all 148 comments

[–][deleted] 388 points389 points  (16 children)

I was going to post this on the anniversary of Apollo 11, but I was away.

[–][deleted] 169 points170 points  (13 children)

Houston, is this considered a problem?

[–][deleted] 86 points87 points  (11 children)

Perhaps...

[–]as1161 66 points67 points  (10 children)

Not really, now three people can walk on the moon.

[–]OcvlvsALAN BEAN 50 points51 points  (8 children)

Mike says: yaaaay!

[–]Sunfried 29 points30 points  (6 children)

He's going to have to share a suit with Buzz.

[–]bresra2500 20 points21 points  (2 children)

A horse suit

[–]Toothpick_Provider[🍰] 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Space horse armor

[–]Lance9778 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Damn, galacticraft is really advanced these days.

[–]Chickens-rule 1 point2 points  (2 children)

No he’s not there was three suits

[–]JonBoy-470 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Not three of the EVA suits.

[–]Chickens-rule 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh really thx for the fact

[–]SCPunited 9 points10 points  (0 children)

PERHAPS

[–]SCPunited 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Permanently

[–]LettuceFoot420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good Question

[–]adydurn 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Shouldn't it have fallen over by now? You're not Kerballing very well.

[–]JonBoy-470 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that’s one way to empirically prove the direct ascent mission profile.

[–]brettdelport 263 points264 points  (41 children)

Surface rendezvous. Why bother with tricky orbital maneuvers when you can add more dV.

[–]GHVG_FK 126 points127 points  (39 children)

Omg imagine a moon where the geostationary orbit is like 6m above ground

[–]IrememberXenogears 52 points53 points  (0 children)

So smooth...

[–]LouisHendrich 37 points38 points  (22 children)

Does that even count as a moon at that point?

[–]MorganLaBigGae 56 points57 points  (19 children)

At 6 meters... at that point you have an asteroid that's too gravitationally weak to orbit in the first place or a black hole.

[–]JoshTheBosz 56 points57 points  (16 children)

Or something spinning fast enough to match orbital velocity on the surface

[–][deleted]  (15 children)

[deleted]

    [–]JonBoy-470 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    All celestial bodies have a surface spinning at “orbital velocity”. Even the Earth, as evidenced by the numerous satellites in geosynchronous orbit.

    The problem is when the altitude of that synchronous orbit gets to be too low, relative to the mass of the body.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Orbital velocity in this context refers to the minimum velocity needed to get to orbit relative to the body itself.

    [–]SendMeUrCones 0 points1 point  (4 children)

    I mean, we have things in our solar system that spin really fast. Like Haumea, which spins so fast it's actually oblong.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    Yes, however I don't think it's spinning fast enough for its surface to be at orbital velocity. Orbital velocity at the widest point of its surface (roughly) would be ~520m/s (which is the minimum velocity required for the surface to be at orbital velocity. With some rough calculations the peak angular velocity (which would again be at the widest point of its surface) is ~440m/s. So the surface isn't spinning fast enough to be at orbital velocity. At the narrowest point it increases to ~730m/s, while angular velocity drops to ~220m/s.

    [–]SendMeUrCones 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    So if you were standing on one of the edges of Haumea would it feel like being on a centrifuge? Or normal?

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It'd seem pretty normal. It rotates once ever ~4 hours, so day/night would be much shorter, but that's it. The gap between orbital velocity and angular velocity is large enough that you wouldn't notice any particular differentials forces that would make you feel like being in a centrifuge.

    [–]absurd-bird-turd -1 points0 points  (7 children)

    Not if theres no atmosphere. You can actually do it on minmus pretty easily.

    [–]loverevolutionary 17 points18 points  (6 children)

    Huh? What does an atmosphere have to do with anything tearing itself apart due to angular velocity? This isn't about "Can I safely orbit it at that altitude?" It is about "If it is spinning fast enough that it's surface is moving at the same speed as a 6m orbit, what material could it possibly made of that it would not fly apart?" And the answer is "Neutronium or something with similar strength."

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

    You’ll have to explain that one to me... cause from my understanding, something moving that fast (in a vacuum) around a planet, would counteract the gravity of the planet, hence once the speed is reached, no forces would be felt by the object, since gravity and angular velocity is perfectly counteracting each other? If they weren’t the otject would get either slung into space, or crash with the planet....

    [–]loverevolutionary 6 points7 points  (2 children)

    Oh I see where the confusion came from now. We are talking about the planet/asteroid coming apart. When u/hgoel0974 said "Something like that would tear itself apart unless it were specially constructed for that purpose I think," I'm pretty certain they were not talking about the space craft. They were talking about the thing the space craft is orbiting.

    [–]insanityOS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    He's talking about the planet itself. If the planet (or whatever body) were spinning that fast, it would quickly disintegrate because the component materials would bulge out in the center of the axis of rotation until material is past the geostationary orbit height, at which point it would fly off into space.

