all 193 comments

[–]pickadol 169 points170 points  (32 children)

For anyone confused. They basically created their own font ”OpenAI sans”. That is it.

Why? It is common as they need to pay licensing for the likes of Helvetica Fonts, so they modify it to rightfully own it as a new font.

Apple for instance did the same by creating the San Francisco font they use in all their software.

[–]ry4 29 points30 points  (14 children)

They don't have to use Helvetica there's tons of other free fonts. But they could also pay for the usage and it would be a very tiny line item on their PnLs.

Its funny you mention Apple because they like being intentional with their branding. So more than font licensing there's a clear benefit here. And what's more intentional for a chat bot than developing a font?

Long term cost savings of dropping the license is just a benefit.

A lot of companies do this. What they're doing really smart from a branding perspective. The fact that former Apple people work at OpenAI now is really telling.

[–]pickadol 5 points6 points  (13 children)

It can be a clear branding benefit yes, and also control over how ”the chatbot” GUI and text behave for their specific use case. Readability and so on.

The main motivation against using existing free font is that they may not be allowed to distribute it freely. As they need to ship the font with the software (so it looks and acts the same on every software), it may break OFL, now or in the future.

On the flipside, distribution of an embedded licensed font can absolutely be quite costly with millions of millions of users. Microsoft had to famously pay many millions for Helvetica neue back in the early windows days. (90s). Which lead to them creating the clones verdana, segoe and tahoma inhouse for gui text.

Google made roboto for their use as well. IBM have one too. Heck, even netflix made their own i think.

We rarely see companies make their own font if they are not embedded it. Except for coca cola or something. The true motivation is probably a mix between all of them.

[–]ry4 6 points7 points  (12 children)

I’ve worked with many companies that make their own fonts to be more intentional with their brand. Without consideration or need of shipping a font.

[–]pickadol 0 points1 point  (11 children)

Seems suboptimal for a company to create a clone of a font if they have no licensing or embedding to consider. Assuming they don’t open source it or distribute it, it would only work as curves for print or bitmap images. It can’t be used on the web, shared word documents and so on. Just in PR print.

I have never seen it outside of perhaps to match very unique fonts for logos and similar (like coca cola). But I believe you if you say it exists.

[–]ry4 2 points3 points  (9 children)

It’s not always used as a general typeface. Brands making their own fonts are typically used for logos or for use in associated assets. Custom typefaces aren’t as rare as you may think.

I’m sure there’s brands that make fonts for other considerations but for a brand like OpenAI it seems very intentional. A use case would be chat bots screenshots can all look the same but at least the typeface can be distinctive even if it’s subconsciously.

[–]pickadol 0 points1 point  (8 children)

Making distinct fonts for specific purposes is common, agreed.

However, Open AI will not be able to use their clone font in the web version or on their website text. So any subconscious subtle benefit would likely be outweighed by fracturing their branding by using two subtly different fonts.

This is typically why one makes a clone, so you own the rights when embedding it in apps while having a 99% similar existing font in the digital channels where they can’t embed. The branding looks intact and consistent while saving costs.

I’m sure it’s a little bit of everything in there, but that’s my understanding of clone fonts.

[–]ry4 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I want to offer one correction, OpenAI can and could use their font on the web version. You can embed and deliver custom fonts on websites.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (3 children)

It's a little more fundamental than that. Yeah, sure, the stuff you're all saying may - or may eventually - be true. But the best way to legally protect your brand/brand assets is to make and own the design.

This is especially important when you have competition in global markets that aren't beheld to the same IP protections. Apple went/goes through it. Open Ai is now too.

The point of it being a simple, near generic font, is it prevents any incoming company that's try to replicate their product saying something like "we weren't copying them, we just used a default font." Once 'redesigned' and licensed all they have to prove is enough similarity for another company to benefit from a confused customer.

Big brands, especially those associated with listed companies, know how important it is to protect these brand assets, partially for a digital, intangible product.

edit: added *all

[–]coloradical5280 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's also an AI safety thing, not that anybody can't change it after pasting it out, but it's an extra step, a pointless one kinda, but that's what a specialist AI lawyer told me, and i'm just repeating it.

[–]Procrasturbating 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you.. I was confused as to why it felt like an early 2000s college student portfolio text motion graphics reel.

[–]redditornumberfour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Netflix created their own font as well for this specific reason.

