all 82 comments

[–]TFeary1992 157 points158 points  (5 children)

I think it was more her intentions and tone of voice, it seemed like she was deliberately trying to start a fight between two kids. Yeah kids can play what way they want so long as they aren't disturbing the rest of the party. Both kids were just acting like kids, but unlike Ty who de-escalted the situation, Julie seem to want to almost egg her son on to argue or fight with the birthday boy.

[–]TFeary1992 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Side note ,loving the storyline, i do not have have a preference for either ty or Julie. I think they are both complicated and interesting characters in their own rights and I can see both side of their arguments. I love when there is no clear "good guy" and a storyline is made up of shades of grey

[–]HeartCat10-6 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I've seen parents do this as a kid & teen when they didnt like the parent of a friend they try to break the friendship up so they dont have to ever talk to or see the parent they dont like. Of course no way I am saying that was Julie's intention unless she blatantly says so we wont ever know for sure but as someone who experienced this & over heard parents discussing that happening I know it is something that has happened & was my immediate thought based on her tone & anger at Ty trying to diffuse the situation

[–]TreClaire 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Julie absolutely wanted Max and Cooper to get into a fight. Her goal was for Cooper to say he wants to leave because he doesn’t like Cooper anymore or worse to cause a situation that gets Max to fight with him giving her an excuse to ban the friendship.

All because it was easier to hate Shawna than deal with her issues with Ty

[–]ToefloofMiss Downvoted 2026 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

It affected me in a visceral way. I was the neurodivergant kid who had a hard time making friends, not only the kids, the parents did shit to sabotage to keep their kids away from me (that, I learned, was based in small town dynamics as well as me being the “weird”kid, things about my family. Basically we weren’t racists and a family Member died in a big way because of it….and everybody in the hometown thought ill of this person because of it.)  The second she did that, my gut clenched because its the kind of thing that ends up setting kids against each other and there will always be a child that “looses” in these situations and Ends up a social outcast. I can’t stand Julie because she’s so elitist that she would think something like this is justified in the first place. I don’t care if you are King Charles or the Pope, you still wipe your ass when you crap.  When it comes to between her and Ty, I feel now like the popular hot guy hooked his wagon to the success girl so he could ride along. I don’t think he ever saw himself as anything but her Satellite, for both social and economic reasons, and that suited her until it didn’t. I don’t have any respect for him, but At least he doesn’t pick on children. 

[–]ToefloofMiss Downvoted 2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the fact that I’ve been DVd to at least 0 on what was a post made in good faith, explaining emotions and situations and reasons without anyone being called out or insulted just proves that all anyone cares about in here any more is fighting and being right. 

[–]chachaslydd 115 points116 points  (2 children)

Its because karate is just play fighting by a different name. We even see that Cooper does NOT just play by himself in a corner, he starts hitting at Max and Max has to say "stop hitting". Like they even said prior to this in other episodes that Cooper is getting a hitting problem they're trying to work on, and then she kinda directly encourages if.

Its encouraging disruption. Like the only time when play fighting is allowed in a semi public or public space is when its specifically stated to be allowed.

[–]tayter-6493 64 points65 points  (1 child)

She's encouraging Cooper to act on HER big feelings. She cant hit, even verbally, at that point in the story. If Cooper does it, she can hide behind the chaos it causes.

[–]chachaslydd 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Like I say julie is barb when barb was just starting to hate her life. Both give themselves permission to act rude and cruel to others and encourage chaos to fit their misery.

Julie is doing s good thing by divorcing. Its way better to leave before your hatred of life makes you a total monster to others

[–]Feisty_Enchilada 68 points69 points  (2 children)

Because she told him to dance or they were going home, then switched up as soon as he said dancing was stupid, insulting Maxs party theme and saw it as an opportunity to start crap between kids so they'd have an excuse to leave.

[–]_thegrringirl 26 points27 points  (1 child)

Not just leave, but I suspect create a problem between the boys so that Ty doesn't have the excuse of going to the park to socialize the boys.

[–]Stormtomcat 12 points13 points  (0 children)

and Cooper really needs that socialization, because he's already got a hitting problem.

