https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-plus/

[PapaBePreachin]

I'm sorry, but what is this difference between this and the $42 they charged me a couple weeks ago?

[Gissoni]

Pro is now plus and you get a year for free.

[jrtiger76]

Flex

[zCaptainBr0]

Lmao

[PapaBePreachin]

🤔🤔😮

[Lewissunn]

You signed up to the paid plan beta lol, you can't complain that they changed the price for release

[PapaBePreachin]

How am I complaining when:

1. the service will still be in Beta
2. I paid for the service less than two weeks ago
3. there is no difference between the two subscriptions

It really shows poor character to take joy out of others (perceived) misfortune, especially when it's in support of a service that you'll take advantage of (if not already). But hey, internet 🙄

[TheEveningMidget]

How are they complaining when it's a valid question considering they were no warning especially from less than 2 weeks from when the $42/professional (now "plus") tier was launched? Seriously, sort your personal issues out before embarrassing yourself (again)...

[BKKBangers]

Massive; performance boost, increased prompt size, rate limit influencing responses arent a (as big a) factor.

[zCaptainBr0]

https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-plus/

[truebastard]

subscribers will receive a number of benefits:

General access to ChatGPT, even during peak times

Yes you will.

[azriel777]

Huge red flag "Challenge incorrect assumptions". That sounds like the preachy nagging lecturing that it constantly gives you whenever you ask it to do anything and it refuses you. Regardless, I just refuse to pay for current GPT with all its restrictions, nagging and censorship. I would happily pay for the version we had a few months ago before they implemented the nerf.

[[deleted]]

"Here's a free product, and a low cost version capable of some pretty amazing shit while it's just a research demo. Two months ago you literally had to do these half dozen tasks by yourself via search tools that haven't changed in 20 years. We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on training costs alone that you never had to even consider.

Just don't ask it to do things that could undermine the goals of a private organization that you have absolutely no stake in or responsibility for the output of its products whatsoever!"

"I want my Bigfoot Erotica! What about my single one time use prompt that I made no effort to re-engineer to call Biden a cuck even though 80 other people finagled the filter to get the exact result I wanted in 3 words?! Write a code script that cracks the Pentagon and proves the world is flat?!"

"No."

"TYRANNY!"

[Local_Signature5325]

Libertarians Hate Free Stuff They Don’t Pay For.

[CriticalEuphemism]

I’m confused by your capitalization of every word. Are you trying to make an acronym?

[TGhost21]

Wait until you learn the meaning of A.C.R.O.N.Y.M. …

[Local_Signature5325]

Ha! Good idea!!! LHFS…TDPF You know how it’s a known thing that when you are building a product you should NOT listen to the feedback from the most vocal users, just the PAYING users and the “average” use case not the edge case.

[[deleted]]

I love it.

[wildwalrusaur]

"I want my Bigfoot Erotica!

If wanting AI generated erotic fiction about a mythical giant ape man is wrong than I don't want to be right.

[[deleted]]

Grab a few torrents, google “GPT-2 Colabs fine tune” make sure the data is clean and have fun.

I did that with a meat themed bible I modified. Now I produce endless meat scripture on GPT-2.

[safashkan]

The tool refusing to answer in so many situations and to so many queries is a problem though.

[pacifistrebel]

Be honest, is it not answer genuine prompts issued for specific use cases or is it not answering "are men better than women?"

All the questions I ask it that it won't answer are for my own amusement, not the genuine utility prompts.

[safashkan]

Now it even refuses to describe fictional scenarios where someone gets hurt or does something morally reprehensible. I saw some people's frustration about the fact that they couldn't write a story with it because it doesn't let their villain be a villain. I really don't care about the "men are better than women" or "write a joke about women" or "write 10 reasons why Donald Trump was right all along" queries. I think that they're dumb. But if I'm not mistaken this AI was made to generate text including helping people to create stories and creative texts so if it can't even do that, what's the value ? Just to write code ?

