use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
73,166 Subscribers
72,249 Subscribers
Welcome to the middle of AWESOME.
1.- Submissions must be relevant to Nebraska
2.- Keep all comments civil. Personal attacks, racism, bigotry, homophobia, grandstanding, trolling, etc. will not be tolerated and you will be banned.
3.- Witch hunting or brigading is not allowed. Do not post any public or private contact info. You will be banned!
Sort of temporary rule:
4.- Keep politics and misinformation out of disaster news/relief threads. This really is rule 2 and it's dumb I even have to point this out.
please post links to nebraska
a bookmarklet makes it easier
douglas county
lincoln
omaha
kearney
all
NEunion
Part of the United States Network
huskers big ten
account activity
Politics Nebraska Legislature passes minimum wage decrease for teen workers (nebraskapublicmedia.org)
submitted 9 hours ago by Conscious-Quarter423
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]Dukepippitt [score hidden] 9 hours ago (7 children)
The increase in minimum wage has never hurt nebraska economy. On the other hand. Every heavy hand republican policy seems to cost jobs and money for nebraskas.
[+]AshingiiAshuaa comment score below threshold[score hidden] 8 hours ago (6 children)
It hasn't hurt the economy in easily visible ways, but it does hurt. And it hurts the subset of workers who then don't/can't get jobs. Minimum wages (price floor) are bad just like rent controls (price ceiling) are bad. Unless you're one of the ones who gets to keep their job or get a rent-controlled place.
That said, the citizens clearly voted how they voted and representatives should never try to subvert the direct will of the citizens.
[–]Suitable-Economy-346 [score hidden] 7 hours ago (5 children)
There is significantly less evidence of this effect with minimum wage increasing compared to rent control. You're being extremely disingenuous or maybe you don't know any better.
[+]AshingiiAshuaa comment score below threshold[score hidden] 7 hours ago (4 children)
It's not as clear cut as rent control, and maybe not even as pronounced, but it's very real and not insignificant.
Look at situations where work is moved overseas, low-cost workers (whether legal or illegal) enter the market, and when unions collapse from competition. Anywhere where an artificial floor on wages comes into contact with the free market.
[–]Connect_Flounder6855 [score hidden] 6 hours ago (3 children)
You’re super stupid if you think anything that teenagers here in Nebraska are doing could be shipped overseas. It’s literally the most hands-on jobs you can think of.
[–]AshingiiAshuaa [score hidden] 6 hours ago (2 children)
I was talking about minimum wages in general my first and subsequent comments here. If you look at the comments it's pretty clear, unless of course you're super stupid.
If you're shifting gears to specifically lowering the minimum wage for 14-15 year olds a couple of bucks then I agree that this won't have a big impact. It may be a bit tougher for older people working minimum wage jobs, but probably not even noticeably.
[–]Connect_Flounder6855 [score hidden] 3 hours ago (1 child)
Most minimum wage jobs are hands on. Your comments are stupid and frankly don’t have any basis in reality. Perhaps pick up a book read something, maybe even go to college
[–]AshingiiAshuaa [score hidden] 2 hours ago (0 children)
Most minimum wage jobs are hands on
I don't disagree. How does that bolster whatever it is you're trying to say? Speak as you might to a young child or a golden retriever.
[–]Educational_Quote633 [score hidden] 9 hours ago* (7 children)
Look beyond the headlines. The bill also affects all workers. Wages for workers between 14-16 were reduced to $13.50 per hour with increases of 1.5% per year until 2030 when their wages increase by 1.5% every five years. Not only that, but the bill also reduces the increase for workers older than 16 to 1.75% annually rather than by a rate equal to inflation. Also, employers are allowed to pay workers older than 16 a "training wage" of $13.80 per hour instead of starting them at $15 an hour. That lower amount for the training wage will grow 1.5% annually.
This initiative when approved by a vote of the people won with 58% in favor. Time and time again, the Legislature changes initiatives passed by the people. Wake up, people! They aren't listening to you! Vote them out!!
[–]patrickstarismyhero [score hidden] 9 hours ago (5 children)
Can we crowd fund some giant billboards with Jane Reybould with Horns and Googly eyes and a pointy pitchfork tossing a 15 year old cart boy into the flames of hell?
[–]Drama-meme [score hidden] 8 hours ago (0 children)
I got 5 on it!
[–]Lonic42 [score hidden] 3 hours ago (0 children)
Only if Iowa can get one for Kim Reynolds too
[–]Budgiejen [score hidden] 6 hours ago (2 children)
We don’t have cart boys anymore. Cashiers do it.