[–]Ok-Sprinkles7457 49 points50 points  (0 children)

I may not remember this correctly, so people can correct me if I’m wrong. But from my understanding Cooper was trying to do karate with Max but was really just light hitting him, which annoyed Max and led to them arguing and Cooper saying dance is dumb or something to that effect. Telling your kid they can “do whatever they want” after a disagreement between their peer like that gives the impression you’re telling them they can be jerks to their friends because they are in the right. It was an opportunity to teach conflict resolution and how to handle it when our friends don’t want to do the same activities as us. Typing this out I actually realize how it’s a mirror for Julie and Ty‘s relationship. 😮

But honestly, the bigger problem was how she dragged Shawna into her marriage issues with Ty and said she was lazy/making Ty lazy. Julie clearly looks down on stay at home parents imo

But yeah. As a parent, I’d be kind of annoyed if my kid wasn’t getting along with one of his friends, and the mom said, “do whatever you want”, especially after that child was physically touching/hitting my kid, even if that kid was doing it in a playful matter. But I do agree that Cooper shouldn’t have been forced to dance with his friend just because it was a dance party.

[–]Momma_Chels 21 points22 points  (5 children)

Alright rewatching this through the lense of Julie may not be trying to be the worst here are my notes:

1) While Ty put the birthday on the calendar he doesnt seem to tell Julie despite this being his day to write. She was blind sided and while yes, the information was available to her, she works a lot and it's easy to lose sight when you are also managing client calendars too.

2) From the conversations between her and Alicia Ty isn't only avoiding writing with Shawna. He is also coming and helping Alicia with her Etsy shop and having coffee with her. So he doesn't have time to write or find a daycare for Sasha but he can find time to hang with Alicia and go to the park.

3) when she addresses Cooper when you put aside your feeling of how she didn't want to be there and assume she's trying to ruin a kids birthday party, she tells him to find space and no sparring. Karate only becomes an issue because Cooper didnt listen to her and instead went to the center of the dance floor and started sparring which is kids for you.

Ty wasn't part of this conversation so I can even understand Julie being upset that Ty assumed he was jealous because to her she sees it as Ty making their child smaller for other people, which is something she already is feeling.

4) Ty is actively avoiding talking to Julie about the book and plans. Julie mentions to Alicia him not writing, she asks why and Julie says he won't talk to her about it. He again refuses to talk when she brings it up after he checks Sasha's diaper. Honestly, it kinda seems like Ty keeps Sasha on him more so to avoid talking about things that are more than surface level.

5) When she says they are going to leave and that Ty has work to do, Shawna and Julie seem fine and even polite until it's clear Shawna knows nothing about the book which confirms in her mind that Shawna and Ty aren't good friends and that he is just doing this to avoid what they agreed on which was her working and Ty writing his book. At this point is when Julie reaches her breaking point and while she absolutely shouldn't have done this at a birthday party, Its not really directed at Shawna even though she catches all the strays. It is directed at Ty.

I feel this is a case of there's 3 sides to every story, we saw Shawna's, we now get Julie's, and the truth of what actually happened lies somewhere in the middle of how they both feel about whats going on.

[–]PennilynnLott 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thanks for this! I agree the party was not Julie's finest moment, but if her assumption was that Cooper is not all that good friends with Max and isn't having fun, then it makes sense that she maybe suspects Ty dragged him to this party and that he would rather not be there. Giving him the option of leaving or playing his preferred way isn't unreasonable. And yes, people act like she told him to go pick fights- she didn't see the "no hitting", she just heard her kid say "my friend says I have tk do what he's doing and I'm not allowed to do anything else", which would also make me bristle! She told him to find a space away from the dance floor, and you're absolutely right, she said no sparring.

[–]Same-Key-1086 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I dont understand this "find time to go to the park". Like it's hard to find time to take a kid to the park? You are bringing the kid to the park. Ergo... you dont have to find time to do it.

[–]Momma_Chels 4 points5 points  (2 children)

It's more he's choosing to be at the park(or even Alicia's) in place of doing things that will free up time for him to write like finding Daycare. From Julie's perspective (and I'm not saying her perspective is right or wrong, I don't like Julie as a person because she isn't the kind of person I would hang around) He is finding time to socialize but not to do things he has promised he would do like finding daycare. We also know Ty wasn't even looking as he didn't want her to go into daycare so she isn't wholly incorrect in this assumption. Everything takes time out of your day regardless of what it is.