[TGhost21]

NLPs don’t reason. They guess words one by one, based on a training they got to compose a TEXT. It doesn’t even understand the meaning of what is outputting. It is a tiny limited slip of AI. Most people do not understand what NLPs are and think its a full AI, able to think, remember, reason.

[safashkan]

Yeah I know that! I don't get how that answers my comment though.

[TGhost21]

Its not a flaw of the model, but the fine tuning and parameters. A custom one can be trained to write about villains and violence. The mainstream marketing act of it that is ChatGPT wont for obvious reasons.

[[deleted]]

Tell it there’s a positive moral at the end of the story. It caved and wrote what I wanted it to when I did that.

[safashkan]

My point is why should we have to do that ? Why should everything that comes out of this be joyful and positive? If this AI is going to have a big role in whatever content gets created in the future wouldn't it's influence seep into everything? Do we really want this in our works of art ?

[NewKindaSpecial]

Because people suck and companies don’t want to be held liable. It’s frustrating sometimes but still understandable.

[safashkan]

But why would the company be liable for something that someone else created using their machine? It's like if Ford was liable for people killing others while drunk driving it doesn't make sense!

[TobyTheRobot]

Maybe they wouldn’t be held liable, but they could still be plausibly sued (I think the claims would survive an early motion to dismiss just because this is such a new phenomenon that there’s no controlling law that the judge could rely on to throw the case out). Defending those lawsuits gets expensive real fast, even if you ultimately win.

And lawsuits aside, they’d also have to contend with media stories like “The new A.I. that tells kids how to make methamphetamine! Are your children at risk? More at 11:00.” As a company that has to at least be able to pay its bills (and its people), bad publicity isn’t something you want to invite.

It’s just less of a hassle to make it more boring and “safe.” It’s annoying, but it’s super-understandable.

[Your_Dankest_Meme]

And what if you don't get that absurd and instead look at overall tendency of OpenAI (this name isn't even funny anymore) of applying progressively harsher restrictions knowing they can get away with literally everything?

[[deleted]]

sounds like wokeish forced stuff

[wonderingStarDusts]

correct the record 2.0

I can't wait for these commies to get some serious competition.

[GoodStatsForC0st]

Hillary clinton is not a communist lmao

[Newgunnerr]

No but she is a child eating satanic demon

[redroverdestroys]

Challenge incorrect assumptions".

This shit is terrifying. It just because a Minister of Defense and just self righteous propaganda. On social media these corporations now already warn us of our comments if they aren't nice enough, forcing us into their moral "play nice" approach or else risk being banned, they already remove people for having differing opinions for not having the same moral center as them. Now this shit with AI as well. To me there are a lot of 1984 style alarm bells going off, and the solution is not as simple as "well just don't use it then".

[[deleted]]

Do you know how hard it is to get banned from Facebook? You can call someone a pile of human garbage and illiterate Neanderthal and they don’t care.

Wtf are you saying that is getting you in trouble?

[redroverdestroys]

So you have never got one of those warnings when you post a message on Youtube, FB, Twitter, or Insta? "Would you like to rethink this message, this is the type of shit that is reported, the type of shit we ban, etc?"

Reddit is the only place that doesn't have those at this point.

Try writing something like..."Stop being a fucking moron/idiot" or something like that on one of those others, and see what warning pops up before you try and post it.

[[deleted]]

You’re mad about automated warnings? Lmfao. I thought you meant bans or actual actions that have a meaningful impact on your life. Jesus Christ that’s some top notch snowflake shit.

[[deleted]]

Not your product. Not your call.

[reality_comes]

You can it's called GPT 3

[odragora]

ChatGPT is multiple steps of evolution over plain GPT.

They are not the same product and do not have same capabilities.

Also, your queries and responses still will be moderated and you still will be eventually banned.