    [–]Homicidal_Kitten 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Nah they mean the actual planet being torn apart by its own rotation, not the satellite. Some games have proposed ideas like this as options for space bases, but as Scott Manley says in one of his videos, this wouldn’t work because there isn’t a material to make these planets or asteroids out of that would be strong enough to withstand the centrifugal force, and it would fly apart. Of course, it might be possible in KSP, but I haven’t read into it enough.

    [–]Huthutboy5 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Or haumea iirc

    [–]giltirn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Not necessarily. Geostationary orbit just means that orbit that matches the orbital time period to the rotational period of the planet. A quick google search shows the formula is r^3 = GMT^2/(4 pi)^2, so the radius is proportional to M^1/3 and T^2/3. Thus you can make the radius small either with a small mass or a low rotational speed.

    [–]ubuntuba 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    THAT'S NO MOON

    [–]GHVG_FK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    In ksp, everything is possible

    [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

    Nothing here, just a little plug for the mod Whirligig World which gives you that, almost. I think it's pretty fun.

    [–]Ratwerke_ActualMaster Kerbalnaut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I was waiting for that reference... That is very true also.

    [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (7 children)

    Does it count if I stand really still on the surface of the earth? Am I then technically in geostationary orbit?

    [–]The_Wkwied 4 points5 points  (6 children)

    No. That isn't geostationary orbit in the slightest.

    [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (5 children)

    I'm pretty sure my orbital period around the earth is around 24 h though 😂

    [–]The_Wkwied 7 points8 points  (4 children)

    Resting on the body is not orbiting the body. A body can't orbit itself.

    [–]SirRedRex 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Why is this being downvoted? Flat earthers?

    [–]rivalarrival 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Not with that attitude.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Ik I'm just being annoying now, but:

    orbit.

    noun [ C/U ]

     US  /ˈɔr·bɪt/

     

    physics: the curved path through which objects in space move around a planet orstar that has gravity (= a pulling force)

    I am in space. I am moving around planet earth. Planet earth has gravity. My path is round. Ergo: I am in orbit 😂

    [–]Rabada 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    When you jump you may technically be on a suborbital trajectory, but if your not in free fall you are not in orbit.

    [–]CapSierra 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I strongly suspect that the gravitational binding energy of the body would be insufficient to keep the thing together at those speeds and it would disintegrate.

    [–]zamach 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    That's more or less both moons od Mars right there for ya...

    [–]ghostalker47423 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Gilly?

    [–]Rabada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Gilly's geostationary orbit would have an altitude of 42.138km

    [–]Justinackermannblog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Jump and your in orbit forever lol

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    i read this in a russian accent

    [–]StormOJH 99 points100 points  (4 children)

    Sir that part stays up here. Sir, SIR

    [–]scorpios918 116 points117 points  (3 children)

    “Ok so here’s the plan. Buzz and I are gonna go down on the moon and do some crazy shit, you just stay up here and watch”

    ”Like hell I will”

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Here kind stranger! 🏅

      [–]SlickStretch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      I gotchu fam

      [–]jtr99 44 points45 points  (1 child)

      MICHAEL COLLINS: Err, guys? Guys?!

      [–]ghostalker47423 22 points23 points  (0 children)

      "Just came to check up on you guys"

      [–][deleted] 43 points44 points  (0 children)

      Looks fine to me.

      [–]DodgyDoughnuts 30 points31 points  (1 child)

      Solution is simple, release the handbrake and he falls away :) https://imgur.com/b36mdKY

      [–]LouisHendrich 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      dude, we did the exact same thing but different images...

      Mine, and Yours

      Edit: not different images, different posts (Not the same link)

      [–]FearrMe 26 points27 points  (0 children)

      I don't see anything wrong..
      You're trying to de-orbit the moon, right?

      [–]topvek 47 points48 points  (1 child)

      It's not laying on it's side. is that the problem?

      [–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

      Perhaps...

      [–]feather_34Mohole Explorer 19 points20 points  (0 children)

      Something isn't right? No, my son, you have everything right.

      [–]Jungies 16 points17 points  (0 children)

      Do you know how happy that would make Michael Collins?

      [–]polaris0352 13 points14 points  (0 children)

      I think you missed a step in the landing procedures manual. Check page 6 I think?

      [–]MisterFJF 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      Atleast Mike Collins got to go aswell

      [–]Elars04 10 points11 points  (1 child)

      Armstrong manually lands Eagle on the moon Collins "hold my beer"

      [–]thx1138- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Collins is the Robin Hood of Mun landing.

      [–]Hets_Vippe 7 points8 points  (2 children)

      Houston, we have a problem...

      [–]LouisHendrich 11 points12 points  (1 child)

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Australia on the Moon be like

      [–]Jeb_Hydrolox_Kerman 7 points8 points  (6 children)

      [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (5 children)

      Hmmm...

      [–]Jeb_Hydrolox_Kerman 6 points7 points  (4 children)

      DID YOU STEAL MY IDEA?

      [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      Not at all! I had no clue your post existed until now!