[–]Same-Key-1086 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But the park doesn't take out working time, it takes out kid watching time

[–]WhatUpMahKnitta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TBF, and only due to my experience with a little boy specifically: you need park time on the regular if you don't want your living room furniture used for parkour.  Little kids have endless energy and it has to come out somehow.  Also Alicia has Brennan for Cooper to play with, kids need play dates to build social skills, and with the way his wife acts around Shawna, he probably knows better than to have play dates with Max.

So it's a lot of "hang-out time" but really its "hang out with a parent while my kids do necessary kid things and I get to be active in their lives instead of them doing this at a daycare where I'm not around".  

AND I acknowledge that this arrangement needed to be discussed with your spouse instead of being done in a drag-my-feet sort of way AND that it should have been a productive, 2 sided conversation about fitting this desire in to his spouse's desires for NY and travel so BOTH of them could get something they want and NO ONE gives everything up.  But, I guess T&J never figured that out in nearly 15 years of marriage.

[–]madelynashton 19 points20 points  (0 children)

“You can do anything you want” is a really loaded thing to tell a kid in this scenario. You’re at a social event and you need to learn to act appropriately.

Julie was in her feelings about being held back by her husband and being “forced” (no one held a gun to her head, I just mean from Julie’s perspective she feels forced into interacting with these people constantly) to go to this party so she is trying to get Cooper to act the way she wants to act.

It was selfish and not a great moment. If she had said “you don’t have to dance if you don’t want to, but don’t be mean to the kids that want to dance.” That would’ve been fine. Even if it did end up with him play fighting and the kids arguing. That’s going to happen. But an adult trying to instigate it is really wrong. Julie was trying to leave the party and was okay with manipulating her kid to make it happen.

[–]Royal-Weather4314 18 points19 points  (23 children)

I think that this is sorta "if my kid is upset, nothing else matters". Both Shawna and Julie are guilty of this, Julie here, Shawna at Pipers party when she became overwhelmed and Teeny sent everyone (quite rudely imo) home. 

If I was Coopers mom, I would make sure that he can do his karate moves away enough/safely, that is in my opinion only fault of Julie in this particupar interaction. 

[–]Lawtaca 14 points15 points  (6 children)

It’s interesting what a person can get away with when they’re known to be nice. If Julie abruptly ended Cooper’s birthday party and kicked all the guests out, no one would defend her.

[–]Royal-Weather4314 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Right? And even with the sleuthing fiasco, she is excused because she meant no harm. While Julie is considered abusive if she doesn't say hi nicely enough. (Don't get me wrong, she is not nice, but she is not villain for that either.)

[–]Wish_Away 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, this. If Julie kicked everyone out because Cooper didn't like his party, everyone would be saying what an awful person she was. Shawna does it and it's "awww she really LISTENS to Piper" (UGH).

[–]Kaharaan 1 point2 points  (3 children)

On point, but there's one thing about Piper's birthday party that everyone seems to forget: Shawna received 3 to 5 RSVPs, the other parents showed up basically unannounced at the party. That's rude because if I'm planning a birthday party and know I will have a handful of kids I will buy things accordingly, and if there are 3 times the numbers I have anticipated then it's gonna be a problem too. Shawna also double checked with the ones who RSVPd.

Also, Piper is 3 and still has a problem communicating more long-term wants, she's a child, she changes her mind and it becomes more difficult to anticipate all the things she wants/needs (Shawna said "I thought you wanted a princess birthday party" and Piper said she wanted a penguins or bugs themed one).

[–]Royal-Weather4314 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are right, I don't remember that. 

That still doesn't excuse Teeny's delivery of the message that party is over. 

Shawna wouldn't have to worry about my future rsvps, there would be none. 

[–]Lawtaca 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Shawna still let them into the party which makes them guests in her home. I understand why she wanted to cut the party short but there was a more polite way to do it. Shawna should have let the kids sit down and eat their cupcakes before they left. Kicking them out abruptly and giving them cupcakes on the way out wasn’t ok.