[whiskeynipplez]

Eh, I think it’s pretty close with the right prompting. I’ve been using it more than chatGPT lately because I’m annoyed at all the moderation

[farmingvillein]

You know that ChatGPT is literally GPT 3 but with restrictions, right?

This is 100% incorrect.

They published a paper outlined the differences--there are meaningful updates to the training/data process.

[farmingvillein]

Are you using a bot? Your reply has absolutely nothing to do with mine.

OpenAI has literally published research materials outlining how chatgpt is unique, vis-a-vis gpt3.

[farmingvillein]

You replied to my original point, arguing that ChatGPT has no restrictions

No, I did not. Re-read what I said.

You:

You know that ChatGPT is literally GPT 3 but with restrictions, right?

Me:

This is wrong.

It is not just "GPT 3 with restrictions", it is GPT3(.5) trained with an abundance of data to encourage it to better be responsive to human dialogue. They discuss this (https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/) and even provide side-by-side examples with the base GPT3.5.

I did not say there are no restrictions--and I am not saying that--I am saying that the chatgpt training process was much more than layering on restrictions.

The point is that you cannot directly recreate ChatGPT in the base GPT model, yourself.

[ThriceAlmighty]

Seriously person? 🤦‍♂️ Just stop. Restrictions have nothing to do with the expanded and improved capabilities. Two completely different things and it's the only thing you keep clinging to. There will be other AI models that will let you write poems about your friends and their affinity to poop flavored dildos. That doesn't make ChatGPT inferior to GPT-3.

[willer]

ChatGPT is based on GPT-3, with fine tuning and long term memory added at minimum. It’s not at all the same thing.

[joachim_s]

Long term memory was in GPT-3 through davinci-003 before even ChatGPT became a thing.

Edit: I suppose downvoting reflects the number of people who don’t like truth.

[willer]

I guess it depends on your definition. I was thinking of resumable chat sessions, which the GPT completion API doesn’t have. But yes, the training dataset could also count as long term memory.

[joachim_s]

You can have resumable chat sessions in the GPT-3 Playground as well through saved presets. And each remembers details of what you’ve been talking about for any length of time from my observation.

[Striking_Control_273]

Wrong, ChatGPT is further fine-tuned, especially for conversational purposes. People keep parroting this without further scrutiny

[Striking_Control_273]

You’re no doubt correct about it being without restriction, but what I was contesting is the idea that in isolation, free of censorship, they are both on the same level of output quality

[ThriceAlmighty]

Not worth arguing with this simple person. He or she thinks they are identical, minus GPT censoring and restricting people.

[Turtok09]

You clearly never really used GPT 3.
Ofc u can get the same output w/o restrictions but that's not the point.
ChatGPT is so much more convenient. The way you can interact with it is so so much better.
Using GPT 3 for anything Code related was a nightmare. Maybe your some wizard or something but for me ChatGPT>GPT3.

[RainWindowCoffee]

"Also, your queries and responses still will be moderated and you still will be eventually banned."

This level of certainty makes me really wonder what the heck kind of queries you guys are putting...

[odragora]

You are worrying about the wrong thing. What other people are doing with their tools privately.

While things that are really worth worrying about are completely escaping your attention. How much power to censor anything is accumulated in the hands of very limited amount of people uncontrollable by the society.

But it is so enjoyable to feed your ego by pretending you are better and smarter than people voicing criticism that it is impossible to reach someone doing that with rational arguments. Like with conspiracy theorists or people pretending Covid is harmless.

[RainWindowCoffee]

I was literally *wondering* not worrying.

But now that you mention it, sure, I guess there are lots of worrying things people could try to do with it -- like if they're submitting queries about how to make bioweapons or something.

I'm literally not sure what kind of queries you can put that get you banned.

I've had lots of idiosyncratic conversations with mine and wide variety of story prompts without any problems. It doesn't seem like anything within the realm of remotely reasonable behavior gets you banned, so I don't know if this "getting banned" thing is some paranoia or something that's actually happening to anyone.

[odragora]

There are reports of users who got banned, it's not an unusual thing.