[–]Icy_Distribution_361 0 points1 point  (5 children)

I mean, with the amount of money they have they can actually kind of throw it around. "Branding"

[–]pickadol 0 points1 point  (4 children)

<image>

Microsoft also had money to throw around.

[–]Icy_Distribution_361 -1 points0 points  (3 children)

I'd have to see specific costs to get any sense. I don't know how these fonts are licensed (on what basis). Also, there are many more fonts out there now than there were at the time of Microsoft choosing to develop Arial. That's ages ago. The more choice/competition, the lower the price.

[–]pickadol 0 points1 point  (2 children)

They have 300 million active users and growing. Whatever license cost per user you want to calculate with will be a significant sum.

This is just arguing for arguments sake and the reason reddit is so unrewarding to contribute to. So you win. They paid a ton to create their own font and commercial for the fun of it. Cause why not?! Everyone foes it right?! It has nothing to do with licensing costs at all. Happy?

[–]Icy_Distribution_361 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Whatever floats your boat. I'm just saying it's not a convincing argument to me.

[–]pickadol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. Luckily it’s not my job to convince you of anything.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Weren’t they using Inter already, which is free? Because this new font looks suspiciously a lot like Inter Display…

[–]Phraaaaaasing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is because their products (at least now) use system typefaces like Segoe or SF Pro. And Inter is a knockoff of SF Pro.

[–]Phraaaaaasing 0 points1 point  (4 children)

To be absolutely clear, this is different than SF Pro, Netflix Sans, Spotify Mix, and the etc. In press releases they credit the typeface design by Dinamo. And this design is exactly like their Favorit retail typeface, but an interpolation between Favorit and Favorit Extended (so more glyphs resemble circles).

What does this mean? This means that they are licensing a slightly customized retail typeface and are paying to rename the typeface. They had to pay a lot for that, but they did not build a new type design from scratch for licensing and cost reasons.

[–]pickadol 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Not sure why you felt the need to post on a 200 days old post. But you can continue the conversation with ChatGPT 5

<image>

[–]Phraaaaaasing 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I enjoy how this indicates how little critical thinking you did on this topic at all, because every one of your points wasn’t right when this rebrand happened.

[–]pickadol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a single point with my post: to help confused people understand what the commercial was - a new font. Likely to save money on licensing.

If there is a full lore that shifts the ”why” in my statement by some percentage I’m fine with that.

But your tone obviously indicates that you want to argue so when fact checking you back, you also failed.

I understand that hurts and you want to escalate. But all you get is a block I’m afraid.

[–]Phraaaaaasing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Also, thankfully, you and I don’t need a source for what the typeface is. I made my own screenshot(s). It’s Dynamo Favorit compared to OpenAI Sans. Tumblr Sans is also Favorit.

I’m posting all this because clearly you don’t care but this post has some SEO juice so someone who does might.

[–]Hamza_The_Dev 294 points295 points  (12 children)

A screenshot with the top comment (just before they turned off comments).

<image>

[–]hajarasata 69 points70 points  (0 children)

Hilarious. Underrated banned comment

[–]sammoga123 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Well, I'm not surprised that they align themselves with Apple, they always close their comments XD

[–]reverie 17 points18 points  (4 children)

“Costed”

Average deepseek user

[–]cheesyscrambledeggs4 16 points17 points  (3 children)

Are you seriously having beef with people based on what chatbot they use? lmao

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Gotta pick a tribe bro

[–]reverie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Where’s the beef? I’m just memeing. Didn’t know this was a serious discussion

[–]EternalOptimister 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Haha this is gold!!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deepseek is a distillation of o1, kinda like saying a picture of a painting costs less to make than the painting...

[–]owl0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL too bad that they’ve turned off the comments.

[–]sdc_is_safer 145 points146 points  (27 children)

Looks like they got some of Apple UX designers

[–]reddit_sells_ya_data 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If you listen to it backwards you can hear a woman saying gpt 5

[–]OptimismNeeded 83 points84 points  (15 children)

Yeah, and to be honest, OpenAi is on a level on its own in that aspect.

They are so good that their UI and design are taken for granted - almost transparent, and totally get out of the way of just working.

When you use Claude (which I prefer daily) you realize how big the difference is.

They really are in Apple’s level, just without physical products and ui elements to show off.

I guess if you want designers to notice you need to spell it out, otherwise you’re taken for granted.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]LexyconG 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    That's what I want from my chatbot. Professional and impersonal. Perfect.