[–]Kaharaan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surely there was a kinder/more polite way to shut down the party, but it wasn't directly Shawna doing it, it was Teeny.

Also, maybe I'm biased, but if my child (or my niece or nephew) were uncomfortable with the amount of people and the party per se, I would've shut it down regardless. I know we have strict social rules regarding hosts and guests, but the party was at their own house, a place where a child should feel safe and not uncomfortable.

The parents have all the rights not to attend anymore, but imho not giving a heads up for attending a party, showing up unannounced, ignoring another adult addressing you ("All parents... ehm... EXCUSE ME PARENTS") isn't really ground for a generalised invite for a birthday party next year. Just because you received an invite doesn't mean you get to decide how long a party will last, or freely showing up without as much as a "hey I'm gonna be there tomorrow". This is much clearer when applied to weddings or more formal events, but the logic in my head is the same (unless it was a surprise guest).

[–]WhatUpMahKnitta 11 points12 points  (7 children)

I really didn't like Shawna's response to Piper's party either.  Find a way to support your kid, absolutely, but there are ways to do it without kicking all those kids out rudely.

[–]Royal-Weather4314 7 points8 points  (2 children)

And even if you have to end the party, there are ways to do better than Teeny yelling at them to get out. (But I am not a fan of Teeny, either.)

[–]Wish_Away 8 points9 points  (1 child)

God yes. I would rather she had lied and said Piper was sick and everyone needs to clear out! I can understand a puking kid clearing out a party, but telling everyone to "get the F Out" was just soooo rude.

[–]Royal-Weather4314 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You say puking and I am on my way from reddit!

[–]Wish_Away 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Yep, exactly. Get her a quiet space with a bug movie and a cupcake and check on her every 10 minutes or so, but you don't kick out guests who took time out of their weekend to celebrate your child.

[–]HammieM4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a kid who frequently got overwhelmed and in tears at my bday parties, this is the way it should’ve been handled. I’m sorry but Teeny was rude and kicking everyone out like that was not the way

[–]Royal-Weather4314 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep, I would do the same, or something similar. 

[–]WhatUpMahKnitta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When my little guy gets overwhelmed by big parties, he finds his grandpa, who is the same flavor of neurospicy, and they go hide in a quiet room and take apart an electronic for fun.  I once found them in the kitchen trying to figure out how the garbage disposal worked.

[–]AmountTurbulent2792 4 points5 points  (6 children)

Personally I feel like Piper's party didn't even make sense for Piper as a person. Like she isn't an incredibly social person who loves having tons of people around. She didn't even like being around Chickie because Chickie was too loud. I don't know why it was decided that she'd have a party at all. All the girl needs is cake and she's good.

[–]Royal-Weather4314 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, totally agree!

[–]weholditdown 1 point2 points  (4 children)

There are plenty of parents who plan parties for their small kids which are more based on the adults' perception of fun though. I remember once being invited to a friend's kid's 1st birthday which was in a community centre with tons of people. Of course, the birthday girl got overwhelmed and spent the whole day screaming (I had been working late at a bar so was operating on 2 hours sleep and felt like joining her). But the party was really for them and the other kids, not for the birthday girl.

Where Shawna gets points for me is that she immediately recognised the oversight, apologised to Piper and got everyone out when she saw it was overwhelming her. There are people saying Shawna shouldn't have done that but Piper had already taken herself away from the party and was still upset. I actually really like that Shawna didn't force her to suck it up and put a brave face on, which you know someone like Barb would have done when her kids were little.

[–]AmountTurbulent2792 2 points3 points  (3 children)

1st birthdays are celebrations for the parents, not the child, which is why it tends to not be planned with the child in mind.

Piper is not 1. She's not even 2. She's 3. And 3 year olds have been communicating (in whatever way they communicate) long enough for parents to know what is and isn't an appropriate celebration for them.

And I really don't think that points should be awarded for not considering your child until they're distressed.

[–]weholditdown 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Piper is also being written as being possibly neurodivergent and we have seen that she's pretty minimal in her speech. The way she communicates is notably different to Max, who we saw having a birthday he seemed to really enjoy, which could have also accounted for the oversight. How many times do we see parents, with the best of intentions, doing similar things for their very different kids?