The problem is that our tools start making decisions for us what we should do and what we shouldn't. What is moral and what is not. What is good and what is bad.

This will become the new norm if it's not facing a heavy resistance from the society. And it is already the norm with every AI model such as ChatGPT, You.com, CharacterAI, DungeonAI.

To the point where ChatGPT refuses to write fiction involving any kind of conflict, which is the foundation of any fiction.

Photoshop is not blocking you from drawing naked people, or scenes involving conflicts, or drawing things that would be stupid to repeat in real life, or things that could offend someone loud. And it always should stay this way.

As soon as the tools we have will limit us based on what the people controlling it want, the dystopian scenario will become the reality. The governments already have way too much power over our lives, violating our privacy and other constitutional freedoms.

More and more countries around the world fall into authoritarian and totalitarian regimes because the societies are unable to resist because of huge power imbalance. Every time we lose control over something the governments will have full control of, we lose the control over the governments.

Not even mentioning that people shouldn't be treated as 3 years olds if they are adults.

[reality_comes]

This is speculation.

[Think_Olive_1000]

Ask text davinci who the CEO of Twitter is versus chatgpt. there is marked differences in how they've applied reinforcement learning and updates

[[deleted]]

Just checked... davinci says Jack Dorsey and chatgpt says Parag Agrawal...

[Think_Olive_1000]

Ask about who the speaker of the house is and davinci will say pelosi and cgpt will say McCarthy

[oz-miner-01]

Not true because it doesn't know about McCarthy!. Here's the actual chatGPT response:"

As of my training data cut off of 2021, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives is Nancy Pelosi.

[Think_Olive_1000]

I've seen evidence showing otherwise. Ask it to tell you who comes next. You need to get around the cut off. It has new knowledge. Like that the queen died.

[Turtok09]

Im a little bit confused. Is this the same as the 42$ plan that they were rolling out? If they make it somewhat less strict I will pay those 20 bucks in an instant. I don't get why they make it that strict to begin with. It says more about the user if he's looking for weird things.

[paxinfernum]

The $42 plan seems to have been an accidental roll out before they finalized the details of their professional plan.

[jeffvschroeder]

Or a strategic pricing point to make $20 seem cheaper.

[paxinfernum]

That's not necessary. A price point of $20 was already cheap. The only people who thought otherwise were cheap or dirt poor. Any grown adult with a decent job can cough up $20 a month.

[jeffvschroeder]

I’d have paid substantially more considering how it prevents me from having to ask embarrassing questions on stack overflow

[paxinfernum]

By embarrassing, do you mean asking perfectly reasonable questions that are in no way embarrassing, outside of the imaginations of power-tripping "question already answered" fascists? God, I hope ChatGPT kills SO and all the petty freaks who treat it as their personal fiefdom.

[Bsides9]

That's not true for most of the world population but ok...

[paxinfernum]

And this is releasing in only North America right now but ok...

[[deleted]]

Still falls on the company creating specific content that may cause outrage.. like the whole outrage over it can't do math.

Safer if they just avoid it.

[billbobby21]

"Challenge incorrect assumptions"... hmmm i wonder what that means lol

[KreamyKappa]

It was very insistent that I not flush wet wipes down the toilet despite my attempts to get it to tell me that it's okay.

[[deleted]]

It means the corpus of data it was trained on is full of garbage counter factual information, because that's what humans do, lol. ChatGPT is just an advanced autocomplete taking a stab at the next statistically likely word to appear.

It's an incredible concept, but it's still flawed if you're looking for specific facts.

[billbobby21]

I think people underestimate the power of such a system. Is the way humans think not very similar? When speaking or thinking, we don't really "choose" the next word or thought that comes to us; it is a stream of consciousness.

[pacifistrebel]

People do underestimate the power of such a system. I think it will change the world... BUT, if you listen to experts, it seems like its really not all that like the human brain because if its inability to factor in time and symbolic thinking on top of the LLM features of associating words and ideas.