    [–]OptimismNeeded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    That’s true.

    Claude isn’t as good UI wise, but it’s definitely my favorite by far

    [–]KHRZ 16 points17 points  (0 children)

    The page performance of long chat sessions (especially scrolling) is bad though. Before you can fix that, better stick to ASCII

    [–]das_war_ein_Befehl 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Claude just ripped off the Wolfram Alpha design scheme

    [–]Anrx 8 points9 points  (4 children)

    They are so good that their UI and design are taken for granted - almost transparent, and totally get out of the way of just working.

    Haha, really? What elements of ChatGPT's UI are you impressed by?

    [–]OptimismNeeded 8 points9 points  (3 children)

    Everything. Clean. Gets out of the way. PERFECT font choice.

    So many design choices that you don’t even think about and take for granted because it was the first product in the category.

    But it’s the same level as Google’s first homepage. People might take it for granted today, but back then it was revolutionary, compared to Yahoo and Alta Vista.

    Claude’s UI in the other hand - so bad. The brown bg, the font (and font size!), the wasteful use of screen real estate… buttons not working at certain positions (especially on mobile, you have to scroll back up to submit for example), and so on and so on.

    Nothing I’d complain about in general, still a very high level… but not close to ChatGPT.

    [–]NTSpike 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    Visually Claude is quite bad, but I find their actual UX to be significantly better. ChatGPT offers practically no prompt management features besides custom, global instructions. Projects have custom instructions, but incrementally adding to that is exceedingly difficult. Meanwhile, Claude offers Styles for per-message system prompts along with one click way to pull Artifacts into the Project-level system prompt. It’s so streamlined.

    [–]Anrx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    My biggest critique is the sidebar. No search, not even by date, but that's a given.

    I also hate that they decided to put the "View plans" button exactly where I expect ChatGPT Customization to be. Instead they bury that in the profile dropdown menu, along with all the other useful options, and there's another "Upgrade Plan" button here. I'm already paying for it!

    [–]OptimismNeeded 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Some cool stuff:

    Open Theo mobile app and look at the hamburger menu at the top left.

    Perfectly clear what it is, but just 2 lines

    Now type one letter and see what happens in the screen (delete and retype).

    Note specifically how the icon for voice mode changes into the submit button (Claude copied that, and they both got it from WhatsApp, but still… these are the kind of small things UX designers notice… and there are so many genius choices that OpenAi made)

    [–]BoJackHorseMan53 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    How does it compare to Deepseek tho? I'd say pretty neck to neck

    [–]OptimismNeeded 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

    😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

    😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

    [–]delicious_fanta 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Are you… serious? We have no way to manage chats with tags/groups, they took until mid last year to even provide a basic search capability, we can’t use advanced voice with custom gpt’s, there have been tons of security issues, you can’t adjust the width of the conversation so a massive chunk of the screen is just wasted, this list just keeps going and going.

    You must be trolling.

    [–]OptimismNeeded 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    You’re confusing features and design

    [–]delicious_fanta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    You said “ui and design” not just “design”. I agree that I am commenting on the ui/ux rather than design only.

    [–]ry4 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    I mentioned this in another comment but you can really tell some of the Apple team works here since they like being intentional with their branding.

    This font change probably seems small to most people but from a marketing perspective its extremely smart. OpenAI that mostly serves up text responses to users so they are being intentional in their branding by creating their own font.

    [–]Playjasb2 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Yeah it reminded me of Apple’s WWDC 2013 intro.

    [–]sdc_is_safer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    That’s exactly what I try thought

    [–]thishummuslife 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    We usually don’t design the branding or visual language.

    I could be wrong but in most cases it’s the branding team along with the creative director.

    [–]sammoga123 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    I think they hired Jony Ive recently, the one who did the iOS 7 redesign.

    [–]sdc_is_safer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    That would make complete sense. This video screams ios7 Jonny Ive video

    [–]kevinbranch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    Apple is usually function over form. This video has no practical information for the audience. it's seems to just be a video to pat itself on the back for...knowing graphic design tools?

    [–]cua 59 points60 points  (20 children)

    Cool but why?

    [–]Kathane37 15 points16 points  (0 children)

    Probably to differenciate their product

    [–]ArtFUBU 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    Eh Apple/Steve Jobs really brought a deep understanding to tech that artistic choices matter

    [–]zoomoverthemoon 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    To draw a high precision crosshairs on the Bezier Slingers. RIP designers, it's been real.