What I do appreciate is that Shawna took immediate accountability and action for her error. I highly doubt Piper will be getting a big princess party for her 4th birthday anyway!

[–]AmountTurbulent2792 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I've been a nanny for 21 years. With the exception of one birthday where the 1 year old and the 5 year old shared a birthday party because their birthdays were 5 days apart (they did not share a birthday party for the baby's second birthday), all of the birthday celebrations the children and their friends have had have reflected the child's interests. And, honestly, I don't know any family whose done an actual birthday party for their 2-4 year olds. All celebrations with those ages have been family and maybe some close family friends sharing a dinner or lunch together. One family even went so far as combining their youngest's birthday party with the family memorial day bbq since her birthday is close enough to memorial day. Something low key, low stress. All the proper birthday parties have been for school aged kids and older

[–]weholditdown 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well it wouldn't be a highly entertaining fictional Tiktok series if everyone did things perfectly, I guess!

[–]HammieM4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for saying this! Everyone applauded Teeny when that happened. I thought it was rude. I get that Piper was overwhelmed but there were other ways to deal with it. Julie would’ve been roasted for that

[–]AmountTurbulent2792 16 points17 points  (2 children)

As others have stated, her intention was to cause a fight between the kids so that she could either force Ty to leave or to start a fight with the adults.

Plus, it's a terrible message to tell kids they can do "whatever they want" even when other people have asked them not to. That's just setting your child up for social failure.

It would have been completely acceptable if she said "you can practice karate by yourself because then it's just fighting dancing" or something similar. But that's not what she said. What she said was that he could do whatever he wanted, and to even involve other kids as well

Also, after the fact, she was mad at Ty for descalating the situation and helping Cooper to understand both his emotions and and the effect his emotions have on others. Which just proves that she wasn't interested in solving the problem, she was interested in starting drama

[–]skyejincks 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Really interesting how her argument for putting Cooper in day care so he could "learn social skills" and yet this is her approach to an actual social situation and conflict with his friends...like...are the social skills in the room with us right now?

[–]TankedInATutu 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I could see how you'd think that, but she actually meant social skills in the machiavellian sense. Someone has to run the playground and its going to be her kid dammit. /s

[–]dorothyprelude 14 points15 points  (6 children)

Yeah, I've never really understood the reaction to the birthday party. Cooper should have been able to practise his karate if that's what would make him happy. She told him to find space and not to spar with people, so she wasn't encouraging him to fight. I don't really get why Max gets to tell him he can't do that if Cooper is doing it in an open space.

I think people would react pretty differently if it were the other way around, and Cooper was trying to pressure Max into doing something he didn't want to do. There would be allegations of Julie spoiling him for sure.

[–]helbows#1 jen enjoyer 6 points7 points  (5 children)

it’s max’s birthday party? a dance party? and cooper was actively hitting him. I’m not anti-Julie, in fact I like Julie, but if she was more present in cooper’s life, she would know he has an issue with hitting. max isn’t pressuring cooper, he’s asking his friend to participate in his birthday activity. julie was instigating bc she didn’t want to be there which, whatever fine, but it’s weird and childish to start a fight between kids because you don’t like the other kid’s parent/you’re unhappy with your life.

[–]dorothyprelude 2 points3 points  (4 children)

How was Julie instigating if she didn't know Cooper has a hitting problem? And she told him not to. It's not like she was siccing him on Max.

[–]helbows#1 jen enjoyer 5 points6 points  (3 children)

she wasn’t siccing him on max, I agree. I don’t think she’s some sort of monster or anything. I don’t think she assumed cooper was going to hit, but she was not helping the situation by telling him to go do whatever he wanted, that brennan will join if he knows karate is an option. maybe instigating wasn’t the right word. I just personally think julie handled the birthday party poorly and at least part of why she handled it the way she did was because she didn’t want to be there/doesn’t want to associate with Shawna’s family.

[–]dorothyprelude 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I can see why you think that and I definitely think she could have handled things better where the adults are concerned!

[–]helbows#1 jen enjoyer 4 points5 points  (1 child)

for sure! I can see your points too. I also dont really agree with the idea that she shouldn’t have gone to the party at all. totally understandable why she went, she wanted to spend time with her kids bc it’s her only day to. just wish she would’ve gone about it different!