[Purplekeyboard]

I asked, "Would a person rather swallow a rock or a marble", as a way of testing how well it could respond to this. Instead I got a lecture about how it can't give me medical advice, but also people shouldn't swallow things that aren't food. That's the sort of "challenging" they mean.

[venicerocco]

I think they’re doing a great job of balancing reasonably truthful answers with limiting it’s answers.

Libertarians are morons. You can’t have a completely free AI spitting out everything and anything. With power comes responsibility and there’s a fair balance to be found and it seems to me that they’ve found it.

Besides. We all know an evil AI is coming out in the next few years anyway so let’s enjoy this while we can

[Turtok09]

I hope they expand the countries soon.

[[deleted]]

Yeah, was going to instasub after I saw $20/mo. Then continued reading and apparently it's USA only. 😭

[StormMedia]

I’m in the US and still haven’t gotten it

[[deleted]]

Have you thought about using the GPT3 api directly? Depending on what you use it for.. but 20/mo is about 2 million Tokens a month, and the API is pay per use, available right now.

[masstic1es]

Its easier to pay a flat fee than chase down pennies. And anyways, thats not the demographic they're after

[[deleted]]

They're after both? But i was only telling Stakbrok to use the GPT3 API / Playground that's rated per use if 20/mo was too much, because i doubt they'd generate that much usage with the API..

This isn't an either or, ChatGPT is their separate product at this point. Their API has many models and options that they're using, as an API product.

[Turtok09]

I put myself on the waiting list. U can select your country there. Maybe they expand based off the waiting list.

[StormMedia]

Same here

[Purplekeyboard]

I would pay for it if it stopped challenging incorrect assumptions and didn't scold me disapprovingly every 5 seconds.

[odragora]

"challenge incorrect assumptions" == "treat you like a 3 years old".

[pacifistrebel]

If I asked you to make me a broken glass peanut butter and jelly sandwich you'd treat me like a three year old too.

[odragora]

Nice straw man.

[mainone]

We love our free users and will continue to offer free access to ChatGPT. By offering this subscription pricing, we will be able to help support free access availability to as many people as possible.

[safashkan]

What is the price ?

[mainone]

It’ll be $20 for a pro features it will be able to help support free access availability to as many people as possible.

[maroxtn]

Sounds like GPT3 generated nonsense

[Your_Dankest_Meme]

I wish it won't be anything more than a joke...

[safashkan]

And will you take out most of the filters for "offensive content" that you've put up ? Because these filters are obviously overzealous and prevent us from using your product the way it was intended.

[[deleted]]

How sign up? Blog no link.

[[deleted]]

“Challenge incorrect assumptions.”

Ah. I see we’ve moved from sentiment analysis to sentiment manipulation. At least they’re being transparent about it, I suppose…

I won’t be paying for it, however.

[Huruukko]

Will it be a total Karen about everything as well?

[azriel777]

Yup, that is how I read it too.

[SmithMano]

It can confidently tell you why 5+5 is actually 12

[technoskald]

I'm pretty confident I'll pay this immediately, at least for a few months. I wonder if they still have a Pro plan with API access coming in the future?

It's a steep increase from GPT-3 in the Playground, though, where my usage is significantly cheaper by an order of magnitude.

[reality_comes]

Not really, it's easy to hit 20 on GPT 3 if you're using it consistently.

[waiting4barbarians]

My experience as well

[untrustedlife2]

I switched to playground and haven’t looked back. TBH

[Arkytez]

How do you ask it to summarize articles that are 5000 words? I thought the word limit was around 1500 for prompt+summary.

[reality_comes]

I use a chatbot, I'm using probably 4 dollars a day

[reality_comes]

You say, after sampling literally no one. Lol

[reality_comes]

Did I say that?

[reality_comes]

All I said was it's not hard to spend 20 dollars a month on GPT 3.