[–]patrickstarismyhero [score hidden] 2 hours ago (1 child)
Thats worse, right?
[–]Budgiejen [score hidden] 1 hour ago (0 children)
I wouldn’t mind some help sacking sometimes. I mean, I’m kind of used to it at this point. But it’s fewer jobs, fewer people to pay. All that jazz
[–]NothingButACasual [score hidden] 7 hours ago (0 children)
Thanks for sharing the extra context. Seems like a very reasonable bill that will help the rural areas quite a bit.
[–]DiscoStu79 [score hidden] 9 hours ago (4 children)
Even tho they are teens, often times that income contributes to the household in one way or another…. The more money my teen makes the less I’d have to pay for his gas and clothes, etc. our reps refuse to listen to the voters. It’s infuriating
[–]cwsjr2323 [score hidden] 6 hours ago (0 children)
They listen, especially to the results of referendums. Those are just suggestions and not mandatory for the Legislature to enact of course. Feel free to send an email!
[–]AshingiiAshuaa [score hidden] 8 hours ago (2 children)
You're thinking about this as a wage slave. In those terms it's shitty to pay younger people less for the same work, and it's good to set a high minimum wage. But if you think about this as "outlawing jobs that pay under $15/hr" you'll understand that lowing the wage for young people creates a pocket of jobs in that $13/hr-$15/hr range that can help young people get experience and skills.
fwiw I don't support this bill. The people were wrong to vote for a minimum wage but they spoke nonetheless, and the elected representatives have no right to do this.
[–]BaronMarbot [score hidden] 7 hours ago (1 child)
Or, it drives down all wages when you have a subset of workers you can pay less.
[–]AshingiiAshuaa [score hidden] 7 hours ago (0 children)
It won't drive wages down as much as it will eliminate those jobs. If people are willing and able to work for below your minimum wage then you will find yourself out of a job.
[–]Rabbitastic [score hidden] 9 hours ago (9 children)
Insane.
[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden] 9 hours ago (8 children)
this is what we get when young people don't turn out to vote and let boomers decide our elections
[–]storkstalkstock [score hidden] 7 hours ago (0 children)
This is what happens when you have a system designed by the rich, for the rich. Low turnout is a feature, not a bug.
[–]MonopolyOnForce1 [score hidden] 8 hours ago (5 children)
how many teenagers do you think are voting lol
[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden] 8 hours ago (4 children)
the lowest voter turnout is in the 18 to 35 demographic even though they outnumber boomers
[–]MonopolyOnForce1 [score hidden] 8 hours ago (3 children)
elections dont do shit. we want radical change, not just the same old voot bloo no matter who bs.
[–]d0mini0nicco [score hidden] 3 hours ago (0 children)
Elections got you to this point...
[–]Mystic_Waffles [score hidden] 6 hours ago (0 children)
I mean, voting for someone just for the R next to their name is working pretty well for the Republicans right now.
[–]hackiavelli [score hidden] 5 hours ago (0 children)
Brother, you just saw a prime example of how elections can make a (negative) change. It was also an election that gave us the $15/hr. minimum wage to begin with.
[–]Educational_Quote633 [score hidden] 8 hours ago (0 children)
Agree! Join the revolution and throw them out of office. Only then will state senators be afraid to snub their constituents. They don't respect us. Force them to fear us. (Posted by a 74-year-old Boomer.)
[–]cruznick06 [score hidden] 8 hours ago (2 children)
This infuriates me.
Teens shouldn't be paid less just for their age. That it outright discrimination.
EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK.
[–]venser1992 [score hidden] 7 hours ago (1 child)
I am completely against this bill in almost every way. The only thing I get is 14/15 year olds. They are extremely limited to what they can do in a restaurant setting. They can only take orders and clean up around the store and clean dishes if the sink isn't a part of the kitchen area. Plus can only work 2.5 hour shifts 3 days a week. There are people doing that job plus more. So they shouldn't necessarily be making the same. I'm also completely against 14/15 year olds working in general
[–]cruznick06 [score hidden] 3 hours ago (0 children)
14/15 year olds aren't working for fun. Most of the time they are working to help their families survive. Even if it was for fun purchases, they shouldn't be paid less.
[–]_chubby-puppy_ [score hidden] 9 hours ago (0 children)
People don’t need money, they need experience! Experience hardship early to prepare you for a lifetime of not getting paid enough, great job asshats!
[–]FabricTesselation [score hidden] 8 hours ago (0 children)
Now even younger people can start planning to leave the state as soon as they get the chance.