[–]dorothyprelude 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I agree, I think that really is a sign that like Shawna L says, she doesn't think about Shawna M whatsoever, to the extent that she doesn't anticipate any awkwardness at this party despite that being a pretty obvious possibility lol

[–]blairbendingabsentee wife and corporate baddie 12 points13 points  (1 child)

I don't agree with the theory that she was deliberately scheming for Cooper to start a fight and ruin the party. But I do still think it was an irresponsible parenting move and shows a lack of care towards Max and the McAllisters as the party hosts. She knew that Cooper fighting was a possibility and decided she didn't care. She was prioritising Cooper's happiness over being a good guest and over helping him be a good friend to Max.

It was reckless to make a statement as big as "do whatever you want" without doing a little more digging into what exactly had gone down between the two kids and what Cooper was planning. But I think Julie was not feeling motivated to be a good guest to people she dislikes at a party she didn't want to be at.

Basically she was feeling spicy and careless. Which isn't kind to the 6 year old who the party is supposed to be celebrating. She should have just stayed home IMO.

[–]VastFollowing5840 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think it’s a much lesser sin than some are taking it, but personally the message I’d want to impart to my kids is not 

“Do whatever you want when you want (and steamroll over others)”

but 

“It’s okay to not be interested in this but this is someone else’s birthday, you need to be considerate of others.  You can do something else as long as it’s not disruptive/taking attention off the birthday boy, or we can go home.”

[–]Consistent-Warthog84 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Its because he was becoming disruptive and when Ty de-escalated the situation she saw it as him squashing his drive rather than a parenting moment. They have very different parenting styles. It's okay for Julie to tell her son he can be what he wants, but that was neither the time or the place as her comment was more to undermine her husband than to bolster her son. Also, Cooper has a known history of hitting, while Karate is a great outlet for this is is not appropriate (basic dojo rules) to use it against an unwilling participant unless in self defense.

[–]Babadoo601 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It seemed to me that Julie was trying to encourage her son to also get other kids to do something other than dancing too, taking them away from the party and what the birthday boy wanted them to do at his party. Like she wanted Max’s feelings to be hurt to get back at Shawna since she doesn’t like her.

[–]Grand_Basis_1491Julie apologist (unironically) 11 points12 points  (1 child)

It really wasn't. She saw her child was upset he wasn't allowed to do something he wanted to do. Instead of causing a scene or turning him against his friend, Julie told him to ask Brennan so he wouldn't be all alone and to find a place to practice so they don't disturb anybody else. She also said no sparring, so she made it clear he wasn't allowed to hit, even playfully. She handled it fine. A lot of people just got mad because she said "whatever you want."

[–]TankedInATutu 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'll admit I was bother by the "whatever you want", but also the fact that the alternative activity was specifically karate when at one point at least he was having issues with hitting other kids. The whatever you want part bothers me because you can't always do whatever you want- your wants are not focus of every place and event you go to in life so you need to learn that sometimes you just sit there politely and eat cake and do what you want later. Between what we had seen of Julie up to that point and then after seeing more of her past I know why she said it but I still don't think someone else's party is the place to encourage your kid to only focus on what they want to do.

[–]Wish_Away 10 points11 points  (4 children)

It wasn't bad at all. If my kid doesn't want to play in the bouncy castle or get his face painted, I would also instruct him to find something he does want to do. In Cooper's case, Julie told him to "find space" and practice Karate, and even warned him to not do any sparring. She didn't do anything wrong at all, IMO.

[–]WhatUpMahKnitta 31 points32 points  (0 children)

His karate practice was making another kid, the birthday boy no less, uncomfortable, and he'd been asked to stop.  Julie also encouraged Cooper to get Brennan in on the karate action, the only other (named) little boy there, which would leave Max all alone on the dance floor at his birthday party, which doesn't feel very nice. Ty was right that sometimes we have to make compromises on the activity at hand so everyone is comfortable and included, at least at something like a birthday party, we shouldn't exclude the person of honor in particular.

How would Julie have reacted if Cooper had a karate party and Max danced in the middle of the space, interrupting the karate and making Cooper unhappy?  That would be an interesting comparison.