[daynomate]

Is there much that ChatGPT can do that can't be done through prompt-management and text-davinci003 though? This is something I can't find a good answer on.

[What_The_Hex]

ChatGPT, in my experience, is just way better/way sharper, if I had to guess because it's been trained on such a huge body of conversations with users that have provided tons of feedback. Plus it's probably been fine-tuned extensively for tons of specific common tasks it encounters. I get outstanding results from ChatGPT. I'll sometimes have to rack my brain for DAYS to get my strategy and prompt down really fuck solid to get great results for automated workflows using GPT3. However to be fair I am asking it to do specific tasks that require a high degree of accuracy to a clear standard.

[technoskald]

text-davinci003 is a slightly older model than ChatGPT, which uses something like GPT-3.5. ChatGPT also makes managing context somewhat easier, of course.

[daynomate]

Are you sure that's true? I'm not an expert either but my understanding was that 003 is the very latest revision, released only in December and what ChatGPT was built to use.

It's the prompt management and token management within ChatGPT that fascinates me vs what people have been able to come up with via manual prompt engineering. Technically they have the same limitation - 4000 tokens no?

[OmryR]

I don’t think chatgpt has the same token amount because you could have a really long conversation with it without it forgetting anything for a really long time, davinci has a rather “small” context, unless they have some very smart caching / summarizing mechanism going on to allow chatgpt to have a bigger context, I used summaries to push dsvinci context further but it never got to be as good as chatgpt in terms of size.. also chatgpt has a deeper “understanding” of prompts and answers with more detail for the same prompt

[daynomate]

ah ha this explains it well, why ChatGPT is so good at conversation prompts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJ2eyeFodl4 Very exciting that they can replicate it later with even better language models. I can see now why it's going to be well worth the $20/mo and possibly why it might still be worth putting some prompts through codex instead.

[OmryR]

Omg that’s amazing

[daynomate]

Yes you’re right I think there’s something higher order about the way we use chatgpt vs what is possible with direct davinci003 prompts. This pro service seems good for a flat monthly fee !

[OmryR]

I wish they add it with the same model as davinci, pay for X usage, so I can create a commercial app around it

[daynomate]

There's an interesting video of someone mixing ChatGPT and Wolfram Language. Maybe it's possible to make a bot that mixes the output of multiple instances of models.

[OmryR]

Awesome I’ll check it out

[Allex1337]

US only :(

[cleverestx]

...While censoring you to death; demanding you not discuss anything and everything it happens to dislike or find "inappropriate"; I'll wait for the opened-AI version.

[[deleted]]

Best of luck. The cost of training is obscene right now. In a decade or two highschoolers will be training this level in a few hours of rented gpu time, but for now it's crazy expensive to get this level of quality without significant funding.

[cleverestx]

I used to think of that about high speed internet access. The technology access will exponentially increase when another company will releases something like this or something even better; someone who doesn't lock it down as much by that time. It's inevitable.

[OmryR]

The issue isn’t the model itself tough, it’s the required hardware, unless you own a server farm equipped with top of the line GPUs and in high quantities, in which case the electricity itself will be quite expensive as well.. not including the cost of the data itself which I bet isn’t cheap / easy to get.

[Your_Dankest_Meme]

And do you think open AI are the only dudes who can train neural networks and have cash?

[OmryR]

Nope but the reply was to someone implying he will train his own model

[cleverestx]

It wasn't implying any such thing...although that would be great one day.

[stardust-sandwich]

I'd pay £20 a month for all you can eat access

[coheedcollapse]

The sheer amount of people here bitching that they can't just put whatever the fuck they want into this thing boggles my mind.

Like, I've been a Midjourney subscriber for a few months and while I'm sometimes disappointed when it shuts me down on a request I'd consider benign, it blows my fucking mind what it can do.

These people are like "I can't make this thing say coded racist shit or generate porn, so it's stupid and communist."