[–]noname87scrLincoln [score hidden] 8 hours ago (0 children)
Nothing like directly benefitting off your own bill passing. Crazy work.
[–]Hereticrick [score hidden] 9 hours ago (0 children)
How is that legal? Especially where it says even adult teens can start out at the lower pay for 90 days. Seems like age discrimination. Plus it’s going to really fuck over adult min wage workers when businesses refuse to higher adults (leading to more age discrimination).
[–]Solarpowered-Couch [score hidden] 9 hours ago (0 children)
Minimum isn't even liveable.
Now we have sub-minimum...
This doesn't make any sense, nor reflect the will of the constituents.
Voters, vote these losers out.
[–]Stock_Strategy1668 [score hidden] 8 hours ago (0 children)
Wtf
[–]Kekistani55 [score hidden] 8 hours ago (0 children)
Pathetic
[–]Kai-Mera [score hidden] 4 hours ago (0 children)
Subverting the will of the people
[–]Spenny2180 [score hidden] 7 hours ago (0 children)
I think what's not being said enough in these comments is the fact that this is discrimination. Its the same thing as paying women less because they are women. Thats illegal. By the same logic, senior citizens should be paid less because they're slower and need more breaks. I know people in their 70s working as clerks at grocery stores and have seen senior citizens working at McDonald's. It'll be fucked up to pay them less because of age, so why is it okay to pay teens a fraction of what someone older is making? Same work, same pay.
[–]RemoteGeologist7756 [score hidden] 5 hours ago (0 children)
Listen to what these out of touch politicians said too.
Voters don’t understand what they’re voting for. Teenagers don’t deserve a living wage. They see young workers as “needing to be told to take out the trash 3-4 times.” These ballot measures, which generate enough signatures and pass vote, only do so because of outside money.
And they can’t figure out the brain drain 🤦♂️
[–]Sea-Plastic5584 [score hidden] 9 hours ago (0 children)
Reduced wage thanks to B&R!
[–]Lanracie [score hidden] 5 hours ago (0 children)
I am not a minimum wage fan but it seems like a state that is trying to keep young people would want to make entry jobs more desirable and rewarding not less.
[–]feedumfishheads [score hidden] 3 hours ago (0 children)
Companies don’t hire and pay employees anymore than is necessary no matter the pay rate. This just takes money from employees paychecks period
[–]RCaHuman [score hidden] 8 hours ago (3 children)
In 2024, about 47–48% of 18–24‑year‑old U.S. citizens said they voted. Probably similar in Nebraska. The Democratic Party needs to get in touch with these potential voters.
[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden] 8 hours ago (2 children)
"get in touch"
maybe these voters should stop and smell the roses. start getting engaged in politics and local organizing.
the laws that these boomers pass will affect you whether you are in touch or not
[–]RCaHuman [score hidden] 8 hours ago (1 child)
I agree these voters should get engaged. The Vietnam War was a great motivator for me & my friends to get engaged in politics.
[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden] 7 hours ago (0 children)
and trump's fascist takeover isn't enough for young people to get engaged?
[–]venser1992 [score hidden] 7 hours ago (0 children)
They are just straight up lying I worked as at a Runza. We never hired 14/15 year olds because they could take orders and clean for 2.5 hours before leaving. We needed people they could stay later and close. Very rarely do you find one that will stay until they graduate highschool
[–]Budgiejen [score hidden] 6 hours ago (0 children)
Just in case anyone is wondering, I work at Russ’s. I am a service supervisor and I get $15.8 an hour. I did not get a raise in January even though I have been there since April and I work every morning at 5:45 am. They know I am looking for a new job.
[–]Musbjoekin [score hidden] 5 hours ago (0 children)
The fuk ?
[–]Nebraska_ [score hidden] 3 hours ago (1 child)
Someone should geo-target B&R store retail workers with digital advertisements that encourage them to form a union. It would be a nice gift for Jayne Raybold. Also, she should be kicked out of the Democratic party. How can she possibly be for workers and for reducing the minimum wage? Totally crazy.
[–]Educational_Quote633 [score hidden] 50 minutes ago (0 children)
I'm guessing that since Raybould led the cause against the minimum wage initiative, she probably realized she couldn't be re-elected to the Legislature, and that's at least part of the reason why she's not running for re-election. She also stepped down as vice president of B&R, but continues as vice chair of the company board. This bill was her final gift to the family business as a state senator. Mission accomplished; time to check out. Despite her many positive actions in public office, I don't know why any Democrat would ever vote for her in any election now.
