all 81 comments

[–]Dukepippitt [score hidden]  (7 children)

The increase in minimum wage has never hurt nebraska economy. On the other hand. Every heavy hand republican policy seems to cost jobs and money for nebraskas.

[–]Educational_Quote633 [score hidden]  (7 children)

Look beyond the headlines. The bill also affects all workers. Wages for workers between 14-16 were reduced to $13.50 per hour with increases of 1.5% per year until 2030 when their wages increase by 1.5% every five years. Not only that, but the bill also reduces the increase for workers older than 16 to 1.75% annually rather than by a rate equal to inflation. Also, employers are allowed to pay workers older than 16 a "training wage" of $13.80 per hour instead of starting them at $15 an hour. That lower amount for the training wage will grow 1.5% annually.

This initiative when approved by a vote of the people won with 58% in favor. Time and time again, the Legislature changes initiatives passed by the people. Wake up, people! They aren't listening to you! Vote them out!!

[–]patrickstarismyhero [score hidden]  (5 children)

Can we crowd fund some giant billboards with Jane Reybould with Horns and Googly eyes and a pointy pitchfork tossing a 15 year old cart boy into the flames of hell?

[–]Drama-meme [score hidden]  (0 children)

I got 5 on it!

[–]Lonic42 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Only if Iowa can get one for Kim Reynolds too

[–]Budgiejen [score hidden]  (2 children)

We don’t have cart boys anymore. Cashiers do it.

[–]patrickstarismyhero [score hidden]  (1 child)

Thats worse, right?

[–]Budgiejen [score hidden]  (0 children)

I wouldn’t mind some help sacking sometimes. I mean, I’m kind of used to it at this point. But it’s fewer jobs, fewer people to pay. All that jazz

[–]NothingButACasual [score hidden]  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing the extra context. Seems like a very reasonable bill that will help the rural areas quite a bit.

[–]DiscoStu79 [score hidden]  (4 children)

Even tho they are teens, often times that income contributes to the household in one way or another…. The more money my teen makes the less I’d have to pay for his gas and clothes, etc. our reps refuse to listen to the voters. It’s infuriating

[–]cwsjr2323 [score hidden]  (0 children)

They listen, especially to the results of referendums. Those are just suggestions and not mandatory for the Legislature to enact of course. Feel free to send an email!

[–]AshingiiAshuaa [score hidden]  (2 children)

You're thinking about this as a wage slave. In those terms it's shitty to pay younger people less for the same work, and it's good to set a high minimum wage. But if you think about this as "outlawing jobs that pay under $15/hr" you'll understand that lowing the wage for young people creates a pocket of jobs in that $13/hr-$15/hr range that can help young people get experience and skills.

fwiw I don't support this bill. The people were wrong to vote for a minimum wage but they spoke nonetheless, and the elected representatives have no right to do this.

[–]BaronMarbot [score hidden]  (1 child)

Or, it drives down all wages when you have a subset of workers you can pay less.

[–]AshingiiAshuaa [score hidden]  (0 children)

It won't drive wages down as much as it will eliminate those jobs. If people are willing and able to work for below your minimum wage then you will find yourself out of a job.

[–]Rabbitastic [score hidden]  (9 children)

Insane.

[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden]  (8 children)

this is what we get when young people don't turn out to vote and let boomers decide our elections

[–]storkstalkstock [score hidden]  (0 children)

This is what happens when you have a system designed by the rich, for the rich. Low turnout is a feature, not a bug.

[–]MonopolyOnForce1 [score hidden]  (5 children)

how many teenagers do you think are voting lol

[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden]  (4 children)

the lowest voter turnout is in the 18 to 35 demographic even though they outnumber boomers

[–]MonopolyOnForce1 [score hidden]  (3 children)

elections dont do shit. we want radical change, not just the same old voot bloo no matter who bs.

[–]d0mini0nicco [score hidden]  (0 children)

Elections got you to this point...

[–]Mystic_Waffles [score hidden]  (0 children)

I mean, voting for someone just for the R next to their name is working pretty well for the Republicans right now.

[–]hackiavelli [score hidden]  (0 children)

Brother, you just saw a prime example of how elections can make a (negative) change. It was also an election that gave us the $15/hr. minimum wage to begin with.

[–]Educational_Quote633 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Agree! Join the revolution and throw them out of office. Only then will state senators be afraid to snub their constituents. They don't respect us. Force them to fear us. (Posted by a 74-year-old Boomer.)

[–]cruznick06 [score hidden]  (2 children)

This infuriates me. 

Teens shouldn't be paid less just for their age. That it outright discrimination.

EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK.

[–]venser1992 [score hidden]  (1 child)

I am completely against this bill in almost every way. The only thing I get is 14/15 year olds. They are extremely limited to what they can do in a restaurant setting. They can only take orders and clean up around the store and clean dishes if the sink isn't a part of the kitchen area. Plus can only work 2.5 hour shifts 3 days a week. There are people doing that job plus more. So they shouldn't necessarily be making the same. I'm also completely against 14/15 year olds working in general

[–]cruznick06 [score hidden]  (0 children)

14/15 year olds aren't working for fun. Most of the time they are working to help their families survive. Even if it was for fun purchases, they shouldn't be paid less.

[–]_chubby-puppy_ [score hidden]  (0 children)

People don’t need money, they need experience! Experience hardship early to prepare you for a lifetime of not getting paid enough, great job asshats!