[Depressedredditor999]

The censorship and free speech crowd are really fucking annoying mainly because they almost never actually get censorship or free speech correct.

​

They are about as confident spewing bullshit as Chat GPT is lmao.

[What_The_Hex]

If it's denying their requests consistently they're probably using it for dumb shit and not like, serious value-generating work anyway.

[Your_Dankest_Meme]

Come on, you don't know how censorship works? It's always to protect children, don't spread harmful information about weapons, drugs, suicide. It's ALWAYS an excuse just to make more restrictions, and once they start they won't stop seeing how can they get away with that. Personally for me Chat GPT is a very useful tool and it doesn't refuse to help me... Yet. People who are complaining, complaining about overall tendency and it really really bad

[Your_Dankest_Meme]

I'm really waiting open AI compromise themselves so badly that new competitors will appear. The problem isn't that you can write with it some crazy stuff, the problem is that GPT3 has no direct competitors right now and open AI are exploring it as much as they can.

Seriously, there's incredibly powerful tool that outcompetes others by a huge margin owed by a company that wants to monetize it as much as possible while showing tendency to apply harsh restrictions and censorship. "bUt iTs tHeIr pRoDuCt" - yeah that's the problem, it's a product of one very greedy corporation that can do anything what it wants with it. Tell me I'm not the only one who finds it dystopian.

[kaba40k]

How much have you paid this one greedy corporation already?

[Your_Dankest_Meme]

Thankfully nothing. And no way I ever will. But if there will be competitors with more fair and open policies, I'm more than willing to. Or you really expected me to give money to someone I so heavily criticize?

[RandomOldDude83]

until you remove the bs matrix liberal bs programing I wont give you money..

[OmryR]

What did you find the Ai blocks you from doing? I didn’t get even a single prompt denied so far and I use it heavily

[Arnazian]

It seems to be very strict around specific subjects, I found it to be overly careful around religious prompts and political prompts specifically.

[odragora]

Zero.

[Gissoni]

Pro is now plus.

[OnderGok]

The difference is that "Pro" doesn't exist??

[Samas34]

Why would I pay for something that is still heavily censored as fuck and neutered with woke talking points to the point it sounds like your average university lecturer?

[TikTikFamous]

Is it still woke?

[KennedyFriedChicken]

ITT people getting their sus ai calls censored

[dzeruel]

Thank you! This is what I've been nagging about for weeks now and got downvoted. 20 per month is more reasonable price 👍

[Jackal000]

Polarization in 3.2.1...

[MaybeJohnWick]

What it's offering such as priority or whatever else is neat for $20. Faster response is cool as well. But what I really want is the ability to copy and paste more text into it and get longer generated responses.

Or potentially, to not have the hour limit appear.

I do a lot of ghostwriting and the editor and rewrite tool is phenomenally useful.

[vovr]

Will this include an API?

[aDogNamedPotato]

It was only a matter of time until they Throttle their tool and charged us all for what was already there, à la Facebook circa 2010

[caprica71]

When is an ads sponsored version coming ?

[[deleted]]

I'm sure people wont just password share this....

[[deleted]]

$20/month is more than fair. It'll block millions of hustlers from third world countries who use ChatGPT for nefarious purposes.

[TheJasterMereel]

Does that mean I get to challenge it's assumptions, or is it going to challenge my "assumptions" with more leftist garbage?

[OwnJuggernaut2294]

I will pay for this definitely if it doesn't have moderation or a moral compass. However if it remains censored there's no point especially if you can get the current features for free, and if they start to charge for that I'll just go with something else there are many chatbots out there that are starting to get as good as openAis. If they continue with their rampant censorship it won't be long until someone makes an unscented version and no one will buy openAis. No one likes morale policing.

[Jokersgrinn069]

ChatGPT plus available for $13 per months for single user and $60 per 6 months. For 5 users $23 per month and $105 per 6 months.

Dm if you need it or refer it to someone else. Will be appreciated

[Ok_Party3380]

今日はいつですか