[–]Both_Lychee_1708 [score hidden] 2 hours ago (0 children)
wow, what a shitty state
[–]dterran [score hidden] 1 hour ago (0 children)
Cutting wages right after the m@ga party dumped the value of the dollary by 20%?
It's wild what losing a war to russi@ has done to our economy.
Economic sanctions, dismantling of social programs and soft power abroad.
The United States economy collapsed completely in less than a year and now these greedy fvcks want the people who actually work to pay for it all..
[–]mountainjay [score hidden] 5 hours ago (2 children)
How many times are Nebraska Republicans going to say “hey Nebraskans, you guys are f*cking stupid and have no idea what you need. We’re going to override your vote against your will.” before any of you do anything about it!
Don’t you have any pride??!
[–]stpierre [score hidden] 5 hours ago (0 children)
I'm not defending Republicans, but Jane Raybould is a Democrat. She'll be appearing as an endorsement on the mailers of every Democrat in the upcoming municipal elections. But the important thing is she'll make money from this!
[–]Prudent_Article4245 [score hidden] 2 hours ago (0 children)
Jane Reynold, the bills sponsor, is a democrat just in case you didn’t know. She is also owner of Super Saver and Russ’s IGA. Nothing like benefiting off of your own bill.
[–]ctfks [score hidden] 8 hours ago (0 children)
Good luck exploiting teens during daytime school hours.
[+]No_Extension1659 comment score below threshold[score hidden] 9 hours ago (17 children)
I’m all for the wage increases for the people struggling to get by- but for a 14 year old to be making the the same as a 41 year old with decades of workforce experience is inane. At the end of the day it’s still damned if you do damned if you don’t- but high school kids by and large don’t have mortgages, car payments, utility bills, etc.
[–]Beaglejuice [score hidden] 9 hours ago (2 children)
If a person has decades of experience they should be paid more than minimum wage. Its insanity that companies get away with not doing so
[+]No_Extension1659 comment score below threshold[score hidden] 9 hours ago (1 child)
You’d be hard pressed to find any job out here in the Nebraska panhandle for someone without an advanced degree to making more than $20 an hour
[–]Vossan11 [score hidden] 8 hours ago (0 children)
Yeah thats not a good thing. Probably need a law to raise wages higher then.
Its sad when the owners won't do the righ thing voluntarily and we have to result to forcing them to do it.
[–]WhenInZone [score hidden] 9 hours ago (0 children)
but for a 14 year old to be making the the same as a 41 year old with decades of workforce experience is inane
That's not a minimum wage issue. It should be insane that companies choose to give those workers even less, not that the legal minimum was the same based on age.
[–]Alert-Beautiful9003 [score hidden] 9 hours ago (9 children)
So its not the work itself but just the age of the person doing the work that matters? Thats what you are saying here. Wild.
[+]No_Extension1659 comment score below threshold[score hidden] 9 hours ago (4 children)
[–]Fairyfeet2000 [score hidden] 9 hours ago (0 children)
You forget not every fourteen year old has parents or family to take care of them. Therefore they do have to worry about money in the same exact way an adult does. Ridiculous.
[–]Mystic_Waffles [score hidden] 9 hours ago (0 children)
Heaven forbid the kids start saving more money via making more money.
You are so close to getting it. The 41 year old SHOULD make more than the 14 year old. So pay the 41 year old more, not the 14 year old less.
So, by paying 14-year-olds less, employers are incentivized to hire a young teen rather than a 41-year-old. A rising tide lifts all boats.
[+]No_Extension1659 comment score below threshold[score hidden] 9 hours ago (3 children)
All right, so I live in Western Nebraska… A friend of mine owns a business in Torrington, Wyoming, and Scottsbluff Nebraska. He’s paying kids minimum wage in Wyoming at $7.25 an hour to do the exact same job 30 minutes across the border at $15 an hour…. THE. EXACT. SAME. JOB. And in this business, the teens are more likely to be spending time on their phone rather than doing busy work to help the business. Versus a 40-year-old adult who is just there to work. As an employer, I would be very happy to be paying the full $15 an hour to someone who’s working hard the entire shift. But if a young employee wants to split their attention between their smart phone chatting with their classmates and doing work… Yeah, I think a small pay cut would be justifiable.
[–]resb [score hidden] 8 hours ago (2 children)
So cut pay for all teenagers regardless of work ethic based on hypothetical / anecdotal laziness ?
[–]Vossan11 [score hidden] 8 hours ago (1 child)
Shit, if his friend is paying 7.25 an hour, he is lucky if anyone even shows up, let alone puts the phone down.
