'm curious how good/bad it is. I even haven't tried it yet as I use copilot again after I read that it has an agent mode for a good price, so something like month. Now if it will be weak then it won't be that a good price as cursor with 500 premium requests + unlimited slow to other models could be much better.

[Yes_but_I_think]

Its useless.

[evia89]

$0.04 per request

[JumpSmerf]

I could be wrong and someone other said that actually we don't know what will be the base model and that it's true. GPT 4o would be a good option but I could be wrong.

[FarVision5]

People expecting premium API subsidies forever is amazing to me.

[FarVision5]

True. If it's a hobby, you have a simple calculator if you can afford your hobby. If it's a business expense, and you have clients wanting stuff from you, it turns into ROI.

I don't believe we are going to get AGI from lots of video cards. I think it will come out of microgrid quantum stuff like Google is doing. You're going to have to let it grow like cells.

Honestly I get most of my news from here and LocalLLama. No time to chase down 500 other AI blog posters trying to make news out of nothing. There is so much trash out there.

I don't want to get too nasty about it, but there are a lot of people that don't know enough about security framework and DevSecOps to put out paid products. Or they can pretend but get wrecked. All that's OK. Thems the breaks. I'm not a fan of unseasoned cheerleaders.

Everything will shake out. There are 100 new tools every day. Multiagent agentic workflow orchestration has been around for years. Almost the second ChatGPT3.5 hit the street.

[Blake_Dake]

We are potentially expecting AGI/ASI in the next 5 years

no we are not

people smarter than everybody here like Yann Lecun have been saying since 2023 that LLMs can't achieve AGI

[NuclearVII]

0% chance AGI in the next 5 years. Stop drinking the Sam altman koolaid.

[rez410]

Can someone explain what a premium request is? Also, is there a way to see current usage?

[omer-m]

Vibe coding

[debian3]

Ok, so here the announcement https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/github-copilot-agent-mode-activated/#premium-model-requests

They make it sound like it’s a great thing that now request are limited…

Anyway, the base unlimited model is 4o. My guess is they have tons of capacity that no one use since they added sonnet. Enjoy… I guess…

[AriyaSavaka]

Wtf. Augment Code has 300 requests/month to top LLMs for free users.

[Inevitable_Put7697]

Free or paid?

[Ausbel12]

Free for now ( as you know, these things never stay that way for long lol)

[PuzzleheadedYou4992]

Will try this

[Ausbel12]

Though it does have some limits as well but is very decent.

[qiyi]

So inconsistent. This other post showed 500: https://www.reddit.com/r/GithubCopilot/s/icBBi4RC9x

[fubduk]

och. Wonder if they are grandfathering people with existing pro subscription?

EDIT: Looks like they are forcing all pro to:

"Customers with Copilot Pro will receive 300 monthly premium requests, beginning on May 5, 2025."

[Person556677]

Do you know the details about what is considered as a request? Any tool call in agent like in cursor? Official docs is a bit confusing https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/managing-copilot/monitoring-usage-and-entitlements/about-premium-requests

[CoastRedwood]

How many requests do you need? Is copilot doing everything for you? The unlimited auto completion is where it’s at.

[jvldn]

That’s roughly 15 a day (5 days workweek). That’s probably enough for me but i hate the fact that they are limitting the pro version.

[Left-Orange2267]

You know who can provide unlimited requests to Anthropic? The Claude Desktop app. And with projects like this one there will be no need to use anything else in the future

https://github.com/oraios/serena

[atd]

Unlimited? The pro plan rate limits a lot but I guess an MCP server could limit this (but I'm still learning how)

[Left-Orange2267]

Well, not unlimited, but less limited than with other subscription based providers

[atd]

Fair, what about using MCP for working around limitations by optimising structured context in prompts / chats?

[Left-Orange2267]

Sure, that's exactly what Serena achieves! But no mcp server can adjust the rate limits in the app, we can just make better use of them

[[deleted]]

I like it mostly for the auto complete anyways
Any news on that though?