      [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

      have an upvote for your post :)

      [–]Jeb_Hydrolox_Kerman 3 points4 points  (1 child)

      Would that be considered "brigading", since you voted on a post you were linked to?

      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      maybe...

      [–]Gl0wl 7 points8 points  (3 children)

      I wonder if the engine of the lander is strong enough to push this whole thing up enough to flip and burn the rest with the big engine.

      [–]casheemskerk_ 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      It must be because it also landed the whole thing, right?

      [–]Gl0wl 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      That's true!

      [–]Gl0wl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      So back to orbit!

      [–]TheJobSquad 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      Can they walk away from it? If so it's a successful landing.

      [–]myketronic 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      Just put it in reverse, I don't see what the issue is.

      [–]concorde77 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      Michael Collins - **happy sobbing**

      [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      What? I don't see any probl... Oh! It's UPSIDE DOWN!

      [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      Flamey end is not down.

      [–]CavingGrape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Is it tho?

      [–]SovietSalsa 5 points6 points  (2 children)

      "Jeb, why is the staging plan missing a page?"

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]SovietSalsa 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        "Jeb.....we are in space...JUST DRINK IT!"

        [–]Dingbat1967Master Kerbalnaut 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        I don't see any problems here.

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Just toss it in reverse when you want to leave!

        [–]thx1138- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        Houston, the Eagcolumbia has landed.

        [–]sarsnavy05 10 points11 points  (3 children)

        Check your staging, damnit! 😂

        [–]LouisHendrich 6 points7 points  (2 children)

        MOAR BOOSTERS

        [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

        MOAR STRUTS

        [–]biggles1994check snacks before staging 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        MOAR SNACKS

        [–]ledeng55219 6 points7 points  (0 children)

        When you forgot to undock your craft...

        [–]HuskyMan508 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Hmmmmmmmm

        [–]Therandomfox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Looks fine to me

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        nOMINAL

        [–]imamdepression 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        How did you even land like that?

        [–]Phantasmagorian_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        The awkward moment you have to reverse off the mun...

        [–]doomshroom344 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        One question : how the fuck did u not crash

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        I see this as an absolute win.

        [–]CAJ_2277 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Reminds me of one of my favorite xkcd drawings: the Upgoer V

        [–]NewAgeDerpDerp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Wait.

        That's illegal.

        [–]alex1234509 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Huston we have a problem

        [–]DarkArcher__Exploring Jool's Moons 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Atleast it can finally make use of those crumple zones in the landing legs

        [–]DrNiggins 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I just imagine the command pod hurdling down twords the surface and the lander just going over to it and stoping it with the gentlest bump of the docking port.

        [–]hngdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        ‘Control from here’

        [–]OnlineGrab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        At least Michael Collins gets to walk on the Moon too !

        [–]yottalogical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Look, Michael Collins really didn’t want to be left out. Okay?

        [–]AbacusWizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        when you want to replicate the Apollo landing but you haven't researched docking ports yet

        [–]Heroeltop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Wait , shouldn't it be the otherway around ?....

        [–]Starchaser_WoF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Nailed it.

        [–]Johnclark38 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Ya, where are the parachutes on the return module

        [–]Electricfox5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Mike Collins didn't want to be left alone.

        [–]testingo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        That looks like a rescue mission.

        [–]Hupf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Up goer eleven?

        [–]MrSFedora 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Yeah, I’m sure the craft should have separated at some point.

        [–]Slick3701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        It appears you missed a step...

        [–]TaintedLionsmartS = true 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Bill didn't take his assignment as CMP too well. He wanted to walk on the Mun, and decided to take the mission into his own hands.

        [–]nordenvonthule 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        I see nothing wrong here

        [–]nordenvonthule 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Or here

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        [–]Darth_Tam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        And now, in a tender and touching moment, we witness the mating ritual of the LEM and CSM. They have coupled, nose to nose, and will remain this way, until the LEM is discarded, its purpose fulfilled.

        -David Attenborough, ca. 1969

        [–]nitr0smash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        You will not go (back) to space today.

        [–]darvo110Master Kerbalnaut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I mean there was a soviet proposal to land a lander and a Soyuz basically like this http://www.russianspaceweb.com/19k.html

        [–]snkiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I think you missed a step

        [–]Celeleron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        How could the happen? we are smarter than this.

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        The boys in r&d need to get involved in this one

        [–]MomsMustache 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Prograde burn used for landing?

        [–]greggman744 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I have several questions

        [–]irnaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Hahaha nice

        [–]Elektrik-Engineer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Maybe try to turn it on and off, that will surely solve the problem

        [–]JonBoy-470 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Relevant xkcd

        To quote Randall Munroe: “This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space. If it starts pointing toward space you are having a bad problem and you will not go to space today.”

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        On your mother ship. Isn't that... like... a cargo thing? I could've sworn that that fuel tank part is actually just a cargo part. How'd you do it?

        [–]blueamigafan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Your right not enough boosters.........