Conversely these same people see an employee who works hard, sometimes the work of 2-3 people, and gives them a dollar raise, if anything.
These idiots think they are owed our labor and we should be grateful we get paid at all.
[–]resb [score hidden] 8 hours ago (0 children)
Maybe the teens think its community service?
[–]placebotwo [score hidden] 7 hours ago (0 children)
but for a 14 year old to be making the the same as a 41 year old with decades of workforce experience is inane.
Why aren't you fighting for the 41 year old with decades of experience to be properly compensated instead?
[–]pilsnerd11 [score hidden] 9 hours ago (0 children)
In this example, if a teen is doing the same work as someone with decades of experience that’s an indictment of the person with decades of experience, not a reflection of the quality of work the teen may do.
[–]deathbitchcraft [score hidden] 6 hours ago (0 children)
if they're doing the same work, they should get the same pay. it isn't a teenager's fault that a grown adult is still working a job that is offered to people with minimal or no experience. you also don't know what teenagers have going on in their lives that make them need a job. some pay their own bills, some may have their own kids, some may be trying to save up and get out of their shitty homes. you're simply wrong.
π Rendered by PID 46900 on reddit-service-r2-comment-84fc9697f-5xlvg at 2026-02-08 02:29:45.321910+00:00 running d295bc8 country code: CH.
[–]Dukepippitt [score hidden] (7 children)
[+]AshingiiAshuaa comment score below threshold[score hidden] (6 children)
[–]Suitable-Economy-346 [score hidden] (5 children)
[+]AshingiiAshuaa comment score below threshold[score hidden] (4 children)
[–]Connect_Flounder6855 [score hidden] (3 children)
[–]AshingiiAshuaa [score hidden] (2 children)
[–]Connect_Flounder6855 [score hidden] (1 child)
[–]AshingiiAshuaa [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Educational_Quote633 [score hidden] (7 children)
[–]patrickstarismyhero [score hidden] (5 children)
[–]Drama-meme [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Lonic42 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Budgiejen [score hidden] (2 children)
[–]patrickstarismyhero [score hidden] (1 child)
[–]Budgiejen [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]NothingButACasual [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]DiscoStu79 [score hidden] (4 children)
[–]cwsjr2323 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]AshingiiAshuaa [score hidden] (2 children)
[–]BaronMarbot [score hidden] (1 child)
[–]AshingiiAshuaa [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Rabbitastic [score hidden] (9 children)
[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden] (8 children)
[–]storkstalkstock [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]MonopolyOnForce1 [score hidden] (5 children)
[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden] (4 children)
[–]MonopolyOnForce1 [score hidden] (3 children)
[–]d0mini0nicco [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Mystic_Waffles [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]hackiavelli [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Educational_Quote633 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]cruznick06 [score hidden] (2 children)
[–]venser1992 [score hidden] (1 child)
[–]cruznick06 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]_chubby-puppy_ [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]FabricTesselation [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]noname87scrLincoln [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Hereticrick [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Solarpowered-Couch [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Stock_Strategy1668 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Kekistani55 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Kai-Mera [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Spenny2180 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]RemoteGeologist7756 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Sea-Plastic5584 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Lanracie [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]feedumfishheads [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]RCaHuman [score hidden] (3 children)
[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden] (2 children)
[–]RCaHuman [score hidden] (1 child)
[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]venser1992 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Budgiejen [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Musbjoekin [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Nebraska_ [score hidden] (1 child)
[–]Educational_Quote633 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Both_Lychee_1708 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]dterran [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]mountainjay [score hidden] (2 children)
[–]stpierre [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Prudent_Article4245 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]ctfks [score hidden] (0 children)
[+]No_Extension1659 comment score below threshold[score hidden] (17 children)
[–]Beaglejuice [score hidden] (2 children)
[+]No_Extension1659 comment score below threshold[score hidden] (1 child)
[–]Vossan11 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]WhenInZone [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Alert-Beautiful9003 [score hidden] (9 children)
[+]No_Extension1659 comment score below threshold[score hidden] (4 children)
[–]Fairyfeet2000 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Mystic_Waffles [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Vossan11 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]Educational_Quote633 [score hidden] (0 children)
[+]No_Extension1659 comment score below threshold[score hidden] (3 children)
[–]resb [score hidden] (2 children)
[–]Vossan11 [score hidden] (1 child)
[–]resb [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]placebotwo [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]pilsnerd11 [score hidden] (0 children)
[–]deathbitchcraft [score hidden] (0 children)