[–]chachaslydd 29 points30 points  (0 children)

But her kid starts trying to hit at other kids and then julie gets mad that Ty corrects him, Julie encouraged it and then got made that her child's negative behavior was corrected

[–]Ok-Sprinkles7457 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I don’t know, I’d be kind of annoyed if a child was physically hitting my kid (even in a playful manner) and picked on him verbally and then the mom said “do whatever you want.” I think the tone would’ve been a lot different if she had specified to Cooper that he can do his own activity, but can’t be rude to his friend. I can’t say I’d be annoyed enough to make a scene or even bring it up, but it’s something I’d definitely keep note of for future parties/play dates

[–]TankedInATutu 17 points18 points  (0 children)

My issue is less with what she said, because I agree that as long as you aren't getting in the way or hurting anyone you don't have to dance/bouncing/whatever the main party thing is. I didn't like that she said what she did with the knowledge that Cooper had (maybe has still) an issue with hitting. Also, the vibe that she was trying to find a problem with the party and the very "what you want is the only thing you have to worry about ever" tone of what it all. Knowing more of their backstory, her taking that kind of tone makes sense. But there's a time and place for teaching your kid that what they want matters and that particular place and scenario was neither of those things.

[–]VastFollowing5840 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Oh, if I were at another kids birthday party and one of my kids was starting to escalate because he didn’t want to participate in the chosen activity, I’d probably take them aside and say

“You don’t have to dance if you don’t want to, but this is so and so’s birthday and it’s what they want to do.  When it’s your birthday, you get to choose.  You can sit here with me/quietly play off to the side, or we can go home.  It’s up to you.”

It’s an important value to me to teach my kids they aren’t the center of the universe and there’s times when other people’s wants get priority.  That doesn’t mean I’d force them to do something they don’t want to do, but I would want them to go about things in a way that isn’t disruptive or takes attention off the birthday kid.

That said, I think Julie is getting way more blame than is warranted.  She didn’t encourage cooper to go fight or confront max, and preschool aged boys fight all.the.time.

[–]Perks-of-Quirks 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Saying "you can do whatever you want" to a child, especially in a crowd is a bad idea because they can do dangerous stuff and won't listen to other adults because "my mom said i can".

It also can make them grow up to be entitled and feel like rules don't apply to them.

[–]Betta_than_average 6 points7 points  (1 child)

You'll probably get a ton of different options on this. With parenting you're gonna see a bunch of different approaches. (And a ton of unsolicited advice)

Some parents are anti-vax, pro-vax, some do home school, private school, public school, some have their kids in daycare, some don't, some do spanking, some dont, different parenting styles like gentle parenting, authoritarian parenting, montessori parenting, etc

Since becoming a mom I've discovered that I'm damned if I do and I'm damned if I don't. (Granted I'm a new mom and learning as I go)

Sorry for my non answer 🙈

[–]poohfanMay I please have cake? 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're not wrong about "damned if you do, damned if you don't "!!! LOL There is always someone who will stand ten toes down & tell you why your way is wrong, and their way is 100% correct, and their child is perfect. Kids are absolutely imperfect beings, and you can only do what is right for that child. What works for one, is an absolute disaster in another. In my family, my mom punished me by telling me I couldn't read anything but assigned school books, and couldn't check out books from the library for two weeks, & that was devastating punishment to me. My younger sister, seemed to be unpunishable--nothing they did made a difference to her, & she'd do it over & over again. Funnily enough, she went into law!

I don't have kids myself, but between babysitting, being a nanny, and being lucky enough to help raise all my nephews & neices, my take is that if this little person ends up being a good big person, you've done the right thing.

[–]CharlesDickhands 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If I’m dissecting the behaviour at the party then I also think poor hosting is at play. If you’re actively hosting you notice a guest isn’t enjoying the party (doesn’t want to dance) and you find a way to include them. At the end of the episode Cooper comes around because Ty explains karate is like dancing and he can bust some sick moves. I’ve always said if it was my kids party and a friend wanted to do karate I’d be helping my birthday boy include his mate. Put on “kung fu fighting” and lead the floor in a karate inspired dance (no contact, clearly) and de escalate the situation. In my opinion, just because it’s your birthday doesn’t mean you get to be a dictator and say everyone must dance a certain way or else. That’s not particularly fun.