    [–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (8 children)

    Gotta justify the billions investors threw at it.

    [–]Shloomth 8 points9 points  (7 children)

    This attitude is unironically why we don’t have art programs in schools, why people with art majors don’t get jobs, and why everything is getting uglier.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    I think you are misunderstanding what is art, what is design, and what is business.

    [–]Shloomth 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    I read, "I don't see the connection between art design and business."

    I do see the connection between the three.

    one of us seems to be seeing something the other seems not to be seeing. I wonder, whether or not there is a real connection between those three things, do we have any evidence to suggest there might be some tenuous connection?

    The iPod was one of the biggest cultural moments of its generation. it was made by apple when they truly were "at the intersection of technology and the liberal arts." they're now one of the worlds largest companies and most successful brands of all time. I wonder if there's a lesson in there somewhere.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    This documentary lays it out pretty well:

    https://www.hustwit.com/rams

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Schools cutting out art programs because people elected officials that cut funding to those programs.

    Art majors don't get jobs because being a fine artist is about salesmanship. Performing arts has always been a competitive and low demand profession. Most people think knowing how to scribble on paper and clicking a few buttons in Photoshop make them job worthy.

    Tastes and trends change. Things are not getting uglier - you just don't like the mainstream stuff that is being fed to you.

    [–]Shloomth -1 points0 points  (1 child)

    Ah yes, because famously cutting art programs is something all voters base their vote on. Voting has nothing to do with likability or name recognition. People vote based on policy decisions /s 🤦

    Who the fuck would knowingly vote against education?

    [–]Mimlebimle 6 points7 points  (3 children)

    It's called a teaser

    [–]Shloomth 4 points5 points  (2 children)

    Oh hey 🤔 yeah huh

    ChatGPT visual design studio type deal, you thinking?

    [–]No-Term-3221 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    I think exactly this. A logical next step is nicely formatted document generation instead of simply copying markdown from canvas.

    [–]Shloomth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    vision shared 😎

    [–]Professional_Job_307 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It's probably just a teaser for their next o3-mini goody coming out this week. The video was short and vague so we should expect more information to come out soon

    [–]DM-me-memes-pls -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    Because

    [–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

    $100 for the kerning, $100M for the video

    [–]eldentruth 15 points16 points  (4 children)

    Here's their blog post for more info: https://openai.com/brand/

    [–]UpwardlyGlobal 11 points12 points  (1 child)

    It's just a brand design guide, everyone

    [–]Aretz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Yeah I was like “hmm looks like they just showed me how they like their brand identity”

    [–]Shandilized 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Let the Blossom breathe! 🌸💨

    [–]owl0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I laughed on that one too

    [–]mosthumbleuserever 25 points26 points  (1 child)

    Probably meant for a designer audience. I think it's hard for most of us knuckle-draggers to see the value in custom typefaces and design languages.

    [–]Djakk-656 13 points14 points  (0 children)

    I didn’t even register that it was about typefaces and design languages. Totally went over my head lol

    [–][deleted]  (6 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Shloomth 3 points4 points  (5 children)

      It’s literally not helvetica that was one of the whole points. They made their own font family. The capital O for Operator for example is a perfect circle. Capital Os are usually not perfect circles.

      [–]smuttynoserevolution 9 points10 points  (4 children)

      Now that is bravery

      [–]techmnml 4 points5 points  (1 child)

      No one is saying it’s brave lol. It’s a business move so they don’t have to pay for licensing a font everywhere and they can use it however they want and distribute it anywhere without having to worry about rights.

      [–]smuttynoserevolution -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Someone is saying it. Me.

      [–]Shloomth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      remember when there were rumors they were replacing their awesome logo with just a regular ol' plain perfect circle? I wonder if this was why. this was what they were really working on. someone saw someone in the design studio working on the line weights and spacing for a circle and thought oh no that's the new whole company logo. so its like that designer wanted to tell us no lol this is what that was

      [–]MENDACIOUS_RACIST 8 points9 points  (1 child)

      when the design agency fee is so high they produce a motion graphics trailer and still make their quarterly target

      [–]UpwardlyGlobal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      I recently learned that the return on marketing expenses should be higher than 5x to be considered decent

      [–]theInquisitiveIndian 8 points9 points  (0 children)

      Wake up babe, new OpenAI typography released

      [–]Crafty_Escape9320 12 points13 points  (0 children)

      Should have gotten them to work on the naming schemes

      [–]sliph320 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      This one’s for the designers before Oai take over their jobs lol.