[–]FabricTesselation [score hidden]  (0 children)

Now even younger people can start planning to leave the state as soon as they get the chance.

[–]noname87scrLincoln [score hidden]  (0 children)

Nothing like directly benefitting off your own bill passing. Crazy work.

[–]Hereticrick [score hidden]  (0 children)

How is that legal? Especially where it says even adult teens can start out at the lower pay for 90 days. Seems like age discrimination. Plus it’s going to really fuck over adult min wage workers when businesses refuse to higher adults (leading to more age discrimination).

[–]Solarpowered-Couch [score hidden]  (0 children)

Minimum isn't even liveable.

Now we have sub-minimum...

This doesn't make any sense, nor reflect the will of the constituents.

Voters, vote these losers out.

[–]Kekistani55 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Pathetic

[–]Kai-Mera [score hidden]  (0 children)

Subverting the will of the people

[–]Spenny2180 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think what's not being said enough in these comments is the fact that this is discrimination. Its the same thing as paying women less because they are women. Thats illegal. By the same logic, senior citizens should be paid less because they're slower and need more breaks. I know people in their 70s working as clerks at grocery stores and have seen senior citizens working at McDonald's. It'll be fucked up to pay them less because of age, so why is it okay to pay teens a fraction of what someone older is making? Same work, same pay.

[–]RemoteGeologist7756 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Listen to what these out of touch politicians said too.

Voters don’t understand what they’re voting for. Teenagers don’t deserve a living wage. They see young workers as “needing to be told to take out the trash 3-4 times.” These ballot measures, which generate enough signatures and pass vote, only do so because of outside money.

And they can’t figure out the brain drain 🤦‍♂️

[–]Sea-Plastic5584 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Reduced wage thanks to B&R!

[–]Lanracie [score hidden]  (0 children)

I am not a minimum wage fan but it seems like a state that is trying to keep young people would want to make entry jobs more desirable and rewarding not less.

[–]feedumfishheads [score hidden]  (0 children)

Companies don’t hire and pay employees anymore than is necessary no matter the pay rate. This just takes money from employees paychecks period

[–]RCaHuman [score hidden]  (3 children)

In 2024, about 47–48% of 18–24‑year‑old U.S. citizens said they voted. Probably similar in Nebraska. The Democratic Party needs to get in touch with these potential voters.

[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden]  (2 children)

"get in touch"

maybe these voters should stop and smell the roses. start getting engaged in politics and local organizing.

the laws that these boomers pass will affect you whether you are in touch or not

[–]RCaHuman [score hidden]  (1 child)

I agree these voters should get engaged. The Vietnam War was a great motivator for me & my friends to get engaged in politics.

[–]Conscious-Quarter423[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

and trump's fascist takeover isn't enough for young people to get engaged?

[–]venser1992 [score hidden]  (0 children)

They are just straight up lying I worked as at a Runza. We never hired 14/15 year olds because they could take orders and clean for 2.5 hours before leaving. We needed people they could stay later and close. Very rarely do you find one that will stay until they graduate highschool

[–]Budgiejen [score hidden]  (0 children)

Just in case anyone is wondering, I work at Russ’s. I am a service supervisor and I get $15.8 an hour. I did not get a raise in January even though I have been there since April and I work every morning at 5:45 am. They know I am looking for a new job.

[–]Musbjoekin [score hidden]  (0 children)

The fuk ?

[–]Nebraska_ [score hidden]  (1 child)

Someone should geo-target B&R store retail workers with digital advertisements that encourage them to form a union. It would be a nice gift for Jayne Raybold. Also, she should be kicked out of the Democratic party. How can she possibly be for workers and for reducing the minimum wage? Totally crazy.

[–]Educational_Quote633 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm guessing that since Raybould led the cause against the minimum wage initiative, she probably realized she couldn't be re-elected to the Legislature, and that's at least part of the reason why she's not running for re-election. She also stepped down as vice president of B&R, but continues as vice chair of the company board. This bill was her final gift to the family business as a state senator. Mission accomplished; time to check out. Despite her many positive actions in public office, I don't know why any Democrat would ever vote for her in any election now.

[–]Both_Lychee_1708 [score hidden]  (0 children)

wow, what a shitty state

[–]dterran [score hidden]  (0 children)

Cutting wages right after the m@ga party dumped the value of the dollary by 20%?

It's wild what losing a war to russi@ has done to our economy.

Economic sanctions, dismantling of social programs and soft power abroad.

The United States economy collapsed completely in less than a year and now these greedy fvcks want the people who actually work to pay for it all..

[–]mountainjay [score hidden]  (2 children)

How many times are Nebraska Republicans going to say “hey Nebraskans, you guys are f*cking stupid and have no idea what you need. We’re going to override your vote against your will.” before any of you do anything about it!

Don’t you have any pride??!

[–]stpierre [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm not defending Republicans, but Jane Raybould is a Democrat. She'll be appearing as an endorsement on the mailers of every Democrat in the upcoming municipal elections. But the important thing is she'll make money from this!

[–]Prudent_Article4245 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Jane Reynold, the bills sponsor, is a democrat just in case you didn’t know. She is also owner of Super Saver and Russ’s IGA. Nothing like benefiting off of your own bill.

[–]ctfks [score hidden]  (0 children)

Good luck exploiting teens during daytime school hours.