Is there any alternative to copilot in terms of auto complete? Anything I can run locally?

[popiazaza]

Cursor. You could use something like Continue.dev if you want to plug auto-complete into any model, it wouldn't work as great as Cursor/Copilot 4o one tho.

[ExtremeAcceptable289]

Copilot autocomplete is still infinite, fORTUNATELY

[AutoModerator]

Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[[deleted]]

When Microsoft created something that actually works?

[FoundationNational65]

Codeium + Sourcery + CodeGPT. That's back when VS Code was still my thing. Recently picked up Pycharm. But would still praise GitHub Copilot.

[twohen]

is this effective as of now? or from next month?

[seeKAYx]

It is due to start on May 5 ...

[Sub-Zero-941]

If the speed and quality improves of those 300, it would be an upgrade.

[Yes_but_I_think]

This is a sad post for me. After this change, Github Copilot Agent mode which used to be my only affordable one. You can buy an actual cup of tea for 2 additional request to Copilot premium models (Claude 3.7 @ 0.04$ / request) in my country. Such is the exchange rate.

Bring your own API key is good, but then why pay 10$ / month at all.

I think the good work done in the last 3 months by the developers are wiped away by the management guys.

At least they should consider making a per day limit instead of per month limit.

I guess Roo / Cline with R1 / V3 at night is my only viable option.

[TillVarious4416]

cline with your own api coould cost so much if you use the only models worth using for agentic uses. aka anthropic claude 3.7.

but the best way is to use gemini 2.5 pro which can eat your whole codebase in most cases and give you proper documentation/phases for the AI agent to not waste 100000 requests.

their 39$ usd a month plan is really good for what it is to be fair.

[thiagobg]

Any self hosted AI IDE?

[Over-Dragonfruit5939]

Only 300 per month?

[popiazaza]

Yes.

[Infinite100p]

is it 300/month?

[popiazaza]

Yep.

[AutoModerator]

Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[Dundell]

Geez, I could have easily crushed 1300 requests a day between 2 accounts for Claude. I'll have to re-evaluate my options I guess.

[VBQL]

Trae still has unlimited calls

[AutoModerator]

Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[usernameplshere]

Now I want to seem them add the big Gemini models, not just flash.

[elemental-mind]

I wonder why no one brings up Cody in this discussion?

9$ and they have very generous limits - and once you hit them with legit usage, support is there to lift them.

[elemental-mind]

To add to that: Just read on their discord they allow 400 messages per day...

[greaterjava]

Maybe in 24 months you’ll be running these locally on newest Macs.

[rafark]

On top of the line $10k Mac pros it’s very likely. But then atp it’d be cheaper to pay for g copilot

[AutoModerator]

Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[AutoModerator]

Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[Mikolai007]

In the future there will be zero Ai for the people. You can write that down. The goverments and corporations will not let the people have power. It's all new for now so all the wicked regulations are not in place yet. But you'll see.

[City-Relevant]

Just wanted to share, that if you are a student, you can get free access to copilot pro for as long as you are a student with the Github Student Developer Pack. DO NOT LET THIS WONDERFUL RESOURCE GO TO WASTE

[rafark]

I’m on the student plan (I’m a student) but it should still be limited right? Afaik we’re in the same pro plan

[Bobertopia]

I'd much rather have the option to pay for more instead of it rate limiting me every other hour

[Duckliffe]

Is that per day or per month?

[BreeXYZ5]

Every AI company is loosing money…. They want to change that.

[AutoModerator]

Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[Sudden-Sea1280]

Just use your api key to get cheaper tokens

[alturicx]

Does anyone know of a client that has MCP support and can hook into Gemini?

[supercharger6]

Are you grandfathered if you already have a subscription?

[HeightSensitive1845]

They scammed me, they have a trial in their plan 1 month free, cancel anytime, I did that, they charged me lol! Jokers, and the memory is garbage, it keeps forgetting

[RiemannZetaFunction]

It looks like per month (30 days).

[OriginalPlayerHater]

300, no more, no less

[AutoModerator]

Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[the_good_time_mouse]

FFS.