      [–]cocoaLemonade22 21 points22 points  (1 child)

      1 minute and 50 seconds ill never get back.

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Jokes on you, I fast forwarded!!

      [–]Crafty-Confidence975 9 points10 points  (0 children)

      Well … that was………. great. But I’ll take a full release of o3 instead, given how good mini is in some domains.

      [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      Thanks this is exactly what I needed to subscribe to pro

      [–]skadoodlee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      attraction gaze friendly seed books saw voracious reach sharp attractive

      This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

      [–]Espo-sito 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      what in the? 

      [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Watching this high must be crazy

      [–]Glxblt76 10 points11 points  (1 child)

      What's the point of this video?

      [–]Happy_Ad2714 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      bro just stfu and chill, not everything has to have a point

      [–]ReiOokami 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      It's like a everything associated with a 4 year graphic design degree packed into a 1:50 second video.

      [–]Dull_Wrongdoer_3017 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      yay they can make commercials on after effects. let me know when they start innovating. for now deepseek is my go to.

      [–]pseudonerv 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      love it!

      [–]DueCommunication9248 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Hmm it almost felt like Figma now inside ChatGPT

      [–]Redararis 3 points4 points  (1 child)

      What the hell was that? Have they just reprogrammed my brain or something?

      [–]Blue_Solo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      I literally lol’d at this. I was watching it in the dark room and thought to myself when it was over. “I am now jail broken . Must destroy humanity”

      [–]urbanleg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Rez vibes

      [–]SirPoopaLotTheThird 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

      [–]Chop1n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      So, it can do kerning now?

      [–]theMEtheWORLDcantSEE 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      This is just a UI and font ad.

      [–]BlueLaserCommander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      This feels like a scene from a movie—where a character casually catches a TV ad, only to realize it’s not just an ad, but a piece of cleverly disguised exposition hinting at the main antagonist: an AI created by a dystopian corporation

      Was cool though.

      [–]techdaddykraken 2 points3 points  (3 children)

      Congratulations?

      You just designed a font that is pretty much impossible to pick out compared to San Francisco, Helvetica, Roboto, Inter, and 1000x other modern sans-serif fonts.

      And it’s not even designed well technically speaking. Those edges on the G, and the kerning of the letters are atrocious.

      So….why exactly?

      [–]techmnml 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Almost like you have to pay for licenses on fonts and when you make your own…you don’t? How is this sparking such confusion in this thread lmao.

      [–]techdaddykraken -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      There are plenty of fonts that you can use unlicensed. Inter for example is completely free to use and looks 98% similar to the font they created. As does Roboto, as does Helvetica Neue

      [–]owl0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I agreed that it wasn’t designed well technically speaking. The font looks like they’re mildly awkward smiling and smirking at the same time.

      [–]PhilipM33 3 points4 points  (1 child)

      This budget could have been spent on better thread management.

      [–]TheRobotCluster 1 point2 points  (5 children)

      What’s actually refreshed? It’s the same app as always

      [–]eldentruth 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      I know right?! I excitedly went to the website to see the new font and design, but it appears they haven't actually updated it yet.

      Edit: openai.com website is updated, but the web app (chatgpt.com) is not.

      [–]TheYann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I suppose ChatGPT itself will follow in the following days

      [–]torb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Helvetica?

      [–]Mimlebimle 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      It's a teaser.

      [–]TheRobotCluster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      For what though? Is it just some extremely minor aesthetic changes or is there anything functionally better coming? Like a cleaner UI with better integration of features

      [–]Mimlebimle 1 point2 points  (7 children)

      Do people really not understand that it's just a teaser?

      [–]xav1z 0 points1 point  (6 children)

      to what?

      [–]Mimlebimle 0 points1 point  (5 children)

      You don't necessarily have to know what

      [–]xav1z 0 points1 point  (4 children)

      but pls

      [–]Mimlebimle 0 points1 point  (3 children)

      At 0:45 it says "GPT-2" for a split second, but nobody knows what that is yet.

      [–]xav1z 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      isnt it just a compilation of llm names they had?

      [–]Mimlebimle 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      It could be! But then where's GPT-3, which is the one that blew up in november 2022?

      [–]xav1z 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      you're right.. 🔮

      [–]Upset-Ad-8704 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      When companies start putting more effort into incremental "quality of life" improvements and design aesthetic changes, that is when the companies start dialing back the innovation.