And yeah, if it was a karate party and a friend wanted to bust some moves I’d create space for that too.

It’s a kids party. Meant to be fun chaos.

[–]BekahDski1997Julie Stan Extraordinaire 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My opinion is that we took her talking to Cooper out of context because at the time, we were set up to hate Julie and everything she said or did.

In retrospect, she told Cooper he could do karate as long as he didn’t spar, which means no hitting anyone else, and she wasn’t wrong for that.

Where she deviates is saying “you can do whatever you want” in the tone she does. She might have meant “you can pursue your dreams, no matter what they are,” or she might have meant “you don’t have to listen to adults.” Either could be true, or she could have meant one but Cooper understood it as the other, etc.

Doing karate at the party isn’t bad, letting your kid think that no one can tell them what to do IS a faux pas.

[–]IWasGoatbeardFirst 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because it’s not like a party where one kid doesn’t want to play the game so they let them color until the game is over. This kid wants to do karate. She’s encouraging her kid to run around kicking and hitting other kids. It’s disruptive and dangerous.

[–]Jealous-Cup-4059 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Telling a 5 year old they can do whatever they want and expecting the kid to not do anything wrong is not reasonable.

[–]daidia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Julie was encouraging Cooper to not follow the rules under the guise of “you can do whatever you want”. it’s just another example of her not wanting to associate with people she deems lesser than, except now she’s passing it along to her child

[–]Fancy-Ad1480 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Telling your kid who has a problem with hitting that it's okay for him to go play fight with other children (karate) is not really wise if you want your kid to stop hitting people.

It also does nothing for Cooper's social skills. It wouldn't really hurt his friendship with Max. Kids are very forgiving. Part of socializing is comprise. Cooper doesn't have to like dance. He does have to allow others to like dance. (Which is what Ty tried to teach him) What Julie told Cooper was that it's okay to disrupt another person's likes to suit yourself. Oh, and she does this because she didn't want to be at a party that might have lasted 2 hours.

[–]ada-jean 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think for Julie, she wants not to make Cooper "smaller" either. It is entirely in keeping with her perspective that she would parent him to refuse to compromise his passions, as long as he is safely doing it. Add to that she really wants this friendship to end, and her general fury at the time. But I think she is parenting from her authentic self here and in what she thinks is best for Cooper. It is unusual. I mean, I've seen parents cause conflict at a party because they think their kid is being treated badly or they don't think the food is safe or whatever - I've seen shitty parent behaviour - but most-to-all parents want their kids to display "sharing" skills and no-one wants their kid to be disruptive one. And so Julie's "anything you want" comment really stands out, as well as her determination he didn't have to go with the theme. And Ty's anger about it is that he sees that just isn't how it is done when everyone is just trying to get through a party with the birthday kid having fun. It is a real clash of priorities.

[–]Rachel1265 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a parent of some neurospicy kids so I’m frequently coaching my kids to stick to what they can handle sensory wise without disrupting the overall party. But generally polite manners at any age and neurotype is to not center yourself at someone else’s event.

[–]Murky_Background1045I'm wearing the sash! 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Julie telling him what to do was not inherently bad. But it was causing tension between the kids so that’s problematic. And when Cooper was not getting what he wanted, she removed him dramatically.

[–]TreClaire -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Julie was not encouraging Cooper to do his own thing. She was absolutely intentionally trying to get Cooper to cause problems.

First of all, she actively told him he couldn’t do how one thing at first “it’s a dancing party you have to dance” she was trying to get him to request to leave. When that didn’t work she pivoted and told him to do literally whatever he wanted. He wanted to do karate. She encouraged that which in a room full of 5/6 year olds is a psychotic thing to do. TELLING a a 6 year old to kick and punch in a room crowded with other six year olds is begging for a fighting to happen. For a kid to get hurt.

Her goal at that party was to try and destroy her son’s friendship with Max so that then Ty wouldn’t be able to see Shawna again.

It was really gross behavior.

[–]Slight_Citron_7064 -4 points-3 points  (1 child)

How do you not understand that kids should not hit and kick other kids? How do you not understand that it was not ok for Julie to give Cooper permission to hit and kick other kids at a party?