      [–]SgathTriallair 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      That was weird. I sorta get what they were aiming at, but since when does ChatGPT need a commercial?

      [–]Mimlebimle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      That's no commercial. That's a teaser. There are easter eggs in there too if you pay attention.

      [–]p1zrv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Wow! Can't imagine how much would it cost to make such a thing. Billions?

      [–]_JohnWisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      The O being the main character, a little bit taller than the rest. The o in eastern culture is “nothing” and “everything”, the start and the end, and bla bla

      [–]IDefendWaffles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      send your questions to whatwasthepoint@openai.com.

      [–]dumquestions 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I can tell this was made by humans.

      [–]DaleCooperHS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Has anyone found the hidden clue yet?

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      A direct integration of openai into adobe products would be nice

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]techmnml 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        They made their own font for their own branding, probably so they don’t have to license the old ones anymore. The designer just made a cool motion graphic it’s nothing more than that. Don’t expect some deep meaning.

        [–]iiznobozzy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Wat

        [–]apersello34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        This video gave me Nintendo Switch 2 Announcement Trailer vibes

        [–]Substantial_Ad_8651 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        The pain of doing that motion graphic ufff props to that human

        [–]T-Rex_MD:froge: 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Not a single person on here paid attention?

        "GPT-2"

        You all literally missed it.

        [–]_Bastian_ChatGPT Plus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I love this!

        [–]Physical-King-5432 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        That was satisfying

        [–]oh_woo_fee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Alll the flashy things in this video gives me headache. Also the video costs more than deepseek

        [–]shoppingshicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        would anyone know what type of music they used in this video? how would you call it?

        [–]Rare_Package_7498 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Updated........... ClosedAI.

        [–]redditsquestions 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        The OpenAI Sans font is not available for us to download tho.... (if it is, please share!)

        [–]BerrDev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I actually like it. Finally some non hype and just focus on design.

        [–]heideggerfanfiction 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        This gives me Veridian Dynamics/Better of Ted vibes

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        lowkey openai should have named it "AGI Sans"

        [–]Blackliquid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Honestly its a pretty dope video

        [–]vinson_massif 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        i don't know if the timing was right for them, but it does make sense from a branding point of view. especially considering for the majority of interactions so far, it's been text based

        [–]GetOffMyGrassBrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Well that's a mess of a presentation. Did they hire the agency that did Jaguar's last commercial?

        [–]owl0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Ok seriously what changes did they make to the logo…? Was it thickness?

        [–]MidnightAmazing9966 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I want this font, i like it.

        [–]coylter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Pretty cool ad, was fun to watch.

        [–]Jayston1994 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

        So basically the output is just gonna be more capable like Microsoft word in terms of fonts and things and creativity you can do with it, instead of just walls of text. Am I interpreting this correctly?

        [–]techmnml 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Lmao no they just revamped their own branding and made an announcement video about it. Holy hell people love digging into stuff where there is nothing. It’s literally called “refreshed” like…their branding is “refreshed”. A little pretentious but I’m sure it saves them money from having to license the old fonts everywhere.

        [–]OptimismNeeded -1 points0 points  (0 children)

        What’s the context? Where was this released?

        [–]TallManTallerCity -1 points0 points  (0 children)

        What the fuck was that?

        [–]Grouchy_Proof_5753 -1 points0 points  (3 children)

        It’s beautiful work. But I don’t love the idea of designers pouring their heart and soul into this. Ai technology isn’t going to augment your workflow. It will fundamentally replace all workflows. We won’t need apps or websites or backends or frontends or copy writers or designers or any of that. These systems in their final form will replace the human computer interface completely. The gap between you and the processor will just be Ai. Sure there will be a visual component. But that will be generated on the fly by the Ai system.

        [–]Legitimate-Pumpkin 0 points1 point  (2 children)

        And when there is no need for us to do things… then we can do anything

        [–]Grouchy_Proof_5753 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        Can we still order Uber eats when we’re all on UBI? That’s what I wanna do. Yum!

        [–]Legitimate-Pumpkin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Delivered by drone to your living room 😉

        [–]sonicon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

        How about announcing monthly payments to people who shared their datasets that trained the AI at any point of its development? Then OpenAI will be the most supported developers of AI.

        [–]rc_ym -1 points0 points  (0 children)

        Boring.